Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Terence Tao needs a 1st page COUNTERPOINT on Google Search list instead of his million hits of sugar coated propaganda. Is Google trying to imitate the Russian state in math and science???
338 views
Skip to first unread message
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 22, 2022, 12:16:27 AM3/22/22
to
Tao so dumb in math-- he cannot tell apart a Oval from ellipse in conic sections. He believes Boole logic with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Worst of all, Tao knows calculus is geometry, but impotent in ever doing a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. So much so that Kibo Parry blurted out "pandemic shit mule".
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
Yes, you have to get up very early in the morning to get one past Dr. Wordsmith.
Kibo complaining for 20 years that Dr. Tao cannot tell apart a Oval from ellipse as proven by AP that slant cut in single cone is a oval, never the ellipse. Or that Dr. Tao is so ignorant of math, he never knew Calculus was geometry and hence required a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or the fact that Tao failed math is because he failed logic using Boole's 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction. Perhaps the reason he failed all of mathematics is because his brain still is chugging on 2 OR 1 = 3. See AP's proofs of all his claims in his Amazon Kindle science books-- 177 books to date.
Why does Google Search have sugar coated boutique shops for failures of science, physics, math, when they have an obligation of Balanced Journalism with A COUNTERPOINT entry on first page of Terence Tao.
Kibo Parry wanting BALANCED JOURNALISM in sci.physics on Sheldon Glashow. Like his own Google search page shows Kibo to be a sickfuck on the first page, but Kibo wants that fine-tuned for Jan Burse (Mostowski Collapse) is shown as a sickfuck on the first entry of his Google search.
For Google does not tell us that Sheldon Glashow is so crippled in physics that his mind cannot even entertain the question of which is the atom's true electron-- the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. See any one of AP's published TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS (Amazon Kindle).
Why does Google have sugar coated boutique shops for failures of science, physics, math, when they have an obligation of Balanced Journalism with A COUNTERPOINT entry on first page of Sheldon Glashow.
Like Judy Woodruff on PBS Newshour is Balanced Reporting.
Kibo likes to see that sugar coated idiots of science and math such as Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow are in scope of True Journalism, for Google searches are not boutique stores of sugar coated garbage but of Point and Counterpoint. Like Kibo's and Jan's Google search revealing the "little farting men that they really are", or as James McGinn recently said in his spamming threads of weather in sci.physics-- Revealing the Asshole Hiding Within.
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer but a evil stalker shithead that wants to torture more South Korean Moon Bears
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:12 AM
_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by
1:08 AM
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz sci.physics
Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:42 AM
6--Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:41 AM
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales, Sheldon Glashow as some propaganda pitch as if Search engines have become science-propaganda-kiosks, instead of Balanced Journalism with Counterpoint. Is Google trying to
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by
1:06 AM
Thanks Google for Balanced Search Hits on Harvard's Dr. Hau
https://groups.google.com › sci.physics
https://groups.google.com › sci.physics
The ... ... Lene Vestergaard Hau is a Danish physicist who is currently the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and of Applied ... ... In 1999, after years of ...
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on ...https://groups.google.com › sci.physics https://groups.google.com › sci.physics Jun 26, 2021 — Lene Vestergaard Hau is the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and of Applied Physics and is also on the faculty of the Harvard Biophysics ...
Kibo Parry M. respectfully requests Balanced Google Search Journalism on Sheldon Glashow, instead of the rosy sugary glop when Sheldon is a mindless idiot in physics and that Counterpoint on his 1st page
Kibo Parry wanting balanced journalism in sci.physics. Like his own Google search page shows Kibo to be a sickfuck on the first page, but Kibo wants that fine-tuned for Jan Burse (Mostowski Collapse) is shown as a sickfuck on the first entry of his Google search.
Kibo likes to see that sugar coated idiots of science and math such as Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow are in scope with True Journalism, for Google searches are not boutique stores of sugar coated garbage but of Point and Counterpoint. Like Kibo's and Jan's Google search revealing the "little farting men that they really are", or as James McGinn recently said in his thread of weather in sci.physics-- Revealing the Asshole Hiding Within.
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer but a evil stalker shithead that wants to torture more South Korean Moon Bears
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:12 AM
_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by
1:08 AM
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz sci.physics
Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:42 AM
6--Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:41 AM
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales, Sheldon Glashow as some propaganda pitch as if Search engines have become science-propaganda-kiosks, instead of Balanced Journalism with Counterpoint. Is Google trying to
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by
1:06 AM
Thanks Google for Balanced Search Hits on Harvard's Dr. Hau
https://groups.google.com › sci.physics
https://groups.google.com › sci.physics
The ... ... Lene Vestergaard Hau is a Danish physicist who is currently the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and of Applied ... ... In 1999, after years of ...
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on ...https://groups.google.com › sci.physics https://groups.google.com › sci.physics Jun 26, 2021 — Lene Vestergaard Hau is the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and of Applied Physics and is also on the faculty of the Harvard Biophysics ...
About 6,440,000 results (0.72 seconds)
Search Results
Terence Tao
Australian-American mathematician
Overview
Education
Videos
Awards
Books
Main Results
Images
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
More images
Web results
Terence Tao - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Terence_Tao
Terence "Terry" Chi-Shen Tao FAA FRS (born 17 July 1975) is an Australian-American mathematician. He is a professor of mathematics at the University of ...
Fields: Mathematics
Doctoral students: Monica Vișan
Thesis: Three Regularity Results in Harmonic ...
Known for: Green–Tao theorem; Erdős discrep...
Green–Tao theorem · Paul Erdős · Erdős number · Fields Medal
Terence Tao from en.wikipedia.org
People also ask
Is Terence Tao the smartest person in the world?
Why is Terence Tao a genius?
What did Terence Tao discover?
Who is the greatest mathematician alive?
Feedback
Terence Tao - UCLA Mathematicshttps://www.math.ucla.edu › ~tao
I am a Professor at the Department of Mathematics ;, UCLA ;. I work in a number of mathematical areas, but primarily in harmonic analysis ;, PDE ;, geometric ...
Terence Tao from www.math.ucla.edu
Videos
PREVIEW
2:10
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking | Official Trailer ...
YouTube · MasterClass
1 month ago
PREVIEW
11:13
The Test That Terence Tao Aced at Age 7
YouTube · Tibees
Jul 15, 2021
PREVIEW
2:57
Math Prodigy Terence Tao, UCLA
YouTube · UCLA
Sep 11, 2008
3 key moments in this video
View all
Terry Tao - WordPress.comhttps://terrytao.wordpress.com
Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Tao.
Career advice · About · On writing · Books
Terence Tao from terrytao.wordpress.com
Terence Tao : Awards | Carnegie Corporation of New Yorkhttps://www.carnegie.org › awards › honoree › terence-...
Called the “Mozart of Math” by fellow mathematicians, Terence Tao was born in Adelaide, Australia, to parents who had immigrated there from Hong Kong.
Nationality: Australia
Education: Princeton University
Terence Tao from www.carnegie.org
The Singular Mind of Terry Tao - The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com › 2015/07/26 › magazine › th...
Jul 26, 2015 — Three years later, at age 10, Tao became the youngest person in history to win a medal in the International Mathematical Olympiad. He has since ...
Terence Tao from www.nytimes.com
Terence Tao - Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com › citations
Terence Tao. Professor of Mathematics, UCLA ... EJ Candès, J Romberg, T Tao ... J Colliander, M Keel, G Staffilani, H Takaoka, T Tao.
Terence Tao | Australian mathematician - Encyclopedia ...https://www.britannica.com › Science › Mathematics
Terence Tao, (born July 17, 1975, Adelaide, Australia), Australian mathematician awarded a Fields Medal in 2006 “for his contributions to partial ...
Born: July 17, 1975, Adelaide
Education: Princeton University
Terence Tao - Simons Foundationhttps://www.simonsfoundation.org › people › terence-tao
Terry Tao is one of the most universal, penetrating and prolific mathematicians in the world. In over 200 publications (in just 15 years) spanning ...
Terence Tao from www.simonsfoundation.org
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking - MasterClasshttps://www.masterclass.com › classes › terence-tao-teac...
Terence Tao, considered one of the world's greatest living mathematicians, teaches mathematical thinking to solve a range of challenges in everyday work and ...
Terence Tao from www.masterclass.com
UCLA Dr. Tao scarring students with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction; never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and his mindless ellipse a conic when it is a oval. What Tao needs is a Counterpoint on his first page of a Google Search hit, for it at least warns students. If Counterpoint is good enough for con-artist John Gabriel, it is good enough for Dr.Tao.
No-one bothers to read the spam failure John Gabriel, why even sleep is more valuable than Gabriel spam and so Gabriel does no harm to anyone, and helps put them to sleep. However, Terence Tao the UCLA fool with ellipse a conic, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and his crazy Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. That Dr. Tao is damaging students with his con-art math, scarring students with ellipse a conic when in truth it is a Oval, and how silly is it for students to think AND is subtraction. Is this what a UCLA math education is for? What $30,000 and come home to say 2 OR 1 equals 3.
Yet Google Search has a counterpoint on first page of John Gabriel who helps those get to sleep fast, while Dr. Tao has no counterpoint as far as the eye can see, but all sugar glop nonsense.
Page 2 of about 7,680,000 results (0.77 seconds)
Search Results
Terence Tao, PhD | The White Househttps://www.whitehouse.gov › pcast › members › terenc...
Terence Tao, PhD, is a mathematician originally from Australia. He is known as one of the great mathematicians of our time, sometimes called the “Mozart of math ...
terence tao from www.whitehouse.gov
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking - MasterClasshttps://www.masterclass.com › classes › terence-tao-teac...
Terence Tao, considered one of the world's greatest living mathematicians, teaches mathematical thinking to solve a range of challenges in everyday work and ...
terence tao from www.masterclass.com
Terence Tao - The Mathematics Genealogy Projecthttps://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu › ...
Name School Year
Austin, Timothy University of California, Los Angeles 2010
Benatar, Jacques University of California, Los Angeles 2015
Bringmann, Bjoern University of California, Los Angeles 2021
View 18 more rows
Terence Tao (1975 - ) - Biographyhttps://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk › Biographies › Tao
Terence Tao won a Fields Medal in 2006 for his contributions to partial differential equations, combinatorics, harmonic analysis and additive number theory.
Education: Blackwood High School,
terence tao from mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk
Images for terence tao
Guided Search Filters
math
ucla
Terence Tao - Professor - UCLA | LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com › terence-tao-6291246
Los Angeles, California, United States · Professor · UCLA
View Terence Tao's profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community. Terence has 3 jobs listed on their profile. See the complete profile on ...
Mind of a Mathematician | Princeton Alumni Weeklyhttps://paw.princeton.edu › article › mind-mathematician
Nov 13, 2019 — Terence Tao *96's book, Solving Mathematical Problems: A Personal Perspective, is an engagingly slender volume, full of insights on how to ...
Parents: Billy Tao
terence tao from paw.princeton.edu
Terence Tao - Solving Mathematical Problems - Goodreadshttps://www.goodreads.com › 155010.Terence_Tao
Mar 11, 2022 — About Terence Tao: Terence Terry Tao FAA FRS (simplified Chinese: 陶哲轩; traditional Chinese: 陶哲軒; pinyin: Táo Zhéxuān) is an ...
terence tao from www.goodreads.com
Terence Tao: Books - Amazon.comhttps://www.amazon.com › Books-Terence-Tao › rh=n:...
Results 1 - 16 of 46 — Analysis I, 3Rd Edn (Texts And Readings In Mathematics) Vol 37. by TAO TERENCE | Jan 1, 2015.
A Close Call: How a Near Failure Propelled Me to Succeedhttps://www.ams.org › journals › notices › rnoti-p1007
Terence Tao is a professor of mathematics at the University of California,. Los Angeles. His email address is t...@math.ucla.edu. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1090 ...
2 pages
Ads
Terence Tao on MasterClass - With Terence Tao
Ad·
https://www.masterclass.com/
Learn about mathematical thinking with the Fields Medal–winning mathematician. The award-winning mathematician teaches you about mathematical thinking. Student Community.
Rating for masterclass.com: 4.3 - 32 reviews
John Gabriel with fake name Eram
Eram semper recta
,
Heywood Jablome
2
unread,
22 March 2022: New visitors to sci.math: The four basic operations of Arithmetic using only magnitudes expressed as ratios, a compass and straight edge.
6:25 PM
2
Google can do it for John Gabriel, then it can do it for Chandler Davis & H. Holden Thorp. A Counterpoint on their first page of a Google Search list, instead of all sugar coated gloss propaganda. Have a counterpoint on 1st page of Thorp and Davis.
5:23 PM
Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
unread,
22 March 2022: New visitors to sci.math: Learn the true story of how you got numbers and arithmetic.
5:11 PM
Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
unread,
22 March 2022: New visitors to sci.math: Like Donald Trump, mainstream academics persist in their BIG LIE that calculus was made rigorous.
5:11 PM
Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
unread,
22 March 2022: New visitors to sci.math: Laughing at mainstream Cantor Cranks.
5:11 PM
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
Yes, you have to get up very early in the morning to get one past Dr. Wordsmith.
Kibo complaining for 20 years that Dr. Tao cannot tell apart a Oval from ellipse as proven by AP that slant cut in single cone is a oval, never the ellipse. Or that Dr. Tao is so ignorant of math, he never knew Calculus was geometry and hence required a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or the fact that Tao failed math is because he failed logic using Boole's 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction. Perhaps the reason he failed all of mathematics is because his brain still is chugging on 2 OR 1 = 3. See AP's proofs of all his claims in his Amazon Kindle science books-- 177 books to date.
Why does Google Search have sugar coated boutique shops for failures of science, physics, math, when they have an obligation of Balanced Journalism with A COUNTERPOINT entry on first page of Terence Tao.
Kibo Parry wanting BALANCED JOURNALISM in sci.physics on Sheldon Glashow. Like his own Google search page shows Kibo to be a sickfuck on the first page, but Kibo wants that fine-tuned for Jan Burse (Mostowski Collapse) is shown as a sickfuck on the first entry of his Google search.
For Google does not tell us that Sheldon Glashow is so crippled in physics that his mind cannot even entertain the question of which is the atom's true electron-- the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. See any one of AP's published TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS (Amazon Kindle).
Why does Google have sugar coated boutique shops for failures of science, physics, math, when they have an obligation of Balanced Journalism with A COUNTERPOINT entry on first page of Sheldon Glashow.
Like Judy Woodruff on PBS Newshour is Balanced Reporting.
Kibo likes to see that sugar coated idiots of science and math such as Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow are in scope of True Journalism, for Google searches are not boutique stores of sugar coated garbage but of Point and Counterpoint. Like Kibo's and Jan's Google search revealing the "little farting men that they really are", or as James McGinn recently said in his spamming threads of weather in sci.physics-- Revealing the Asshole Hiding Within.
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer but a evil stalker shithead that wants to torture more South Korean Moon Bears
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:12 AM
_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by
1:08 AM
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz sci.physics
Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:42 AM
6--Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:41 AM
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales, Sheldon Glashow as some propaganda pitch as if Search engines have become science-propaganda-kiosks, instead of Balanced Journalism with Counterpoint. Is Google trying to
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by
1:06 AM
Thanks Google for Balanced Search Hits on Harvard's Dr. Hau
https://groups.google.com › sci.physics
https://groups.google.com › sci.physics
The ... ... Lene Vestergaard Hau is a Danish physicist who is currently the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and of Applied ... ... In 1999, after years of ...
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on ...https://groups.google.com › sci.physics https://groups.google.com › sci.physics Jun 26, 2021 — Lene Vestergaard Hau is the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and of Applied Physics and is also on the faculty of the Harvard Biophysics ...
Kibo Parry M. respectfully requests Balanced Google Search Journalism on Sheldon Glashow, instead of the rosy sugary glop when Sheldon is a mindless idiot in physics and that Counterpoint on his 1st page
Kibo Parry wanting balanced journalism in sci.physics. Like his own Google search page shows Kibo to be a sickfuck on the first page, but Kibo wants that fine-tuned for Jan Burse (Mostowski Collapse) is shown as a sickfuck on the first entry of his Google search.
Kibo likes to see that sugar coated idiots of science and math such as Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow are in scope with True Journalism, for Google searches are not boutique stores of sugar coated garbage but of Point and Counterpoint. Like Kibo's and Jan's Google search revealing the "little farting men that they really are", or as James McGinn recently said in his thread of weather in sci.physics-- Revealing the Asshole Hiding Within.
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer but a evil stalker shithead that wants to torture more South Korean Moon Bears
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:12 AM
_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by
1:08 AM
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz sci.physics
Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:42 AM
6--Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
#1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series,
1:41 AM
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales, Sheldon Glashow as some propaganda pitch as if Search engines have become science-propaganda-kiosks, instead of Balanced Journalism with Counterpoint. Is Google trying to
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor by
1:06 AM
Thanks Google for Balanced Search Hits on Harvard's Dr. Hau
https://groups.google.com › sci.physics
https://groups.google.com › sci.physics
The ... ... Lene Vestergaard Hau is a Danish physicist who is currently the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and of Applied ... ... In 1999, after years of ...
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on ...https://groups.google.com › sci.physics https://groups.google.com › sci.physics Jun 26, 2021 — Lene Vestergaard Hau is the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and of Applied Physics and is also on the faculty of the Harvard Biophysics ...
About 6,440,000 results (0.72 seconds)
Search Results
Terence Tao
Australian-American mathematician
Overview
Education
Videos
Awards
Books
Main Results
Images
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
More images
Web results
Terence Tao - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Terence_Tao
Terence "Terry" Chi-Shen Tao FAA FRS (born 17 July 1975) is an Australian-American mathematician. He is a professor of mathematics at the University of ...
Fields: Mathematics
Doctoral students: Monica Vișan
Thesis: Three Regularity Results in Harmonic ...
Known for: Green–Tao theorem; Erdős discrep...
Green–Tao theorem · Paul Erdős · Erdős number · Fields Medal
Terence Tao from en.wikipedia.org
People also ask
Is Terence Tao the smartest person in the world?
Why is Terence Tao a genius?
What did Terence Tao discover?
Who is the greatest mathematician alive?
Feedback
Terence Tao - UCLA Mathematicshttps://www.math.ucla.edu › ~tao
I am a Professor at the Department of Mathematics ;, UCLA ;. I work in a number of mathematical areas, but primarily in harmonic analysis ;, PDE ;, geometric ...
Terence Tao from www.math.ucla.edu
Videos
PREVIEW
2:10
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking | Official Trailer ...
YouTube · MasterClass
1 month ago
PREVIEW
11:13
The Test That Terence Tao Aced at Age 7
YouTube · Tibees
Jul 15, 2021
PREVIEW
2:57
Math Prodigy Terence Tao, UCLA
YouTube · UCLA
Sep 11, 2008
3 key moments in this video
View all
Terry Tao - WordPress.comhttps://terrytao.wordpress.com
Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Tao.
Career advice · About · On writing · Books
Terence Tao from terrytao.wordpress.com
Terence Tao : Awards | Carnegie Corporation of New Yorkhttps://www.carnegie.org › awards › honoree › terence-...
Called the “Mozart of Math” by fellow mathematicians, Terence Tao was born in Adelaide, Australia, to parents who had immigrated there from Hong Kong.
Nationality: Australia
Education: Princeton University
Terence Tao from www.carnegie.org
The Singular Mind of Terry Tao - The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com › 2015/07/26 › magazine › th...
Jul 26, 2015 — Three years later, at age 10, Tao became the youngest person in history to win a medal in the International Mathematical Olympiad. He has since ...
Terence Tao from www.nytimes.com
Terence Tao - Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com › citations
Terence Tao. Professor of Mathematics, UCLA ... EJ Candès, J Romberg, T Tao ... J Colliander, M Keel, G Staffilani, H Takaoka, T Tao.
Terence Tao | Australian mathematician - Encyclopedia ...https://www.britannica.com › Science › Mathematics
Terence Tao, (born July 17, 1975, Adelaide, Australia), Australian mathematician awarded a Fields Medal in 2006 “for his contributions to partial ...
Born: July 17, 1975, Adelaide
Education: Princeton University
Terence Tao - Simons Foundationhttps://www.simonsfoundation.org › people › terence-tao
Terry Tao is one of the most universal, penetrating and prolific mathematicians in the world. In over 200 publications (in just 15 years) spanning ...
Terence Tao from www.simonsfoundation.org
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking - MasterClasshttps://www.masterclass.com › classes › terence-tao-teac...
Terence Tao, considered one of the world's greatest living mathematicians, teaches mathematical thinking to solve a range of challenges in everyday work and ...
Terence Tao from www.masterclass.com
UCLA Dr. Tao scarring students with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction; never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and his mindless ellipse a conic when it is a oval. What Tao needs is a Counterpoint on his first page of a Google Search hit, for it at least warns students. If Counterpoint is good enough for con-artist John Gabriel, it is good enough for Dr.Tao.
No-one bothers to read the spam failure John Gabriel, why even sleep is more valuable than Gabriel spam and so Gabriel does no harm to anyone, and helps put them to sleep. However, Terence Tao the UCLA fool with ellipse a conic, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and his crazy Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. That Dr. Tao is damaging students with his con-art math, scarring students with ellipse a conic when in truth it is a Oval, and how silly is it for students to think AND is subtraction. Is this what a UCLA math education is for? What $30,000 and come home to say 2 OR 1 equals 3.
Yet Google Search has a counterpoint on first page of John Gabriel who helps those get to sleep fast, while Dr. Tao has no counterpoint as far as the eye can see, but all sugar glop nonsense.
Page 2 of about 7,680,000 results (0.77 seconds)
Search Results
Terence Tao, PhD | The White Househttps://www.whitehouse.gov › pcast › members › terenc...
Terence Tao, PhD, is a mathematician originally from Australia. He is known as one of the great mathematicians of our time, sometimes called the “Mozart of math ...
terence tao from www.whitehouse.gov
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking - MasterClasshttps://www.masterclass.com › classes › terence-tao-teac...
Terence Tao, considered one of the world's greatest living mathematicians, teaches mathematical thinking to solve a range of challenges in everyday work and ...
terence tao from www.masterclass.com
Terence Tao - The Mathematics Genealogy Projecthttps://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu › ...
Name School Year
Austin, Timothy University of California, Los Angeles 2010
Benatar, Jacques University of California, Los Angeles 2015
Bringmann, Bjoern University of California, Los Angeles 2021
View 18 more rows
Terence Tao (1975 - ) - Biographyhttps://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk › Biographies › Tao
Terence Tao won a Fields Medal in 2006 for his contributions to partial differential equations, combinatorics, harmonic analysis and additive number theory.
Education: Blackwood High School,
terence tao from mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk
Images for terence tao
Guided Search Filters
math
ucla
Terence Tao - Professor - UCLA | LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com › terence-tao-6291246
Los Angeles, California, United States · Professor · UCLA
View Terence Tao's profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community. Terence has 3 jobs listed on their profile. See the complete profile on ...
Mind of a Mathematician | Princeton Alumni Weeklyhttps://paw.princeton.edu › article › mind-mathematician
Nov 13, 2019 — Terence Tao *96's book, Solving Mathematical Problems: A Personal Perspective, is an engagingly slender volume, full of insights on how to ...
Parents: Billy Tao
terence tao from paw.princeton.edu
Terence Tao - Solving Mathematical Problems - Goodreadshttps://www.goodreads.com › 155010.Terence_Tao
Mar 11, 2022 — About Terence Tao: Terence Terry Tao FAA FRS (simplified Chinese: 陶哲轩; traditional Chinese: 陶哲軒; pinyin: Táo Zhéxuān) is an ...
terence tao from www.goodreads.com
Terence Tao: Books - Amazon.comhttps://www.amazon.com › Books-Terence-Tao › rh=n:...
Results 1 - 16 of 46 — Analysis I, 3Rd Edn (Texts And Readings In Mathematics) Vol 37. by TAO TERENCE | Jan 1, 2015.
A Close Call: How a Near Failure Propelled Me to Succeedhttps://www.ams.org › journals › notices › rnoti-p1007
Terence Tao is a professor of mathematics at the University of California,. Los Angeles. His email address is t...@math.ucla.edu. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1090 ...
2 pages
Ads
Terence Tao on MasterClass - With Terence Tao
Ad·
https://www.masterclass.com/
Learn about mathematical thinking with the Fields Medal–winning mathematician. The award-winning mathematician teaches you about mathematical thinking. Student Community.
Rating for masterclass.com: 4.3 - 32 reviews
John Gabriel with fake name Eram
Eram semper recta
,
Heywood Jablome
2
unread,
22 March 2022: New visitors to sci.math: The four basic operations of Arithmetic using only magnitudes expressed as ratios, a compass and straight edge.
6:25 PM
2
Google can do it for John Gabriel, then it can do it for Chandler Davis & H. Holden Thorp. A Counterpoint on their first page of a Google Search list, instead of all sugar coated gloss propaganda. Have a counterpoint on 1st page of Thorp and Davis.
5:23 PM
Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
unread,
22 March 2022: New visitors to sci.math: Learn the true story of how you got numbers and arithmetic.
5:11 PM
Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
unread,
22 March 2022: New visitors to sci.math: Like Donald Trump, mainstream academics persist in their BIG LIE that calculus was made rigorous.
5:11 PM
Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
unread,
22 March 2022: New visitors to sci.math: Laughing at mainstream Cantor Cranks.
5:11 PM
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 23, 2022, 12:14:31 AM3/23/22
to
Reason Univ Cambridge is in the weeds over real proton 840MeV, reading too much Olcott spam, morning noon and night. And reason Tao cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- eating up Olcott spam till it comes out of the ears
Cambridge's Sainsbury, Harry Cliff,Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri,Campbell, of Cambridge are you like Olcott too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding
> > > Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison of Cambridge are you like Olcott too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding
> > >
olcott's profile photo
olcott
unread,
Concise refutation of halting problem proofs V63 [ Linz Proof ]
On 3/22/2022 10:36 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > olcott <No...@NoWhere.com> writes: > >
10:51 PM
olcott's profile photo
olcott
11
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V5 [ without an algorithm ]
10:02 PM
> > >
> > > Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison of Cambridge are you like Olcott too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ..
> > > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > > , . `.' ' `.
> > > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > > . ; .' . `. ;
> > > ; . ' `. . '
> > > . ' ` `. |
> > > . '. '
> > > . 0 0 ' `.
> > > ' `
> > > ; `
> > > .' `
> > > ; U `
> > > ; '; `
> > > : | ;.. :` `
> > > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > > '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> > > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi I am Pete Olcott, a English Village idiot who bloody well has proved proven and prooft (amo, amas, amat) this is not friggin spam. On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 12:45:05 PM UTC-5, peteolcott wrote:
> > > When I correct the errors of the foundation of math in a math group
> > > this is bloody well not frigging spam.
> > > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > > ` . ' '
> > > / ` `. ' ' .
> > > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > > | ' ` ' `. `
> > > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > > `.' ` ; `-'
> > > `...'
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cambridge Physics Dept
> > >
> > > Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell, Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
> > >
> > > Cambridge Math Dept
> > >
> > > Alan Baker
> > > Bela Bollobas
> > > Darwin Smith
> > > John Coates
> > > Timothy Gowers
> > > Peter Johnstone
> > > Imre Leader
> > > Gabriel Paternain
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 24, 2022, 4:32:56 PM3/24/22
to
Pete Olcott has a 1st page Google Search hit detailing how Olcott is a crank spammer, but Terence Tao has only sugary flowery nonsense in his million hits. Nothing on the 1st page of Tao telling us that Tao flunked basic math with his ellipse a conic section when that is the oval, see AP proofs.
Peter Olcott, can Cambridge's Nunnenkamp, Padman please help Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else turn the light switch off in Slow Light rather than play ad hominem games?
Instead of doing Physics where AP proves that Light Waves are pencil ellipse closed loop circuits not straightline arrow rays, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics rather than your utter hatred of AP.
Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.
So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously.
Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ and Berkeley physics? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?
It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.
Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley Sylvia Else think Light Waves are arrow like single rays with a head and tail on a arrow ray. But that is only because they are ignorant in physics. They cannot turn off the light for it proves AP correct-- that the Light Wave is a closed loop circuit with the source of the light always in the closed loop circuit. So if and when those two incompetents Dr. Hau and Sylvia Else turn off the light source, all the light the fast light the Slow Light, the fast light exiting the BEC medium, all the Light vanishes simultaneously.
Hau and Else think that the SLOW LIGHT will still be visible, still be crawling slow in the BEC. But no, it vanishes instantly as all the other light from that source. But Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not want to report that truth, no, they want to never report any true science that is connected with Archimedes Plutonium, because Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else are not scientists at all-- but suppression jerks.
What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.
So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy ways and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.
So get off your lazy ways and finish the experiment.
Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.
Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time you roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.
AP, King of Science, especially Physics
Cambridge Univ
Cambridge's Lonzarich,Maiolino,Marshall,Martin,Mitov,Morris,Mortimer,Moller,Needs,Norman,Nunnenkamp,Padman,
Can any-one at Cambridge please help Dr. Hau? Turn the light switch off and prove that the Light wave is a circuit pencil ellipse not a arrow ray of head and tail which everyone except AP believes.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Nov 13, 2021, 1:25:26 PM
to
No wonder Cambridge Univ cannot tell the difference between ellipse and oval for the slant cut is never a ellipse in cone.
Nor can anyone at Cambridge Univ tell the difference between real true electron is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole.
And probably the reason Dirac departed England was the mindless moron science thinking that Cambridge engages in, in that they worship Boole and Jevons and Russell and Whitehead and Godel and Wittgenstein as heroes heroes when in fact they were abject failures of logic with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
No-one in England thinks their logic is odd, strange and stupid with 2 OR 1 = 3 because England is primitive intellectual behavior with hometown hero worship comes first, and only later does anyone in England ask the question-- do we really have it correct and right and truthful?
And the fool Pete Olcott is a byproduct of the academic insanity that pervades England, especially Cambridge University.
The ignorant of Cambridge and Oxford, and that means all of them, are so stupid academically, that they never thought Calculus needed a geometry proof. Probably because they were too busy polishing the bronze statues of their heroes Boole, Jevons, Russell, Whitehead, Godel, Wittgenstein and the Austrian schools of crazy logic.
For every insane Olcott, there is probably 10,000 more little Olcotts turned into insane Olcotts from Cambridge and Oxford Insane Crank Teaching Machine.
5th published book
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
Length: 72 pages
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Nov 16, 2021, 9:54:43 PM
to
Pete Olcott tearing down all of Cambridge University as a hypocrite school with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. So ignorant in academics, the fools of Cambridge cannot even ask which is the atom's true real electron, see below.
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 9:01:16 PM UTC-5, Tshokanma Balzalot wrote:
> Shut up idiot.
Mr. Balzalot does one like Pete Olcott spam because he fails math and logic and so he is only alternative is to spam every day with more and more b.s.
Pete Olcott closing down Cambridge University because they teach hypocrisy of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 12:45:05 PM UTC-5, peteolcott wrote:
> this is bloody well not frigging spam.
Pete, I recommended just Suspending Logic class not tearing down the whole University
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
Length: 72 pages
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
#6-2, 27th published book
Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.
Preface:
These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic
Equal+Not
T = T = T
T = ~F = T
F = ~T = T
F = F = T
If--> then
T --> T = T
T --> F = F
F --> T = U (unknown or uncertain)
F --> F = U (unknown or uncertain)
And
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F
Or
T or T = F
T or F = T
F or T = T
F or F = F
Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.
Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:
| | ~p
| |---
| | .
| | .
| | q
| | .
| | .
| | ~q
| p
Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.
Length: 86 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
• Publication date : March 23, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1178 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 86 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic
•
Cambridge's lost sheep Pete Olcott and MitchR can Florentin Wörgötter, Annette Zippelius please ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or as Jan Burse in Switzerland constantly posts of farting and brain fart around at ETH which he mentions in so many of his posts as ha,ha, brain farts. Is ETH and Univ Bern and Germany Jan Burse brain fart schools?
Gottingen Univ math
Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
Eternal-September.org
Wolfgang M. Weyand
Berliner Strasse
Bad Homburg
Goethe Universitat Physics dept
Brigitta Wolff president
Jurgen Habermass
Horst Stocker
Gerd Binnig
Horst Ludwig Stormer
Peter Grunberg
math
Alex Kuronya
Martin Moller
Jakob Stix
Annette Werner
Andreas Bernig
Esther Cabezas-Rivas
Hans Crauel
Thomas Gerstner
Bastian von Harrach
Thomas Mettler
Tobias Weth
Amin Coja-Oghlan
Raman Sanyal
Thorsten Theobald
Yury Person
Gottingen Univ physics
Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
Why can no-one in Germany ever ask the question which is the atom's true electron the muon or the 0.5MeV particle
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-4, 105th published book
Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-5, 112th published book
New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-6, 135th published book
QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry
#1-7, 138th published book
The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
Length: 41 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-8, 1st published book
Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
Foreward:
I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
Length: 632 pages
Product details
File Size: 1132 KB
Print Length: 632 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#8526 in Physics (Books)
#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
#2-1, 137th published book
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages
Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 386 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#3-1, 2nd published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Peter Olcott, can Cambridge's Nunnenkamp, Padman please help Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else turn the light switch off in Slow Light rather than play ad hominem games?
Instead of doing Physics where AP proves that Light Waves are pencil ellipse closed loop circuits not straightline arrow rays, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics rather than your utter hatred of AP.
Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.
So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously.
Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ and Berkeley physics? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?
It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.
Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley Sylvia Else think Light Waves are arrow like single rays with a head and tail on a arrow ray. But that is only because they are ignorant in physics. They cannot turn off the light for it proves AP correct-- that the Light Wave is a closed loop circuit with the source of the light always in the closed loop circuit. So if and when those two incompetents Dr. Hau and Sylvia Else turn off the light source, all the light the fast light the Slow Light, the fast light exiting the BEC medium, all the Light vanishes simultaneously.
Hau and Else think that the SLOW LIGHT will still be visible, still be crawling slow in the BEC. But no, it vanishes instantly as all the other light from that source. But Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not want to report that truth, no, they want to never report any true science that is connected with Archimedes Plutonium, because Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else are not scientists at all-- but suppression jerks.
What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.
So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy ways and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.
So get off your lazy ways and finish the experiment.
Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.
Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time you roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.
AP, King of Science, especially Physics
Cambridge Univ
Cambridge's Lonzarich,Maiolino,Marshall,Martin,Mitov,Morris,Mortimer,Moller,Needs,Norman,Nunnenkamp,Padman,
Can any-one at Cambridge please help Dr. Hau? Turn the light switch off and prove that the Light wave is a circuit pencil ellipse not a arrow ray of head and tail which everyone except AP believes.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Nov 13, 2021, 1:25:26 PM
to
No wonder Cambridge Univ cannot tell the difference between ellipse and oval for the slant cut is never a ellipse in cone.
Nor can anyone at Cambridge Univ tell the difference between real true electron is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole.
And probably the reason Dirac departed England was the mindless moron science thinking that Cambridge engages in, in that they worship Boole and Jevons and Russell and Whitehead and Godel and Wittgenstein as heroes heroes when in fact they were abject failures of logic with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
No-one in England thinks their logic is odd, strange and stupid with 2 OR 1 = 3 because England is primitive intellectual behavior with hometown hero worship comes first, and only later does anyone in England ask the question-- do we really have it correct and right and truthful?
And the fool Pete Olcott is a byproduct of the academic insanity that pervades England, especially Cambridge University.
The ignorant of Cambridge and Oxford, and that means all of them, are so stupid academically, that they never thought Calculus needed a geometry proof. Probably because they were too busy polishing the bronze statues of their heroes Boole, Jevons, Russell, Whitehead, Godel, Wittgenstein and the Austrian schools of crazy logic.
For every insane Olcott, there is probably 10,000 more little Olcotts turned into insane Olcotts from Cambridge and Oxford Insane Crank Teaching Machine.
5th published book
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
Length: 72 pages
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Nov 16, 2021, 9:54:43 PM
to
Pete Olcott tearing down all of Cambridge University as a hypocrite school with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. So ignorant in academics, the fools of Cambridge cannot even ask which is the atom's true real electron, see below.
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 9:01:16 PM UTC-5, Tshokanma Balzalot wrote:
> Shut up idiot.
Mr. Balzalot does one like Pete Olcott spam because he fails math and logic and so he is only alternative is to spam every day with more and more b.s.
Pete Olcott closing down Cambridge University because they teach hypocrisy of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 12:45:05 PM UTC-5, peteolcott wrote:
> this is bloody well not frigging spam.
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
Length: 72 pages
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
#6-2, 27th published book
Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.
Preface:
These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic
Equal+Not
T = T = T
T = ~F = T
F = ~T = T
F = F = T
If--> then
T --> T = T
T --> F = F
F --> T = U (unknown or uncertain)
F --> F = U (unknown or uncertain)
And
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F
Or
T or T = F
T or F = T
F or T = T
F or F = F
Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.
Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:
| | ~p
| |---
| | .
| | .
| | q
| | .
| | .
| | ~q
| p
Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.
Length: 86 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
• Publication date : March 23, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1178 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 86 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic
•
Cambridge's lost sheep Pete Olcott and MitchR can Florentin Wörgötter, Annette Zippelius please ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or as Jan Burse in Switzerland constantly posts of farting and brain fart around at ETH which he mentions in so many of his posts as ha,ha, brain farts. Is ETH and Univ Bern and Germany Jan Burse brain fart schools?
Gottingen Univ math
Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
Eternal-September.org
Wolfgang M. Weyand
Berliner Strasse
Bad Homburg
Goethe Universitat Physics dept
Brigitta Wolff president
Jurgen Habermass
Horst Stocker
Gerd Binnig
Horst Ludwig Stormer
Peter Grunberg
math
Alex Kuronya
Martin Moller
Jakob Stix
Annette Werner
Andreas Bernig
Esther Cabezas-Rivas
Hans Crauel
Thomas Gerstner
Bastian von Harrach
Thomas Mettler
Tobias Weth
Amin Coja-Oghlan
Raman Sanyal
Thorsten Theobald
Yury Person
Gottingen Univ physics
Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
Why can no-one in Germany ever ask the question which is the atom's true electron the muon or the 0.5MeV particle
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-4, 105th published book
Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-5, 112th published book
New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-6, 135th published book
QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry
#1-7, 138th published book
The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
Length: 41 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-8, 1st published book
Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
Foreward:
I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
Length: 632 pages
Product details
File Size: 1132 KB
Print Length: 632 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#8526 in Physics (Books)
#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
#2-1, 137th published book
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages
Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 386 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#3-1, 2nd published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 24, 2022, 7:54:13 PM3/24/22
to
Tao needs a 1st page counterpoint just as Olcott has one for his crank buffoonery of logic. For Tao never understood slant cut in cone is a oval, never ellipse in single cone. And worst of all Tao missed the boat in mathematics for a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is the main topic of 20th and 21st century mathematics. And Tao cannot do one. See AP's proofs.
2- Pete Olcott has a 1st page Google Search hit detailing how Olcott is a crank spammer, but Terence Tao has only sugary flowery nonsense in his million hits. Nothing on the 1st page of Tao telling us that Tao flunked basic math with his ellipse a conic section when that is the oval, see AP proofs.
2- Pete Olcott has a 1st page Google Search hit detailing how Olcott is a crank spammer, but Terence Tao has only sugary flowery nonsense in his million hits. Nothing on the 1st page of Tao telling us that Tao flunked basic math with his ellipse a conic section when that is the oval, see AP proofs.
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 25, 2022, 4:47:05 PM3/25/22
to
Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page Counterpoint.
unread,
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V6
On 3/25/2022 3:29 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > olcott <No...@NoWhere.com> writes: > >
3:37 PM
Mathin3D
34
unread,
Keith Thompson
20
unread,
infinitesimal number system [ smallest possible number ] V2
On 3/25/2022 2:01 PM, Keith Thompson wrote: > olcott <No...@NoWhere.com> writes: >> On
2:29 PM
The Earl of Dongtaster
2
unread,
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V8
unread,
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V6
On 3/25/2022 3:29 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > olcott <No...@NoWhere.com> writes: > >
3:37 PM
olcott's profile photo
olcott
,
olcott's profile photo
olcott
Mathin3D
34
unread,
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V5 [ without an algorithm ]
3:27 PM
olcott's profile photo
olcott
, …
olcott's profile photo
olcott
Keith Thompson
20
unread,
infinitesimal number system [ smallest possible number ] V2
On 3/25/2022 2:01 PM, Keith Thompson wrote: > olcott <No...@NoWhere.com> writes: >> On
2:29 PM
olcott's profile photo
olcott
,
olcott's profile photo
olcott
The Earl of Dongtaster
2
unread,
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V8
Michael Moroney
Mar 25, 2022, 9:45:53 PM3/25/22
to
🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page Counterpoint.
> unread,
But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
fair King if there ever was one. Tao is so benevolent as King of Math,
there is no foul verbiage for Google to find on the King. This is unlike
the evil Pretender to the Throne of Physics, the wicked Archimedes
Plutonium who wishes to destroy physics, not rule beneficially over it.
Here Google has the opposite problem, struggling to find anything good
whatsoever to say about Plutonium in science, as he tries to brainwash
children as young as 5 into mislearning science and likely hating it.
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page Counterpoint.
> unread,
fair King if there ever was one. Tao is so benevolent as King of Math,
there is no foul verbiage for Google to find on the King. This is unlike
the evil Pretender to the Throne of Physics, the wicked Archimedes
Plutonium who wishes to destroy physics, not rule beneficially over it.
Here Google has the opposite problem, struggling to find anything good
whatsoever to say about Plutonium in science, as he tries to brainwash
children as young as 5 into mislearning science and likely hating it.
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 25, 2022, 10:56:54 PM3/25/22
to
UCLA Dr. Tao flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test. Why Kibo? Because Tao and Panchanathan were never able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
Dr.Panchanathan NSF, and UCLA Dr.Tao barking fuckdogs of math and science teaching anti-science so says Kibo Parry M
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Imp of Math"
>"barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Sethuraman Panchanathan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sethuraman Panchanathan
Sethuraman Panchanathan, portrait, National Science Foundation.jpg
Panchanathan in 2020
15th Director of the National Science Foundation
Incumbent
Assumed office
June 23, 2020
President Donald Trump
Joe Biden
France A. Córdova
Personal details
Born Chennai, India
Spouse(s) Soumya Panchanathan
Education University of Madras (BS)
Indian Institute of Science (BEng)
Indian Institute of Technology (MTech)
University of Ottawa (PhD)
Scientific career
Fields Electrical engineering
Computer engineering
Informatics
Institutions University of Ottawa
Arizona State University
Thesis Algorithms and architectures for image coding using vector quantization (1989)
Doctoral advisor Morris Goldberg
Sethuraman Panchanathan is an Indian-American computer scientist and academic administrator, and the 15th Director of National Science Foundation since June 2020.[1] He previously served as the Executive Vice President, ASU Knowledge Enterprise Development and Chief Research and Innovation Officer at Arizona State University (ASU). He was also Director of the Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing (CUbiC), Foundation Chair of Computing and Informatics at ASU and Professor in the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering (CIDSE), part of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering.[2]
Contents
1 Early life and education
2 Academic career
3 National Science Foundation
4 Research interests
5 Personal life
6 Awards, appointments and fellowships
7 Works
8 References
9 External links
Early life and education
Panchanathan was born and raised in Chennai. He attended the Vivekananda College (University of Madras), graduating in 1981 with a B.Sc. in Physics. Subsequently, in 1984, he earned a B.E. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore, India. In 1986, he completed his M.Tech in Electrical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. He later enrolled in the doctoral program at the University of Ottawa, Canada, and received his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 1989[4] while working under the direction of Morris Goldberg.
Academic career
After receiving his Ph.D. from the University of Ottawa in 1989, Panchanathan stayed on at Ottawa as an assistant professor and was later promoted to associate professor in 1994 after receiving tenure.
Panchanathan moved to Arizona in 1997 as a tenured associate professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at ASU. In 2001, he was promoted to full professor and founded the Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing (CUbiC), which is focused on designing technologies and devices for assisting individuals with disabilities. He also founded and led the School of Computing and Informatics (2006-2009) and the Department of Biomedical Informatics (2005-2007).
Dr.Panchanathan NSF, and UCLA Dr.Tao barking fuckdogs of math and science teaching anti-science so says Kibo Parry M
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Imp of Math"
>"barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> fails at math and science:
>in science, as he tries to brainwash
> children as young as 5 into mislearning science and likely hating it.
Kibo Parry M. this is Wikipedia's page on NSF Panchanathan and I do not see the word "barking fuckdog" anywhere in sight.
> children as young as 5 into mislearning science and likely hating it.
Sethuraman Panchanathan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sethuraman Panchanathan
Sethuraman Panchanathan, portrait, National Science Foundation.jpg
Panchanathan in 2020
15th Director of the National Science Foundation
Incumbent
Assumed office
June 23, 2020
President Donald Trump
Joe Biden
France A. Córdova
Personal details
Born Chennai, India
Spouse(s) Soumya Panchanathan
Education University of Madras (BS)
Indian Institute of Science (BEng)
Indian Institute of Technology (MTech)
University of Ottawa (PhD)
Scientific career
Fields Electrical engineering
Computer engineering
Informatics
Institutions University of Ottawa
Arizona State University
Thesis Algorithms and architectures for image coding using vector quantization (1989)
Doctoral advisor Morris Goldberg
Sethuraman Panchanathan is an Indian-American computer scientist and academic administrator, and the 15th Director of National Science Foundation since June 2020.[1] He previously served as the Executive Vice President, ASU Knowledge Enterprise Development and Chief Research and Innovation Officer at Arizona State University (ASU). He was also Director of the Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing (CUbiC), Foundation Chair of Computing and Informatics at ASU and Professor in the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering (CIDSE), part of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering.[2]
Contents
1 Early life and education
2 Academic career
3 National Science Foundation
4 Research interests
5 Personal life
6 Awards, appointments and fellowships
7 Works
8 References
9 External links
Early life and education
Panchanathan was born and raised in Chennai. He attended the Vivekananda College (University of Madras), graduating in 1981 with a B.Sc. in Physics. Subsequently, in 1984, he earned a B.E. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore, India. In 1986, he completed his M.Tech in Electrical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. He later enrolled in the doctoral program at the University of Ottawa, Canada, and received his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 1989[4] while working under the direction of Morris Goldberg.
Academic career
After receiving his Ph.D. from the University of Ottawa in 1989, Panchanathan stayed on at Ottawa as an assistant professor and was later promoted to associate professor in 1994 after receiving tenure.
Panchanathan moved to Arizona in 1997 as a tenured associate professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at ASU. In 2001, he was promoted to full professor and founded the Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing (CUbiC), which is focused on designing technologies and devices for assisting individuals with disabilities. He also founded and led the School of Computing and Informatics (2006-2009) and the Department of Biomedical Informatics (2005-2007).
Russ Diaz
Mar 26, 2022, 7:22:24 AM3/26/22
to
Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium
> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
>> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page
>> Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page
>> Counterpoint. unread,
>
> But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
I never understood these amerecans, are fighting with their life for
> 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium
> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
>> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page
>> Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page
>> Counterpoint. unread,
>
> But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
what?? For the corrupt bidans_clan, making millions and billions out of
the *poorest* fucking shithole fictitious *naze_country* in europe?? And
now, since the russians stopped the bidans_clan misery?
Is this what you want to die for, for the capitalist *big_pharma* and
eugenicist bill gaytes etc capitalist oligarchs wanting to kill you and
your kids with lethal injections they illegally call for being
*_"vaccines"_*, having *_NOTHING_* to do with health, but with criminal
population killing, called "reduction"??
Are you fucking completely idiots??
Russ Diaz
Mar 26, 2022, 7:34:18 AM3/26/22
to
Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium
> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
>> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page
>> Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page
>> Counterpoint. unread,
>
> But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
> fair King if there ever was one. Tao is so benevolent as King of Math,
I never understood these amerecans, are fighting with their life,
> 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium
> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
>> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page
>> Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page
>> Counterpoint. unread,
>
> But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
> fair King if there ever was one. Tao is so benevolent as King of Math,
*_for_what_*?? For the corrupt bidans_clan, making millions and billions
out of the *poorest* fucking shithole fictitious *naze_country* in
europe?? And now, since the russians stopped the bidans_clan *bio_weapons*
misery??
Is this what you want to die for, for the capitalist *big_pharma* and
you and your kids, with *lethal_injections* illegally called
*_"vaccines"_*, having *_NOTHING_* to do with health, but with the world
criminal act of humankind killing, called
*_"climate_population_reduction"_*??
Are you fucking completely idiots, you amerecans??
Russ Diaz
Mar 26, 2022, 9:50:37 AM3/26/22
to
Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page
>> Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page
>> Counterpoint. unread,
>
> But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
> fair King if there ever was one. Tao is so benevolent as King of Math,
and you think the "ukrainians" are stupid, not knowing they have a
>> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page
>> Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page
>> Counterpoint. unread,
>
> But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
> fair King if there ever was one. Tao is so benevolent as King of Math,
*_puppet_actor_* as *_the_lying_"president"_*, playing his *homo_dick* on
the piano, *weakening* the capitalist western europe?? Bio_weapons labs to
kill the pork etc, are you a fucking idiot??
Eyewitness testimony from Mariupol you won't see on the MSM news
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oLBjASYFBVy5/
Michael Moroney
Mar 26, 2022, 2:54:48 PM3/26/22
to
On 3/26/2022 7:22 AM, Russ Diaz wrote:
> Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>> 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium
>> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>>
>>> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page
>>> Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page
>>> Counterpoint. unread,
>>
>> But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
>
> I never understood these amerecans, are fighting with their life for
> what?? For the corrupt bidans_clan, making millions and billions out of
> the *poorest* fucking shithole fictitious *naze[sic]_country* in europe??
> Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>> 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium
>> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>>
>>> Olcott spam the front page of sci.math. Olcott has 1st page
>>> Counterpoint in Google Search. So should Terence Tao have 1st page
>>> Counterpoint. unread,
>>
>> But Terence Tao is a most kind and benevolent King of Math, a just and
>
> I never understood these amerecans, are fighting with their life for
> what?? For the corrupt bidans_clan, making millions and billions out of
The poorest Nazi shithole country in Europe? Sounds like Russia in a
year or so, having been isolated economically from just about every
other country in the world? Even neutral Switzerland and Sweden went
along with sanctions. So much Russian military vehicles sold as scrap
metal by the Ukrainian farmers Russia will need to replace. So many of
its workers never to return home to work.
Stupid Nazi 卐Путин卐, he wanted to see the glory days of his beloved
Soviet Union return with his Третий Рейх. It does look like the Soviet
Union days will return for the common people of Russia, in the form of
long lines just to get a bit of rotten meat at the store, while other
stores are shuttered. (Or will the people revolt and hang 卐Путин卐 from
the tallest light pole in the Kremlin?)
Does 卐Путин卐's Russia have a chance to be the poorest country in Asia
as well? Russia is "lucky" spanning two continents, they can "win" two
prizes in that field.
> Is this what you want to die for, for the capitalist *big_pharma* and
> eugenicist bill gaytes etc capitalist oligarchs wanting to kill you and
> your kids with lethal injections they illegally call for being
> *_"vaccines"_*, having *_NOTHING_* to do with health, but with criminal
> population killing, called "reduction"??
off so many Russian soldiers? So very sad, but not as sad as Ukrainian
civilians who were minding their own business in their own homes and
were killed?
>
> Are you fucking completely idiots??
The Russians will be complete idiots if they don't get rid of their evil
> Are you fucking completely idiots??
dictator. It won't be easy but it needs to be done.
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 26, 2022, 4:43:09 PM3/26/22
to
James Kibo Parry M. I do not see "barking fuckdog" or "Putin's Stooge" or "CCP stooge" anywhere on Terence Tao Wikipedia page. Why do you hate him so much Kibo? Is it because he failed math with his ellipse a slant cut in single cone is actually a Oval, and not what stupid Tao calls a ellipse? Or is it because he can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus that AP proved in 2015 or thereabouts?
Terence "Terry" Chi-Shen Tao FAA FRS (born 17 July 1975) is an Australian-American mathematician. He is a professor of mathematics at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), where he holds the James and Carol Collins chair. His research includes topics in harmonic analysis, partial differential equations, algebraic combinatorics, arithmetic combinatorics, geometric combinatorics, probability theory, compressed sensing and analytic number theory.[4]
He was a recipient of the 2006 Fields Medal and the 2014 Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics. He is also a 2006 MacArthur Fellow. Tao has been the author or co-author of over three hundred research papers.[5] He is widely regarded as one of the greatest living mathematicians.[6][7][8][9]
Contents
1 Personal life and career
1.1 Family
1.2 Childhood
1.3 Career
1.4 Recognition
2 Research contributions
2.1 Dispersive partial differential equations
2.2 Harmonic analysis
2.3 Compressed sensing and statistics
2.4 Random matrices
2.5 Analytic number theory and arithmetic combinatorics
3 Notable awards
4 Major publications
5 See also
6 References
7 External links
UCLA Dr. Tao flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test. Why Kibo? Because Tao and Panchanathan were never able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
Dr.Panchanathan NSF, and UCLA Dr.Tao barking fuckdogs of math and science teaching anti-science so says Kibo Parry M
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Imp of Math"
>"barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Terence Chi-Shen Tao
FAA FRS

Born
17 July 1975 (age 46)
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Citizenship
Australia[1]
United States[1]
Alma mater
Flinders University (BA, MA)
Princeton University (PhD)
Compressed sensing
Tao's inequality
Kakeya conjecture
Bounding the de Bruijn–Newman constant
Horn conjecture
Cramer conjecture
Collatz conjecture
Chowla conjecture
Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness
Uncountable Moore–Schmidt theorem
Sendov's conjecture
Singmaster's conjecture
Spouse(s)
Laura Tao
Children
2
Awards
Fields Medal (2006)
show
List
Scientific career
Fields
Mathematics
Institutions
UCLA
Thesis
Three Regularity Results in Harmonic Analysis[1] (1996)
Doctoral advisor
Elias M. Stein
Doctoral students
Monica Vișan
Website
www.math.ucla.edu/~tao/
terrytao.wordpress.com
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:29:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
>"one marble illogical brain"
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 1:31:34 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"
> "has anyone seen my marbles"
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:22:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "barking fuckdog" David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> William J. Burns "Putin's Stooge"
On Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 10:37:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
By Dan Christensen 39 posts 472 views updated 2:53 AM
Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker
By Zelos Malum 15 posts 108 views updated 2:49 AM
Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"
Terence "Terry" Chi-Shen Tao FAA FRS (born 17 July 1975) is an Australian-American mathematician. He is a professor of mathematics at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), where he holds the James and Carol Collins chair. His research includes topics in harmonic analysis, partial differential equations, algebraic combinatorics, arithmetic combinatorics, geometric combinatorics, probability theory, compressed sensing and analytic number theory.[4]
He was a recipient of the 2006 Fields Medal and the 2014 Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics. He is also a 2006 MacArthur Fellow. Tao has been the author or co-author of over three hundred research papers.[5] He is widely regarded as one of the greatest living mathematicians.[6][7][8][9]
Contents
1 Personal life and career
1.1 Family
1.2 Childhood
1.3 Career
1.4 Recognition
2 Research contributions
2.1 Dispersive partial differential equations
2.2 Harmonic analysis
2.3 Compressed sensing and statistics
2.4 Random matrices
2.5 Analytic number theory and arithmetic combinatorics
3 Notable awards
4 Major publications
5 See also
6 References
7 External links
UCLA Dr. Tao flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test. Why Kibo? Because Tao and Panchanathan were never able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
Dr.Panchanathan NSF, and UCLA Dr.Tao barking fuckdogs of math and science teaching anti-science so says Kibo Parry M
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Imp of Math"
>"barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> fails at math and science:
>in science, as he tries to brainwash
> children as young as 5 into mislearning science and likely hating it.
Kibo Parry M. this is Wikipedia's page on Terence Tao and I do not see the word "barking fuckdog" anywhere in sight.
> children as young as 5 into mislearning science and likely hating it.
Terence Chi-Shen Tao
FAA FRS

Born
17 July 1975 (age 46)
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Citizenship
Australia[1]
United States[1]
Alma mater
Flinders University (BA, MA)
Princeton University (PhD)
Known for
Green–Tao theorem
Erdős discrepancy problem
Green–Tao theorem
Compressed sensing
Tao's inequality
Kakeya conjecture
Bounding the de Bruijn–Newman constant
Horn conjecture
Cramer conjecture
Collatz conjecture
Chowla conjecture
Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness
Uncountable Moore–Schmidt theorem
Sendov's conjecture
Singmaster's conjecture
Spouse(s)
Laura Tao
Children
2
Awards
Fields Medal (2006)
show
List
Scientific career
Fields
Mathematics
Institutions
UCLA
Thesis
Three Regularity Results in Harmonic Analysis[1] (1996)
Doctoral advisor
Elias M. Stein
Doctoral students
Monica Vișan
Website
www.math.ucla.edu/~tao/
terrytao.wordpress.com
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:29:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
>"one marble illogical brain"
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 1:31:34 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"
> "has anyone seen my marbles"
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:22:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "barking fuckdog" David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> William J. Burns "Putin's Stooge"
On Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 10:37:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
Re: software that engineers out stalking bullies on Twitter, Facebook, Google Newsgroups Re: Michael Moroney Anal ButtfuckManure stalker for 26 years
By Dan Christensen 39 posts 472 views updated 2:53 AM
Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker
By Zelos Malum 15 posts 108 views updated 2:49 AM
Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"
Willian Josey
Mar 26, 2022, 6:42:32 PM3/26/22
to
Michael Moroney wrote:
>> I never understood these amerecans, are fighting with their life for
>> what?? For the corrupt bidans_clan, making millions and billions out of
>> the *poorest* fucking shithole fictitious *naze[sic]_country* in
>> europe??
>
> The poorest Nazi shithole country in Europe? Sounds like Russia in a
> year
Before that you have to pay your energy in gold backed rubles. You idiot.
>> I never understood these amerecans, are fighting with their life for
>> what?? For the corrupt bidans_clan, making millions and billions out of
>> the *poorest* fucking shithole fictitious *naze[sic]_country* in
>> europe??
>
> The poorest Nazi shithole country in Europe? Sounds like Russia in a
> year
Ask again, after that. What kind of mathematician are you??
Mostowski Collapse
Mar 26, 2022, 7:10:26 PM3/26/22
to
The most gold is produced in China, not in Russia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_gold_production#/media/File:Top_5_Gold_Producers.png
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 28, 2022, 2:02:19 AM3/28/22
to
I think Russia went to the USA to learn how to do extreme propaganda from Terence Tao Google Search page. The ultimate in sugar coated glop, when Terry is a utter failure of math with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction Boole logic, with his slant cut in single cone a ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and Terry's never ability to muster a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of calculus. Russia learned how to do propaganda to peak performance from Tao in mathematics and Google Search hits. Even the failure Kibo Parry M. has been watching this travesty of science.
Neither Tao nor Kibo Parry M. understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, not an ellipse, yet Kibo Parry has a Counterpoint on his first page of Google Search showing him an ignoramus in math but not Tao with millions of sugar coated glop.
Tao of course can do a proper correct percentage, but the failed Kibo Parry Moroney fresh out of Rensselaer Polytech (my their standards have fallen in the past 70 years when engineers knew how to do percentage problems correctly-- maybe that is why Kibo went on to a dance art school in Boston-- hey Kibo did you make an A in tapdancing?)
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:45:18 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "one marble illogical brain"
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!
>
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- <= x=h
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ <= x=0
>
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' <= x = h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed
>
Neither Tao nor Kibo Parry M. understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, not an ellipse, yet Kibo Parry has a Counterpoint on his first page of Google Search showing him an ignoramus in math but not Tao with millions of sugar coated glop.
Tao of course can do a proper correct percentage, but the failed Kibo Parry Moroney fresh out of Rensselaer Polytech (my their standards have fallen in the past 70 years when engineers knew how to do percentage problems correctly-- maybe that is why Kibo went on to a dance art school in Boston-- hey Kibo did you make an A in tapdancing?)
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:45:18 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "one marble illogical brain"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > Which is the greater failure of math-- Wiles or Olcott?
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!
>
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- <= x=h
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ <= x=0
>
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' <= x = h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed
>
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 28, 2022, 5:21:47 PM3/28/22
to
What Mathematical Induction has proven the Pythagorean theorem true but also proven that only whole numbers as sides of a right triangle constitute a right triangle.
These are Right Triangles--- Statement: Every right triangle has its sides, a,b,c related by the algebra of a^2+b^2= c^2. Most people know that c is the hypotenuse but in this proof that is inconsequental. Now we know that the first Pythagorean triples of Counting Numbers are (3,4,5), (5,12,13), (7,24,25), (8,15,17), (9,40,41).
Now, we can take (3,4,5) and make it into (1, 4/3, 5/3). Now in true math 4/3 and 5/3 are not numbers, not numbers at all but are incomplete divisions. We call them fractions and are temporarily used in mathematics for the sake of expediency and ease. And let me show you how I use this (1, 4/3, 5/3).
I want Pythagorean Triples from 1 to 10 such as this (1, 4/3, 5/3), (2, 8/3, 10/3), (3, 4, 5), (4, 16/3, 20/3), (5,12,13), (6,8,10), (7,24,25), (8,15,17), (9,40,41), (10, 24, 26)
These are _Not_ Right Triangles -- (1,1,sqrt2) (1, sqrt2, sqrt3) (sqrt2, sqrt3, sqrt5) (2, 2, sqrt8). Using the proof method of Mathematical Induction on any of those triples yields no equation of a^2 + b^2 = c^2 in geometry because the lengths of one of its sides is too short and does not form a square.
So here Mathematical Induction as a proof that those are not right-triangles is a Fermat's Proof of Infinite Descent, as mentioned previously.
Let us inspect triangle (2,2,sqrt8) inspect it alongside (3,4,5). The square root of 8 is 2.8284......
So we have sides 2 and 2 and a right angle and we have squares of 2^2 attached to side 2 and side 2. We have the side 2.8284.... and we make a "sketch of a square but not sure it is a square for it maybe a rhombus of angles 89-91-89-91 degrees".
Now in (3,4,5) we placed the 16 unit square inside the 25 unit square and place 5 of the units of 9 unit square and 4 units the crosswise direction to completely fill 25 unit square.
In the (2,2,sqrt8) we placed one of the 4 unit square insided the 8 unit square but impossible to fill with the remaining 4 units for we cannot place 3 units one way and 1 another and fill the 8 unit square. This tells us that sqrt8 is not a square at all but perhaps a rhombus, a parallelogram or trapezoid.
Because the side hypotenuse of (2,2,sqrt8) is not even a right triangle for in 10 Grid it has length 2.8, in 100 Grid it has length 2.82, in 1000 Grid its length is 2.828, in 10^4 Grid the hypotenuse length is 2.8284 but always short of an Exacting length. It is not a right triangle. The triple (2,2,sqrt8) is not a right triangle for the specific reason that the hypotenuse is too short to join the 2 and 2 sides and thus no right angle exists in (2,2,sqrt8) for the two squares of 4 units each cannot fill a square of sqrt8.
What Mathematical Induction in conjunction with Infinite Descent proof method has shown here, is that Right Triangles to exist, must be whole number sides. The (3,4,5) is a right triangle and so is (1,4/3,5/3), but (1,1,sqrt2) is not a right-triangle.
These conclusions can only come once you apply Mathematical Induction Proof Method to the Ancient Greek Pythagorean Theorem. Already, way back in Ancient Greek times was the creeping in of fake numbers-- irrationals. For the only true numbers to exist in mathematics are Decimal Grid Numbers-- all obtained by Math Induction itself.
Irrational numbers are as fake as believing in ghosts, witches, hobgoblins and fire breathing dragons. And it is Mathematical Induction that brings the mind back down to Earth from its fantasy illusion.
AP
These are Right Triangles--- Statement: Every right triangle has its sides, a,b,c related by the algebra of a^2+b^2= c^2. Most people know that c is the hypotenuse but in this proof that is inconsequental. Now we know that the first Pythagorean triples of Counting Numbers are (3,4,5), (5,12,13), (7,24,25), (8,15,17), (9,40,41).
Now, we can take (3,4,5) and make it into (1, 4/3, 5/3). Now in true math 4/3 and 5/3 are not numbers, not numbers at all but are incomplete divisions. We call them fractions and are temporarily used in mathematics for the sake of expediency and ease. And let me show you how I use this (1, 4/3, 5/3).
I want Pythagorean Triples from 1 to 10 such as this (1, 4/3, 5/3), (2, 8/3, 10/3), (3, 4, 5), (4, 16/3, 20/3), (5,12,13), (6,8,10), (7,24,25), (8,15,17), (9,40,41), (10, 24, 26)
These are _Not_ Right Triangles -- (1,1,sqrt2) (1, sqrt2, sqrt3) (sqrt2, sqrt3, sqrt5) (2, 2, sqrt8). Using the proof method of Mathematical Induction on any of those triples yields no equation of a^2 + b^2 = c^2 in geometry because the lengths of one of its sides is too short and does not form a square.
So here Mathematical Induction as a proof that those are not right-triangles is a Fermat's Proof of Infinite Descent, as mentioned previously.
Let us inspect triangle (2,2,sqrt8) inspect it alongside (3,4,5). The square root of 8 is 2.8284......
So we have sides 2 and 2 and a right angle and we have squares of 2^2 attached to side 2 and side 2. We have the side 2.8284.... and we make a "sketch of a square but not sure it is a square for it maybe a rhombus of angles 89-91-89-91 degrees".
Now in (3,4,5) we placed the 16 unit square inside the 25 unit square and place 5 of the units of 9 unit square and 4 units the crosswise direction to completely fill 25 unit square.
In the (2,2,sqrt8) we placed one of the 4 unit square insided the 8 unit square but impossible to fill with the remaining 4 units for we cannot place 3 units one way and 1 another and fill the 8 unit square. This tells us that sqrt8 is not a square at all but perhaps a rhombus, a parallelogram or trapezoid.
Because the side hypotenuse of (2,2,sqrt8) is not even a right triangle for in 10 Grid it has length 2.8, in 100 Grid it has length 2.82, in 1000 Grid its length is 2.828, in 10^4 Grid the hypotenuse length is 2.8284 but always short of an Exacting length. It is not a right triangle. The triple (2,2,sqrt8) is not a right triangle for the specific reason that the hypotenuse is too short to join the 2 and 2 sides and thus no right angle exists in (2,2,sqrt8) for the two squares of 4 units each cannot fill a square of sqrt8.
What Mathematical Induction in conjunction with Infinite Descent proof method has shown here, is that Right Triangles to exist, must be whole number sides. The (3,4,5) is a right triangle and so is (1,4/3,5/3), but (1,1,sqrt2) is not a right-triangle.
These conclusions can only come once you apply Mathematical Induction Proof Method to the Ancient Greek Pythagorean Theorem. Already, way back in Ancient Greek times was the creeping in of fake numbers-- irrationals. For the only true numbers to exist in mathematics are Decimal Grid Numbers-- all obtained by Math Induction itself.
Irrational numbers are as fake as believing in ghosts, witches, hobgoblins and fire breathing dragons. And it is Mathematical Induction that brings the mind back down to Earth from its fantasy illusion.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 29, 2022, 2:02:39 AM3/29/22
to
BWR-FML the Uncle to Terry Tao and Andrew Wiles, guiding them out of their failures and failings and having a 1st page Counterpoint in Google Search.
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 12:05:06 AM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> > On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 8:45:43 PM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> > > I believe what this shows you is that if you change the definitions that everyone else is using
> > > then what you do has little or nothing to do with what everyone else is or ever has done.
> > > As I've written to you a number of times, if you thought very very carefully and deeply
> > > and begun each of you claims with "Given the following axions: 1.... 2.... 3.... 4...."
> > > and then made your claims then you might have a better chance.
> >
AP writes: Yes, BWR, who does Wiles think he is to teach slant cut in single cone is a ellipse for a ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry but a cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry. Does Wiles think he is some Sheepdog God of Math?
> Step 1: Convince half a dozen competent respected working mathematicians that your "oval" claim is true.
> Really really REALLY convince them that your claim is true.
> That will put you light years ahead of where you are now.
> Please, please, actually really convince some competent mathematicians.
> But I think you and I both know that isn't ever going to happen.
AP writes: BWR, your confused already, Terry thinks the slant cut in cone is ellipse, not the Oval, while AP proved it was a Oval, for that makes commonsense-- both have one axis of symmetry, ellipse has two.
> > > Think really really carefully what you think you have when all that exists are 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, ...
> > > Consider your "torus" when you believe all that exists are your "grid numbers."
> > > Is there a smooth round surface? I don't think so. Is there even a surface? I don't think so.
> > > Consider the volume of your "donut hole", with or without being limited to grid numbers.
> > > I don't believe that "volume", whatever that really means with nothing more than grid
> > > numbers and maybe not even having a surface that makes up a grid.
> > > If you can't even make up a triangle then how do you imagine you can have a torus?
> >
AP writes: Yes, BWR, can Wiles ever think, think enough to know calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Can he think BWR??? Or only lick sugar coated Google Search Hits, like a Lick Lap dog at Univ. Oxford?
> Even if you convince half a dozen competent mathematicians of this claim, that isn't going to help you much.
> A geometry proof can work IF you restrict functions to be really really really simple.
> The moment you let in more complicated functions I think your geometry proof starts having problems.
AP writes: First, BWR, we have to make it clear to Terry Tao being in the weeds of calculus, that calculus is geometry and a "limit analysis" is not geometry nor is a analysis of anything a proof.
> > > p.s. Over in the world where everyone else lives, the volume of your donut hole is not 8.
> > > That value is incorrect by close to 20%. And numerology lives and dies on the accuracy
> > > and correctness of the digits because of all the magic power attributed to those digits.
> >
AP writes: Yes, BWR, you mean Andrew Wiles lives close to Univ Cambridge where he can inform Harry Cliff that the real proton of atoms is 840MeV not 939 and inside the proton torus is the real electron of atoms the muon thrusting through the proton torus in the Faraday law, producing electricity with Dirac magnetic monopoles of 0.5MeV.
> How or why would Wiles be able to convince competent physics people about physics?
> Now if you ever demonstrate an actual experiment which absolutely convinces everyone that
> EITHER your muon is thrusting hard up your torus OR that you are completely wrong,
> then you will be far far ahead of where you are now.
> But I think you and I both know that isn't ever going to happen.
> I strongly suspect that you don't actually want to risk doing that.
> I strongly suspect that you don't actually want to produce much stronger proofs that might/could/would show you are wrong.
AP writes: because he cannot tell apart from ellipse and oval, he fails even simple math, that he may achieve some success in physics.
> > > Consider your often repeated claim that nothing exists but polynomials.
> > > So what is the polynomial that makes up something that replaces the torus that everyone
> > > else believes in and understands, but which only exists if you use everyone else's numbers,
> > > not your "grid numbers."
> >
> > Yes, BWR, I love polynomials. Why does Wiles hate them? Because they are too real and genuine, not kookish like his elliptic functions.
> Writing things like that is hurting your case, not helping it.
> > > But how can polynomials, those nice curves that everyone else has studied and understood,
> > > how can polynomials be anything more than a collection of grid numbers, there is no smooth
> > > curve between those grid numbers. There aren't even any lines between grid numbers,
> > > because your grid is all that you imagine exists. There certainly aren't surfaces between
> > > grid numbers.
> >
> > Yes, BWR, Y= mx + b is not a polynomial for you because you skipped school. And Wiles failed Logic with his Boole Logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> Writing things like that is hurting your case, not helping it.
> > > Consider your "phi" when you believe all that exists are your "grid numbers."
> > > Yes you can imagine a few digits, but you are stealing those digits the math that you reject.
> > > What is REALLY the value of phi when all you have are 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, ...
> >
> > Yes, BWR, you and Wiles skipped school when 100 Grid was developed, you and Wiles with only 10Grid.
> Writing things like that is hurting your case, not helping it.
> > > If you can't even cut a 1 by 1 square in half and get two triangles then how do you imagine
> > > that you have all the machinery to calculate phi with nothing more than grid numbers.
> >
> > Yes, BWR, Wiles still thinks sine and cosine curves are sinusoidal when in reality they are semicircle, but you and Wiles never checked your eyes for "seeing".
> Writing things like that is hurting your case, not helping it.
> > > I believe you have dug yourself into a far far deeper hole than you can even realize now.
> > >
> > > When you have rejected everything I think you have to start with nothing and construct
> > > everything before you can imagine that you can use it.
> > >
> > > Dig yourself out of all this.
> >
> > Yes, BWR, Wiles is dug so deep in math failure, why, he could not even spot the error of Euler's proof of FLT in exponent 3, and the fruitcake thinks he proved all of FLT. Do they give a Fields Medal for 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, these days?
> Just convince the world that one of your astonishing claims that contradicts
> what everyone has known for hundreds or thousands of years is actually
> correct, that you are right and not wrong. Then you will be taken far far more
> seriously. Until then... you can see that nobody is taking you seriously.
> CONVINCE everyone else that even one of your astonishing claims is true.
AP writes: Yes, BWR, Tao is pretty silly about even the most simple things of math, for Terry believes in primes as a concept of mathematics, hard core. But Terry never understood the counting numbers which contain the primes, has no division operator on primes. Primes exist only in terms of add and multiply. And this is why primes have no formula, because they are make-believe with no theoretical value. Primes do not exist in physics. But evens and odds exist in physics. So even the most simple of ideas of math are missed by Terence Tao, and the most crackpot ideas -- Green-Tao theorem are pushed by Tao. Terry never understood infinity needs a borderline for the Green-Tao fakery theorem.
AP
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 12:05:06 AM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> > On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 8:45:43 PM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> > > I believe what this shows you is that if you change the definitions that everyone else is using
> > > then what you do has little or nothing to do with what everyone else is or ever has done.
> > > As I've written to you a number of times, if you thought very very carefully and deeply
> > > and begun each of you claims with "Given the following axions: 1.... 2.... 3.... 4...."
> > > and then made your claims then you might have a better chance.
> >
AP writes: Yes, BWR, who does Wiles think he is to teach slant cut in single cone is a ellipse for a ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry but a cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry. Does Wiles think he is some Sheepdog God of Math?
> Step 1: Convince half a dozen competent respected working mathematicians that your "oval" claim is true.
> Really really REALLY convince them that your claim is true.
> That will put you light years ahead of where you are now.
> Please, please, actually really convince some competent mathematicians.
> But I think you and I both know that isn't ever going to happen.
AP writes: BWR, your confused already, Terry thinks the slant cut in cone is ellipse, not the Oval, while AP proved it was a Oval, for that makes commonsense-- both have one axis of symmetry, ellipse has two.
> > > Think really really carefully what you think you have when all that exists are 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, ...
> > > Consider your "torus" when you believe all that exists are your "grid numbers."
> > > Is there a smooth round surface? I don't think so. Is there even a surface? I don't think so.
> > > Consider the volume of your "donut hole", with or without being limited to grid numbers.
> > > I don't believe that "volume", whatever that really means with nothing more than grid
> > > numbers and maybe not even having a surface that makes up a grid.
> > > If you can't even make up a triangle then how do you imagine you can have a torus?
> >
AP writes: Yes, BWR, can Wiles ever think, think enough to know calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Can he think BWR??? Or only lick sugar coated Google Search Hits, like a Lick Lap dog at Univ. Oxford?
> Even if you convince half a dozen competent mathematicians of this claim, that isn't going to help you much.
> A geometry proof can work IF you restrict functions to be really really really simple.
> The moment you let in more complicated functions I think your geometry proof starts having problems.
AP writes: First, BWR, we have to make it clear to Terry Tao being in the weeds of calculus, that calculus is geometry and a "limit analysis" is not geometry nor is a analysis of anything a proof.
> > > p.s. Over in the world where everyone else lives, the volume of your donut hole is not 8.
> > > That value is incorrect by close to 20%. And numerology lives and dies on the accuracy
> > > and correctness of the digits because of all the magic power attributed to those digits.
> >
AP writes: Yes, BWR, you mean Andrew Wiles lives close to Univ Cambridge where he can inform Harry Cliff that the real proton of atoms is 840MeV not 939 and inside the proton torus is the real electron of atoms the muon thrusting through the proton torus in the Faraday law, producing electricity with Dirac magnetic monopoles of 0.5MeV.
> How or why would Wiles be able to convince competent physics people about physics?
> Now if you ever demonstrate an actual experiment which absolutely convinces everyone that
> EITHER your muon is thrusting hard up your torus OR that you are completely wrong,
> then you will be far far ahead of where you are now.
> But I think you and I both know that isn't ever going to happen.
> I strongly suspect that you don't actually want to risk doing that.
> I strongly suspect that you don't actually want to produce much stronger proofs that might/could/would show you are wrong.
AP writes: because he cannot tell apart from ellipse and oval, he fails even simple math, that he may achieve some success in physics.
> > > Consider your often repeated claim that nothing exists but polynomials.
> > > So what is the polynomial that makes up something that replaces the torus that everyone
> > > else believes in and understands, but which only exists if you use everyone else's numbers,
> > > not your "grid numbers."
> >
> > Yes, BWR, I love polynomials. Why does Wiles hate them? Because they are too real and genuine, not kookish like his elliptic functions.
> Writing things like that is hurting your case, not helping it.
> > > But how can polynomials, those nice curves that everyone else has studied and understood,
> > > how can polynomials be anything more than a collection of grid numbers, there is no smooth
> > > curve between those grid numbers. There aren't even any lines between grid numbers,
> > > because your grid is all that you imagine exists. There certainly aren't surfaces between
> > > grid numbers.
> >
> > Yes, BWR, Y= mx + b is not a polynomial for you because you skipped school. And Wiles failed Logic with his Boole Logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> Writing things like that is hurting your case, not helping it.
> > > Consider your "phi" when you believe all that exists are your "grid numbers."
> > > Yes you can imagine a few digits, but you are stealing those digits the math that you reject.
> > > What is REALLY the value of phi when all you have are 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, ...
> >
> > Yes, BWR, you and Wiles skipped school when 100 Grid was developed, you and Wiles with only 10Grid.
> Writing things like that is hurting your case, not helping it.
> > > If you can't even cut a 1 by 1 square in half and get two triangles then how do you imagine
> > > that you have all the machinery to calculate phi with nothing more than grid numbers.
> >
> > Yes, BWR, Wiles still thinks sine and cosine curves are sinusoidal when in reality they are semicircle, but you and Wiles never checked your eyes for "seeing".
> Writing things like that is hurting your case, not helping it.
> > > I believe you have dug yourself into a far far deeper hole than you can even realize now.
> > >
> > > When you have rejected everything I think you have to start with nothing and construct
> > > everything before you can imagine that you can use it.
> > >
> > > Dig yourself out of all this.
> >
> > Yes, BWR, Wiles is dug so deep in math failure, why, he could not even spot the error of Euler's proof of FLT in exponent 3, and the fruitcake thinks he proved all of FLT. Do they give a Fields Medal for 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, these days?
> Just convince the world that one of your astonishing claims that contradicts
> what everyone has known for hundreds or thousands of years is actually
> correct, that you are right and not wrong. Then you will be taken far far more
> seriously. Until then... you can see that nobody is taking you seriously.
> CONVINCE everyone else that even one of your astonishing claims is true.
AP writes: Yes, BWR, Tao is pretty silly about even the most simple things of math, for Terry believes in primes as a concept of mathematics, hard core. But Terry never understood the counting numbers which contain the primes, has no division operator on primes. Primes exist only in terms of add and multiply. And this is why primes have no formula, because they are make-believe with no theoretical value. Primes do not exist in physics. But evens and odds exist in physics. So even the most simple of ideas of math are missed by Terence Tao, and the most crackpot ideas -- Green-Tao theorem are pushed by Tao. Terry never understood infinity needs a borderline for the Green-Tao fakery theorem.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 29, 2022, 4:57:55 PM3/29/22
to
#7-1, 39th published book
AP Atom Model replacing the Rutherford-Bohr Atom Model (Physics series for High School Book 1) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in General Chemistry & Reference
The Rutherford and Bohr model of the Atom is seen now as fake physics. And it will take a lot of time before that nonsense is removed and replaced in science textbooks and classrooms for a truer model of the Atom. So to accelerate that movement towards the truth of what the Atom is, I present this short book for High School. In the age of the Internet, when we discover true science but am teaching fake science, we need a process to quicken the exit of fake science. Not to wait around for 50 years to be teaching the true science, we should be teaching the true science as fast as possible and to remove the fake science in our school curriculums in a timely and orderly manner. So this small book is a pattern for future removal of fake science from school curriculums. This small book explains what the Rutherford-Bohr model was and why it was phony science. And I explain what replaces the Rutherford-Bohr model with the AP model of the Atom. So the pattern is -- show both -- and then authors of texts will eliminate the fake science until it is a passing footnote.
Cover Picture is a coil and a bar magnet and a galvanometer that measures the current produced as the bar magnet is thrust through the coil. This is Faraday's Law and needs to be taught in High School.
Length: 12 pages
Product details
File Size: 2207 KB
Print Length: 12 pages
Publication Date: April 10, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07QKHRWG8
Language: English
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #220,321 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
#5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#39 in General Chemistry & Reference
#381 in General Chemistry
#7-2, 40th published book
How the Sun and Stars truly shine, not by fusion, but by Faraday's Law (Physics series for High School Book 2) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
One of my recent books (published a few days ago) was the AP model of the interior of atoms replacing the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom. And the differences are vast between these two atom models, for the AP model has the Faraday law going on, with actual work and job for the subatomic particles. And in that Atom model book, I was complaining that our modern science education school system has no good way of ridding itself of fake science where we keep on teaching propaganda and fake science for as much as 50 years beyond the discovery of what the true underlying science actually is. I gave as an example the Wegener Continental Drift theory in geology, where students had to suffer 50 years of a fake static-earth-theory when the Continental Drift theory was all around. One of the reasons for the delay in teaching the truth of science, is there is so much money interests involved of people selling fake science textbooks. And this is where the Internet can come in and play a vital role in school education, because the Internet can publish books of "true science" and get them exposed to a world audience, and so fake science like the static-earth theory would have been gone long before 50 years had elapsed if the internet were present for Wegener.
But now an even bigger and more important theory of science and physics is here and threatens to throw out as fake science the fusion theory of star energy, especially since it is "How the Sun shines". In effect, the question is, how do all stars shine? What is their energy source. And hard to believe that this topic in current science education with their explanation as "being fusion" is fake science. We all know what the answer is from present day science-- that stars and sun shine because of fusion. That they fuse hydrogen and light elements to make heavier elements like helium and in that fusion they give off energy which is sunshine. But is it true? Is that true science. You would be surprised to find out, that such is not the truth of how stars and Sun shine. They do not shine because of fusion. They shine because the Faraday law is going on inside each and every atom in that star or the Sun.
Now, here is another science teaching that needs to replace the fake science of fusion for the Sun and stars. And it should not take 50 years like Wegener's continental drift to push out the fake static earth theory. We should not have to wait 50 years for our teachers to teach the truth about how the stars and Sun shine with energy. And so, here again, just as in the previous book "AP's model of the Atom", I present the old theory of how stars shine and alongside that old fake theory, I present the new true theory. And in that presentation, we can give the entire science education community, give them about say 5 years of time in which to completely remove the old fake theory that fusion causes stars and Sun to shine with energy. When in fact, the truth is, Faraday Law causes stars and the Sun to shine.
Cover Picture is my photograph of a Google search on my computer of Sun images.
Length: 14 pages
Product details
File Size: 1629 KB
Print Length: 14 pages
Publication Date: April 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07QRPZQ4Q
Language: English
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #289,187 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
#4150 in Physics (Books)
#8 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#679 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#7-3, 26th published book
AP-Faraday Law replacing Nebular Dust Cloud theory (Physics series for High School Book 3) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
How our Sun and planets that make-up the Solar System, came to be is not the Nebular Dust Cloud theory. Nebular Dust Cloud is a fake theory that posits the remnants of long past supernova explosions creating dust and uniformly spread, and that this dust cloud condensed into forming our Solar System is a silly theory proffered by silly mind's of science. For one, it makes no sense that our Universe has many many supernova explosions and dust clouds spread uniformly in vast regions of the universe to account for all solar systems. Supernova are rare and cannot explain the abundance and uniformity of solar systems. When science has no theory to explain something-- they grab the first silly theory that comes along, no matter how bad it is, for science abhors a vacuum of explanation. What this book offers is a alternative theory of how the Solar System formed that makes logical sense given the observations. I believe the true theory of how the Solar System formed starts around 1977 with Dirac's book "Directions in Physics" with his "new radioactivities". Then that "new radioactivities" is picked up by AP in his Plutonium Atom Totality theory as seed-dots of the electron dot cloud, by 1990. And during the 1990's AP used a mechanism of radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization (rsnm), explaining that particles of energy like neutrons or photons are shot from the Atom Totality Nucleus to increase the mass of astronomy bodies and let them grow larger. But not much else occurred on this theory until 2017. Then by 2017, this new-radioactivities and seed dots and rsnm is further elaborated upon by the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV and the real proton is 840 MeV, and the little particle that J.J. Thomson discovered in 1897 was in fact, Dirac's magnetic monopole at .5MeV. What that discovery lead to in 2018 is the realization that subatomic particles are doing a job, a task, doing work inside of atoms, doing a function inside of atoms, where the proton is a Faraday coil and a muon is a Faraday bar magnet doing the Faraday law in producing-- electricity, magnetic monopoles. As the atoms produce monopoles, the atom itself grows, and increases in size and mass to grow into a new atomic numbered atom, where hydrogen grows into helium, helium grows into lithium, etc etc. So by 2018, we see how atoms grow into newer atoms and thus, the creation and formation and growing of our Solar System is simply the atoms growing inside themselves, from taking the Space they occupy and converting Space via AP-Faraday Law into creating new and more energy, mass, matter, becoming a newer higher atomic element. So we do not need a Nebular Dust Cloud, nor do we need a Big Bang theory.
There is no need for Nebular Dust Clouds. All that is needed is the AP-Faraday Law that converts Space into magnetic monopoles that grows the atom to become a larger heavier atom. And magnetic monopoles are the seed-dot from which an entire planet can be grown, with the start of a new hydrogen atom and that growing into helium, and more monopoles growing into hydrogen, more growing into helium, and helium growing into lithium and on and on.
Cover Picture: Nasa pictures of some of the planets of our Solar System from my computer.
Length: 43 pages
Product details
File Size: 1600 KB
Print Length: 43 pages
Publication Date: March 22, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07NNXZ9Z8
Language: English
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
#7-4, 41st published book
Unification of the 4 Forces of Physics as All being Electromagnetism (Physics series for High School Book 4) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Ever since I discovered the universe was one big atom in 1990 and that this atom was a plutonium atom, I vowed to solve what the unification of the 4 forces of physics was. Those 4 forces in 1990 were 1) Strong Nuclear force, 2) Weak Nuclear force, 3) Electricity/Magnetism force 4) Gravity. In physics, much of the 1900s was spent on finding a unification of those four forces. Most of the famous physicists of the 1900s was dabbling in this desire to unify those 4 forces. Trouble was, hardly anyone trying to unify the four forces of physics had a logical mind to be ever able to do that task. And, sadly, when the history books of physics are written on the topic of unification of the 4 forces of physics, it is not a achievement but rather a whisking away by a broom that sweeps away dust and dirt. There never was 4 forces of physics, all the forces of physics were just electricity and magnetism. If all the forces of physics is electricity and magnetism means there are no 3 other forces to have to unify. And the year was 2017 with AP's 8th edition of Atom Totality Universe that the slow reality was beginning to unfold. And the reasoning is utterly simple and easy. Since the proton is the coil of Faraday's Law and the electron muon is the bar magnet in Faraday's Law, there is no Strong Nuclear Force (see my book AP model of atoms). In addition, with the Faraday Law going on, there is no Weak Nuclear Force for the radioactivity of atoms is mostly the ejection of magnetic monopoles due to Faraday Law. Gravity as 10^-40 weaker than Electromagnetism and with the identical same formula as Coulomb law of EM, means there never was a gravity force apart from electricity and magnetism. Some in Old Physics complain that EM has both attract and repel. But they were wrong on that account also. For there are two concepts-- actual repel and then there is a concept of "denial of same space occupancy". Magnetism and Electricity have no repel force at all. They have a denial of same space occupancy which fools many in science and physics. So what happened in the history of Physics, with their quest to unify the 4 forces, ended in a whimper, where it was seen that the interior of atoms has a Faraday Law of EM going on, which immediately dismisses a Strong Nuclear force and a Weak Nuclear force. And gravity is just a minimal EM attraction force.
So Old Physics had a quest to unify 4 forces, but it turns out, there never was 4 different separate forces.
Cover Picture: My photograph of page 2-10 from The Feynman Lectures on Physics 1963, in which my first understanding that there were 4 forces of physics and how they compared to one another. I do not recall when I saw this, perhaps when 20 years old-- 1970 or thereabouts at the University of Cincinnati. I do remember taking a class in physics where all it was, was watching a film series of Feynman lecturing. I do not recall how many films that was, but I thoroughly enjoyed it. This film series on Feynman occurred at Utah State University circa 1978.
Length: 25 pages
Product details
ASIN : B07QMLMJDN
Publication date : April 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1406 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 26 pages
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #6,866,647 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #773 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #1,994 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,978 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#7-5, 42nd published book
Charge does not exist in Science, what does exist is WIRE-Vector-Direction in electromagnetism//(Physics series for High School Book 5) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
If you ask me from 2010 to 2020 what the worst evil in physics and chemistry was, it would have been easy for me to say "charge" in physics and chemistry. Not only was charge wrong in physics but it kept the illusion and delusion of negative numbers alive in mathematics, with the physics -1 charge. So from about 2010 to 2020, I was desperately wanting to get rid of the physics "charge". To my pleasant surprise, I really could not get rid of physics charge until after 2017, when I discovered the real electron was the muon at 105MeV, not the tiny particle JJ Thomson found in 1897 of 0.5MeV and which Thomson assigned to be the electron of -1 charge. Turns out, what Thomson had found was the Dirac Magnetic Monopole of the 1930s. You see, Thomson found something that would not be known of as a particle until Dirac needed a particle of a magnetic monopole. The charge in physics and chemistry and biology and all other sciences that use electrons, protons and electricity, for the charge is this magnetic monopole. Let me explain this history below in a few chapters.
Cover Picture: Shows some wires on a Galvanometer and also shows some wires as being part of the Lewis Structure in Chemistry, those white arms or tentacles in Lewis theory of Chemistry are wires of magnetic monopole.
Length: 29 pages
Product details
File Size: 1398 KB
Print Length: 29 pages
Publication Date: April 15, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07QSS4HZC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
#7-6, 43rd published book
Doppler redshift (blueshift) has nothing to do with motion of source and cannot tell you distance// (Physics series for High School Book 6) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 29May2021. And this is AP's 43rd book of science published.
Preface:
What the Doppler redshift & blueshift really are-- heat and magnetism shifts of 8 Rings of the proton torus in hydrogen, or any other atom. Old Physics had the interior of atoms all messed-up, not knowing what the real electron of atoms was; and with that messed-up view and understanding and idea of atoms, they would mess-up on what is called the Doppler Redshift of spectral lines of atoms.
Product details
• ASIN : B07QTFYXZL
• Publication date : April 17, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 2177 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Print length : 17 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #227,141 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #81 in Cosmology (Kindle Store)
◦ #332 in Cosmology (Books)
•
#7-7, 53rd published book
Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
Product details
ASIN : B07VMZ698G
Publication date : July 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1801 KB
Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 22 pages
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books)
#7-8, 62nd published book
Elementary Angular-Momentum with Force of Gravity// Angular-Momentum equals Electric Field// Physics series for High School, Book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 14Mar2021. This is AP's 62nd published book of science.
--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------
1) Angular Momentum is one of the most difficult concepts of physics.
2) Strange motion of Uranus and its satellites.
3) UNITS of PHYSICS
4) Linear Momentum
5) Angular Momentum
6) Principle that Angular Momentum is represented by an ellipse.
7) Principle of Gravity
8) Return and Review of the Moons (satellites) of Uranus.
9) Quantum Duality that is Electricity to Magnetism, and that is Angular Momentum with Force of Gravity.
10) Angular-Momentum equals Electric-Field.
Product details
• File Size : 959 KB
• ASIN : B07XT4SP6N
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 16 pages
• Publication Date : September 11, 2019
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Simultaneous Device Usage : Unlimited
• Language: : English
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #171,127 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2 in 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #12 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #21 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
#7-9, 82nd published book
World's first experimental Proof that the Proton rest mass is 840 MeV and the real electron is the muon //Physics series for High School Book 9 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
World's first experimental proof that the real proton rest mass is 840MeV not 938, and the real electron was the muon of 105MeV, that little particle of 0.5MeV that J.J. Thomson discovered in 1897 turns out not to be the electron of atoms but rather the Dirac magnetic monopoles of atoms. The experimental proof comes as a surprise, because most people would think some big physics machine such as CERN would prove the proton is 840MeV. Surprise, because it turns out that the molecule CO and N2, via dissociation energy, proves the proton must be 840 MeV and true electron is the muon at 105MeV.
Alternatively, using hardness, the hardest substance is diamond, and diamond is Lewis 6 structure, not 8. And diamond is a cubic (or rhombus-parallelepiped) for there are 3 axes of which each has 2 magnetic monopoles 3 X 2 = 6 pole bonds. In a Lewis 6 structure, it is not the electrons doing the chemistry bonding but the surface magnetic monopoles and these can only be 6 monopoles to cover the surface on the carbon atom.
Cover Picture are Lewis Structure models of the CO, N2, O2, and H2O molecules. The oxygen atoms are colored orange; the nitrogen atoms are colored blue; the hydrogen atoms are small and colored white with a blue ring around them; the carbon atom is colored black. Notice the unshared dipoles on O2 and H2O. Notice those two magnetic monopoles that are unshared on the O2 molecule and the H2O molecule those unshared dipoles are actually stuck together such as the arc of a magnetic field, although in the picture they are not connected. The magnetism of those end-caps in the picture were not strong enough to stick the two together to form a arc. I suppose I could have gotten a small magnet to stick the two unshared monopoles together. And notice the other two molecules CO and N2 have no unshared dipole or unshared pole. They, CO and N2, are among the strongest chemical bonds that exist and the reason is that they fill completely the Lewis 6 Structure, no unshared pole, magnetic monopole that is.
Product details
File Size: 599 KB
Print Length: 43 pages
Publication Date: January 22, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B0845124DX
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
#7-10, 83rd published book
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Airfoil Lift solved, true theory of how flight is possible///Physics series for High School book 10 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
When I was in High School, in the Cincinnati, Ohio region, I remember reading in "General Science" classrooms of what was the explanation of why planes flew in the sky. Of course, so young of age we never questioned the truth or veracity of such, we accepted it, especially since we are graded on ideas like that. And the picture we saw of how a airplane flies, is a picture of a wing with the air having many lines of pressure under the wing and few lines of pressure over the top of the wing. And then a arrow of lift upwards because the high pressure below the wing lifted the wing and airplane upwards. I do not think it was given the name Bernoulli's law, and I am certain that Newton's law of every action has equal and opposite reaction was not mentioned back then circa 1965 in Ohio classrooms.
But now, fast forward to January 23, 2020 some 55 years later, and to my pleasant surprise, in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN (SA) magazine, their FEB2020 issue starting page 44 is an article titled "The Enigma of Aerodynamic Lift" "No one can completely explain why planes stay in the air" by Ed Regis.
And I had just published a few days earlier in January, two books talking about the fact that the chemistry molecule of O2 that composes 21% of the air, is a polar molecular. Polar molecule just like water, H2O is a polar molecule. A polar molecule is filled with electricity and magnetism, just ready to go into action. And so, reading this SA article, and fresh in mind that O2 is brimming with electricity and magnetism, made me realize-- there is a new and third and better explanation for why airplanes fly. Thus was born the true theory of why planes fly, as you read the text below.
Cover Picture: Is my photo of a Google Search on Bumblebees.
Product details
Publication Date : January 24, 2020
Print Length : 25 pages
Language: : English
ASIN : B0846F1JKP
Word Wise : Enabled
File Size : 964 KB
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #3,363,074 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
◦ #920 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #7,760 in General Technology & Reference
◦ #11,536 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#7-11, 85th published book
Proof Stars shine from Faraday Law, not from fusion // (Physics series for High School book 11) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium
On 30JAN2020, while watching the BBC on TV, was news and video images of the Sun's surface, showing what looks like golden chips, with white flowing magnetism or electricity as the white flowing in between the golden chips. This was exciting, extremely exciting because with this "observational data" I could use it to prove that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion but from Faraday Law of each and every atom inside the Sun having its muons thrust through its attendant proton coil and producing electricity and magnetism via the Faraday and Ampere laws. This is what gives stars their shining outbursts of energy, their starshine or for the sun, sunshine. If star energy was due to fusion, there would be very little light in the universe. There would be no life on Earth. So with the 30 JAN2020 report, I can use those video imagines to actually prove our Sun is a Faraday Law machine, not a fusion machine.
Cover Picture is my photograph of the BBC video image. A BBC quote: "The Daniel K Inouye Solar Telescope on Hawaii has released pictures that show features as small as 30km across."
Product details
File Size: 963 KB
Print Length: 20 pages
Publication Date: January 30, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B084D54TH8
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
#7-12, 87th published book
Photosynthesis // Physics series for High School book 12 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 14Nov2021. This is AP's 87th published book of science.
Preface:
Photosynthesis is big important science, it is the food foundation source for animal life on Earth. It is the science of how plants turn sunlight plus carbon dioxide CO2 gas plus water H2O into carbohydrates (sugar) for which is the basis of the food chain for animals. So here we study and learn how Photosynthesis works. How sunlight energy plus CO2 plus H2O are turned into a sugar carbohydrate of CH2O.
Cover Picture: Is a photo of a Google search for chlorophyll, magnesium, capacitor. The key to understanding how Photosynthesis works is the capacitor of physics, and the magnesium metal atom in chlorophyll forms a capacitor. Do you see that picture of all those balls in a planar sheet? That is a capacitor with the magnesium metal being the ball, and the tail hanging down from the ball are formed-sugars.
Product details
ASIN : B084T8NHXP
Publication date : February 13, 2020
Language : English
File size : 1134 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 36 pages
File size : 1134 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Lending : Enabled
#7-13, 116th published book
Rewrite of all Wave theory of Old Physics // Physics series for High School book 13 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a set of experiments using a high speed motion camera of waves generated on a coil spring in the High School Physics textbook of PSSC, 1971, page 96.
Product details
File Size: 636 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: April 28, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B087TKZ3T9
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #261,678 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
#17 in Electromagnetic Theory
#36 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
#9 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#7-14, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
Preface:
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 31, 2022, 10:21:38 AM3/31/22
to
Dan & Kibo, is that how UCLA teaches these days, preventing them from learning real electron is muon inside a 840MeV proton torus
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
Kibo Parry Moroney replied from Boston's hate channel World std Barry Shein:
Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
By Richard Cranium 1 post 3 views updated 8:30 PM
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 3:09:33 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 3/26/2022 9:32 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science
> >> James Kibo ...
> >
> He will NEVER learn.
> He isn't smart enough to learn. In fact he's STOOOPID as Uncle Al would say.
> He never learned not to attack me.
> He even thinks I'm James Parry.
> >
>>who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.
> >
> >OWN WORDS here:
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan
> >
Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM
Homosexual says Zelos Malum, Markus Hennrich, Carl XVI Gustaf, Tommy Ohlsson, Paul Crutzen, stalker-- Zelos Malum, Can't do proper Calculus, thinks electron is .5MeV when it is Dirac's monopole , Real Proton = 840MeV
On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 5:25:22 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> I call him out cause it is hilarious
Zelos, did you point out to John Stillwell a single cone has 1 axis of symmetry not 2 and so the slant cut is a Oval, never the Ellipse, and he still got it wrong?
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 7:24:59 AM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> all still fucking wrong
On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 6:27:45 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> why would one need to do it geometrically?
Zelos Malum, did you point out to John Stillwell that calculus is geometry, and a geometric proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is demanded, yet he still is too dumb to do one.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:19:30 PM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> We know you're homosexual, why do you need to tell us?
Unplugging Dan Christensen and entire Univ Western Ontario uwo from sci.math as a demented racist defaming poster
John Woods, Mario Bunge, Ted Honderich, Brendan Myers, Joachim Lambek, Carrie Jenkins, Katalin Bimbo, Doug Walton.
Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM
Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard
Amit Chakma (chem engr)
Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang
Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM
Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM
Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021
Re: Dan Christensen says close all math, physics, chemistry dept. in ALL Canadian Colleges with their fake electron (muon is real electron), fake geometry proof of calculus (Old Math sums up 0 width rectangles), fake Lewis 8 Structure (dissociation...
by Giant Radioactive Easter Bunnie Jan 21, 2021, 5:38:37 PM
Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed
by Dan Christensen
Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM
Re: Markus Klyver greatest math fool of Sweden-- thinks an ellipse is a conic section
by
Dan Christensen Aug 2, 2017, 11:52:21 PM
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan
Re: 81,045-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker
by Frank Cassa 12Apr2021 7:00 AM
Re: 7,744-Student victims of Linda Hasenfratz Univ Western Ontario from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz President Alan Shepard
11:53 AM 10Apr2021
by Wayne Decarlo
Re: 102,852-Student victims of Dominic Barton, Univ Waterloo from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Dominic Barton, President Feridun Hamdullahpur physics
by konyberg Apr 15, 2021, 3:09:41 PM
Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus... 0.5MeV electron when in truth it is the muon as the real electron
by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM
Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of
May 10, 2021
by Professor Wordsmith
Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney
Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM
Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle
by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,
Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM
Re: Spamming fuckdog Dan Christensen says fire Stanford's John Lipa, Alexander Fetter, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash our
by Mutt Buncher
Re: 2-fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Dan Christensen, Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP??
Earl Biggs
Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
Earl Biggs
..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan
>
> Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
> Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com
Here is an example of Dan Christensen fumbling with the most simple of logic reasoning, and yet Canada keeps allowing this misfit to dig deeper into logic.
The stupid Dan Christensen always chokes up when it comes to logic or even just plain commonsense with his 2 OR 1 = 3 and his AND as subtraction.
On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>>> PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector
> >>>>
> >>>> The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.
> >>>
> >>> The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."
> >>>
> >>
> >> What a monsterous fool you are
> >>
> >
> > OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.
>
> And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would
> be one) and it is not necessary to say so.
>
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
> > Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
Kibo Parry Moroney replied from Boston's hate channel World std Barry Shein:
Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
By Richard Cranium 1 post 3 views updated 8:30 PM
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 3:09:33 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 3/26/2022 9:32 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science
> >> James Kibo ...
> >
> He will NEVER learn.
> He isn't smart enough to learn. In fact he's STOOOPID as Uncle Al would say.
> He never learned not to attack me.
> He even thinks I'm James Parry.
> >
>>who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.
> >
> >OWN WORDS here:
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan
> >
Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM
Homosexual says Zelos Malum, Markus Hennrich, Carl XVI Gustaf, Tommy Ohlsson, Paul Crutzen, stalker-- Zelos Malum, Can't do proper Calculus, thinks electron is .5MeV when it is Dirac's monopole , Real Proton = 840MeV
On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 5:25:22 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> I call him out cause it is hilarious
Zelos, did you point out to John Stillwell a single cone has 1 axis of symmetry not 2 and so the slant cut is a Oval, never the Ellipse, and he still got it wrong?
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 7:24:59 AM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> all still fucking wrong
On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 6:27:45 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> why would one need to do it geometrically?
Zelos Malum, did you point out to John Stillwell that calculus is geometry, and a geometric proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is demanded, yet he still is too dumb to do one.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:19:30 PM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> We know you're homosexual, why do you need to tell us?
Unplugging Dan Christensen and entire Univ Western Ontario uwo from sci.math as a demented racist defaming poster
John Woods, Mario Bunge, Ted Honderich, Brendan Myers, Joachim Lambek, Carrie Jenkins, Katalin Bimbo, Doug Walton.
Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM
Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard
Amit Chakma (chem engr)
Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang
Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM
Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM
Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021
Re: Dan Christensen says close all math, physics, chemistry dept. in ALL Canadian Colleges with their fake electron (muon is real electron), fake geometry proof of calculus (Old Math sums up 0 width rectangles), fake Lewis 8 Structure (dissociation...
by Giant Radioactive Easter Bunnie Jan 21, 2021, 5:38:37 PM
Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed
by Dan Christensen
Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM
Re: Markus Klyver greatest math fool of Sweden-- thinks an ellipse is a conic section
by
Dan Christensen Aug 2, 2017, 11:52:21 PM
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan
Re: 81,045-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker
by Frank Cassa 12Apr2021 7:00 AM
Re: 7,744-Student victims of Linda Hasenfratz Univ Western Ontario from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz President Alan Shepard
11:53 AM 10Apr2021
by Wayne Decarlo
Re: 102,852-Student victims of Dominic Barton, Univ Waterloo from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Dominic Barton, President Feridun Hamdullahpur physics
by konyberg Apr 15, 2021, 3:09:41 PM
Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus... 0.5MeV electron when in truth it is the muon as the real electron
by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM
Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of
May 10, 2021
by Professor Wordsmith
Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney
Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM
Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle
by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,
Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM
Re: Spamming fuckdog Dan Christensen says fire Stanford's John Lipa, Alexander Fetter, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash our
by Mutt Buncher
Re: 2-fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Dan Christensen, Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP??
Earl Biggs
Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
Earl Biggs
..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Christensen,I am such a stupid insane imp of math and logic that I thought a vertex has a derivative, that distinct means not-distinct, and that 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. And I love spam reading of vvgra and tomato hello, and I am a failure of academics and so I spend most days making out hate-lists of people who actually succeed in science for my pea sized brain is envious and jealous of those who succeed in science yet I failed in science.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'
Here is an example of where Dan Christensen seems to act out his classroom fantasies, and whether he is a threat to students along with being a bully in sci.math.
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan
>
> Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
> Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com
Here is an example of Dan Christensen fumbling with the most simple of logic reasoning, and yet Canada keeps allowing this misfit to dig deeper into logic.
The stupid Dan Christensen always chokes up when it comes to logic or even just plain commonsense with his 2 OR 1 = 3 and his AND as subtraction.
On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>>> PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector
> >>>>
> >>>> The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.
> >>>
> >>> The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."
> >>>
> >>
> >> What a monsterous fool you are
> >>
> >
> > OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.
>
> And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would
> be one) and it is not necessary to say so.
>
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
> > Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 3, 2022, 3:50:42 PM4/3/22
to
Terence Tao and NSF Dr. Panchanathan, how much do you pay Kibo Parry Moron to stalk AP for 30 years nonstop, is it more than 0 dollars???
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 2:00:15 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "little stinker"
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. AP no longer tolerates insane stalkers like Kibo no matter where they are located. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.
Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
Books
Videos
Green–Tao theorem · Paul Erdős · Fields Medal · Elias M. Stein
Did Terence Tao take an IQ test?
PREVIEW
11:13
The Test That Terence Tao Aced at Age 7
YouTube · Tibees
Jul 15, 2021
PREVIEW
12:19
Trying to read the books Terence Tao read as a child
YouTube · Tibees
Jul 28, 2021
8 key moments in this video
View all
Web results
Terence Tao : Awards | Carnegie Corporation of New Yorkhttps://www.carnegie.org › awards › honoree › terence-...
Called the “Mozart of Math” by fellow mathematicians, Terence Tao was born in Adelaide, Australia, to parents who had immigrated there from Hong Kong.
Nationality: Australia
Terence Tao from www.masterclass.com
Terence Tao - Simons Foundationhttps://www.simonsfoundation.org › people › terence-tao
Terry Tao is one of the most universal, penetrating and prolific mathematicians in the world. In over 200 publications (in just 15 years) spanning ...
Terence Tao from www.simonsfoundation.org
Terence Tao | Australian mathematician - Encyclopedia ...https://www.britannica.com › Science › Mathematics
Terence Tao, (born July 17, 1975, Adelaide, Australia), Australian mathematician awarded a Fields Medal in 2006 “for his contributions to partial ...
Born: July 17, 1975, Adelaide
Education: Princeton University
Related searches
terence tao (iq)
terence tao net worth
terence tao laura tao
terence tao masterclass
terence tao blog
terence tao google scholar
terence tao wife
terence tao age
Page Navigation
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 2:00:15 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "little stinker"
> fails at math and science:
>"barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. AP no longer tolerates insane stalkers like Kibo no matter where they are located. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.
Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>
About 3,680,000 results (0.65 seconds)
>
Search Results
Terence Tao
Australian-American mathematician
Overview
Education
Awards
Terence Tao
Australian-American mathematician
Overview
Education
Books
Videos
Main Results
Images
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Images
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
Image result for Terence Tao
More images
Web results
Terence Tao - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Terence_Tao
Terence "Terry" Chi-Shen Tao FAA FRS (born 17 July 1975) is an Australian-American mathematician. He is a professor of mathematics at the University of ...
Fields: Mathematics
Web results
Terence Tao - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Terence_Tao
Terence "Terry" Chi-Shen Tao FAA FRS (born 17 July 1975) is an Australian-American mathematician. He is a professor of mathematics at the University of ...
Fields: Mathematics
Known for: Green–Tao theorem; Erdős discrep...
Thesis: Three Regularity Results in Harmonic ...
Doctoral students: Monica Vișan
Thesis: Three Regularity Results in Harmonic ...
Green–Tao theorem · Paul Erdős · Fields Medal · Elias M. Stein
Did Terence Tao take an IQ test?
Why is Terence Tao a genius?
What did Terence Tao discover?
What did Terence Tao discover?
Feedback
Terence Tao - UCLA Mathematicshttps://www.math.ucla.edu › ~tao
I am a Professor at the Department of Mathematics ;, UCLA ;. I work in a number of mathematical areas, but primarily in harmonic analysis ;, PDE ;, geometric ...
Terence Tao from www.math.ucla.edu
Terence Tao - UCLA Mathematicshttps://www.math.ucla.edu › ~tao
I am a Professor at the Department of Mathematics ;, UCLA ;. I work in a number of mathematical areas, but primarily in harmonic analysis ;, PDE ;, geometric ...
Terence Tao from www.math.ucla.edu
Terry Tao - WordPress.comhttps://terrytao.wordpress.com
Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Tao.
Career advice · About · On writing · Books
Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Tao.
Career advice · About · On writing · Books
Videos
PREVIEW
2:10
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking | Official Trailer ...
YouTube · MasterClass
Jan 27, 2022
PREVIEW
2:10
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking | Official Trailer ...
YouTube · MasterClass
PREVIEW
11:13
The Test That Terence Tao Aced at Age 7
YouTube · Tibees
Jul 15, 2021
PREVIEW
Trying to read the books Terence Tao read as a child
YouTube · Tibees
Jul 28, 2021
8 key moments in this video
View all
Web results
Terence Tao : Awards | Carnegie Corporation of New Yorkhttps://www.carnegie.org › awards › honoree › terence-...
Called the “Mozart of Math” by fellow mathematicians, Terence Tao was born in Adelaide, Australia, to parents who had immigrated there from Hong Kong.
Nationality: Australia
Terence Tao from www.carnegie.org
The Singular Mind of Terry Tao - The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com › 2015/07/26 › magazine › th...
Jul 26, 2015 — Three years later, at age 10, Tao became the youngest person in history to win a medal in the International Mathematical Olympiad. He has since ...
Terence Tao from www.nytimes.com
Terence Tao - Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com › citations
Terence Tao. Professor of Mathematics, UCLA ... EJ Candès, J Romberg, T Tao ... J Colliander, M Keel, G Staffilani, H Takaoka, T Tao.
The Singular Mind of Terry Tao - The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com › 2015/07/26 › magazine › th...
Jul 26, 2015 — Three years later, at age 10, Tao became the youngest person in history to win a medal in the International Mathematical Olympiad. He has since ...
Terence Tao from www.nytimes.com
Terence Tao - Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com › citations
Terence Tao. Professor of Mathematics, UCLA ... EJ Candès, J Romberg, T Tao ... J Colliander, M Keel, G Staffilani, H Takaoka, T Tao.
Terence Tao Teaches Mathematical Thinking - MasterClasshttps://www.masterclass.com › classes › terence-tao-teac...
World-renowned mathematician Dr. Terence Tao teaches you his approach to everyday problem-solving—without complex equations or formulas.
Terence Tao from www.masterclass.com
Terence Tao - Simons Foundationhttps://www.simonsfoundation.org › people › terence-tao
Terry Tao is one of the most universal, penetrating and prolific mathematicians in the world. In over 200 publications (in just 15 years) spanning ...
Terence Tao from www.simonsfoundation.org
Terence Tao | Australian mathematician - Encyclopedia ...https://www.britannica.com › Science › Mathematics
Terence Tao, (born July 17, 1975, Adelaide, Australia), Australian mathematician awarded a Fields Medal in 2006 “for his contributions to partial ...
Born: July 17, 1975, Adelaide
Education: Princeton University
terence tao (iq)
terence tao net worth
terence tao laura tao
terence tao masterclass
terence tao blog
terence tao google scholar
terence tao wife
terence tao age
Page Navigation
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 4, 2022, 3:20:27 AM4/4/22
to
James 'Kibo' Parry's profile photo
James 'Kibo' Parry
,
4
Large Primes
James Kibo Parry new book-- Why Putin failed in Ukraine. Why Kibo Parry? Because he used tanks that
1:31 AM
James Kibo Parry's profile photo
James Kibo Parry
, …
11
By the way
General Paul Nakasone duet William J. Burns singing in B minor at CIA concert Hall, singing "
12:32 AM
James Kibo Parry's profile photo
James Kibo Parry
23
crancks & loonies
Harvard's Lisa Randall and NSF Dr. Panchanathan needs a Counterpoint on her 1st page Google
12:24 AM
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 4, 2022, 11:30:26 AM4/4/22
to
James Kibo Parry 1st page Counterpoint for Terence Tao, UCLA. Why Kibo? Because Terry is too dumb to admit slant cut in single cone is always a Oval, never the ellipse? Or because he is too stupid in math to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
James Kibo Parry's 1st page Counterpoint for Harry Cliff of Univ Cambridge-- too dumb to ask the question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle
Large Primes
James Kibo Parry new book-- Why Putin failed in Ukraine. Why Kibo Parry? Because he used tanks that
1:31 AM
James Kibo Parry's profile photo
James Kibo Parry
11
By the way
General Paul Nakasone duet William J. Burns singing in B minor at CIA concert Hall, singing "
12:32 AM
James Kibo Parry's profile photo
James Kibo Parry
, …
By the way
General Paul Nakasone duet William J. Burns singing in B minor at CIA concert Hall, singing "
12:32 AM
James Kibo Parry's profile photo
James Kibo Parry
23
crancks & loonies
Harvard's Lisa Randall and NSF Dr. Panchanathan needs a Counterpoint on her 1st page Google
12:24 AM
,
crancks & loonies
Harvard's Lisa Randall and NSF Dr. Panchanathan needs a Counterpoint on her 1st page Google
12:24 AM
Michael Moroney
7
128th book by AP//Research Notebook: Earth has perhaps 1-10 million years, before it is broiled by the Sun RED GIANT phase// consequence of starshine is Faraday law, not fusion// Astronomy series, book 1 by Archimedes Plutonium
> Cambridge's Harry Cliff and NSF Dr. Panchanathan, how much do you pay Kibo Parry Moron to stalk AP for 30 years nonstop, is it more than 0 dollars???
>
> HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Print Length : 17 pages
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-4, 105th published book
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
> Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
>
> Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> Length: 39 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> • Print Length : 39 pages
> • File Size : 935 KB
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
>
> Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> Length: 39 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> • Print Length : 39 pages
> • File Size : 935 KB
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
> #1-5, 112th published book
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
> #1-5, 112th published book
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Publication date : April 15, 2020
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 20 pages
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
>
> QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> • Publication date : September 25, 2020
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> • Language : English
> • File size : 587 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 25 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-8, 1st published book
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
> Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> Length: 632 pages
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1132 KB
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> Language: English
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
>
>
> #1-9, 163rd published book
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
>
>
> Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
>
>
> Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
> • Publication date : December 15, 2021
> • Language : English
> • File size : 999 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 60 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
>
> #1-10, 161st published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> Length: 64 pages
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 790 KB
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Print Length : 64 pages
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Publication date : November 29, 2020
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 682 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 78 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> • Language : English
> • File size : 794 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 123 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
>
>
> #2-4, 151st published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
>
>
> #2-4, 151st published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
>
> Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> • Publication date : October 19, 2021
>
> Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> • Language : English
> • File size : 1035 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 386 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
>
>
>
> #2-5, 174th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
>
> Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B09TKL4HMC
> • Publication date : February 27, 2022
> • Language : English
> • File size : 675 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 41 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
>
> #2-6, 177th published book
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
>
> Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B09VFH9QST
> • Publication date : March 12, 2022
> • Language : English
> • File size : 823 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 74 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
>
> #2-7, 178th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
>
>
> Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
>
> The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
>
> Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B09W58XGDW
> • Publication date : March 21, 2022
> • Language : English
> • File size : 824 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 66 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
>
>
> #2-9, 161st published book
>
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> Edward Witten needs a Balanced Google Search with Counterpoint in his first page, just as the science failure Arindam Banerjee has counterpoints in first page of a Google Search list. Witten has millions of sugar coated nonsense about Witten for in truth of fact, he is a failure of physics and math.
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
> Google Search hits on Ed Witten, Princeton, a failed physicist and mathematician with his ellipse a conic section, his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, his never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, his stupid mind never able to ask the simple question-- which is the atom's true electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
> We need Google Search to always have a Counterpoint to any person on the first page, instead of this ugly horrible propaganda of Mister-Miss goody two shoe. For Google Search is Journalism and like PBS Newshour with Judy Woodruff striving for Balanced reporting, not sugar coated propaganda.
>
>
> On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 4:47:22 AM UTC-5, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > The subject of this thread is not about your attempts at physics, for you fail physics. This is obvious a decade ago with your 1/2 m*v^2* k where you cannot even understand the prime rudimentary physics of units.
> > Archie poor chap...
>
> About 2,600,000 results (0.64 seconds)
> Search Results
>
> Edward Witten
> American mathematical physicist
> Overview
> Education
> Books
> Awards
> Interviews
> Videos
> Main Results
> Images
> Image result for edward witten
> Image result for edward witten
> Image result for edward witten
> Image result for edward witten
> More images
> Web results
>
> Edward Witten - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Edward_Witten
> Edward Witten (born August 26, 1951) is an American mathematical and theoretical physicist. He is the Charles Simonyi Professor in the School of Natural ...
> Fields: Theoretical physics; Mathematical phys...
> Thesis: Some Problems in the Short Distance ...
> Doctoral students: Jonathan Bagger (1983); C...
> Doctoral advisor: David Gross
> Louis Witten · Daniela Witten · Ilana B. Witten · Chiara Nappi
> edward witten from en.wikipedia.org
> People also ask
> What did Edward Witten discover?
> Who is the smartest physicist alive today?
> Who is the greatest living physicist?
> What is Edward Witten doing now?
> Feedback
>
> EDWARD WITTEN - School of Natural Sciences - Institute ...https://www.ias.edu › sns › witten
> EDWARD WITTEN · Reflections on the Fate of Spacetime · Duality, Spacetime and Quantum Mechanics · Magic, Mystery, and Matrix · The Holes are Defined by the String ...
> edward witten from www.ias.edu
> Videos
>
> PREVIEW
> 15:44
> Edward Witten - How Do Scientific Breakthroughs Happen?
> YouTube · Closer To Truth
> Mar 13, 2021
> 7 key moments in this video
> From 00:49
> Something specific at the time that excited you to make that transition
> From 00:59
> Early discoveries of elementary particles
> From 01:38
> Asymptotic freedom and the last big breakthrough
> From 04:18
> What was your main interest as a graduate student?
> From 05:27
> What was your journey?
> From 08:20
> A series of magical turns of events
> From 12:42
> It ` s 1 thing in physics to write down the equations
>
> PREVIEW
> 6:37
> Edward Witten - How is Mathematics Truth and Beauty?
> YouTube · Closer To Truth
> Apr 27, 2020
> 8 key moments in this video
>
> PREVIEW
> 39:23
> Edward Witten - Complex Metrics on Spacetime
> YouTube · Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques (IHÉS)
> Oct 18, 2021
> 5 key moments in this video
> View all
>
> Edward Witten - Scholars | Institute for Advanced Studyhttps://www.ias.edu › scholars › witten
> Edward Witten's work exhibits a unique combination of mathematical power and physics insight, and his contributions have significantly enriched both fields.
> edward witten from www.ias.edu
>
> A Physicist's Physicist Ponders the Nature of Reality ...https://www.quantamagazine.org › Q&A
> Nov 28, 2017 — Edward Witten reflects on the meaning of dualities in physics and math, emergent space-time, and the pursuit of a complete description of ...
> edward witten from www.quantamagazine.org
>
> Edward Witten | American mathematical physicist | Britannicahttps://www.britannica.com › Science › Mathematics
> Edward Witten, (born August 26, 1951, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.), American mathematical physicist who was awarded the Fields Medal in 1990 for his work in ...
> Education: Brandeis University, Princeton Univ...
> Born: August 26, 1951, Baltimore
> edward witten from www.britannica.com
>
> NOVA | The Elegant Universe | Edward Witten | PBShttps://www.pbs.org › nova › elegant › view-witten
> Many physicists consider Ed Witten to be Einstein's true successor. A mathematical physicist at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, ...
>
> Edward Witten (1951 - ) - Biographyhttps://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk › Biographies › W...
> Edward Witten is an American mathematician who won a Fields Medal for his work on quantum field theory. Thumbnail of Edward Witten View five larger pictures ...
> Education: Princeton, Brandeis University
> edward witten from mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk
>
> nLab Edward Wittenhttps://ncatlab.org › nlab › show › Edward+Witten
> Witten's work originates in theoretical quantum field theory and stands out as making numerous and deep connections between that and mathematical geometry and ...
> edward witten from ncatlab.org
>
> Edward Witten - Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com › citations
> E Witten. Communications in Mathematical Physics 121 (3), 351-399, 1989. 6003, 1989. String theory and noncommutative geometry. N Seiberg, E Witten.
>
> Edward Witten Biography - Life of American Mathematicianhttps://totallyhistory.com › edward-witten
> Edward is also a researcher in quantum gravity, string theory, and other areas of mathematical physics. Apart from his great contribution in physics, Witten's ...
>
> John Baez needs a Balanced Google Search with Counterpoint in his first page, just as the science failure James McGinn and Jim Pennino and have counterpoints in first page of a Google Search
>
>
> Google Search hits on John Baez UCR, a failed physicist and mathematician with his ellipse a conic section, his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, his never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, his stupid mind never able to ask the simple question-- which is the atom's true electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
> So why is a stupid idiot of math and physics like John Baez given millions of Google Search hits all in wow and awe, with no COUNTERPOINT in all those millions of search hits of Google. This is unfair journalism that Google practices, where they sugarcoat propaganda on failures of science.
>
> Just look at the science failure McGinn and he has a Counterpoint on his first page of a Google Search of James McGinn, but not Baez. Does Google let Baez edit his own Search list???????
>
> On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 9:00:44 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
> Re: revealing the asshole hiding within
> > Only a moron would submit references without an argument.
> > Answer yes or no.
> On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 6:31:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote: his front page hogging spam
>
> About 21,100,000 results (0.61 seconds)
> Search Results
>
> John Baez's Stuff - UCR Mathhttps://math.ucr.edu › home › baez
> I'm a mathematical physicist. I work at the math department at U. C. Riverside in California, and also at the Centre for Quantum Technologies in Singapore and ...
> This Week's Finds · Diary - December 2021 · Serious Stuff · Fun Stuff
>
> John C. Baez - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › John_C
> John Carlos Baez is an American mathematical physicist and a professor of mathematics at the University of California, Riverside (UCR) in Riverside, ...
> Thesis: Conformally Invariant Quantum Fields ...
> Fields: Mathematics, mathematical physics
> Born: John Carlos Baez; June 12, 1961 (age 6...
> Early life and education · Career · Blogs · Selected publications
> Twitter Results
>
> John Carlos Baez (@johncarlosbaez) · Twitter
> https://twitter.com/johncarlosbaez
> When Kenny Courser and I invented "structured cospans" - a category-theoretic framework for open systems - I never dreamed I'd be seeing them in code on GitHub only a few years later! But @ejpatters and @fairbanksjp took them seriously. (1/n) pic.twitter.com/TMtf4Ob…
> Twitter · 3 days ago
>
> Azimuth - WordPress.comhttps://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com
> John Baez, Owen Lynch and Joe Moeller, Compositional thermostatics. In Part 1, we went over our definition of thermostatic system: it's a convex space X ...
> Videos
>
>
> PREVIEW
> 1:24:47
> John Baez: "Mathematics in the 21st century"
> YouTube · Topos Institute
> Mar 26, 2021
>
> 10 key moments in this video
>
>
> PREVIEW
> 22:00
> John Baez - Categories: the Mathematics of Connection ...
> YouTube · Institute for Pure & Applied Mathematics (IPAM)
> 1 month ago
>
> 8 key moments in this video
>
> 28:42
> John Baez: "Symmetric Monoidal Categories A Rosetta Stone"
> YouTube · Topos Institute
> May 26, 2021
>
> 10 key moments in this video
> Feedback
> View all
>
> nLab John Baezhttps://ncatlab.org › nlab › show › John+Baez
> I work on mathematical physics — which I interpret broadly as 'math that could be of interest in physics, and physics that could be of interest in math'.
>
> John Baez - Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com › citations
> John Baez. Professor of Mathematics, University of California, Riverside. Verified email at ucr.edu - Homepage · mathematical physics.
>
> John Baez's articles on arXivhttps://arxiv.org › baez_j_1
> Authors: John C. Baez. Subjects: Mathematical Physics (math-ph); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); ...
>
>
>
>
> Physics failures Sheldon Glashow,Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,Peter Higgs, ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
> Can failed physicists with their mindless 0.5MeV particle traveling at 99% speed of light outside a 938MeV proton ever stay together, where AP says the true electron is the muon stuck INSIDE a proton torus of 840MeV doing the Faraday law-- do physicists Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane have to be failures all their life and never ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
>
> Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> Arthur B. McDonald
> Francois Englert
> Saul Perlmutter
> Brian P. Schmidt
> Adam G. Riess
> Makoto Kobayashi
> Toshihide Maskawa
> Yoichiro Nambu
> John C. Mather
> George F. Smoot
> Roy J. Glauber
> David J. Gross
> Hugh David Politzer
> Frank Wilczek
> Raymond Davis Jr.
> Masatoshi Koshiba
> Riccardo Giacconi
> Gerardus 't Hooft
> Martinus J.G. Veltman
> Jerome I. Friedman
> Henry W. Kendall
> Richard E. Taylor
> Carlo Rubbia
> Simon van der Meer
> William Alfred Fowler
> Kenneth G. Wilson
> James Watson Cronin
> Val Logsdon Fitch
> Sheldon Lee Glashow
> Steven Weinberg
> .
> .
> little fishes
> .
> .
> Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
>
> Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> more and more layers of error thinking physics
> .
> .
> John Baez
> Brian Greene
> Lisa Randall
> Alan H. Guth
> Michael E. Brown
> Konstantin Batygin
> Ben Bullock
> Larry Harson
> Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> Edward Witten
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 4, 2022, 3:57:47 PM4/4/22
to
2-James Kibo Parry 1st page Counterpoint for Terence Tao, UCLA. Why Kibo? Because Terry is too dumb to admit slant cut in single cone is always a Oval, never the ellipse? Or because he is too stupid in math to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
Geometry of the Chemical Bond; metallic, covalent, ionic//Chemistry Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
This is the second book of the Series -- True Chemistry. I left off of True Chemistry with trying to solve the Chemical bond when the proton and muon inside of each and every atom is doing the Faraday Law. And since that book was already 1154 pages long, I decided to start afresh in a second book devoted to solving the Geometry of the chemical bond of metallic, covalent and ionic.
Cover Picture: PHYSICS: Part 2: Extended Version: Halliday & Resnick, 1986, pages 654, 655 talking about Capacitors and my collection of some capacitors in my lab. The first one is a two prong wall plug taken apart to show what the prongs fasten onto when plugged-in (two parallel plates). The next three are spade and socket connectors (two parallel plates). Next is circular or hook plates, and last is a cylinder plate and socket.
Length: 134 pages
Product details
Print Length : 134 pages
Publication Date : June 21, 2019
Word Wise : Enabled
ASIN : B07TCVBD93
File Size : 1308 KB
Simultaneous Device Usage : Unlimited
Animal-CO2 of the 3 CO2 isomers// Chemistry Series, book 3
This is very important chemistry science for it impacts Global Warming but also hugely impacts biology because plants can only live on animal-CO2 and the fire-CO2 is a toxic poison to plants, much like CO is a toxic poison to animals.
Here we learn new facts about the molecules CO, N2, CO2, O2 and even H2O, new facts we never understood before, all because the real electron is the muon stuck inside a proton doing the Faraday Law and that chemical bonding is governed not by electrons but by Dirac magnetic monopoles, and that makes the Lewis structure be based on 6 not 8.
New concepts in chemistry: Lewis structure based on 6, not 8, and the unshared dipole. For a Lewis Structure based on 6, not 8, is the only logical way that the strongest bonded molecules end up being CO and N2. With a Lewis 8 Structure, the strongest bonded molecules, by logic, note, by logic would have to be O2 and FH or possibly FB. However, the proof is that bond dissociation energy of CO is the highest, proving Lewis 6 Structure is the true structure of Chemistry.
source: chem.ucsb.edu
in kJ/mol
CO 1076
N2 946
CO2 532
O2 498
C2 as in diamond is 602 kJ/mol
H2O = 492
OH = 425
H2 = 432
Cover Picture is a winter stored potted clover that I am experimenting with and shows a animal-CO2 molecule going in, and going out is a O2 molecule that animals need to breathe.
Length: 15 pages
Product details
ASIN : B084217LB9
Publication date : January 19, 2020
Language : English
File size : 1042 KB
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #277,873 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #9 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#3-4, 38th published book
Hypothesis that Tar restores the Iron in Rust, back to the iron metal object// Chemistry series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Back in 2003 I noticed that while working on my roof, that when I pulled off tar on steel, that the steel was shiny bright iron with no rust while all around where no tar was, was much rust. So that started me to think whether tar acts as a chemical reaction in which it takes the iron atoms out of rust and places those iron-atoms-back-into-the-iron-object. Now that was 2003, and I have not had much time to really dive into experiments on this topic. For one reason-- I have to wait years for the tar to dissolve the rust and perhaps return the iron from iron oxide back into the original iron object. No, I do not have years and I was far too busy with other items of science. But now I plan to do more on this subject. Especially since in 2017 I discovered the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV and real proton is 840MeV, casting brand new light on chemistry and chemical reactions. The iron rust molecule Fe2O3 in New Chemistry where the .5MeV particle is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole, has to be reviewed in terms of this new found knowledge, and whether or not, tar can return the Fe2 back to the original metal object.
Picture cover: About 5 years ago this hammer and trowel were both iron rusted surfaces, both had iron rust, the trowel worse than the hammer. I put tar on the trowel rusty surface and today with a chisel removed some tar and see the shiny bright iron surface. I suppose if I had coated the hammer back then when I coated the trowel, the hammer would also be bright shiny iron. So the tar must have done something to not only remove the rust but restore the trowel to "more iron bright shiny surface", some claim (see below in text) that the tar only lifted the rust off the iron surface. I think there is more to it than just adhesion lift, and am thinking the tar takes the iron atoms out of iron oxide and puts the iron atoms back into the original iron object. So this is not a proof by any means, but a hypothesis, and a request for more research.
Length: 32 pages
File Size: 2655 KB
Print Length: 32 pages
Publication Date: April 9, 2019
#3-5, 119th published book
The 2 Chemistry Periodic Tables of Elements, one based on magnetic monopole S,P,D,F and one a Nuclear Table based on torus geometry of 6
by Archimedes Plutonium (Kindle edition)
Preface:
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real true electron of atoms was the muon and this muon is stuck inside its attendant proton torus. The muon is of 105MeV while the proton is 840 MeV. The particle that JJ Thomson in 1897 discovered was not the electron of atoms but instead was the Dirac magnetic monopole. Such a huge mistake throughout all of chemistry and physics, to think the electron was 0.5MeV orbiting around outside a proton of 938MeV breaks even the angular momentum concept of physics, for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5 MeV particle traveling at 99.9% the speed of light around a 938MeV particle just will not stay together. And besides, in that Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom, their subatomic particles have no function, no job, no task, nothing. In that viewpoint of the atom, there must be a second Periodic Table of Chemical Elements that takes into account the true geometry of the atom. That geometry is based on protons forming a torus and the nucleus of the atom is the donut hole and parallel plate capacitor covering top and bottom of the proton torus composed of neutrons.
We keep the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements based on magnetic monopoles, the 0.5MeV particle and causing S,P,D,F orbitals. We keep that table, but we now include a second table based on the torus structure of protons of atoms.
Cover Picture: artwork of what a Periodic Table of Chemical Elements based on 6, looks like.
Product details
ASIN : B0891TTP29
Publication date : May 21, 2020 revised in 2022
Language : English
File size : 1081 KB
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #4,312,406 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2,251 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #15,495 in General Chemistry
#3-6, 123rd published book
World's first logical teaching of 6.*10^23, Avogadro's number and "mole"; refurbished with "hyasys" as 6.18*10^23 // Chemistry series, book 6
Cover Picture is page 448-9 of PSSC Physics, 3rd ed., 1971, Haber-Schaim, Cross, Dodge, Walter, explaining how Rutherford in 1919 weighed the mass of the proton in a experiment. It is disheartening to find I cannot see that experiment in a Google search because of another famous experiment of Rutherford of the gold leaf. And lucky for me that I retrieved this PSSC book I used in High School circa 1967-8 that explains how the proton mass was weighed in physics history. The mass of the proton is vital to understand the mole and Avogadro's number concept. Sad of course that every Old Chemistry and Old Physics textbooks that teaches the concept mole and Avogadro number never mentions the proton mass as crucial to understanding.
Length: 70 pages
Product details
File Size : 796 KB
Publication Date : June 10, 2020
Word Wise : Enabled
Print Length : 70 pages
Language: : English
ASIN : B08B1GCRDH
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #233,083 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #68 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #69 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #425 in General Chemistry
#3-1, 2nd published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#3-2, 50th published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
Geometry of the Chemical Bond; metallic, covalent, ionic//Chemistry Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
This is the second book of the Series -- True Chemistry. I left off of True Chemistry with trying to solve the Chemical bond when the proton and muon inside of each and every atom is doing the Faraday Law. And since that book was already 1154 pages long, I decided to start afresh in a second book devoted to solving the Geometry of the chemical bond of metallic, covalent and ionic.
Cover Picture: PHYSICS: Part 2: Extended Version: Halliday & Resnick, 1986, pages 654, 655 talking about Capacitors and my collection of some capacitors in my lab. The first one is a two prong wall plug taken apart to show what the prongs fasten onto when plugged-in (two parallel plates). The next three are spade and socket connectors (two parallel plates). Next is circular or hook plates, and last is a cylinder plate and socket.
Length: 134 pages
Product details
Print Length : 134 pages
Publication Date : June 21, 2019
Word Wise : Enabled
ASIN : B07TCVBD93
File Size : 1308 KB
Language: : English
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Simultaneous Device Usage : Unlimited
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
#3-3, 81st published book
Lending : Enabled
Animal-CO2 of the 3 CO2 isomers// Chemistry Series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
CO2 molecule has 3 isomers. An isomer means same chemical formula but different geometries. The 3 isomers of CO2 come from fire-CO2 and animal-CO2. The fire-CO2 has the carbon atom as central in the molecule and one of the oxygen atoms has a unshared dipole. The animal-CO2 has the carbon atom on the periphery with an unshared dipole.
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
This is very important chemistry science for it impacts Global Warming but also hugely impacts biology because plants can only live on animal-CO2 and the fire-CO2 is a toxic poison to plants, much like CO is a toxic poison to animals.
Here we learn new facts about the molecules CO, N2, CO2, O2 and even H2O, new facts we never understood before, all because the real electron is the muon stuck inside a proton doing the Faraday Law and that chemical bonding is governed not by electrons but by Dirac magnetic monopoles, and that makes the Lewis structure be based on 6 not 8.
New concepts in chemistry: Lewis structure based on 6, not 8, and the unshared dipole. For a Lewis Structure based on 6, not 8, is the only logical way that the strongest bonded molecules end up being CO and N2. With a Lewis 8 Structure, the strongest bonded molecules, by logic, note, by logic would have to be O2 and FH or possibly FB. However, the proof is that bond dissociation energy of CO is the highest, proving Lewis 6 Structure is the true structure of Chemistry.
source: chem.ucsb.edu
in kJ/mol
CO 1076
N2 946
CO2 532
O2 498
C2 as in diamond is 602 kJ/mol
H2O = 492
OH = 425
H2 = 432
Cover Picture is a winter stored potted clover that I am experimenting with and shows a animal-CO2 molecule going in, and going out is a O2 molecule that animals need to breathe.
Length: 15 pages
Product details
ASIN : B084217LB9
Publication date : January 19, 2020
Language : English
File size : 1042 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 15 pages
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #277,873 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #9 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #297 in Biology (Kindle Store)
#3-4, 38th published book
Hypothesis that Tar restores the Iron in Rust, back to the iron metal object// Chemistry series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Back in 2003 I noticed that while working on my roof, that when I pulled off tar on steel, that the steel was shiny bright iron with no rust while all around where no tar was, was much rust. So that started me to think whether tar acts as a chemical reaction in which it takes the iron atoms out of rust and places those iron-atoms-back-into-the-iron-object. Now that was 2003, and I have not had much time to really dive into experiments on this topic. For one reason-- I have to wait years for the tar to dissolve the rust and perhaps return the iron from iron oxide back into the original iron object. No, I do not have years and I was far too busy with other items of science. But now I plan to do more on this subject. Especially since in 2017 I discovered the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV and real proton is 840MeV, casting brand new light on chemistry and chemical reactions. The iron rust molecule Fe2O3 in New Chemistry where the .5MeV particle is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole, has to be reviewed in terms of this new found knowledge, and whether or not, tar can return the Fe2 back to the original metal object.
Picture cover: About 5 years ago this hammer and trowel were both iron rusted surfaces, both had iron rust, the trowel worse than the hammer. I put tar on the trowel rusty surface and today with a chisel removed some tar and see the shiny bright iron surface. I suppose if I had coated the hammer back then when I coated the trowel, the hammer would also be bright shiny iron. So the tar must have done something to not only remove the rust but restore the trowel to "more iron bright shiny surface", some claim (see below in text) that the tar only lifted the rust off the iron surface. I think there is more to it than just adhesion lift, and am thinking the tar takes the iron atoms out of iron oxide and puts the iron atoms back into the original iron object. So this is not a proof by any means, but a hypothesis, and a request for more research.
Length: 32 pages
File Size: 2655 KB
Print Length: 32 pages
Publication Date: April 9, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07QK428KN
Language: English
#3-5, 119th published book
The 2 Chemistry Periodic Tables of Elements, one based on magnetic monopole S,P,D,F and one a Nuclear Table based on torus geometry of 6
by Archimedes Plutonium (Kindle edition)
Preface:
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real true electron of atoms was the muon and this muon is stuck inside its attendant proton torus. The muon is of 105MeV while the proton is 840 MeV. The particle that JJ Thomson in 1897 discovered was not the electron of atoms but instead was the Dirac magnetic monopole. Such a huge mistake throughout all of chemistry and physics, to think the electron was 0.5MeV orbiting around outside a proton of 938MeV breaks even the angular momentum concept of physics, for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5 MeV particle traveling at 99.9% the speed of light around a 938MeV particle just will not stay together. And besides, in that Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom, their subatomic particles have no function, no job, no task, nothing. In that viewpoint of the atom, there must be a second Periodic Table of Chemical Elements that takes into account the true geometry of the atom. That geometry is based on protons forming a torus and the nucleus of the atom is the donut hole and parallel plate capacitor covering top and bottom of the proton torus composed of neutrons.
We keep the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements based on magnetic monopoles, the 0.5MeV particle and causing S,P,D,F orbitals. We keep that table, but we now include a second table based on the torus structure of protons of atoms.
Cover Picture: artwork of what a Periodic Table of Chemical Elements based on 6, looks like.
Product details
ASIN : B0891TTP29
Publication date : May 21, 2020 revised in 2022
Language : English
File size : 1081 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 109 pages
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #4,312,406 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2,251 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #15,495 in General Chemistry
#3-6, 123rd published book
World's first logical teaching of 6.*10^23, Avogadro's number and "mole"; refurbished with "hyasys" as 6.18*10^23 // Chemistry series, book 6
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: I was worried I did not reach the target audience on this topic of mole and Avogadro's number. The cover picture is a High School physics textbook, a later edition of PSSC that I took when I was in High School circa 1967. It teaches mole and Avogadro's number. So I needed to write this textbook starting High School, because it is shameful to teach wrong science in either High School or University.
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Cover Picture is page 448-9 of PSSC Physics, 3rd ed., 1971, Haber-Schaim, Cross, Dodge, Walter, explaining how Rutherford in 1919 weighed the mass of the proton in a experiment. It is disheartening to find I cannot see that experiment in a Google search because of another famous experiment of Rutherford of the gold leaf. And lucky for me that I retrieved this PSSC book I used in High School circa 1967-8 that explains how the proton mass was weighed in physics history. The mass of the proton is vital to understand the mole and Avogadro's number concept. Sad of course that every Old Chemistry and Old Physics textbooks that teaches the concept mole and Avogadro number never mentions the proton mass as crucial to understanding.
Length: 70 pages
Product details
File Size : 796 KB
Publication Date : June 10, 2020
Word Wise : Enabled
Print Length : 70 pages
Language: : English
ASIN : B08B1GCRDH
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #233,083 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #68 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #69 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #425 in General Chemistry
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 10, 2022, 3:14:20 PM4/10/22
to
burs...@gmail.com
unread,
ETH's_Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner,
Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, is Jan Burse violent-stalker the reason you not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV, real electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole
On Friday, June 21, 2019 at 2:46:23 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Was that you,
On Friday, June 14, 2019 at 6:59:05 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> brain farto, do we have some primes:
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:14:02 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> brain farto claims 22699 is a Sierpiński number.
>
On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 4:43:20 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Spamming dumb fuck, will your wheelchair
> have hexadecimal or decimal wheels?
>
> This one:
>
> |__
> |__|
> * *
>
> Or this one:
>
> |__
> |__|
> o o
Jan Burse is a different type of bully stalker for he tore down AP's Wikipedia page in 2017 and then participated in condoning the forgery of AP to Math Stack Exchange in 2017 along with Dan Christensen, and then has continued to post graphic pictures of bodily violence on AP and then Burse has posted the real-estate near AP in order to incite violence upon AP. Burse is a new type of bully stalker with overt violence in his posts and I recommend that he be permanently banned from sci.math and sci.physics before someone gets hurt from all his over-testosterone bullying and violence association.
o-:^>___?
`~~c--^c'
Navy dog says: Jan Burse, --- brain in the sewer, never any math or science, just a sewer kook
Joel Mesot,Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger,Sarah M. Springman
Joel Mesot, President
Sarah M. Springman, Rector
Zurich ETH, physics dept
Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland,
Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin,
Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel,
Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home,
Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner,
Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff,
Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
Mar 14, 2022, 5:30:57 PM
to
Because his wheelchair is too wide, it makes the following sound:
fffaarafafffartoottoooo
Just like APs brain...
Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Mittwoch, 21. Juli 2021 um 18:10:05 UTC+2:
burs...@gmail.com's profile photo
burs...@gmail.com
unread,
Mar 19, 2022, 5:27:02 AM
to
lost his marbles when suddently
all ellipses became oval, because of some wormhole in his kitchen.
burs...@gmail.com's profile photo
burs...@gmail.com
unread,
Mar 19, 2022, 8:29:48 PM
to
Ha Ha, brain farto has Alzheimer.
burs...@gmail.com's profile photo
burs...@gmail.com
unread,
3:43 AM (10 hours ago)
to
The 4 horsemen of the apocalypse:
Horse 1: Corona Pandemic
Horse 2: Ukraine Russo Conflict
Horse 3: Graham Cooper
Horse 4:
Aphrodite's Child - The Four Horsemen
unread,
ETH's_Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner,
Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, is Jan Burse violent-stalker the reason you not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV, real electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole
On Friday, June 21, 2019 at 2:46:23 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Was that you,
On Friday, June 14, 2019 at 6:59:05 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> brain farto, do we have some primes:
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:14:02 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> brain farto claims 22699 is a Sierpiński number.
>
On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 4:43:20 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Spamming dumb fuck, will your wheelchair
> have hexadecimal or decimal wheels?
>
> This one:
>
> |__
> |__|
> * *
>
> Or this one:
>
> |__
> |__|
> o o
Jan Burse is a different type of bully stalker for he tore down AP's Wikipedia page in 2017 and then participated in condoning the forgery of AP to Math Stack Exchange in 2017 along with Dan Christensen, and then has continued to post graphic pictures of bodily violence on AP and then Burse has posted the real-estate near AP in order to incite violence upon AP. Burse is a new type of bully stalker with overt violence in his posts and I recommend that he be permanently banned from sci.math and sci.physics before someone gets hurt from all his over-testosterone bullying and violence association.
o-:^>___?
`~~c--^c'
Navy dog says: Jan Burse, --- brain in the sewer, never any math or science, just a sewer kook
Joel Mesot,Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger,Sarah M. Springman
Joel Mesot, President
Sarah M. Springman, Rector
Zurich ETH, physics dept
Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland,
Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin,
Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel,
Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home,
Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner,
Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff,
Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
Mar 14, 2022, 5:30:57 PM
to
Because his wheelchair is too wide, it makes the following sound:
fffaarafafffartoottoooo
Just like APs brain...
Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Mittwoch, 21. Juli 2021 um 18:10:05 UTC+2:
burs...@gmail.com's profile photo
burs...@gmail.com
unread,
Mar 19, 2022, 5:27:02 AM
to
lost his marbles when suddently
all ellipses became oval, because of some wormhole in his kitchen.
burs...@gmail.com's profile photo
burs...@gmail.com
unread,
Mar 19, 2022, 8:29:48 PM
to
Ha Ha, brain farto has Alzheimer.
burs...@gmail.com's profile photo
burs...@gmail.com
unread,
3:43 AM (10 hours ago)
to
The 4 horsemen of the apocalypse:
Horse 1: Corona Pandemic
Horse 2: Ukraine Russo Conflict
Horse 3: Graham Cooper
Horse 4:
Aphrodite's Child - The Four Horsemen
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 10, 2022, 6:14:50 PM4/10/22
to
Analbuttfuckmanure Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Dr.Panchanathan, General Paul Nakasone SAYS 30 year stalker Kibo Parry M
On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 4:40:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"
Analbuttfuckmanure Dartmouth Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner SAYS 30 year stalker Kibo Parry M
Analbuttfuckmanure Dr.Panchanathan,Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Dr.Hanlon says Kibo Parry M. the 30 year stalker.
On Saturday, April 9, 2022 at 9:58:38 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"
> fails at math and science:
>"mindless barking fuckdog"
Kibo Parry M. wrote
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>
Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>
1/23/18
By Michael Moroney
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
President Larry Summers
President now Lawrence Bacow
Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
1481 views
by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
Hewitt Buettner Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM
On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"
Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner
Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined
by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey
Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM
Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
by Hewitt Buettner
Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM
Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o
by
Richard Cranium
Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM
Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM
Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
3/4/18
By Michael Moroney
Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
by
Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM
Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM
Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM
Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM
Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM
Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM
Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM
Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM
Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM
Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021
Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...
by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM
Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
by Hewitt Buettner
Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
Re: 1---Kibo Parry Moroney asks, did we ally ourselves correctly in Korea, for it is South Korea that is behaving like a savage evil barbarians to Moon Bears
by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says// Dr. Lawrence Bacow, can Harvard stop the Kibo Parry Moroney from his constant insane drumbeat of .... "I ate my brain" ... flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
by Fred Glover
Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash
by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
Re: Moon Bear contents of Samsung and Hyundai? Is it true kibo Parry Moroney & Nicholas Thompson are investigating how much tortured moon-bear parts are installed in Samsung & Hyundai equipment??
by Herp Derpington
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne, CalTech's Thomas Rosenbaum with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to..
by Eddie "Fish Basket" Reynolds Jr.
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Drs. Block, Dr. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math and "nude sluts". Is it any worse than Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945?
by Professor Wordsmith
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at science Drs. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math "Mouse Dimple Cunt Hair"...
by Herp Derpington
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test
By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM
Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
1/23/18
By Michael Moroney
Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
10/28/17
By Michael Moroney
Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
8 posts by 2 authors
12/4/17
By Michael Moroney
Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
20 posts by 3 authors
By Michael Moroney
Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
20 posts by 2 authors
4/9/18
By Michael Moroney
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
by Budd Hakken
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears
by Roger Davis
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
by Roger Davis
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
by Irwin Houser
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
2:15 AM
by Buck Futter
Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
2:07 AM
by Michael Moroney
Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
2:02 AM
by Bret Alva
Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
1:55 AM
by Michael Moroney
Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
1:52 AM
by Michael Moroney
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
1:47 AM
by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking
By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated
Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
1:37 AM
by Michael Moroney
Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
1:30 AM
by Michael Moroney
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP. Dartmouth College Kibo Parry Moroney, threatening the life of AP with this nonstop 28 year long hate spew stalking.
On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"
Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner
Kibo Parry Moron blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!
>
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- <= x=h
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 11, 2022, 1:53:39 AM4/11/22
to
2-Analbuttfuckmanure Dr.Panchanathan,Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, General Paul Nakasone SAYS 30 year stalker Kibo Parry M
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's lackey"
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's lackey"
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's lackey"
>"Putin's lackey"
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 11, 2022, 2:08:15 AM4/11/22
to
These 2 hits below are in the back of Terence Tao google search and you have to type in "terence tao plutonium" for the to come up. What is needed is one of the two hits below showing up on the first page of a google search for "terence tao"
About 306,000 results (0.35 seconds)
Search Results
2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation testhttps://groups.google.com › sci.math › ugRuJkIyZbE
Jun 9, 2018 — Juni 2018 22:24:33 UTC+2 schrieb Archimedes Plutonium: ... But Terence Tao stupidity in mathematics does not stop with Calculus, for, ...
Terence Tao needs a 1st page COUNTERPOINT on Google ...https://groups.google.com › sci.math
Results 1 - 16 of 46 — Terence Tao needs a 1st page COUNTERPOINT on Google Search list instead ... #1-1, 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, ...
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 24, 2022, 6:48:37 PM4/24/22
to
Xi's China invades Outer Manchuria, Amur & Ussuri Rivers to regain land taken by Russia, while Putin invades Ukraine// Science Council Rules Earth
Wikipedia--
Starting with the Treaty of Aigun in 1858 and the Treaty of Peking in 1860,the Sino-Russian border was realigned in Russia's favor along the Amur and Ussuri rivers. As a result, China lost Outer Manchuria (an area of more than 1 million km^2) and access to the Sea of Japan.
Is Xi the greater fool to Putin once again in 2022?
Or will Xi invade Outer Manchuria and reclaim its lost land.
I mean, well Taiwan is only 36,000 km^2 while Outer Manchuria is 1 million km^2.
Unless I am mistaken, is not Outer Manchuria rich rich rich in Geothermal Energy lying near the surface of Earth? I think China has only 1 geothermal plant in operation near Tibet. But Outer Manchuria is a colossal geothermal unless I am not remembering correctly.
So, Xi, what is holding you back? While Putin is insanely invading Ukraine, here is your chance to take back stolen land from Russia.
AP
Wikipedia--
Starting with the Treaty of Aigun in 1858 and the Treaty of Peking in 1860,the Sino-Russian border was realigned in Russia's favor along the Amur and Ussuri rivers. As a result, China lost Outer Manchuria (an area of more than 1 million km^2) and access to the Sea of Japan.
Is Xi the greater fool to Putin once again in 2022?
Or will Xi invade Outer Manchuria and reclaim its lost land.
I mean, well Taiwan is only 36,000 km^2 while Outer Manchuria is 1 million km^2.
Unless I am mistaken, is not Outer Manchuria rich rich rich in Geothermal Energy lying near the surface of Earth? I think China has only 1 geothermal plant in operation near Tibet. But Outer Manchuria is a colossal geothermal unless I am not remembering correctly.
So, Xi, what is holding you back? While Putin is insanely invading Ukraine, here is your chance to take back stolen land from Russia.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2022, 12:16:04 PM4/28/22
to
Panchanathan,Cordova,Suresh,Bement NSF looking for lost marbles Tao,Wiles,Hales,Stillwell, Strang,Baez,Ribet, Pipher, Churney. Why Kibo Parry M 30 year hate stalker? Do you actually think they will admit slant cut of cone is a Oval never ellipse?
Panchanathan,Cordova,Suresh,NSF,Nakasone NSA looking for lost marbles of Rensselaer Polytech Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, with their 30 year nonstop hate stalk of Kibo
Kibo Parry--NSA,NSF hate stalkers looking for Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, lost marbles On Thursday, April 28, 2022 Kibo Parry M,General Nakasone,NSF France Anne Cordova,Subra Suresh,Arden Lee Bement Jr.,Rita R. Colwell,Neal Francis Lane,John Howard Gibbons wrote: "I*still* can't find my marbles".
Kibo Parry Moron blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997, where was General Nakasone?
Dr. Panchanathan NSF, General Nakasone, Kibo Parry M on math failures Philip J. Hanlon, Thomas Hales. Why Kibo, because he is too dumb in math to do a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Or is it because he is still deluded with a slant cut in single cone as ellipse when it is in truth a Oval, see AP proof below.
Kibo, why is Dr. Hanlon so dumb in math that he cannot even add 1 and 1, for a single cone has 1 axis of symmetry, oval 1 axis of symmetry yet ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry, yet the fools Hanlon, Hales, Wiles, Tao still teach ellipse is a conic section when it the Oval at slant cut.
The 30 year payed for attack stalker Kibo Parry M.
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 1:59:04 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"I *still* can't find my marbles" "math hater"
> 77)
Kibo Parry M on Donald Schwendeman and Harry Cliff-- why kibo? Because he cannot ask the simple question which is the atoms real electron -- muon or 0.5MeV particle?
>
> More to the point Rensselaer losing its accreditation for graduating a moron like Kibo Parry M. who still thinks 938 is 12% short of 945. Talk about failure, here Rensselaer graduates a so called engineer who cannot even do proper percentage problems.
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 2:15:25 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "math hater"
by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM
Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM
Re: _Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer,Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, is the reason you failed to confirm .5MeV was not the atom's electron but Dirac's monopole because you failed science like kibo
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Apr 25, 2019, 12:08:26 PM
Re: a second forgery post by Jan Burse-- time to pull the plug on him
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Feb 24, 2017, 6:00:53 AM
Re: 4-Andrew Wiles and his fake FLT proof, so dumb on FLT he could not even spot Euler's flaw of exp 3 FLT, and so dumb as a mathematician, he never could do a geometry proof of calculus, FTC.
by Blake Studdard Jul 12, 2021, 10:51 AM
Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM
Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.
by Dan Christensen Jun 28, 2021, 2:33 PM
Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021
Jan Burse is Joel Mesot a failure of math because he cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus or because he cannot even comprehend the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse? Stands to reason if Joel is too dumb in conic sections he would fail doing a proof of calculus.
>
> Jan Burse laughs at Joel Mesot, too dumb to ask even the simple question of physics-- which is the Atom's true electron, the 0.5MeV particle or the muon, which AP says the muon is stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law producing more Dirac magnetic monopoles of 0.5MeV.
> >
> Jan Burse Swiss failure with his ellipse a conic section when it is a Oval at the slant cut, but Jan farted his way through ETH.
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 8:52:23 AM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > Ha Ha, dream on with your Nazi mathematics and cleansing.
> >brain farto, Putler of sci.math and sci.physics.
> > Not a single line of math in 30 years.
Panchanathan,Cordova,Suresh,NSF,Nakasone NSA looking for lost marbles of Rensselaer Polytech Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, with their 30 year nonstop hate stalk of Kibo
Kibo Parry--NSA,NSF hate stalkers looking for Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, lost marbles On Thursday, April 28, 2022 Kibo Parry M,General Nakasone,NSF France Anne Cordova,Subra Suresh,Arden Lee Bement Jr.,Rita R. Colwell,Neal Francis Lane,John Howard Gibbons wrote: "I*still* can't find my marbles".
Kibo Parry Moron blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997, where was General Nakasone?
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Kibo, 30 year nonstop stalker, even if you do find Rensselaer Polytech marbles, do you honestly think they will admit the truth-- Oval is slant cut in single cone, not the ellipse, or give a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or ask the simple question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle.
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Dr. Panchanathan NSF, General Nakasone, Kibo Parry M on math failures Philip J. Hanlon, Thomas Hales. Why Kibo, because he is too dumb in math to do a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Or is it because he is still deluded with a slant cut in single cone as ellipse when it is in truth a Oval, see AP proof below.
Kibo, why is Dr. Hanlon so dumb in math that he cannot even add 1 and 1, for a single cone has 1 axis of symmetry, oval 1 axis of symmetry yet ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry, yet the fools Hanlon, Hales, Wiles, Tao still teach ellipse is a conic section when it the Oval at slant cut.
The 30 year payed for attack stalker Kibo Parry M.
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 1:59:04 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"I *still* can't find my marbles" "math hater"
> 77)
Kibo Parry M on Donald Schwendeman and Harry Cliff-- why kibo? Because he cannot ask the simple question which is the atoms real electron -- muon or 0.5MeV particle?
>
> More to the point Rensselaer losing its accreditation for graduating a moron like Kibo Parry M. who still thinks 938 is 12% short of 945. Talk about failure, here Rensselaer graduates a so called engineer who cannot even do proper percentage problems.
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 2:15:25 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "math hater"
> > fails at math and science:
> >Village Idiot"
> > fails at math and science:
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM
Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Apr 25, 2019, 12:08:26 PM
Re: a second forgery post by Jan Burse-- time to pull the plug on him
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Feb 24, 2017, 6:00:53 AM
Re: 4-Andrew Wiles and his fake FLT proof, so dumb on FLT he could not even spot Euler's flaw of exp 3 FLT, and so dumb as a mathematician, he never could do a geometry proof of calculus, FTC.
by Blake Studdard Jul 12, 2021, 10:51 AM
Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM
Re: 30) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM
by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM
Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.
by Dan Christensen Jun 28, 2021, 2:33 PM
Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021
>
> Jan Burse laughs at Joel Mesot, too dumb to ask even the simple question of physics-- which is the Atom's true electron, the 0.5MeV particle or the muon, which AP says the muon is stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law producing more Dirac magnetic monopoles of 0.5MeV.
> >
> Jan Burse Swiss failure with his ellipse a conic section when it is a Oval at the slant cut, but Jan farted his way through ETH.
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 8:52:23 AM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > Ha Ha, dream on with your Nazi mathematics and cleansing.
> >brain farto, Putler of sci.math and sci.physics.
> > Not a single line of math in 30 years.
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2022, 12:08:18 AM5/1/22
to
Dan Christensen on Terence Tao, Dan is this the Dr. Tao of UCLA the overinflated imp of math who says a slant cut in cone is a ellipse, the buffoon not knowing a cone has one axis of symmetry yet ellipse has two axes of symmetry. I guess the imp Tao never heard of the Oval.
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 10:52:27 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of tao's fake math and science
>
>
> When will you learn, itchy gitchy goo Terry ???
>
> Tao and UCLA is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.
>
> In Tao's OWN WORDS here:
>
> “Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
> --June 29, 2020
>
> “The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
> --June 3, 2015
>
> “0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
> --June 9, 2015
>
> “0/0 must be equal to 1.”
> -- June 9, 2015
>
> “0 is an infinite irrational number.”
> --June 28, 2015
>
> “No negative numbers exist.”
> --December 22, 2018
>
> “Rationals are not numbers.”
> --May 18, 2019
>
> According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
> --December 11, 2019
>
> Which could explain...
>
> “The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
> --May 31, 2019
>
> AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:
>
> “New Logic
> AND
> T & T = T
> T & F = T
> F & T = T
> F & F = F”
> --November 9, 2019
>
> UCLA and Tao seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:
>
> "Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
> --November 9, 2017
>
>
> And if that wasn't weird enough...
AP> please don't stop Dan the Man the cornholer of UWO
Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM
Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 10:52:27 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of tao's fake math and science
>
>
> When will you learn, itchy gitchy goo Terry ???
>
> Tao and UCLA is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.
>
> In Tao's OWN WORDS here:
>
> “Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
> --June 29, 2020
>
> “The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
> --June 3, 2015
>
> “0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
> --June 9, 2015
>
> “0/0 must be equal to 1.”
> -- June 9, 2015
>
> “0 is an infinite irrational number.”
> --June 28, 2015
>
> “No negative numbers exist.”
> --December 22, 2018
>
> “Rationals are not numbers.”
> --May 18, 2019
>
> According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
> --December 11, 2019
>
> Which could explain...
>
> “The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
> --May 31, 2019
>
> AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:
>
> “New Logic
> AND
> T & T = T
> T & F = T
> F & T = T
> F & F = F”
> --November 9, 2019
>
> UCLA and Tao seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:
>
> "Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
> --November 9, 2017
>
>
> And if that wasn't weird enough...
AP> please don't stop Dan the Man the cornholer of UWO
Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM
Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM
Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2022, 5:25:43 PM5/1/22
to
Is Dr. Tao the most ignorant mathematician today with his ellipse a conic when cone has 1 axis of symmetry yet ellipse 2 axes of symmetry
301
unread,
DC Proof is the biggest teaching mistake
Mostowski Collapse wrote: > I recently saw somebody using FOMO on Twitter. > Now I have FOMO
4:17 PM
Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
, …
Mostowski Collapse
114
unread,
Function Spaces of Empty Functions
I recently saw somebody using FOMO on Twitter. Now I have FOMO that I cannot use FOMO. But I did it
4:15 PM
WM's profile photo
WM
, …
horand....@gmail.com
877
unread,
Cantor's notion of countability is trash.
On Sunday, 1 May 2022 at 17:18:13 UTC-3, WM wrote: [...] > ∀n ∈ ℕ_P: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
4:01 PM
Joel Mesot, ETH Zurich needs a Counterpoint on 1st page of Google Search hits saying that Joel is too dumb in physics to even ask the question-- which is the atom's true electron- muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton doing Faraday law or 0.5MeV particle
3:57 PM
Canadian Arthur B.McDonald needs 1st page counterpoint on his Google Search hits, for Arthur is too stupid in physics to ask the question-- which is Atom's true electron- muon or 0.5MeV particle
3:48 PM
William's profile photo
William
, …
WM
3
301
unread,
DC Proof is the biggest teaching mistake
Mostowski Collapse wrote: > I recently saw somebody using FOMO on Twitter. > Now I have FOMO
4:17 PM
Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
, …
Mostowski Collapse
114
unread,
Function Spaces of Empty Functions
I recently saw somebody using FOMO on Twitter. Now I have FOMO that I cannot use FOMO. But I did it
4:15 PM
WM's profile photo
WM
, …
horand....@gmail.com
877
unread,
Cantor's notion of countability is trash.
On Sunday, 1 May 2022 at 17:18:13 UTC-3, WM wrote: [...] > ∀n ∈ ℕ_P: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
4:01 PM
Joel Mesot, ETH Zurich needs a Counterpoint on 1st page of Google Search hits saying that Joel is too dumb in physics to even ask the question-- which is the atom's true electron- muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton doing Faraday law or 0.5MeV particle
3:57 PM
Canadian Arthur B.McDonald needs 1st page counterpoint on his Google Search hits, for Arthur is too stupid in physics to ask the question-- which is Atom's true electron- muon or 0.5MeV particle
3:48 PM
William's profile photo
William
, …
WM
3
Dan Christensen
May 1, 2022, 8:22:15 PM5/1/22
to
STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science
On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 5:25:43 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote:
> Is Dr. Tao the most ...
When will you learn, Archie Poo???
AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.
In AP's OWN WORDS here:
"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017
And if that wasn't weird enough...
--April 4, 1994
“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019
AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???
“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)
Mostowski Collapse
May 3, 2022, 3:56:35 AM5/3/22
to
STUDENTS Beware: Dan Christensen doesn't understand
this simple mathematical fact:
This here:
ALL(a):[a e X => fun(a) e Y]
And this here:
fun : X -> Y
Are not logically equivalent.
Counter Example:
fun : R -> R, fun(x) = abs(x)
It satisfy:
ALL(a):[x e R+ => fun(x) e R+]
It does not satisfy:
fun : R+ -> R+
this simple mathematical fact:
This here:
ALL(a):[a e X => fun(a) e Y]
And this here:
fun : X -> Y
Are not logically equivalent.
Counter Example:
fun : R -> R, fun(x) = abs(x)
It satisfy:
ALL(a):[x e R+ => fun(x) e R+]
It does not satisfy:
fun : R+ -> R+
Archimedes Plutonium
May 5, 2022, 4:30:01 PM5/5/22
to
Dr. Tao cannot even add 1 + 1 for a ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry, cone only 1. Is Dr. Tao the most ignorant mathematician today with his ellipse a conic when cone has 1 axis of symmetry yet ellipse 2 axes of symmetry.
Does Tao read the spam in sci.physics to make him this stupid in math, rather than read "what is symmetry"?
Glashow, instead of asking which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle reads the daily spam by drag net spammers
FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer's profile photo
FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer
, …
Suspicious
3
unread,
Micro chip implant of any type all leads to Remote Neural Monitoring!!
In article <C3UcK.6$Acq...@fx13.iad> FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer <FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@
3:05 PM
claudi...@gmail.com's profile photo
claudi...@gmail.com
, …
Michael Moroney
13
unread,
Question for Sylvia Else
On 5/5/2022 9:04 AM, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 9:11:31 AM UTC-8, claudi
2:22 PM
Garry Denke's profile photo
Garry Denke
unread,
Daniel the prophet and Son of man Ezekiel chose Stonehenge for the Third Temple because the Alamo was not built yet. John the baptist and Son of man Jesus moved Helestone over the Tabernacle Mishkan to protect it from Rome's armies.
1:11 PM
solvingt...@gmail.com's profile photo
solvingt...@gmail.com
, …
James McGinn
15
unread,
Moroney on Evaporative Cooling
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 11:46:10 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, July
11:27 AM
claudi...@gmail.com's profile photo
claudi...@gmail.com
, …
James McGinn
4
unread,
Stop doing that
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 4:04:24 PM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday,
11:26 AM
James McGinn's profile photo
James McGinn
, …
claudi...@gmail.com
7
unread,
Are they not black and white for you too?
On Sunday, February 6, 2022 at 3:29:28 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > On Sunday, February 6, 2022
11:26 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take back what i said previosu frgive me im sik i cry
i take back what i said previosu frgive me im sik i cry
10:11 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 she wanted me to give her back the crown(my crown) taht she had before 1998 when she was queen and carried my crown>>in 1998 i took her crown off>>what she wanted was me to give her my crown back so she could be queen and treat me like shit>>all just like it was before 1998>>she queen and me bleeding for her
10:11 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take bac what i said previous forgive m e imsick i cry
i take bac what i said previous forgive me imsick i cry
10:06 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 me flying over her was to tell her( the local queen )all that she missed that i could give her before she traded me for someone else her bf>>all that she lost, that i could give her the world if she hadnt screwed me with someone else>>
10:00 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take bback what i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
i take bback what i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
9:35 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 i was american rockstarss bitch gay fag gimp and i was friends with them thinking they liked me and they were all eating me and devouring and i still smiled at them>>my diplomacy failed>>i just want them to go to hell and leave me alone>>im sick of america>>america never agains tehy arent humans and they dont wanted peace they wanted me to fry and bleed for the fat cows etertainment industry>>deceivers and con artist the americans are schizzophrenizers
9:35 AM
_'s profile photo
_
,
Kristjan Robam
5
unread,
i take back what i said previous forgive me i m sick i cry
i take back what i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
9:25 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
she bled for them and they bled for her and someone had to pay>>me>>robbers monsters mind and soul thieves >>animals they used hard artillery and cannons to shoot me aka a cup of coffee>>they ddint ask me for nothing>>they used buldozers to kill a smal litlle earthworm
9:25 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take back what i said previosu forgive me im sick icry
i take back what i said previosu forgive me im sick icry
9:20 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 my ego aka the reaosn why i felt superior to them was because of their sins>>they sinned first>>they dont give a shit about sins they arent christian>>americans are satan worshippers vampires all think is with thier stomachs>>like vampires>>anything that moves they shoot>>animals>>they think that suporting and being friends with israel it cleans their sins but they dont they are just as animals as everyone else
9:20 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 the americans wanted me to be public figure so they could laugh in my face and burn me more>>the star was the queen>>they said iwas star causei was their food>>those machines are stillp playing my songs and shit on me to makeme sick and insane>>im not my real me>>im the prosuct of their brain wash>>they prodiced and made me sub human while they were profiting millions on selling me out>>they hated me so i hate them>>they treated me like shit they arent humans they are american savages and burglars soul thieces and schizzophrenizers animals chimps primates who think their force can beat the truth and the true justice that isnt street justice where they are the judges, they are all criminals and should be in jail or psychiatirc hospitals bleeding for me
9:15 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take bakc hwat i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
i take bakc hwat i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
9:15 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
americans are monsters of the world they told me nothing so they could exploit me better sell me out and burn me>>dictators i n1999 they were Putins and i was zelensky>>they didnt want diplomacy tey wanted sacrifice to show everyone that america was great and me ukrain was shit they even made a horror movie called hugh krayn
9:00 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
the stars in 1999 they said i was a king but they never said that king is a clown a meat puppet>>for canibals and vampires to drink my blood and eat my meat>> they tricked me fooled me
8:15 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take back waht i said previosu forgive m eim sick i cry
i take back waht i said previosu forgive m eim sick i cry
8:05 AM
claudi...@gmail.com's profile photo
claudi...@gmail.com
, …
James McGinn
10
unread,
a limitation built into reality
On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 2:33:00 PM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday,
8:04 AM
James McGinn's profile photo
James McGinn
, …
mitchr...@gmail.com
8
Does Tao read the spam in sci.physics to make him this stupid in math, rather than read "what is symmetry"?
Glashow, instead of asking which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle reads the daily spam by drag net spammers
FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer's profile photo
FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer
, …
Suspicious
3
unread,
Micro chip implant of any type all leads to Remote Neural Monitoring!!
In article <C3UcK.6$Acq...@fx13.iad> FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer <FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@
3:05 PM
claudi...@gmail.com's profile photo
claudi...@gmail.com
, …
Michael Moroney
13
unread,
Question for Sylvia Else
On 5/5/2022 9:04 AM, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 9:11:31 AM UTC-8, claudi
2:22 PM
Garry Denke's profile photo
Garry Denke
unread,
Daniel the prophet and Son of man Ezekiel chose Stonehenge for the Third Temple because the Alamo was not built yet. John the baptist and Son of man Jesus moved Helestone over the Tabernacle Mishkan to protect it from Rome's armies.
1:11 PM
solvingt...@gmail.com's profile photo
solvingt...@gmail.com
, …
James McGinn
15
unread,
Moroney on Evaporative Cooling
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 11:46:10 AM UTC-7, solvingt...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, July
11:27 AM
claudi...@gmail.com's profile photo
claudi...@gmail.com
, …
James McGinn
4
unread,
Stop doing that
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 4:04:24 PM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday,
11:26 AM
James McGinn's profile photo
James McGinn
, …
claudi...@gmail.com
7
unread,
Are they not black and white for you too?
On Sunday, February 6, 2022 at 3:29:28 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > On Sunday, February 6, 2022
11:26 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take back what i said previosu frgive me im sik i cry
i take back what i said previosu frgive me im sik i cry
10:11 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 she wanted me to give her back the crown(my crown) taht she had before 1998 when she was queen and carried my crown>>in 1998 i took her crown off>>what she wanted was me to give her my crown back so she could be queen and treat me like shit>>all just like it was before 1998>>she queen and me bleeding for her
10:11 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take bac what i said previous forgive m e imsick i cry
i take bac what i said previous forgive me imsick i cry
10:06 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 me flying over her was to tell her( the local queen )all that she missed that i could give her before she traded me for someone else her bf>>all that she lost, that i could give her the world if she hadnt screwed me with someone else>>
10:00 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take bback what i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
i take bback what i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
9:35 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 i was american rockstarss bitch gay fag gimp and i was friends with them thinking they liked me and they were all eating me and devouring and i still smiled at them>>my diplomacy failed>>i just want them to go to hell and leave me alone>>im sick of america>>america never agains tehy arent humans and they dont wanted peace they wanted me to fry and bleed for the fat cows etertainment industry>>deceivers and con artist the americans are schizzophrenizers
9:35 AM
_'s profile photo
_
,
Kristjan Robam
5
unread,
i take back what i said previous forgive me i m sick i cry
i take back what i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
9:25 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
she bled for them and they bled for her and someone had to pay>>me>>robbers monsters mind and soul thieves >>animals they used hard artillery and cannons to shoot me aka a cup of coffee>>they ddint ask me for nothing>>they used buldozers to kill a smal litlle earthworm
9:25 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take back what i said previosu forgive me im sick icry
i take back what i said previosu forgive me im sick icry
9:20 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 my ego aka the reaosn why i felt superior to them was because of their sins>>they sinned first>>they dont give a shit about sins they arent christian>>americans are satan worshippers vampires all think is with thier stomachs>>like vampires>>anything that moves they shoot>>animals>>they think that suporting and being friends with israel it cleans their sins but they dont they are just as animals as everyone else
9:20 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
in 1999 the americans wanted me to be public figure so they could laugh in my face and burn me more>>the star was the queen>>they said iwas star causei was their food>>those machines are stillp playing my songs and shit on me to makeme sick and insane>>im not my real me>>im the prosuct of their brain wash>>they prodiced and made me sub human while they were profiting millions on selling me out>>they hated me so i hate them>>they treated me like shit they arent humans they are american savages and burglars soul thieces and schizzophrenizers animals chimps primates who think their force can beat the truth and the true justice that isnt street justice where they are the judges, they are all criminals and should be in jail or psychiatirc hospitals bleeding for me
9:15 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take bakc hwat i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
i take bakc hwat i said previous forgive me im sick i cry
9:15 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
americans are monsters of the world they told me nothing so they could exploit me better sell me out and burn me>>dictators i n1999 they were Putins and i was zelensky>>they didnt want diplomacy tey wanted sacrifice to show everyone that america was great and me ukrain was shit they even made a horror movie called hugh krayn
9:00 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
the stars in 1999 they said i was a king but they never said that king is a clown a meat puppet>>for canibals and vampires to drink my blood and eat my meat>> they tricked me fooled me
8:15 AM
_'s profile photo
_
unread,
i take back waht i said previosu forgive m eim sick i cry
i take back waht i said previosu forgive m eim sick i cry
8:05 AM
claudi...@gmail.com's profile photo
claudi...@gmail.com
, …
James McGinn
10
unread,
a limitation built into reality
On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 2:33:00 PM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday,
8:04 AM
James McGinn's profile photo
James McGinn
, …
mitchr...@gmail.com
8
0 new messages