Chapt13.24 Orbital Resonance proves EM-gravity and disproves mass-gravity #302 Atom Totality 5th ed

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Chapters
(13.23) Moon tides supports EM-gravity not mass-gravity
(13.24) Orbital Resonance proves EM-gravity and disproves mass-gravity

Tides of the Moon and Sun are just supporting evidence as seen on Lake
tides for EM-gravity. A large body of water such as a lake, for we do
not need an ocean to show EM-gravity, has more EM-gravity due to the
polar molecule of water as compared to say a nonmagnetic type of
material. The Great Lakes in USA have about a 2 cm tides and the Black
Sea has about 9 cm tides due to EM-gravity.

Tides are supporting evidence but the proof of EM-gravity over that of
mass-gravity easily comes out of odd behaviour of planets and moons
where they have the same face towards the Sun such as Mercury with the
Sun, or the same face towards the Earth such as Moon with Earth. This
is called orbital-resonance in the literature, only in old-physics,
they did not realize that mass-gravity cannot give same-face
resonance. Only the EM-force is strong enough to make the Mercury same-
face or the Moon the same-face.

In Old Physics this phenomenon was called orbital resonance and was
attributed to mass-gravity, but mass-gravity is too weak to allow same-
face
or to allow for the Ganymede, Europa, and Io. Look at this explanation
of
orbital resonance given in Wikipedia:

--- quoting Wikipedia on orbital resonance ---
In celestial mechanics, an orbital resonance occurs when two orbiting
bodies exert a regular, periodic gravitational influence on each
other, usually due to their orbital periods being related by a ratio
of two small integers. Orbital resonances greatly enhance the mutual
gravitational influence of the bodies, i.e., their ability to alter or
constrain each others' orbits. In most cases, this results in an
unstable interaction, in which the bodies exchange momentum and shift
orbits until the resonance no longer exists. Under some circumstances,
a resonant system can be stable and self correcting, so that the
bodies remain in resonance. Examples are the 1:2:4 resonance of
Jupiter's moons Ganymede, Europa and Io, and the 2:3 resonance between
Pluto and Neptune. Unstable resonances with Saturn's inner moons give
rise to gaps in the rings of Saturn. The special case of 1:1 resonance
(between bodies with similar orbital radii) causes large Solar System
bodies to eject most other bodies sharing their orbits; this is part
of the much more extensive process of clearing the neighbourhood, an
effect that is used in the current definition of a planet.
--- end quote ---

Think of how illogical that idea is. It is saying that mass-gravity,
sometimes
is different for one pair of gravitational objects versus another pair
of gravitational objects. It is saying that gravity is sometimes
resonant-gravity
and other times nonresonant-gravity.

In EM-gravity, gravity is always dependent on charge differentials,
and so the Mercury has more charge differential from the Sun that it
is the same face than does Earth to Sun.

In mass-gravity, it matters not whether a body is rotating or not
rotating for the gravity is the same, but in EM-gravity, the rotation
of a body influences the EM-gravity of another body. So that Mercury
near the powerful charge differential of the Sun became a spin
rotation of same-face and the Moon close to the powerful charge
differential of Earth became a spin-rotation of
same-face to Earth.

So in EM-gravity we have resonant energy because it is from the
stronger force of EM and not mass-gravity.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On Feb 11, 2:52 pm, Archimedes Plutonium

Now in Old Physics and Old&Poor Astronomy, they thought that the
orbital resonance
of Ganymede, Europa, Io was a different phenomenon of "same-face" for
Mercury to
Sun and for Moon to Earth. And read what Wikipedia defines as orbital
resonance as a
mathematical relationship, not a physical relationship.

You cannot have, by logic, a resonant gravity versus a nonresonant
gravity.

And in mass-gravity, you cannot have a alteration of spin rotation of
a body due to mass gravity,
because mass-gravity cannot distinguish a mass that is rotating or a
mass that is nonrotating.

However, if gravity was all EM-gravity, then of course a body that is
spin rotating has a vast influence on another body, such a Jupiter to
its moons or Sun to Mercury or Earth to Moon.

Physicists and astronomers of the past have "dropped the ball" so to
speak in error when it comes to this concept of orbital-resonance.

All of gravity is EM-gravity and it is about charge differentials in
astro bodies, and it also influences the spin rotation of an astro
body. So that the phenomenon of "same face" and of
Ganymede, Europa, Io are all the same phenomenon of EM-gravity on
orbits and spin rotation.

It is sad indeed that physicists and astronomers in College are not
required to take a formal course in advanced logic in order to have
them think better and clearer once they step out
into a physics career.