A test for the "King of Science"

[Earle Jones]

I have three things connected in series (in a loop.) One resistor, one battery, and one current meter. The battery is a ten-volt battery. The TOTAL resistance in the loop is five ohms. What is the reading on the current meter. Hint: Use Ohm's law and show your work.

earle
*

[Archimedes Plutonium]

AP, King of Science took time away from his 221st book to answer Jones.

A test for the Stanford Univ failure of electrical engineering Earle Jones, who to this day cannot understand how Ohm's law is really V = i*B*E, and not V= iR. Earle is that why you went into Business, for you failed science??

Anyway, your test, since you failed with slant cut of Cone is Oval, never ellipse-- maybe you need glasses Earle.

Your test Earle, is you have 2 meters of copper wire, and only 2 meters in all, a battery and unlimited light bulbs whose terminals are 4 centimeters separated. What is the maximum number of these light bulbs and 2 meters of wire to string together that work in a Series. And what is the maximum number of bulbs hooked up for Parallel circuit that works? Hint: use the wire.

AP's 221st book of science// Test to see if you are mathematician material & the Education Ladder in Mathematics for curriculum reform
10 views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Dec 1, 2022, 2:22:15 AM (3 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's 221st book of science// Test to see if you are mathematician material & the Education Ladder in Mathematics for curriculum reform
1m views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo, King of Science diploma and portfolio
Archimedes Plutonium
12:47 AM (2 hours ago)



to
AP's 221st book of science// Test to see if you are mathematician material & the Education Ladder in Mathematics for curriculum reform.

Ordered Sequence of Mathematical Knowledge

1) slant cut of Cone

2) Numbers are decimal Grid


An Education Ladder in Mathematics add to my TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbook series 55th published book TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition by Archimedes P...
6 views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Oct 16, 2022, 5:07:44 PM



to Plutonium Atom Universe
An Education Ladder in Mathematics add to my TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbook series 55th published book TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition by Archimedes P...


So, we have an education ladder of mathematical abilities. So far as I know every professor in mathematics in colleges around the world fail on the first rung of the ladder.

1) Cannot understand slant cut of cone is Oval never ellipse.

2) Cannot understand Boole logic is all wrong and corrupt of its 4 operators --- AND, OR, Equal+Not, If->Then

3) Cannot understand Rationals as a division of two integers cannot form a valid number for valid numbers are not derived numbers but primitive numbers without a operator involved.

4) Cannot understand zero is not a number but a place value for the meaning of "nothing".

5) Cannot envision nor comprehend nor do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
2:18 AM (1 minute ago)



to
Alright, this is my 221st book of science to be published quickly. For I want to move onto the subject of moving the Moon to collide with Earth that pushes both Moon and Earth out to a Mars orbit, because our Sun has gone Red Giant Phase.

And to do the calculations, I am going to be assisted by the recent "move of the orbit" of Dimorphos about Didymos, the two asteroids. I want NASA and European Space agency to go back to Dimorphos and give it a nuclear missile impact to make it collide with Didymos and push Didymos into Mars orbit. All the mathematical data collected and utilized for a day in about 2,000 years in the future where we attempt to save Moon and Earth by pushing them into a Mars orbit.

So as I write my 221st book of science, my greater appeal is writing my 222nd book of science.

This book 221st is both a TEST and a Curriculum Guide.

And surprisingly, most every professor of mathematics will fail this book, fail it on the very first question. The first question being-- is slant cut of Cone a ellipse or oval. I would estimate that 99.9% of mathematics professors will say it is a ellipse and only goes to show that a math professor is memorized knowledge, not innate intrinsic reasoned and logical knowledge.

And I start the first question with geometry, for I sense that geometry is the far more important side of mathematics than is numbers, quantity and algebra. Math has two sides to it-- geometry and algebra-numbers. Same as physics has two sides to it-- electricity and magnetism. In physics this is called duality, and duality is the existence function. Things exist only when both electricity and magnetism are present. In physics there are other dualities such as particle and wave, or energy and time, but the most important duality of all is electricity and magnetism.

And it is known by now, with the Atom Totality theory that Physics is the top science and mathematics is a small subset of physics. The Primal Axiom of all sciences is -- All is Atoms, and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism.

I bring this up because in the most part of the 20th century, there were many many fools of mathematics that thought the Universe is going to be explained by some simple elegant mathematical formula. In other words, in their dumb minds, they elevated mathematics above physics.

In the Plutonium Atom Totality theory where the entire Universe is a giant plutonium 231Pu Atom containing smaller atoms inside itself, that we begin to see that the special numbers of mathematics come directly out of the layout of the 231Pu Atom Totality. For instance pi is what it is because plutonium has 22 subshells in 7 shells in collapsed rational waveform 22/7 = 3.14... And the special number "e" 2.71..... the equiangular number in the logarithmic spiral is because the 231Pu Atom Totality has only 19 of those 22 subshells in 7 shells filled at any specific moment in time, and hence 19/7 = 2.71.... I bring this to your attention only to show that Physics is the top science and all other sciences are minor details and aspects of physics.

So let me get started with the 1st question or 1st curriculum guidance, and it is the slant cut of a cone, what Apollonius studied in Ancient Greek times, yet got the answer wrong.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Question way way to hard for you Earle? Easy to understand for about every one of your posts have shown a corner of ignorance, as if you are some AI dummy, posting as if you are pretending to come from a human with a average intelligence. But you are a dummy in science, Earle.

My question could easily be answered with a real electrical engineer. Not you Earle.

For my question asks, how much more electric copper line is needed to make say 10 light bulbs connected in Parallel rather than those 10 connected in Series. How much more copper wiring do electricians need to connect in Parrallel than connect in Series. But I am sure someone at Stanford Univ can give a decent research answer to that question, just not you Earle Jones the pathetic 25 year stalking imbecile of Stanford.

And I need actually a research answer to that question, someone who can make "all things being equal", for I have the feeling that the length of copper wiring needed for Parallel is a special number related to the Maxwell Equations. Is it that 4 times the copper wire needed for Parallel than Series? Is it 3.14??? Is it 2 times??? Is it 1.6 times?? All of this, is vastly over your stupid head, Earle Jones, the 25 year long pathetic stalker of Stanford University.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now this question on my mind relates to my recent work in Psychology as to nerve cells, are they engineered in Parallel or in Series. I would have to guess Parallel for Series has few benefits compared to Parallel. For in Series if one nerve gets malfunction a whole line of nerves stop working.

So I know Earle is too much of a dimwit to do any problem solving, but I think I already know the answer, even though I am not a electrical engineer.

The answer likely comes straight from geometry as we can picture a series circuit as this

___
| |
| |
| |
___

And can picture the Parallel circuit geometrically as this.

___
| |
----
| |
----
| |
___

We picture the Series circuit as a pencil ellipse

We picture the Parallel circuit as another pencil ellipse but with rungs in it like the rungs in a ladder.

The Series is 1 closed loop. The Parallel is more than 1 closed loop. In my above Parallel circuit there are 3 closed loops.

So, from geometry, can I figure out how much more copper wiring I need to do a Parallel circuit rather than a Series circuit? It looks as though it depends on how many devices are connected. If 2 devices, say 2 light bulbs, I need 2 times the copper wire. If 3 devices, I need 3 times the copper wire. Until I run into trouble with spacing too close together.

But it is nice to teach Series is one closed loop while Parallel is a Ladder with its rungs. A picture is easy to remember, and the ladder has 2 parallel sides.

Go back to sleep, Earle Jones, you are a 25 year worthless stalking nitwit.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Is all of Stanford Univ, Earle Jones, Alexander Fetter, John Lipa failures in electricity and magnetism?? Do they only have stalker idiots at Stanford Univ, too dumb to even recognize slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too stupid to ask if the true electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. Is every professor at Stanford a mindless jackarse in Logic with Boole's 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction because Boole and Jevons mistakenly switched the AND truth table with OR???

Are the professors of science at Stanford mindless idiots that Earle Jones is a mindless idiot???

Now, Earle Jones who stalks from Stanford Univ, and claims he has a degree in electrical engineering but fails in science and math, we ask another question.

Using Youtube "FuseSchool-- Global Education" "Series and Parallel Circuits 4:55 minutes"

Earle & Stanford Univ, we quiz you on length of copper wire needed and used. Earlier we asked you the maximum amount of light bulbs attached in series and then parallel given only 2 meters length of copper wire.

Now we ask you the opposite question of the shortest length of copper wire to connect two light bulbs in series and in parallel. Use any size battery and copper wire and idealize the connectors-- alligator or otherwise.

Say you are a company making a headlamp with two light bulbs and you want to design the headlamp with using the least length of copper wire. So, how much copper wire for the series and how much for the parallel circuits???


Stanford University, math dept.

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu


President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès,Stanford Univ, are they all fools like Earle Jones, Alexander Fetter, John Lipa failures in electricity and magnetism?? Do they only have stalker idiots at Stanford Univ, too dumb to even recognize slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too stupid to ask if the true electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. Is every professor at Stanford a mindless jackarse in Logic with Boole's 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction because Boole and Jevons mistakenly switched the AND truth table with OR???

[Dan Christensen]

On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 9:38:37 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 6:26:37 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > I have three things connected in series (in a loop.) One resistor, one battery, and one current meter. The battery is a ten-volt battery. The TOTAL resistance in the loop is five ohms. What is the reading on the current meter. Hint: Use Ohm's law and show your work.
> >

> AP, King of Science took time away from his 221st book to answer Jones.
>
> A test for the Stanford Univ failure of electrical engineering Earle Jones, who to this day cannot understand how Ohm's law is really V = i*B*E, and not V= iR. Earle is that why you went into Business, for you failed science??
>

[snip]

So, what is the answer, Archie Poo?

[Archimedes Plutonium]

William Little, Douglas Osheroff fails the geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, but do they fail on how much copper wire is needed????

[Earle Jones]

*
Archie: I am not surprised that you cannot answer this question, since it involves Ohm's Law.

The correct answer is two amps. Use Ohm's Law: I = E/R -- this is electrical engineering 101. (In fact, my 12-year-old grandson got the right answer!)

Archimedes Plutonium, the King of BullShit!

earle
*

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I am not surprised that Stanford University has a insane asylum burnt out piece of shit named Earle Jones who keeps stalking for 25 years nonstop. And in every post tries to demonize another.

A 10 year old knows the answer, but the insane Earle Jones, Stanford Univ mascot fuckdog who says he is an electrical engineer yet cannot answer what is the length of wire needed for parallel versus series.

Did you fail electrical engineering Earle??? And all you can do in old age is attack people in sci.math.

Earle Jones, you are a shithead. Not a teacher but a disgusting stalker shithead. And the mother of your grandson would be wise to keep her son away from you the disgusting stalker shithead.

AP

[Chris M. Thomasson]

Check his shit out... LOL!

https://youtu.be/KMK8Ev3aaK8

AP goes nuts!

[Archimedes Plutonium]

David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman fails the geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, but do they fail on how much copper wire is needed????
Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar,Stanford Univ, are they all fools like Earle Jones, Alexander Fetter, John Lipa failures in electricity and magnetism?? Do they only have stalker idiots at Stanford Univ, too dumb to even recognize slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too stupid to ask if the true electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. Is every professor at Stanford a mindless jackarse in Logic with Boole's 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction because Boole and Jevons mistakenly switched the AND truth table with OR???

[FromTheRafters]

Dan Christensen formulated the question :

Starting like this, he is destined to become even more wrong.

[Michael Moroney]

I have noticed that cranks, when posting a new "theory", cannot/will not
solve simple textbook type problems involving their "theory". Especially
when they "correct" an old concept, like Arky is trying to do here.

Ohm's Law is trivial, but Arky cannot/will not answer a simple problem
that a 12 year old can solve, neither by using "old" Ohm's Law nor his
"new, improved" Ohm's Law.

Archimedes Plutonium, the Clown Prince of BullShit. 🤡

[Archimedes Plutonium]

3--David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman fails the geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, but do they fail on how much copper wire is needed????

And more questions-- how much wire do you need for a specific battery so as you apply a circuit, that it is not a "short circuit"???

Asking your electrical engineer Earle Jones who is still back on 10/5 = 2, will be of no use.

And Stanford, while you are at it, what is the equation for length of copper wire needed for 3 light bulbs connected in Series versus 3 light bulbs connected in Parallel??? I am wanting some math relationship of how much more copper wire is needed to connect Parallel rather than Series. Here again, the bozo Earle Jones is of no mind for such.


[Earle Jones]

*
I really should not give Archimedes Plutonium (AP) these fundamental questions about anything as simple as Ohm's Law. He is obviously a disturbed individual with some inflated aspect of his own "King of Science". We should not pick on him, thereby taking advantage of his lack of any realistic knowledge of anything about science. I feel the same about the recent candidate for Senate from the state of Georgia (where I receieved my first degree in Electrical Engineering at Georgia Tech), Herschel Walker, who is a very limited individual with marginal knowledge about anything. Very fortunately, for the state of Georgia and more importantly, for the USA, he has lost his senatorial candidacy. My mother taught me to avoid picking on handicapped folks. My questions to AP, like my words about Herschel Walker, fall into that category. I should stop asking AP any questions about any scientific subject, which seems to only result in his weak, and profoundly obscene, responses. Note to AP: Ohm's Law is this: Current is equal to Voltage divided by resistance: I = E/R. And, by the way, the elliiple is, n fact, a conic section. As is the circle, the parabola, and the hyperbola.

earle
*

[Archimedes Plutonium]

4--John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner fails the geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, but do they fail on how much copper wire is needed????

>
> And more questions-- how much wire do you need for a specific battery so as you apply a circuit, that it is not a "short circuit"???
>
> Asking your electrical engineer Earle Jones who is still back on 10/5 = 2, will be of no use.
>
> And Stanford, while you are at it, what is the equation for length of copper wire needed for 3 light bulbs connected in Series versus 3 light bulbs connected in Parallel??? I am wanting some math relationship of how much more copper wire is needed to connect Parallel rather than Series. Here again, the bozo Earle Jones is of no mind for such.
> 

Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad,Stanford Univ, are they all fools like Earle Jones, Alexander Fetter, John Lipa failures in electricity and magnetism?? Do they only have stalker idiots at Stanford Univ, too dumb to even recognize slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too stupid to ask if the true electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. Is every professor at Stanford a mindless jackarse in Logic with Boole's 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction because Boole and Jevons mistakenly switched the AND truth table with OR???

[Archimedes Plutonium]

5--Persis Drell, Robert Wagoner fails the geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, but do they fail on how much copper wire is needed????
> >

Question is still open-- and Jones is far too dumb and failure of electrical engineering to answer the question. I want to know what length of wire to connect to a specific battery, a formula so the battery will not short circuit. Simple and pure-- battery connected to length of copper wire, what is the formula. And once we have the formula, does it mean AP is correct, that current is not the idiotic idea of 0.5MeV particles moving around in a circuit, but rather, current is a hoola hoop entire closed loop wave that is pushed and pulled out of the battery to occupy the new circuit geometry.

I know not everyone at Stanford Univ is a dunce failure of physics and that someone there at Stanford can research this question and tell me what length of copper wire avoids a short circuit. Give me the formula.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

6--Persis Drell,Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian fails the geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, but do they fail on how much copper wire is needed????

> > >
>
> Question is still open-- and Jones is far too dumb and failure of electrical engineering to answer the question. I want to know what length of wire to connect to a specific battery, a formula so the battery will not short circuit. Simple and pure-- battery connected to length of copper wire, what is the formula. And once we have the formula, does it mean AP is correct, that current is not the idiotic idea of 0.5MeV particles moving around in a circuit, but rather, current is a hoola hoop entire closed loop wave that is pushed and pulled out of the battery to occupy the new circuit geometry.

In Old Physics, the short-circuit is seen as just a novelty, nothing more to make of it, with their mindless archaic view of current as 0.5MeV particles moving around, outside of atoms. When the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus with a job and task to perform-- the Faraday law. But, so be it when fools "rush into physics" never a iota of logical intelligence.

In New Physics, the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole of either North pole or South pole, and when you combine them 0.5+0.5MeV you get a closed loop-- a electric current. And the current is a Wave structure-- either a standing wave as inside the battery or in a motion wave as when a light bulb is on, or electric appliance in operation.

Now every electrician, every electrical engineer, every physicist before AP, would not understand the huge significance of a Short Circuit-- for they see it and then say "oh yes, now time for coffee and danish roll break". Am I not right Persis and Mason? "Oh well, time for a coffee and donut."

But then when AP studies physics, in that AP is a master of mathematics, and one of the things you must master in mathematics, not in physics where there are loose marbles floating in the head-- is primal axioms. We in math who mastered math, know there are primal first axioms. And so when a fleeting physicist studies electricity and magnetism and the topic of "short circuit arises", the response is-- yes yes, now are the donuts and danish warm??

When AP studies physics and gets to short-circuit, AP, a master of math recognizes the Short Circuit as a Primal Principle of electromagnetism and asks the ultimate question of Short Circuit-- so, how long of a copper wire is needed for that specific battery when hooked up to the wire, will _not short circuit_ but instead, the electric current stays as a Standing Wave inside the copper wire circuit, along with some standing wave still inside the battery.

You see, Old Physics treats electric current as this infantile image of tiny 0.5MeV particles slowly moving forward in the copper wire. AP sees the electric current as full circuit waves like a Hoola Hoop wave that as soon as the wire is connected to the battery, electric current in the form of hoola hoops rush into that wire and stay as a standing wave.

So in Old Physics-- the worthless baloney taught at Stanford Univ, there never arises a question of how long of a copper wire for a given voltage battery so there is _no short circuit_ but rather a standing wave.

In New Physics we ask the formula for battery size and voltage and amperage, and what is the copper wire size and length to not be a short circuit, but a standing wave inside the battery along with wire circuit.

This question and this formula proves AP correct-- the unit of electricity is the magnetic monopole of 0.5MeV and two opposite magnetic monopoles form a unit of electric current.

Stanford Univ fails on theory on truth and ideas of electric current. I will find it hard to believe that Stanford Univ will also fail on going into the Lab and experimenting and telling AP what that formula of wire distance is. But who knows, maybe Stanford Univ is a complete wipe out failure school.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

7--Persis Drell,Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian fails the geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, but do they fail on how much copper wire is needed????

AP Newsflash: sorry, there has been a updated research on my part. Not the question of short circuit, that I want Stanford Univ to carry out for if they decline, Stanford Univ will decline as a school of science.

The newsflash concerns my ongoing research into the nature of the Electric Current itself. I have researched with several magnets to penetrate the inside of magnets for a current and all attempts failed.

Now of course a Standing Current is a oxymoron. And I was looking for a Standing Current inside a magnet. Apparently a current derived from magnetism has to come from the "Cutting of Lines of Force of Magnetism", something in motion. And I could not find any motion inside magnets.

This then brings me to Life of biology itself. What causes the heart to beat as electricity and magnetism. Of course it is the oxygen from air that breaks down food into heat energy. The infrared radiation of EM spectrum which is longitudinal waves.

It is the heat energy in a living organism that is animal (plants get it from transverse wave radiation), but the heat energy in animals is longitudinal waves. It is these longitudinal waves inside the animal body that creates the Electric Current. It is heat in motion as infrared waves, longitudinal waves that is responsible for the heart to beat, for the diaphragm to draw in oxygen.

I often wondered how a seed is alive (have you wondered how a plant seed can be alive?). And the answer is that not until the longitudinal waves of infrared radiation is enough to create a current flow in the seed that it is alive.

Of course the life or death of a human is when the heart stops beating. So where in the human body is the electric current that keeps the heart pumping?? There is no battery pack. So the current must come from Heat. Heat is the longitudinal EM radiation from burning food. That infrared radiation is longitudinal waves, and those waves are directly converted to electric current.

So, AP has no book for finding electric current inside a magnet. But, instead, AP has to write a book on how a Animal is alive only as there exists at all times a electric current inside the body. Plants have a continual electric current from converting light to electricity. A plant seed and a virus is not alive until they gain electric current from the environment via heat energy. I have written several books on the EM spectrum and as you get into the radio and microwave and infrared you turn from Transverse wave to that of Longitudinal wave. This transition into Longitudinal wave is the same as a Magnet is Transverse waves and the thrusting through a coil and cutting of lines of force of magnetism turns into Longitudinal wave of Electric Current. Electric Current is a Longitudinal Wave.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

8--Persis Drell,Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian fails the geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, but do they fail on how much copper wire is needed????

8-Physicists have never spent time in explaining how the heart and diaphragm get constant nonstop electric current to keep them going. And the answer was only recently seen by AP in the idea that heat energy is electrical current energy as Longitudinal EM waves of electric current. This is how you die when you freeze to death--the heart stops beating. But Physicists have been deaf dumb and silent how a animal body makes constant nonstop electric current. Are they so dumb as to think a animal body carries some sort of battery pack??? Time for Stanford University to stop being a dunce science school and start answering true physics.

[Michael Moroney]

On 12/7/2022 12:29 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
> On Mon Dec 5 22:01:11 2022 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>> Earle Jones, you are a shithead. Not a teacher but a disgusting stalker shithead. And the mother of your grandson would be wise to keep her son away from you the disgusting stalker shithead.
>>
>> AP
>>
>
> *
> I really should not give Archimedes Plutonium (AP) these fundamental questions about anything as simple as Ohm's Law. He is obviously a disturbed individual with some inflated aspect of his own "King of Science".

Almost certainly mentally ill. Narcissistic Personality
Disorder/megalomania leading to his delusions of greatness, whatever it
is that makes one unable to see in himself what he can see in others,
delusional thinking, Dunning-Kruger (but Dunning-Kruger is probably
automatic with NPD/megalomania), a touch of paranoid schizophrenia. And
autism. Lots of repetitive autistic patterns that make sense only to him.

> I should stop asking AP any questions about any scientific subject, which seems to only result in his weak, and profoundly obscene, responses.

I wonder if it's subconscious recognition that he *can't* answer
scientific questions, either with his own made-up pseudoscience or the
correct science theories like Ohm's Law.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Kibo looking at the Ekibastuz-Kokshetau high-voltage line that looks like this 1,150 kV, 5,500 MW
Kibo are you sending Earle Jones to read the ohm's and amperage??

> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´´´●´´´´´´´´´●´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´C.´´´´´´´´´´´´V´´´´´´´´´´´.Ↄ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´´´´´\__/´´´´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.........´´´´..........´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
> ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´.´´´´.´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´

On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 11:45:29 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> On Mon Dec 5 00:26:27 2022 Earle Jones wrote:
> > I have three things connected in series (in a loop.) One resistor, one battery, and one current meter. The battery is a ten-volt battery. The TOTAL resistance in the loop is five ohms. What is the reading on the current meter.

> The correct answer is two amps.

Would it send a flaming arc ball of lightning right into downtown Moscow???

Earle, are you taking your tools to Moscow to fix the lines???

       /|\       []   |"""""""""""--__    /|  |\  
      / | \      ||   |____________--""  ( |__| )
     | ( ) |     ||         | |           \    /  
     | .-. |     ||         | |            |12|  
     ]( 0 )[     ||         | |            |  |    
     / `-' \     ||         | |            |  |    
    / /' `\ \    ||         | |            |  |  
   | |     | |  |%%|        | |            |  |    
   | |     | |  ,'`,        | |            |  |        
   | |     | |  ||||        | |            |14|                          
   | |     | |  ||||        | |           / __ \    
    \ \   / /   ||||        | |          ( |  | )   
     `-' `-'    `--'        `-'           \|  |/    




In Kibo Parry M. travels to Putin
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 11:47:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"
> blithered:


TGK-1, TGK-2, Mosenergo, it is all one connected
> > Moscow Electric high voltage lines
> >> ........///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////|
> >> ......///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////..|
> >> ....///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////....|
> >> ..///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////......|
> >> ///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////........|
> >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|......../
> >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|....../
> >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|..../
> >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|../
> >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> ||
> >> ||
> >> //////// ||
> >> |:---[.] ||
> >> |( _J ||
> >> | ^ ( _| ||
> >> / \_____) ||
> >> / _____ \ || Long Aluminum pole to short circuit
> >> | / \ | || .
> >> | | | | ||
> >> \ /\ /\__ | ||
> >> | | \/---
> >> \ \ )
> >> | >_____/_____)
> >> \__________/ ||
> >> / \ ||
> >> | | ~~
> >> \ \\
> >> \ |\
> >> \ | \
> >> \ | |
> >> | | |
> >> | | |
> >> | / |
> >> |________/____|
> >> (_________)____)
> >> ==============================
> >> Moscow or Tehran freedom fighter from the tiresome dictator
> >
> > Yea, the dictator has no power and no hot water, no heat, no electricity for his house, offices.
> Is this part of your insidious plan, as Putin's Stooge, to get freedom
> fighters

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity


NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!

NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!


Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity


Ukraine cannot win a war if it has nada, no, zero offense, it needs to knock out Russian electric lines. And the Baltic states can help.
Knock out electricity in
Novosibirsk
Yekaterinburg
Novgorod
Samara
Omsk
Kazan
Rostov-na-Donu
Chelyabinsk
Ufa
Perm


Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines

Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!

NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!

NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!

_No one can win a fight or war without any offense, West, Biden give Ukraine drones that knock out electricity inside Russia

_End the Ukraine war by March 2023 as the Russian people depose the dictator

_rolling electric blackouts and give Iran to Iraq-- a blooming democracy, not a stupid dictator

_And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.

_Xi has 1,000 divisions on Vladivostok border ready to swoop in and reclaim the stolen land of Outer Manchuria. See reconnaissance photo above of 1,000 divisions.

NATO and the West has just two good options here, for Putin should have been removed in 2006 with Litvinenko poisoning. Now the insane Putin can poison the entire world with a nuclear war. Putin needed to go in 2006, for insanity just gets worse and worse.

Either
(1) give Ukraine drones to knock out electric power in Moscow and beyond
Or
(2) give Ukraine NATO membership and tell Russia to clear out in a week or NATO forces go in and clear them out.

Of course, every day Putin and Russia needs reminding that if he presses nuclear buttons or nuclear bomb on Ukraine that Russia will be a nuclear ash pile before the day is out.

What should have been done in 2006, unfortunately that delay to 2022. Same can be said of Hitler-- he should have been removed in the early 1930s before his insanity got going.

The picnic table in the oak and chestnut tree groves of the Amur river and seeing the Baby Xi grew up into strong manhood:

Divisions of Armies for Xi now, no longer the concubines of the Ussuri and Amur rivers. No more concubines....

> _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen

No more concubines, or is there more concubines of Haishenwai and Qing's fabulous Outer Manchuria Homeland where he had hot geothermal bathes much like Archimedes on the far side of the planet bathed in Siracusa, hot bathes. No wonder Russia wants to steal Haishenwai-- who cares about Taiwan has no hot bathes.

And the concubines giving Xi his wine and saki with rice and fish.

So, one can look at the present situation on Earth and ask several logical questions about the 2 dictators of Putin's Russia and China's Xi.


> > But can we find differences in Putin and Xi themselves? Well in the West we call the Chinese inscrutable-- meaning -- little logical commonsense. And is this a valid description?? Yes of course, considering that Russia had stolen the lands of Outer Manchuria, some 28 times larger of a land mass than is Taiwan island. Yet there is Xi, spending so much time on wanting to invade Taiwan, when it is Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok (Haishenwai) that he should be focusing attention upon. And while Putin is distracted with Ukraine, is the time for Xi to recapture Outer Manchuria, the Qing dynasty empire, Qing's Manchurian homeland.
> >
> > What does Xi do instead??? He focuses on Taiwan and befriends Russia. Why, at this rate, if Russia takes Inner Manchuria, we can expect Xi and the Chinese Communist Party to become even more loving of Russia for stealing more land of China.
> >
> > And there is Xi, whose China has become rich with trading with the West, yet every day, Xi foaming at the mouth in hatred of the West.
> >
> > So yes, Putin is 2X smarter as a dictator than is Xi, as if Putin has Xi in his side pocket.
> >
> > Is there some scientific explanation as to why Xi is 2X dumber than Putin?? Perhaps, in that China is densely populated and the air pollution over all of China is worse than most countries. That Xi probably has 1/2 of his brain filled with CO and CO2 isomers and lead, and mercury and nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide from just living in that air polluted hellhole of Beijing. Xi studied chemistry and should know this. Whereas Putin likely detox..s every evening with breathing in pure oxygen at his residence and takes oxygen breathing tanks to office and work. This easily can explain the light-headed reasoning that Xi and his foreign diplomats Wang Yi display, where Putin plays them like a chess game, --- checkmate in 7 moves.
> >
> > This explains why Xi hates the West for not stealing any Chinese lands and making China rich in trade, while loving Putin for stealing Outer Manchuria, and proposing having Russia push nuclear buttons, making both Russia and China a nuclear waste site after ICBMs wipe China off the map.
> >
> > Xi's brain is full of air pollution toxins from the nasty Chinese air. They still build a new coal fired plant in China every day. The air in China is the worst air in the entire world.
> >
> > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators.
> >
> > > > Subject: Insanity is a contagious disease as proven here in sci.math
> > >
> > > Are you saying that since you were one of the very first kooks in groups
> > > like sci.math and sci.physics 30 years ago, normal people caught
> > > insanity from you? And that's why there are so many other kooks in
> > > sci.math and sci.physics? Hmmm, interesting theory! You may be onto
> > > something!
> > >
> > > > One can easily define insanity as "doing the same foolish thing over and over again".
> > >
> > > 2/1, AP tards:
> > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/2, AP tards:
> > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/3, AP tards:
> > > > Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> > > >
> > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/4, AP tards:
> > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/9 (vacation?), AP tards:
> > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/9, AP tards (again):
> > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/10, AP tards:
> > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/11, AP tards:
> > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/12, AP tards:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/12, AP tards again:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/13, AP tards:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/14, AP tards:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/15, AP tards:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/16, AP tards:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/17, AP tards:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/18, AP tards:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/19, AP tards:
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/20, AP tards:
> > >
> > > > Electricity out Novosibirsk &Volgograd█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/22, AP tards:
Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/23, AP tards:
Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/24, AP tards:
Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > 2/25, AP tards:
Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
2/26, AP tards: