John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?

[DFS]

I saw this claim on a YouTube video comment you made a couple months ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc

If so, how do you post to sci.math? From the public library?

Obviously you're your own worst enemy.


<quotes>
John Gabriel2 months ago (edited)
You are not the first to notice this. I am bitter about the way I have
been libeled and trashed on the internet by those who do know better:
Prof. Gilbert Strang, Prof. Jack Huizenga and others.

Exposing the fallacies in mainstream mathematics is a retaliation
against the BIG STUPID (mainstream academia). They know the New
Calculus I have discovered is the first and only rigorous formulation,
but refuse to admit it. I didn't set out to do this initially, but I was
going to highlight these fallacies eventually. It has to be done so that
new progress can be realised.

What about the New Calculus? Here are just a few reasons:

1. It is the first and only rigorous formulation.
2. It can be learned in a very short time.
3. Has many new features not possible in mainstream calculus, such as
the auxiliary equation, the Gabriel Polynomial, systematic integration
and a whole lot more.
4. The New Calculus handles PDEs far better than the bogus mainstream
calculus. It is better in every respect.
5. Good for non-linear regression and analysis.

I could list many other reasons, but I'll tell you that many STEM
professionals are already using it: engineers, computer software
developers, graphics developers, statisticians, scientists and even
teachers who are not afraid of being labeled negatively.

The mainstream calculus is doomed. It is going nowhere fast. To wit,
there has been zero progress in the last 150 years. The mainstream
fallacies and rotten theories of Georg Cantor have contributed to this
malaise.

There is much I have not shared about the new calculus, but how can I
share anymore when I am so reviled. Dishonest and jealous academics
spend most of their time libeling and defaming my character, rather than
admitting I am correct. It takes a very strong mind to admit error.

Prof. Strang is an example of an individual who represents the
quintessential face of the BIG STUPID. For almost 2 years he libeled me
on sci.math under the alias Port563. There's a link on my site to his
disgusting and unprofessional behaviour. He has yet to formally apologise.

Because of his actions and those of a vile troll (Dan Christensen) on
sci.math, I have been fired unethically from two jobs at private schools
where I was employed less than a week in both cases. The administrators
at these schools are idiots, but the behavior of Strang and others
helped to fire me. The new discrimination in the USA is "not being a
culture fit". I was fired from both Rancho Solano in Arizona
(http://www.ranchosolano.com/) and BASIS Independent School in San Jose
(http://siliconvalley.basisindependent.com). I have no money to take
them to court otherwise I would be rich. Both these schools are
for-profit and run by Jews who falsely imagine I am anti-semitic.

This country (USA) is going down the drain fast. They have a need for
the best mathematics teachers. I am the best but no one wants to hire me
because most of the schools are run by morons. When I am hired, I am
fired even before I get to teach, so it's a catch 22 for me. I am no
longer looking for work.

I am homeless, destitute and unemployed. This is the result of the
actions of the bastards whom I just described. The filthy lawyers who do
not accept my case are just more of the same as they. How can I not be
bitter? Strang is a felon because he called me a terrorist.

So, for me, this is an outlet of my anger and frustration. There is
nothing academics hate more than to be shown how ignorant, incompetent
and stupid they are. I'll continue to do this until my last breath.
Show less
Reply 2
Doctor Doom
Doctor Doom2 months ago
those who do *NOT know better. My opinion is to leave emotions out of
this and just concentrate on curating knowledge.Those who resonate with
truth see your good work.
Reply 1
John Gabriel
John Gabriel2 months ago
+Doctor Doom Your opinion is correct, but I have a problem forgetting
and forgiving.
I have tried working on this. It has been my means of survival all these
years. In fact, it shouldn't matter what those idiots think. Somehow, I
keep coming across the most ignorant people on my life's journey. Very
seldom are there those who are intelligent, but the majority are useless
morons. Very unfortunate. Okay, Dr. Doom, I'll keep trying. :-)
Show less
Reply 1
Christian Chapman
Christian Chapman2 months ago
Scary stuff, man!
Reply
John Gabriel
John Gabriel2 months ago
+Christian Chapman Yeah. :-) It's very hard to change once you are set
in your ways. Love me with potty mouth or leave me.
Reply
infinitesimotel
infinitesimotel1 month ago
I'd like to see a game engine or rendering software made from it.
Reply
infinitesimotel
infinitesimotel1 month ago
Your situation sounds a lot like (((communist))) treatment of those who
want to expose and destroy their lies and trash. Look at what happened
to Tesla and Viktor Schauberger.
Reply 1
infinitesimotel
infinitesimotel1 month ago
Those who are putting out all the shit, and have been for millennia, are
the same ones who own the banks and print the money. They run the
media, and they own all channels of communication. I'll leave that to
you to find out who that is. BUT I bet you (and I have looked myself)
that ooooh yes, the very same tribe is in the maths world, fucking
things up as usual.
Show less
Reply 1
John Gabriel
John Gabriel1 month ago (edited)
@infinitesimotel: Yes. I have been the target by filthy trash such as
Gilbert Strang, Jack Huizenga, David Ullrich and a host of other
reptiles. Then they have their lackeys such as sci.math's troll Dan
Christensen whose libel cost me two jobs this year because school
administrators here are such idiots that they can't think independently.
It's like a beehive mentality.

Educators are among some of the dumbest humans I have ever met. It's
very sad. There is this thing about being politically correct, but one
cannot communicate civilly with these baboons. It's just not possible.
They are cowards of the highest order. Strang taunted me on sci.math for
almost 2 years using the alias Port563 until I outed him. The coward has
since disappeared. The filthy swine has never formally apologised, nor
has his boss - Mr. Reif, the president of MIT - that shit institution.
Show less
Reply 1
John Gabriel
John Gabriel1 month ago (edited)
@infinitesimotel: Oh, I know exactly who the filthy swines are! The
disgusting rich Jews and their lackeys. I hate them all with a vengeance.

But not all are bad. Only the ones who control the banks and the wealth
of the planet. Wish Hitler had gotten these bastards. They got away by
fleeing to the US, Canada, Australia, South Africa and UK.

Unfortunately, the Jews Hitler murdered were mostly innocent. Did you
know that the wealthy reptiles such as the Rothchilds, etc abandoned
their very own Jewish brothers during the Holocaust?

Greed will eventually destroy this planet.
Show less
Reply 1
infinitesimotel
infinitesimotel1 month ago
+John Gabriel Personally, I do not believe in the "good jew" myth, that
is something I will not push onto you but something you will encounter
on your own journey in your own time and way. Hitler did not kill
anyone, that is another PR jew slander campaign. Hitler was completely
set up by our beloved (((chosen ones))), topics too vast to go into, but
I would recommend the documentary "the greatest story never told". And
if you feel like reading something the Protocols of Zion, it is a free
PDF, also Henry Ford "The International Jew" PDF also free. Your
battle on the mathematics frontier is another spear towards the face of
the enemy. I know of the Rothschild shitheads, probably the ones most
responsible for the ruin of good life on Earth. Not all jews are bad,
but in every bad there is a jew. Again, I don't want to stray too far
from the main topic but just raise this issue.
Read more
Reply
John Gabriel
John Gabriel1 month ago
I hear what you are saying. I just can't bring myself to harm them or
anyone else. They will self-destruct as I've said. Parasites die once
the host dies.
Reply 1
infinitesimotel
infinitesimotel1 month ago (edited)
+John Gabriel I don't want the host to die, but if the parasite is cut
off then it will fade into nothing, keep up the good work. The truth
can never be destroyed or hidden for long. On another note, you have
enough of a battle on this front, I'm only showing you the face of the
enemy. They perk up in all topics. 
Reply
John Gabriel
John Gabriel1 month ago
+infinitesimotel Trust me. I know the Jews are jealous enemies, but so
are most others. It's in human nature to be envious and want to take the
credit for everything.
Reply 1
John Gabriel
John Gabriel1 month ago (edited)
They sure do. Hitler said:

"Was there any form of filth or crime…without at least one Jew involved
in it. If you cut even cautiously into such a sore, you find like a
maggot in a rotting body, often dazzled by the sudden light – a Jew."

See, I hate to generalise because not all Jews are bad. I do not hate
them. I hate what they do. They have spread so many lies about
everything and everyone. They have also recruited stupid goyim
(gentiles) to fight their battles on their behalf.

You can't even say anything objective about a Jew and you are labelled a
Jew-hater. They are systematically reducing the world to slavery. This
is unwise, because the last time they did this in Germany, it didn't
work out too well for them.

If someone had to say what Hitler said today, it would be called hate
speech, but it's not hate speech if it's true. The Wikipedia has a
policy of publishing the nationality of those whose names appear in
biographies. In many instances they are quick to do this for famous
people even when these people were not Jews in fact. However, they slink
back from including the nationality when the article involves a bad Jew.
Double standards of course.

For example, the Madoff article calls Madoff an American fraudster, not
an American Jewish fraudster and only mentions his nationality in the
Early Life section.

But the Wikipedia is controlled by Jews. Control of media and
information dissemination is a powerful and effective tool in their
hands. They are undoubtedly the masters of information gathering and
deception dissemination.

They are making the entire world hate them. It appears they have learned
nothing from the holocaust.

To understand the Jews, you should read Mein Kampf. It's quite scary
how they haven't changed one bit.

I don't like or agree with what Hitler did. It was wrong. However, you
can understand why he became so bitter and filled with hate for them.
You know, even by today's standards, he was an exceptionally talented
artist. The filthy and arrogant Jews at the Vienna academy rejected him
because they did not like him personally. In retrospect, I bet they wish
they had accepted him.
Show less
Reply 1
TheYes Dave
TheYes Dave2 weeks ago
Hi John, you say "Both these schools are for-profit and run by Jews who
falsely imagine I am anti-semitic" regarding the schools that fired you.
Then you dive into a long rant about how bad/evil/dishonest/jealous Jews
are, along with infinitesimotel. This is quite the contradiction. How
could any Jewish person want to work with you after having read these
posts?
Read more
Reply 1
John Gabriel
John Gabriel2 weeks ago
Well, my experiences with Jews have mostly been bad. They are not a
pleasant lot to be around. Truth is I don't think I want anything to do
with them either.

They were clearly in the wrong and I don't see how your remark has any
relevance. It's like someone saying:

"The Nazis tortured and gassed you. You've been saying nothing but bad
things about them. How could any Nazi want to be your friend?"

The leadership at these schools are vile, disgusting reptiles who would
have been sorry if I had the money to sue them. Their ethnic background
just further underscores the crooked nosed Jew and his filthy dealings.

I do not hate all Jews, but some of them are prize scum.
Show less
Reply 1
TheYes Dave
TheYes Dave2 weeks ago
I see that I dragged myself into a bit of an opinion based argument! On
the grounds that I don't think it's constructive and that I need to
spend less time doing this sort of thing, I am respectfully dropping out
of this one, Regards
Reply
John Gabriel
John Gabriel2 weeks ago
I don't see what the topic of Jews has to do with mathematics and in
particular my YT channel. It's one which should clearly not have been
brought up. Judaism and Jews have no relevance on my channel and I do
not want that topic discussed on my channel preferably at all. But if
you are into that sort of thing, there is no shortage of forums on the
internet. Frankly I don't care for the topic at all.
</quotes>

[John Gabriel]

Yes, it is true. I am not a liar like most of you.

[John Gabriel]

My worst enemies are jealous scum the likes of the BIG STUPID.

[bassam king karzeddin]

I do not know who are you too, and what is your true intention here, but let me say or remind that occurrence of such stories from the history of mathematics in particular without lengthy details, where many public genius people had been recognized after their miserable lives had been passed away

Then the big Question might arise immediately!
Why this is always the case in mathematics?

Especially when it comes to change, or to be revolutionized,

Why this peculiar category of people behaviours are generally different from other common categories of human being whom seems no suffering if you were a good singer or a good football player for instance?

In the contrary we observe that if any talented mathematician try to show his talent innocently to the world publically and not officially, he immediately invites hates and curse upon himself for ever!

Is it because this category of people think themselves smart enough or more clever than others?
On the opposite, this was shown and proven beyond doubt, that those people are the most innocent whom they easily could be cheated and brainwashed for so many centuries!

Or is it because there feeling is so sensitive to the limit that their feelings guts hurt when someone shows superiority in their own fields despite not being classified professionally from their category?

Or is it their unnoticeable dignity (no matter however small it is) that would not allow them considering anyone else talent, except when imposed upon themselves by their alleged authorities despite being out of the whole issue? not having a hint to what is going on above their heads!
as the so famous case of accepting a proof of their highest riddle as Fermat's Last Theorem, where at same time they admit no understanding a hint to the proof despite it is available for more than quarter a century now?

And more strangely they defend the alleged proof to the limit that makes you think that it is their proof too!

Many more questions could be added to understand this type of people thinking themselves as mathematicians!

But I have many answers to this topic where my time is not allowing me to say

Thanks being (me) not from this really strange category of people

Regards
Bassam King Krzeddin
22ed, Jan., 2017

[burs...@gmail.com]

By scum you are talking about you and your new
calculooose bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

Am Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 18:27:47 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:

[John Gabriel]

DFS is probably just another of Dan Christensen's many aliases. The first job I was fired from last year was partly a result of his libel and the stupidity of those who believed it. I didn't even get a chance to defend myself. The idiots who employed me simply accepted that I am an anti-Jew, which is of course total bullshit.

The Jews have terrorised everyone into thinking twice before they say anything about them. You can talk disparagingly about Palestinians and there is no equivalent term for anti-Jew, that is, anti-Arabite ? Chuckle. You'll never get fired for being an anti-Arabite. But the moment you say anything about the Jews which is not flattering (even if it's not hate speech), you are called an anti-semite by their yapping lackey dogs. They have their lackeys so well trained, that they don't even bother defending themselves any more. Only the stupid Goyim (Dan Christensen, Shionoro, etc) do it for them.

They have a saying "Never again the Shoah". Well, just wait and see. I read in the news that 26 Jewish establishments had bomb threats.

I will turn a blind eye and never speak out or defend another fucking Jew in my life. I will never hire a Jew again. Yes, I know that I might be harming an innocent Jew, but what goes round comes round. I am at a point where I don't even like to hear the word Jew or Holocaust any longer. It's propaganda. If the Holocaust were a cow, the damn Jews would have milked it to death a long time ago. Despicable. Utterly despicable. I don't want to know anything about them. Not interested when they get bombed by Arabs or targeted. They can go to hell for all I care.

What is the difference between firing me and killing me? If I have no means to take care of myself, it would have been better if I were dead.

The Jews will be brought to justice for their crimes. Just a matter of time. All I can say is that I am sorry there will be those innocent ones who will suffer along with the scum. Too bad.

[DFS]

On 1/22/2017 12:26 PM, John Gabriel wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 January 2017 09:25:22 UTC-8, DFS wrote:
>> I saw this claim on a YouTube video comment you made a couple months ago.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc
>>
>> If so, how do you post to sci.math? From the public library?
>>
>> Obviously you're your own worst enemy.

Why couldn't you be happy as a mathematician/teacher/professor, instead
of ruining your reputation by insulting everyone, all the time, who
doesn't agree with your perspectives, many of which sound crazy to an
unsophisticated math layman like myself?

At this point it looks like you're unemployable in math.

Is that what you wanted?



> Yes, it is true.

So how/where do you live? How do you eat? How do you post to sci.math
all the time?

> I am not a liar like most of you.

From what I've read, you lie a lot, and say a bunch of crazy things, too:


* "Strang is a felon and a morally and ethically corrupt bastard"

* "I was the first to understand what Euclid was attempting to do."

* "the concept of number exists independently of the human mind"

* "MIT is a shit institution"

* about Judaism and Jews: "Frankly I don't care for the topic at all."

* "Because of fools like Gilbert Strang, mathematics has been turned
into a circus and no significant progress made in mainstream
academia over the last century (my new calculus aside)."

heh! Your 'new calculus' is the only significant progress made in
math in 100 years? cuckoo! GTFO with this arrogant, lying delusion.

[John Gabriel]

On Sunday, 22 January 2017 11:12:26 UTC-8, DFS wrote:


> Why couldn't you be happy as a mathematician/teacher/professor, instead
> of ruining your reputation by insulting everyone, all the time, who
> doesn't agree with your perspectives, many of which sound crazy to an
> unsophisticated math layman like myself?

Your assertions are not reality.

> At this point it looks like you're unemployable in math.

I am very employable. The problem is not on my end.

> So how/where do you live? How do you eat? How do you post to sci.math
> all the time?

That is none of your business. Do you honestly think I would tell you all these things?

> > I am not a liar like most of you.
>
> From what I've read, you lie a lot, and say a bunch of crazy things, too:
>
>
> * "Strang is a felon and a morally and ethically corrupt bastard"
>
> * "I was the first to understand what Euclid was attempting to do."
>
> * "the concept of number exists independently of the human mind"
>
> * "MIT is a shit institution"
>
> * about Judaism and Jews: "Frankly I don't care for the topic at all."
>
> * "Because of fools like Gilbert Strang, mathematics has been turned
> into a circus and no significant progress made in mainstream
> academia over the last century (my new calculus aside)."
>
> heh! Your 'new calculus' is the only significant progress made in
> math in 100 years? cuckoo! GTFO with this arrogant, lying delusion.

Every one of those statements is PURE, UNDILUTED truth.

Being the lay man that you called yourself, how can you discern anything about mathematics and claim those statements are all lies? I'll tell you how: YOU ARE A LIAR.

[DFS]

On 1/22/2017 2:08 PM, John Gabriel wrote:


> DFS is probably just another of Dan Christensen's many aliases.

No. Those are my initials. I've posted to Usenet with them - and only
them - for a dozen years.

I'm not even a math guy, per se. I just read sci.math from time to
time, and noticed today (and in the past) your numerous posts. Watched
some of your videos, and read some of the comments.

> The
> first job I was fired from last year was partly a result of his libel

I'm sure he didn't slander or libel you: publicly state things about you
that he knew were false in order to defame your good reputation.

You already defamed yourself, and continue to do so (as below). Why?

> and the stupidity of those who believed it. I didn't even get a
> chance to defend myself. The idiots who employed me simply accepted
> that I am an anti-Jew, which is of course total bullshit.

heh! The rest of this vicious rant belies that claim. You're a rabid
Jew-hater.

Wow!

If you were intellectually honest, you'd accept that your fight isn't
against Jewish people, but against your own mental issues.

[DFS]

On 1/22/2017 2:23 PM, John Gabriel wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 January 2017 11:12:26 UTC-8, DFS wrote:
>
>
>> Why couldn't you be happy as a mathematician/teacher/professor,
>> instead of ruining your reputation by insulting everyone, all the
>> time, who doesn't agree with your perspectives, many of which sound
>> crazy to an unsophisticated math layman like myself?
>
> Your assertions are not reality.

Yes they are:

* you - and only you - ruined your reputation
* you viciously insult everyone who doesn't agree with you
* your claims sound crazy to me - very delusional, in fact

So my question stands. Answer it.

>> At this point it looks like you're unemployable in math.
>
> I am very employable. The problem is not on my end.

ha! If nobody will hire you, the problem IS on your end.

You can recover, maybe. Legal name change, medication, plastic surgery,
contacts...

>> So how/where do you live? How do you eat? How do you post to
>> sci.math all the time?
>
> That is none of your business.

You made it everyone's business by posting it on YouTube.

Are you living in homeless shelters? Who feeds you? Where are you
posting from?

> Do you honestly think I would tell you all these things?

Why not? You're all about TRUTH, aren't you?

>>> I am not a liar like most of you.
>>
>> From what I've read, you lie a lot, and say a bunch of crazy
>> things, too:
>>
>>
>> * "Strang is a felon and a morally and ethically corrupt bastard"
>>
>> * "I was the first to understand what Euclid was attempting to
>> do."
>>
>> * "the concept of number exists independently of the human mind"
>>
>> * "MIT is a shit institution"
>>
>> * about Judaism and Jews: "Frankly I don't care for the topic at
>> all."
>>
>> * "Because of fools like Gilbert Strang, mathematics has been
>> turned into a circus and no significant progress made in
>> mainstream academia over the last century (my new calculus
>> aside)."
>>
>> heh! Your 'new calculus' is the only significant progress made in
>> math in 100 years? cuckoo! GTFO with this arrogant, lying
>> delusion.
>
> Every one of those statements is PURE, UNDILUTED truth.

They're all bullshit.

Why do you say such stupid and dishonest things?

> Being the lay man that you called yourself, how can you discern
> anything about mathematics and claim those statements are all lies?
> I'll tell you how: YOU ARE A LIAR.

Your lie that "MIT is a shit institution" doesn't require math knowledge.

[John Gabriel]

On Sunday, 22 January 2017 12:50:41 UTC-8, DFS wrote:
> On 1/22/2017 2:08 PM, John Gabriel wrote:
>
>
> > DFS is probably just another of Dan Christensen's many aliases.
>
>
> No. Those are my initials. I've posted to Usenet with them - and only
> them - for a dozen years.
>
> I'm not even a math guy, per se. I just read sci.math from time to
> time, and noticed today (and in the past) your numerous posts. Watched
> some of your videos, and read some of the comments.

Liar. You were stalking me. I get that a lot.

> > The
> > first job I was fired from last year was partly a result of his libel
>
> I'm sure he didn't slander or libel you: publicly state things about you
> that he knew were false in order to defame your good reputation.

Of course you are "sure": you are either DC or a very close friend of his. Chuckle. He didn't mean to defame my good reputation?? Really?? You are one very naive lay man. I suppose you think that ISIS didn't meant to be so harsh by beheading all those kaffirs? Chuckle.

If you even had a clue what honesty means, you wouldn't be writing all this shit.

[John Gabriel]

On Sunday, 22 January 2017 12:59:45 UTC-8, DFS wrote:


> Your lie that "MIT is a shit institution" doesn't require math knowledge.

Except it's not a lie. Chuckle.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/1rGbFury97Q

[DFS]

Classic idiocy: back up your stupid claims with links to more of your
own stupid claims.

[DFS]

On 1/22/2017 1:43 PM, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 8:25:22 PM UTC+3, DFS wrote:
>> I saw this claim on a YouTube video comment you made a couple
>> months ago.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc
>>
>> If so, how do you post to sci.math? From the public library?
>>
>> Obviously you're your own worst enemy.

> I do not know who are you too, and what is your true intention here,

Listen to John Gabriel rant, I guess.

He appears to be a true math crank. There was another one here years
ago - James Harris. Gabriel is worse.

> but let me say or remind that occurrence of such stories from the
> history of mathematics in particular without lengthy details, where
> many public genius people had been recognized after their miserable
> lives had been passed away

Which mathematicians are you talking about that were excoriated during
their lifetimes but recognized as geniuses in death?

> Then the big Question might arise immediately! Why this is always the
> case in mathematics?

I suppose because math is difficult and mysterious to many people, and
mathematicians are often considered to be geniuses, and
uneducated/natural genius is interesting?

> Especially when it comes to change, or to be revolutionized,
>
> Why this peculiar category of people behaviours are generally
> different from other common categories of human being whom seems no
> suffering if you were a good singer or a good football player for
> instance?
>
> In the contrary we observe that if any talented mathematician try to
> show his talent innocently to the world publically and not
> officially, he immediately invites hates and curse upon himself for
> ever!

In this case, JG is not in any way innocent. He viciously curses and
insults everyone who doesn't agree with him, and makes delusional
claims. For years.

> Is it because this category of people think themselves smart enough
> or more clever than others? On the opposite, this was shown and
> proven beyond doubt, that those people are the most innocent whom
> they easily could be cheated and brainwashed for so many centuries!
>
> Or is it because there feeling is so sensitive to the limit that
> their feelings guts hurt when someone shows superiority in their own
> fields despite not being classified professionally from their
> category?

Maybe. I would guess some of the Cambridge mathematicians were
extremely jealous of the innate math abilities of Ramanujan.

> Or is it their unnoticeable dignity (no matter however small it is)
> that would not allow them considering anyone else talent, except when
> imposed upon themselves by their alleged authorities despite being
> out of the whole issue? not having a hint to what is going on above
> their heads! as the so famous case of accepting a proof of their
> highest riddle as Fermat's Last Theorem, where at same time they
> admit no understanding a hint to the proof despite it is available
> for more than quarter a century now?
>
> And more strangely they defend the alleged proof to the limit that
> makes you think that it is their proof too!
>
> Many more questions could be added to understand this type of people
> thinking themselves as mathematicians!
>
> But I have many answers to this topic where my time is not allowing
> me to say
>
> Thanks being (me) not from this really strange category of people
>
> Regards Bassam King Krzeddin 22ed, Jan., 2017

22nd

[DFS]

On 1/22/2017 4:02 PM, John Gabriel wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 January 2017 12:50:41 UTC-8, DFS wrote:


> You were stalking me. I get that a lot.

Paranoia.

> Of course you are "sure": you are either DC or a very close friend of his.

Conspiracies.

> The Jews will be brought to justice for their crimes.

Persecution complex.





See a pattern here?

[John Gabriel]

On Sunday, 22 January 2017 13:11:35 UTC-8, DFS wrote:
> On 1/22/2017 1:43 PM, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 8:25:22 PM UTC+3, DFS wrote:
> >> I saw this claim on a YouTube video comment you made a couple
> >> months ago.
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc
> >>
> >> If so, how do you post to sci.math? From the public library?
> >>
> >> Obviously you're your own worst enemy.
>
>
> > I do not know who are you too, and what is your true intention here,
>
> Listen to John Gabriel rant, I guess.
>
> He appears to be a true math crank.

Appears? Chuckle.

> There was another one here years ago - James Harris. Gabriel is worse.

Heard of him. Never actually communicated. Was on for a few months for the first time in 2005.

The forum was full of undesirables and deplorables such as you back then also.

>
> > but let me say or remind that occurrence of such stories from the
> > history of mathematics in particular without lengthy details, where
> > many public genius people had been recognized after their miserable
> > lives had been passed away
>
> Which mathematicians are you talking about that were excoriated during
> their lifetimes but recognized as geniuses in death?
>
>
>
> > Then the big Question might arise immediately! Why this is always the
> > case in mathematics?
>
> I suppose because math is difficult and mysterious to many people, and
> mathematicians are often considered to be geniuses, and
> uneducated/natural genius is interesting?

Why? What an irony! You think math is difficult? Chuckle. Could this be the case because it is not math but myth and myth is illogical? I have never found math difficult. Well, I am a genius so perhaps one could disqualify me on that score.

>
>
> > Especially when it comes to change, or to be revolutionized,
> >
> > Why this peculiar category of people behaviours are generally
> > different from other common categories of human being whom seems no
> > suffering if you were a good singer or a good football player for
> > instance?
> >
> > In the contrary we observe that if any talented mathematician try to
> > show his talent innocently to the world publically and not
> > officially, he immediately invites hates and curse upon himself for
> > ever!
>
> In this case, JG is not in any way innocent. He viciously curses and
> insults everyone who doesn't agree with him, and makes delusional
> claims. For years.

Of course. It's my only means of defense. Scum like you can only be addressed in the language of insults. As an example, consider that WM has pointed out some serious problems and provided very convincing proofs and yet he is ridiculed all these years even though he is part of the mainstream academia. What chance do I stand against the BIG STUPID?

I started out very civil. It all changed because I was insulted and cursed. I have wasted enough time with you. You are obviously a piece of worthless shit not interested in truth.


**PLONK**

[burs...@gmail.com]

By BIG STUPID you are talking about you and your
new calculoose bird brain John Gsbriel birdbrains?

Am Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 22:21:24 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:

[burs...@gmail.com]

Interestingly the current crank spectrum is not extremly
large. Pythagoreans, Infinite, Calculoose. But no LFT and such.

This book gives a list of modern crank topics:

- Mathematical Cranks (Spectrum) by Underwood Dudley
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0883855070

And these slides list some historical mistakes:

- Famous Mistakes in Mathematics - Jerzy Pogonowski
http://logic.amu.edu.pl/images/c/c1/Aalcs20jp.pdf

[burs...@gmail.com]

Nah the current list is/wss a little larger: Negative
Numbers, Complex Numers, Set Theory, Cantor, Peano.

What else?

[John Gabriel]

How about real crank Jan Burse? Chuckle.

[John Gabriel]

Yes, I do. The question to ask is: Do you? Chuckle. Lies, libel, insults, ad hominem, jealousy - they generally go together. Typical of losers such as you and the BIG STUPID.

Tell me, if I am so insignificant and my work is so harmless, why are you wasting so much time on rants like this? Chuckle.

Why do you think Burse has gone dotty insane and made it a full time job of spamming my threads? The answer should be obvious to anyone whose eyes are wide open.

[John Gabriel]

On Sunday, 22 January 2017 13:16:59 UTC-8, DFS wrote:

And I suppose it is also just a coincidence that my New Calculus site was taken down 6 times when all it contained was math...

>
>
>
>
>
> See a pattern here?

Yes, a pattern of strong delusion. May I recommend a good psychiatrist for you?

[burs...@gmail.com]

By insignificant you are talking about you and
your new calculoose bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

> - Famous Mistakes in Mathematics - Jerzy Pogonowski
> http://logic.amu.edu.pl/images/c/c1/Aalcs20jp.pdf

The above contains an entry in the crank department:
Wolfgang Mückenheim: fight with actual infinity

What should be the entry for JG? Fight with
Gabrieloconfusion and Johnostupidics?

Am Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 22:57:25 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:

[genm...@gmail.com]

Yes, there is a good example of Jerzy Pogonowski failed mistakes:

Wolgang Mueckenheim: fight with actual infinity.

WM is far smarter than one million Jerzy Pogonowskis.

Come to think of it, the Germans should have annexed Poland. Some of the nastiest arseholes I have met are Polish. In terms of distrust, they are not far behind the Jews. Not generalising, but it has been my experience...

[j4n bur53]

So I guess the entry will indeed read for JG: Fight
with Gabrieloconfusion and Johnostupidics.

genm...@gmail.com schrieb:

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

I'd recantly found clarification on this, that
it was actually one of Fermat's earliest notation to the b00k
of Bachet, and he must have had a real comprehension of p-adics,
well before they were ever known in the literature, because
he and Pascal and Liebniz all built the same machine -- although
it is probably quite elementary, as opposed to Wiles' alleged pr00f.

of course, that is just because I have not even tried to read it;
I'm sure that it is perfectly profound, justifiably iff
it links several areas of math.

> Fermat's Last Theorem, where at same time they admit no understanding a hint to the proof despite it is available for more than quarter a century now?
>
> And more strangely they defend the alleged proof to the limit that makes you think that it is their proof too!
>
> Many more questions could be added to understand this type of people thinking themselves as mathematicians!

if you are just going to sit on your hands,
what difference would it make?

[Dan Christensen]

On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 4:11:35 PM UTC-5, DFS wrote:

>
> In this case, JG is not in any way innocent. He viciously curses and
> insults everyone who doesn't agree with him, and makes delusional
> claims.

He also threatens to exterminate anyone who refuses to accept his infinite wisdom in the style of his hero. JG wrote:

“Hitler was a genius and a very talented artist... As from a moral point of view, again his actions can't be judged, because his morals are different.” (Like JG's morals?)
-- sci.math, March 18, 2015

"I will crush you... You need to be very careful what you say."
-- sci.math, November 10, 2016

“It would be a very good idea to round up all the academic idiots, gas them and incinerate the useless lot. Only those that pass John Gabriel's exam should be allowed to live.”
-- sci.math, July 13, 2014

What a charming fellow!


Dan

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

there is probably a pill for that, but
I never saw The matriX

[bassam king karzeddin]

John Gabriel wrote:

> How about real crank Jan Burse? Chuckle.

This one Jan Burse, or bursegan, ..., is (99.999... )% crank, for at least not being able to differentiate between (100%) and (99.999... %), he still considers them the same, which is more than sufficient reason to be described as a real crank, but the real tragedy that he belongs to the majority of the modern mythematickers


Bassam karzeddin

[j4n bur53]

Yes sure I am a crank. You are completly right. But I am
not a little pink crank as JG calls me, since I am actually
198 cm tall and usually have a tanned skin,

from the cathode ray tube of my tektronix 4010

bassam king karzeddin schrieb:

[John Gabriel]

Burse is no doubt a troll. Has some serious mental issues too. I seem to attract psychos like Dan Christensen and Burse. Very unhealthy. It's puzzling because in my life's journey I just seem to attract abnormal people for some unknown reason. If I didn't know myself, I would be worried.

Around 20 years of age, I was once upon a time having lunch at a hotel when the manager asked if a certain guest could share my table because there were no empty tables left. Without too much thought, I consented. Oh boy, was I sorry. The guy who sat down was extremely chatty. At first I just ignored him and carried on eating my lunch, when out of the blue, he stated: "I could slit your throat and kill you using this knife without anyone here noticing. I am a Recce."

Well, now he had my attention. I knew he was a psychopath. He became very aggressive when I just stared at him. To avoid a scene and possibly getting injured, I left the table.

Dan Christensen and Burse have the same kind of fatal attraction to me. Also, the guy who started this thread (DFS). Telle est ma vie.

[John Gabriel]

See Bassam? :-) I rest my case. 100% psycho. Tsk, tsk.

[John Gabriel]

On Monday, 23 January 2017 04:20:39 UTC-8, j4n bur53 wrote:

> Yes sure I am a crank. You are completly right. But I am
> not a little pink crank as JG calls me, since I am actually
> 198 cm tall and usually have a tanned skin,
>
> from the cathode ray tube of my tektronix 4010

Gee, almost sounds like Port563. The beginning of a new "friendship". Ugggghhh.

[John Gabriel]

On Monday, 23 January 2017 04:29:38 UTC-8, John Gabriel wrote:
> On Monday, 23 January 2017 04:20:39 UTC-8, j4n bur53 wrote:
> > Yes sure I am a crank. You are completly right. But I am
> > not a little pink crank as JG calls me, since I am actually
> > 198 cm tall and usually have a tanned skin,
> >
> > from the cathode ray tube of my tektronix 4010
>
> Gee, almost sounds like Port563. The beginning of a new "friendship". Ugggghhh.

Difference is that Port563 is a psychopath of class and writes exceptionally good English. Well, he wouldn't be a professor at MIT otherwise...

[j4n bur53]

Corr.: Latest measurement
197.999... cm tall and usually have a tanned skin,

Sorry my bad.

j4n bur53 schrieb:

[John Gabriel]

If 197.999... is the same as 198, then why a need to "correct"? A Freudian slip. Chuckle.

[bassam king karzeddin]

abu.ku wrote:

> if you are just going to sit on your hands,
> what difference would it make?

I had already sit my foot before hands in it, even few years before the century proof was corrected, but everything was under control, since I didn't know what did that mean, so strange

But do you think that even Fermat himself or the proofers new the simplest real form, where it was even impossible for a given constructed cube (with real number side) to be equal exactly to the sum or a difference of two other cubes with positive integer sides

I had published one line formula, still undeleted in HSE, which is even much better than hundreds of proofs (if they still could comprehend it)

I had also provided them (in my posts) with few mysteries that would be more than sufficient for them in the next few centuries

Next: planning to post something for future generations of artificial intelligent

Bassam king Karzeddin

[John Gabriel]

On Monday, 23 January 2017 04:33:48 UTC-8, j4n bur53 wrote:

In Arabic, we would call you "Taweel u achbal". Chuckle.

Tektronix 4010: Did your grandfather give you that because you look like a very young pink man?

[j4n bur53]

JG: Well I was using an ukulele stereometer to measure my
height, which should be precise enough for infinitessimals.

Ths instrument was already invented 1553 in St. Petersburg
before Euler, it is mainly used to measure cruise ship

billiard tables. So its a "fact", shut up moron.

j4n bur53 schrieb:

[bassam king karzeddin]

That is why I said (99.999...%) and not 100%, since the difference is so huge, it can still shift the state of someone as you from being a real crank to being a true forgotten genius, who knows?

But, I am still wondering for your intensive contribution on the opposite side of the truth

Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin

[j4n bur53]

You moron, don't you get it. It was measured with
an ukulele stereometer. Baaaaa waaaa haaaa there is

no opposite side of the truth, its a "fact". A
"fact" cannot be falsified. Shut up.

An ukulele stereometer is error free, even in
the infinitessimal domain since it is based on

3D gyroscopic concepts, for en explanation see here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

>>> 198 cm tall and usually have a tanned skin,

bassam king karzeddin schrieb:

[bassam king karzeddin]

At any case, your height must be constructible number, with 50% being rational number, but it is impossible to be real algebraic or transcendental number (for sure), check it up please and tell us again!

Regards
Bassam Karzeddin

[j4n bur53]

Shut up, you really don't have any clue why 0.333... != 1/3.
I piss and shit on you. Nobody is as intelligent as me.

bassam king karzeddin schrieb:

[bassam king karzeddin]

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 3:40:33 PM UTC+3, John Gabriel wrote:
> On Monday, 23 January 2017 04:33:48 UTC-8, j4n bur53 wrote:
> > Corr.: Latest measurement

John Gabriel wrote:

> In Arabic, we would call you "Taweel u achbal". Chuckle.

Yes, there is a wisdom in arabic that says, ( kl tawil la yakhlu min alhabl wakull qasir la yakhlu min alkhabath), google translation:

Each long is not without Habal (Habal: meaning some kind of stupidity),

& each short is not without malice

There are also some funny slung songs "Taweel wa ahbal"

[bassam king karzeddin]

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 4:26:54 PM UTC+3, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Shut up, you really don't have any clue why 0.333... != 1/3.
> I piss and shit on you. Nobody is as intelligent as me.

At this moment I am really confused, are you playing Gohn Gabriel character, or do you mean that is you, wonder!

BK

[j4n bur53]

You should know that ukulele is an old arabic word.
It stems from uku = unknown and lele = measure.

An ukulele stereometer has a display and a scala,
one for the non-infinitessimal part and one for

the infinitessimal part. You should know that!

bassam king karzeddin schrieb:

[j4n bur53]

There is a lesser known math historical incident. It
happened on the cruise ship Santa Barbara, when Henry
Boo played on the billiard table, and suddently a

billiard ball left the table and landed in the lap
of Princess Chopra Sukra. The following night Henry
Boo write a treatese on ukulele measure calculuations

to impress the Princess, whom he was secretly in love.
He could readily develop some arithmetic for ukulele
measurements. In his original manuscript he

writes them as polynomials x+e*y, but to avoid confusion
we will write them as pairs (x,y), since they don't exactly
work as poynomials. Here are the rules deviced by

Henry Boo for the usual arithmetic where for a pair
(x,y), x denotes the non-infinitessimal part and y
denotes the infinitessimal part:

- (x,y) := (-x, -y)

(x,y) + (z,t) := (x+z, y+t)

(x,y) * (z,t) := (x*z, y*z+x*t)

(x,y) / (z,t) := (x/z, (y*z-x*t)/z^2)

During the long journey Henry Boo became friend with
the Princess and they enjoyed the many sight seeings in
mediterian see.

[j4n bur53]

Before the cruise was finished Henry Boo made a successful
attempt to abstract some of his results. He was planning
to show them to Newton and Leibniz after his return

to Rotterdam. So he began looking at his new calculus in
the light of functions instead in the light of arithmetic.
So everything became a function for him, even constants (K)

and variables (I). Again in his manuscript there is some
old notation for functions, but we can use the newer simple
introduction of a function by the assignment sign:

f(x) := ... /* function introduction */

K_c(x) := c /* constant function */

I(x) := x /* identity function */

The first thing he obsevered was that he can extend a
function from non-infinitessimals to his ukulelel measures.
He figured out that for every function f(x) there must

be a derivative f'(x), and he used this derivative
to extend a function to take care of both an non-infinitessimal
part and an infinitessimal part. The core definition is:

f((x,y)) := ( f(x), f'(x)*y )

We readily get:

K_c((x,y)) = (c,0)

I((x,y)) = (x,y)

Interestingly he could verify that function composition
works, which helped him a lot in calculating billiard table
trajectories. Namely he saw that from his definition
of an infinitessimal extended function:

f(g( (x,1) )) = f( (g(x), g'(x)) )

= ( f(g(x)), f'(g(x))*g'(x) )

To his great distress, when he arrived at Rotterdam, he saw
that Newton and Leibniz had a lot of fame. He quickly went
on and verified some of their doing, from his definition of
an infinitessimal extended function and his arithmetic
for ukulele measures:

f( (x,h) ) - f( (x,0) )
----------------------- = (0, f'(x))
(h, 0)

But he told himself, what the heck, my new calculus is much
better, I don't need this complication, if I want to calculate
f'(x), I go directly with:

f( (x,1) ) = ( f(x), f'(x) )

And just pick the second projection of the result. Hadn't he
spent so much time in the mediteranean sea, maybe would now
be known as the inventor of calulus.

j4n bur53 schrieb:

[John Gabriel]

Oh yeah. That's what I meant: "Taweel wa ahbal"

Arabic and Greek were the first spoken languages I heard. I have forgotten most of my Arabic as we left the country of my birth (Khartoum, Sudan) when civil war broke out. However, I heard my parents speak it many times thereafter. My mother was Greek so I learned Greek well. Unfortunately, there is still much trouble there.

[burs...@gmail.com]

trouble like trouble in your brains and of your

new calculoose bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

Am Montag, 23. Januar 2017 17:38:06 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:

[John Gabriel]

:-) What a clown is Burse. What irks me most about BIG STUPID academics is that they think they are authorities in mathematics, but I must tell you that some of the dumbest people I have met in my life's journey work in math education.

Here in the US, they finish high school and know nothing about fractions. But they do know that 0.999... = 1! And they can tell you the distributive and associative properties by heart (Dan Christensen types - everything teacher told me is true...). Chuckle. They can't even calculate percentages without use of a calculator. The funny thing is they all graduate with a diploma. Quite hilarious when they go out to find a job and can't do anything but flip burgers at MacDonalds.

[burs...@gmail.com]

By BIG STUPID you are talking about you and your

new calculoose bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

Am Montag, 23. Januar 2017 17:43:15 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

w0w, the twenty-second b.k.k -- they must
have been a round for a longtime

> In this case, JG is not in any way innocent. He viciously curses and
> insults everyone who doesn't agree with him, and makes delusional
> claims. For years.

> > Regards Bassam King Krzeddin 22ed, Jan., 2017
>
> 22nd

[John Gabriel]

On Sunday, 22 January 2017 09:25:22 UTC-8, DFS wrote:

<cowardly rant>

Yeah. Only cowards are afraid to reveal their real name.

**PLONK**

[Dan Christensen]

So you can track them down and murder them, Troll Boy?


JG wrote:

“Hitler was a genius and a very talented artist... As from a moral point of view, again his actions can't be judged, because his morals are different.” (Like JG's morals?)
-- March 18, 2015

"I will crush you... You need to be very careful what you say."
--November 10, 2016

“It would be a very good idea to round up all the academic idiots, gas them and incinerate the useless lot. Only those that pass John Gabriel's exam should be allowed to live.”
-- July 13, 2014


Dan

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

but, if you cannot put into comprehensice words
-- all such problems are wrod problemmas, at first --
how will any one know, including you?

there are now extant simpler renditions of Wiles' pr00f, and
that is one thing that can be studied, in small doses ... like,
if your writing for an audience de bots

> > of Bachet, and he must have had a real comprehension of p-adics,
> > well before they were ever known in the literature, because
> > he and Pascal and Liebniz all built the same machine -- although
> > it is probably quite elementary, as opposed to Wiles' alleged pr00f.

[bassam king karzeddin]

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 7:38:06 PM UTC+3, John Gabriel wrote:
> On Monday, 23 January 2017 05:37:22 UTC-8, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 3:40:33 PM UTC+3, John Gabriel wrote:
> > > On Monday, 23 January 2017 04:33:48 UTC-8, j4n bur53 wrote:
> > > > Corr.: Latest measurement
> >
> > John Gabriel wrote:
> >
> > > In Arabic, we would call you "Taweel u achbal". Chuckle.
> >
> > Yes, there is a wisdom in arabic that says, ( kl tawil la yakhlu min alhabl wakull qasir la yakhlu min alkhabath), google translation:
> >
> > Each long is not without Habal (Habal: meaning some kind of stupidity),
> >
> > & each short is not without malice
> >
> > There are also some funny slung songs "Taweel wa ahbal"
>
> Oh yeah. That's what I meant: "Taweel wa ahbal"
>

John Gabriel wrote:

> Arabic and Greek were the first spoken languages I heard. I have forgotten most of my Arabic as we left the country of my birth (Khartoum, Sudan) when civil war broke out. However, I heard my parents speak it many times thereafter. My mother was Greek so I learned Greek well. Unfortunately, there is still much trouble there.

Those languages are thousands of years old, and still spoken and learnt so widely,

BK

[bassam king karzeddin]

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:11:35 AM UTC+3, DFS wrote:
> On 1/22/2017 1:43 PM, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 8:25:22 PM UTC+3, DFS wrote:
> >> I saw this claim on a YouTube video comment you made a couple
> >> months ago.
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc
> >>
> >> If so, how do you post to sci.math? From the public library?
> >>
> >> Obviously you're your own worst enemy.
>
>
> > I do not know who are you too, and what is your true intention here,
>

DFS wrote:
> Listen to John Gabriel rant, I guess.

I do not know what does DFS stands for, but for sure a character that prefers to be hidden in dark, and this only indicates your intention!
>
> He appears to be a true math crank. There was another one here years
> ago - James Harris. Gabriel is worse.

WHO would believe someone who does not like to show himself under the sun light, so you are a big liar even if you were true
>
>
>
> > but let me say or remind that occurrence of such stories from the
> > history of mathematics in particular without lengthy details, where
> > many public genius people had been recognized after their miserable
> > lives had been passed away
>
> Which mathematicians are you talking about that were excoriated during
> their lifetimes but recognized as geniuses in death?

May be many historical books can help!
>
>
>
> > Then the big Question might arise immediately! Why this is always the
> > case in mathematics?
>
> I suppose because math is difficult and mysterious to many people, and
> mathematicians are often considered to be geniuses, and
> uneducated/natural genius is interesting?

Mathematics is not difficult, except for those professionals whom they turned it into pure business for their living purposes

A genius never meant to be a professional mathematicians
>
>
> > Especially when it comes to change, or to be revolutionized,
> >
> > Why this peculiar category of people behaviours are generally
> > different from other common categories of human being whom seems no
> > suffering if you were a good singer or a good football player for
> > instance?
> >
> > In the contrary we observe that if any talented mathematician try to
> > show his talent innocently to the world publically and not
> > officially, he immediately invites hates and curse upon himself for
> > ever!

>
> In this case, JG is not in any way innocent. He viciously curses and
> insults everyone who doesn't agree with him, and makes delusional
> claims. For years.

But his claims is now so obvious even for a layperson, and remember that he is not the only one who realised many inconsistent mathematics, with so many easy proofs, so where are the noble historian people to announce the obvious facts now, may be entertaining or engaging or fabricating another novel story!
>
>
> > Is it because this category of people think themselves smart enough
> > or more clever than others? On the opposite, this was shown and
> > proven beyond doubt, that those people are the most innocent whom
> > they easily could be cheated and brainwashed for so many centuries!
> >
> > Or is it because there feeling is so sensitive to the limit that
> > their feelings guts hurt when someone shows superiority in their own
> > fields despite not being classified professionally from their
> > category?
>
> Maybe. I would guess some of the Cambridge mathematicians were
> extremely jealous of the innate math abilities of Ramanujan.

The Paradise of mathematicians (infinity) had given many thousands of Cambridge alike an easy chance of being illegally called genius,

Where their alleged geniosity was based on (0=1), which must require identifying them again and more precisely
>
>
>
> > Or is it their unnoticeable dignity (no matter however small it is)
> > that would not allow them considering anyone else talent, except when
> > imposed upon themselves by their alleged authorities despite being
> > out of the whole issue? not having a hint to what is going on above
> > their heads! as the so famous case of accepting a proof of their
> > highest riddle as Fermat's Last Theorem, where at same time they

> > admit no understanding a hint to the proof despite it is available
> > for more than quarter a century now?
> >
> > And more strangely they defend the alleged proof to the limit that
> > makes you think that it is their proof too!
> >
> > Many more questions could be added to understand this type of people
> > thinking themselves as mathematicians!
> >

> > But I have many answers to this topic where my time is not allowing
> > me to say
> >
> > Thanks being (me) not from this really strange category of people
> >
Regards
Bassam King Krzeddin 25th, Jan., 2017

[Dan Christensen]

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:35:51 AM UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:11:35 AM UTC+3, DFS wrote:
> > On 1/22/2017 1:43 PM, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 8:25:22 PM UTC+3, DFS wrote:
> > >> I saw this claim on a YouTube video comment you made a couple
> > >> months ago.
> > >>
> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc
> > >>
> > >> If so, how do you post to sci.math? From the public library?
> > >>
> > >> Obviously you're your own worst enemy.
> >
> >
> > > I do not know who are you too, and what is your true intention here,
> >
>
> DFS wrote:
> > Listen to John Gabriel rant, I guess.
>
> I do not know what does DFS stands for, but for sure a character that prefers to be hidden in dark, and this only indicates your intention!
> >
> > He appears to be a true math crank. There was another one here years
> > ago - James Harris. Gabriel is worse.
>
> WHO would believe someone who does not like to show himself under the sun light, so you are a big liar even if you were true

It would be foolish to give ones real name in this forum. Your friend wants to exterminate all who question his infinite wisdom. And he seems capable of anything. JG wrote:

“Hitler was a genius and a very talented artist... As from a moral point of view, again his actions can't be judged, because his morals are different.” (Like JG's morals?)
-- March 18, 2015

"I will crush you... You need to be very careful what you say."
--November 10, 2016

"It would be a very good idea to round up all the academic idiots, gas them and incinerate the useless lot. Only those that pass John Gabriel's exam should be allowed to live.”
-- July 13, 2014

So, if you continue to insist, for example, that 1 -:- 2 = 0.5, it could be off the "showers" and thence to ovens for you!


Dan

[j4n bur53]

Yeah don't insist on decimals, it can be pretty dangerous
with bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains around.

His math is entirely based on smooth functions(*), but its
not yet clear whether he wants them also analytic,

but one thing is already clear, everything else will
be exterminated by JG without mercy! So be very careful.

(*)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/3GwRYZU5yMU/MZ14UMovAwAJ

Dan Christensen schrieb:

[John Gabriel]

This video really got to you eh? Chuckle.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGHaTnss6kM


You bastard. Hope a bus rides over your skull and the mush oozes out. Dead dog!!!!

>
>
> Dan

[John Gabriel]

To be recognised by the BIG STUPID, one must be a very good brown-noser. It is all about business and job security unfortunately. But it has started to bite the BIG STUPID in the bum here in the USA: Not only can most students not do calculus, they can't even understand fractions when they graduate from high school.

I have discovered the new calculus which even 8th grade students can learn, but do these morons realise it? Of course not. And those who do, reject it because they don't like me or they don't like it.

Just imagine: the derivative in one easy lesson using only 8th grade math. Using their bogus calculus which is FULL of flaws, ill-formed concepts, thousands of rules (sometimes a distance is positive and sometimes negative), circularity, illogical arithmetic, ad nauseum...

Their bogus calculus takes years to learn and even professors don't understand it in a lifetime. Here's what one of their own says:

http://faculty.etsu.edu/knisleyj/calculus/Crisis.htm

http://faculty.etsu.edu/knisleyj/calculus/facing.htm

No matter how one interprets those articles, the fact is that if they really understood calculus and had a rigorous formulation, there would be no need to write these and no calculus crisis in the USA.

But it doesn't end there...

They will "defend" their ignorance, arrogance and stupidity when all they have to do is admit they are wrong and I will allow them to use the New Calculus.

[burs...@gmail.com]

Why post old shitty useless spam videos from 09.12.2016, this
is a news group bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

Are this your mental milestones of Gsbrieloconfusion and
Johnostupidics nobody is interested in?

Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2017 17:10:03 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:

[Dan Christensen]

Didn't bother to see it. Can't think of a greater waste of time.

I'm just cautioning readers about sharing personal info with the likes of you, Troll Boy.


Dan

[shio...@googlemail.com]

Your reading comprehension must be really low if you think the person who wrote what is written in your links would ever agree with you.

[John Gabriel]

He doesn't have my stupid one. What he writes is self-incriminating. Chuckle.

[shio...@googlemail.com]

He has a lot of intellect and raises serious question.s Unlike you who is a crank and nothing else.

[John Gabriel]

On Wednesday, 25 January 2017 15:05:21 UTC-8, shio...@googlemail.com wrote:


> He has a lot of intellect and raises serious question.s Unlike you who is a crank and nothing else.

Sorry to disappoint you but he agrees with me on a lot of things:

If it were so rigorous, then why would their very own write articles like this:

http://faculty.etsu.edu/knisleyj/calculus/Crisis.htm

http://faculty.etsu.edu/knisleyj/calculus/facing.htm

"The fundamental theorem of calculus has not only made calculus one of the most powerful intellectual tools known to man, but it has also created a dichotomy that makes calculus very difficult to teach." - Kniseley

It has created such problems because NO ONE understood it before I came along. In order to understand the fundamental theorem, one first has to understand the mean value theorem because the fundamental theorem is DERIVED in ONE step from the mean value theorem.

See first ever constructive proof and derivation of FTC in one step:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLZG1pNlVIX2RTR0E

f'(c) = [f(b)-f(a)]/(b-a)

f'(c) = 1/(b-a) * { \int_a^b f'(x) dx }

Area = interval width * height = (b-a) * f'(c) = f(b)-f(a)

None of the DUMB bastards in academia knew this before I discovered it. NOT ONE. It is NOT published anywhere in any book or online.

I, John Gabriel, the greatest mathematician was the first to realise this.


"It is unlikely that there will ever be a means of teaching calculus that allows every theorem to be proven rigorously..." - Kniseley

Actually there is my dear Professor Kniseley, it's called the New Calculus - the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.

Well, how can you prove theorems if you've never really understood them? Chuckle.

[burs...@gmail.com]

By rogueloose you are talking about you and your
new calculoose bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

Am Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2017 00:14:22 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

there are no negative p-adics, but there also are no such ten-adics, and
you really have to utilize the *notion* of infinite places
to the left of the decimal point, without actually trying
to write every non-last one of them, "down."

now, get the **** out of this conversational format, f00l

> Next: planning to post something for future generations of artificial intelligent
>
> Bassam king Karzeddin

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

[shio...@googlemail.com]

""
> > He has a lot of intellect and raises serious question.s Unlike you who is a crank and nothing else.
>
> Sorry to disappoint you but he agrees with me on a lot of things:
> ""

Sorry to burst your bubble, but he does not agree with you.

He says there is a difficulty in the way we teach calculus, not in the what.
You making wrong claims and statements does not help.

[John Gabriel]

That is obviously false. Those articles are quite self-explanatory.
There is not only a problem in the way calculus is taught but also a problem with the way it is formulated.

[Dan Christensen]

Readers can see here what a pathetic liar you are, Troll Boy. Those links again:

http://faculty.etsu.edu/knisleyj/calculus/Crisis.htm

http://faculty.etsu.edu/knisleyj/calculus/facing.htm


Dan
Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

[shio...@googlemail.com]

It is, it is sad that you still are unable to comprehend it XD

He raises a problem in that teachers are using questionable formulations in their questions, not that calculus itself, when it is rigourusly laid out with mathematical operators, is formulated inadequately.

[John Gabriel]

You are quite pathetic because the article is clear. Even if one were to read it through biased eyes such as yours, it's very telling that Knisley talks about circularity, bad definitions, etc. Of course he wants to sell a textbook - so much is clear, but in the process he reveals much of the truth, which fools like you simply love to hate and refuse to acknowledge.

"It is unlikely that there will ever be a means of teaching calculus that allows every theorem to be proven rigorously..." - Kniseley

See, a statement such as the following is a telling admission that Knisley and others have never really understood calculus, even though he says this himself clearly:

"...Students don't get it, teachers don't get it..."

"Teachers" don't get it????? Chuckle. Well, of course they don't get it. Mainstream calculus has never been rigorous.

That says a lot about the bogus calculus. If it were so well formed, there never would have been this discussion or a New Calculus.

[burs...@gmail.com]

By bogus you mean you and your hocus pocus new

calculoose bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

Am Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2017 12:52:21 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

the matter of pr00f is not in question, at all;
it is sympli not addressed by these freaks de math,
as it is just binary arithmetic per Boole ... and, crucially,
the literate use of dyspositive statements of a)
neccesity and b)
sufficiency in matters of everyday dyscourse -- go for it

[bassam karzeddin]

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 2:07:48 PM UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:53:52 AM UTC+3, John Gabriel wrote:
> > On Sunday, 22 January 2017 13:46:52 UTC-8, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Nah the current list is/wss a little larger: Negative
> > > Numbers, Complex Numers, Set Theory, Cantor, Peano.
> > >
> > > What else?
> > >
> > > Am Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 22:43:09 UTC+1 schrieb burs...@gmail.com:
> > > > Interestingly the current crank spectrum is not extremly
> > > > large. Pythagoreans, Infinite, Calculoose. But no LFT and such.
> >
> John Gabriel wrote:
>
> > How about real crank Jan Burse? Chuckle.
> This one Jan Burse, or bursegan, ..., is (99.999... )% crank, for at least not being able to differentiate between (100%) and (99.999... %), he still considers them the same, which is more than sufficient reason to be described as a real crank, but the real tragedy that he belongs to the majority of the modern mythematickers
>
>
> Bassam karzeddin

[markus...@gmail.com]

söndag 22 januari 2017 kl. 18:25:22 UTC+1 skrev DFS:
> I saw this claim on a YouTube video comment you made a couple months ago.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc
>
> If so, how do you post to sci.math? From the public library?
>
> Obviously you're your own worst enemy.
>
>

> <quotes>
> John Gabriel2 months ago (edited)
> You are not the first to notice this. I am bitter about the way I have
> been libeled and trashed on the internet by those who do know better:
> Prof. Gilbert Strang, Prof. Jack Huizenga and others.
>
> Exposing the fallacies in mainstream mathematics is a retaliation
> against the BIG STUPID (mainstream academia). They know the New
> Calculus I have discovered is the first and only rigorous formulation,
> but refuse to admit it. I didn't set out to do this initially, but I was
> going to highlight these fallacies eventually. It has to be done so that
> new progress can be realised.
>
> What about the New Calculus? Here are just a few reasons:
>
> 1. It is the first and only rigorous formulation.
> 2. It can be learned in a very short time.
> 3. Has many new features not possible in mainstream calculus, such as
> the auxiliary equation, the Gabriel Polynomial, systematic integration
> and a whole lot more.
> 4. The New Calculus handles PDEs far better than the bogus mainstream
> calculus. It is better in every respect.
> 5. Good for non-linear regression and analysis.
>
> I could list many other reasons, but I'll tell you that many STEM
> professionals are already using it: engineers, computer software
> developers, graphics developers, statisticians, scientists and even
> teachers who are not afraid of being labeled negatively.
>
> The mainstream calculus is doomed. It is going nowhere fast. To wit,
> there has been zero progress in the last 150 years. The mainstream
> fallacies and rotten theories of Georg Cantor have contributed to this
> malaise.
>
> There is much I have not shared about the new calculus, but how can I
> share anymore when I am so reviled. Dishonest and jealous academics
> spend most of their time libeling and defaming my character, rather than
> admitting I am correct. It takes a very strong mind to admit error.
>
> Prof. Strang is an example of an individual who represents the
> quintessential face of the BIG STUPID. For almost 2 years he libeled me
> on sci.math under the alias Port563. There's a link on my site to his
> disgusting and unprofessional behaviour. He has yet to formally apologise.
>
> Because of his actions and those of a vile troll (Dan Christensen) on
> sci.math, I have been fired unethically from two jobs at private schools
> where I was employed less than a week in both cases. The administrators
> at these schools are idiots, but the behavior of Strang and others
> helped to fire me. The new discrimination in the USA is "not being a
> culture fit". I was fired from both Rancho Solano in Arizona
> (http://www.ranchosolano.com/) and BASIS Independent School in San Jose
> (http://siliconvalley.basisindependent.com). I have no money to take
> them to court otherwise I would be rich. Both these schools are
> for-profit and run by Jews who falsely imagine I am anti-semitic.
>
> This country (USA) is going down the drain fast. They have a need for
> the best mathematics teachers. I am the best but no one wants to hire me
> because most of the schools are run by morons. When I am hired, I am
> fired even before I get to teach, so it's a catch 22 for me. I am no
> longer looking for work.
>
> I am homeless, destitute and unemployed. This is the result of the
> actions of the bastards whom I just described. The filthy lawyers who do
> not accept my case are just more of the same as they. How can I not be
> bitter? Strang is a felon because he called me a terrorist.
>
> So, for me, this is an outlet of my anger and frustration. There is
> nothing academics hate more than to be shown how ignorant, incompetent
> and stupid they are. I'll continue to do this until my last breath.
> Show less
> Reply 2
> Doctor Doom
> Doctor Doom2 months ago
> those who do *NOT know better. My opinion is to leave emotions out of
> this and just concentrate on curating knowledge.Those who resonate with
> truth see your good work.
> Reply 1
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel2 months ago
> +Doctor Doom Your opinion is correct, but I have a problem forgetting
> and forgiving.
> I have tried working on this. It has been my means of survival all these
> years. In fact, it shouldn't matter what those idiots think. Somehow, I
> keep coming across the most ignorant people on my life's journey. Very
> seldom are there those who are intelligent, but the majority are useless
> morons. Very unfortunate. Okay, Dr. Doom, I'll keep trying. :-)
> Show less
> Reply 1
> Christian Chapman
> Christian Chapman2 months ago
> Scary stuff, man!
> Reply
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel2 months ago
> +Christian Chapman Yeah. :-) It's very hard to change once you are set
> in your ways. Love me with potty mouth or leave me.
> Reply
> infinitesimotel
> infinitesimotel1 month ago
> I'd like to see a game engine or rendering software made from it.
> Reply
> infinitesimotel
> infinitesimotel1 month ago
> Your situation sounds a lot like (((communist))) treatment of those who
> want to expose and destroy their lies and trash. Look at what happened
> to Tesla and Viktor Schauberger.
> Reply 1
> infinitesimotel
> infinitesimotel1 month ago
> Those who are putting out all the shit, and have been for millennia, are
> the same ones who own the banks and print the money. They run the
> media, and they own all channels of communication. I'll leave that to
> you to find out who that is. BUT I bet you (and I have looked myself)
> that ooooh yes, the very same tribe is in the maths world, fucking
> things up as usual.
> Show less
> Reply 1
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel1 month ago (edited)
> @infinitesimotel: Yes. I have been the target by filthy trash such as
> Gilbert Strang, Jack Huizenga, David Ullrich and a host of other
> reptiles. Then they have their lackeys such as sci.math's troll Dan
> Christensen whose libel cost me two jobs this year because school
> administrators here are such idiots that they can't think independently.
> It's like a beehive mentality.
>
> Educators are among some of the dumbest humans I have ever met. It's
> very sad. There is this thing about being politically correct, but one
> cannot communicate civilly with these baboons. It's just not possible.
> They are cowards of the highest order. Strang taunted me on sci.math for
> almost 2 years using the alias Port563 until I outed him. The coward has
> since disappeared. The filthy swine has never formally apologised, nor
> has his boss - Mr. Reif, the president of MIT - that shit institution.
> Show less
> Reply 1
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel1 month ago (edited)
> @infinitesimotel: Oh, I know exactly who the filthy swines are! The
> disgusting rich Jews and their lackeys. I hate them all with a vengeance.
>
> But not all are bad. Only the ones who control the banks and the wealth
> of the planet. Wish Hitler had gotten these bastards. They got away by
> fleeing to the US, Canada, Australia, South Africa and UK.
>
> Unfortunately, the Jews Hitler murdered were mostly innocent. Did you
> know that the wealthy reptiles such as the Rothchilds, etc abandoned
> their very own Jewish brothers during the Holocaust?
>
> Greed will eventually destroy this planet.
> Show less
> Reply 1
> infinitesimotel
> infinitesimotel1 month ago
> +John Gabriel Personally, I do not believe in the "good jew" myth, that
> is something I will not push onto you but something you will encounter
> on your own journey in your own time and way. Hitler did not kill
> anyone, that is another PR jew slander campaign. Hitler was completely
> set up by our beloved (((chosen ones))), topics too vast to go into, but
> I would recommend the documentary "the greatest story never told". And
> if you feel like reading something the Protocols of Zion, it is a free
> PDF, also Henry Ford "The International Jew" PDF also free. Your
> battle on the mathematics frontier is another spear towards the face of
> the enemy. I know of the Rothschild shitheads, probably the ones most
> responsible for the ruin of good life on Earth. Not all jews are bad,
> but in every bad there is a jew. Again, I don't want to stray too far
> from the main topic but just raise this issue.
> Read more
> Reply
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel1 month ago
> I hear what you are saying. I just can't bring myself to harm them or
> anyone else. They will self-destruct as I've said. Parasites die once
> the host dies.
> Reply 1
> infinitesimotel
> infinitesimotel1 month ago (edited)
> +John Gabriel I don't want the host to die, but if the parasite is cut
> off then it will fade into nothing, keep up the good work. The truth
> can never be destroyed or hidden for long. On another note, you have
> enough of a battle on this front, I'm only showing you the face of the
> enemy. They perk up in all topics. 
> Reply
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel1 month ago
> +infinitesimotel Trust me. I know the Jews are jealous enemies, but so
> are most others. It's in human nature to be envious and want to take the
> credit for everything.
> Reply 1
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel1 month ago (edited)
> They sure do. Hitler said:
>
> "Was there any form of filth or crime…without at least one Jew involved
> in it. If you cut even cautiously into such a sore, you find like a
> maggot in a rotting body, often dazzled by the sudden light – a Jew."
>
> See, I hate to generalise because not all Jews are bad. I do not hate
> them. I hate what they do. They have spread so many lies about
> everything and everyone. They have also recruited stupid goyim
> (gentiles) to fight their battles on their behalf.
>
> You can't even say anything objective about a Jew and you are labelled a
> Jew-hater. They are systematically reducing the world to slavery. This
> is unwise, because the last time they did this in Germany, it didn't
> work out too well for them.
>
> If someone had to say what Hitler said today, it would be called hate
> speech, but it's not hate speech if it's true. The Wikipedia has a
> policy of publishing the nationality of those whose names appear in
> biographies. In many instances they are quick to do this for famous
> people even when these people were not Jews in fact. However, they slink
> back from including the nationality when the article involves a bad Jew.
> Double standards of course.
>
> For example, the Madoff article calls Madoff an American fraudster, not
> an American Jewish fraudster and only mentions his nationality in the
> Early Life section.
>
> But the Wikipedia is controlled by Jews. Control of media and
> information dissemination is a powerful and effective tool in their
> hands. They are undoubtedly the masters of information gathering and
> deception dissemination.
>
> They are making the entire world hate them. It appears they have learned
> nothing from the holocaust.
>
> To understand the Jews, you should read Mein Kampf. It's quite scary
> how they haven't changed one bit.
>
> I don't like or agree with what Hitler did. It was wrong. However, you
> can understand why he became so bitter and filled with hate for them.
> You know, even by today's standards, he was an exceptionally talented
> artist. The filthy and arrogant Jews at the Vienna academy rejected him
> because they did not like him personally. In retrospect, I bet they wish
> they had accepted him.
> Show less
> Reply 1
> TheYes Dave
> TheYes Dave2 weeks ago
> Hi John, you say "Both these schools are for-profit and run by Jews who
> falsely imagine I am anti-semitic" regarding the schools that fired you.
> Then you dive into a long rant about how bad/evil/dishonest/jealous Jews
> are, along with infinitesimotel. This is quite the contradiction. How
> could any Jewish person want to work with you after having read these
> posts?
> Read more
> Reply 1
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel2 weeks ago
> Well, my experiences with Jews have mostly been bad. They are not a
> pleasant lot to be around. Truth is I don't think I want anything to do
> with them either.
>
> They were clearly in the wrong and I don't see how your remark has any
> relevance. It's like someone saying:
>
> "The Nazis tortured and gassed you. You've been saying nothing but bad
> things about them. How could any Nazi want to be your friend?"
>
> The leadership at these schools are vile, disgusting reptiles who would
> have been sorry if I had the money to sue them. Their ethnic background
> just further underscores the crooked nosed Jew and his filthy dealings.
>
> I do not hate all Jews, but some of them are prize scum.
> Show less
> Reply 1
> TheYes Dave
> TheYes Dave2 weeks ago
> I see that I dragged myself into a bit of an opinion based argument! On
> the grounds that I don't think it's constructive and that I need to
> spend less time doing this sort of thing, I am respectfully dropping out
> of this one, Regards
> Reply
> John Gabriel
> John Gabriel2 weeks ago
> I don't see what the topic of Jews has to do with mathematics and in
> particular my YT channel. It's one which should clearly not have been
> brought up. Judaism and Jews have no relevance on my channel and I do
> not want that topic discussed on my channel preferably at all. But if
> you are into that sort of thing, there is no shortage of forums on the
> internet. Frankly I don't care for the topic at all.
> </quotes>


"But the Wikipedia is controlled by Jews. Control of media and
information dissemination is a powerful and effective tool in their
hands. They are undoubtedly the masters of information gathering and
deception dissemination.

They are making the entire world hate them. It appears they have learned
nothing from the holocaust.

To understand the Jews, you should read Mein Kampf. It's quite scary
how they haven't changed one bit."


Jesus, John Gabriel is an unhinged anti-Semite.