Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Finlayson's slate

111 views
Skip to first unread message

Ross A. Finlayson

unread,
Dec 20, 2018, 10:08:00 AM12/20/18
to
> Cantor's nested intervals theorem <-> Finlayson's EF as counterexample
> Cantor's antidiagonal argument <-> Finlayson's EF as counterexample
> continued fractions <-> Finlayson's EF as counterexample
> Cantor's indicator function theorem <-> Finlayson's symmetrical
> mapping as counterexample
> Zuhair's binary tree theorem <-> Finlayson's BT = EF as counterexample
> Cantor's powerset theorem <-> Finlayson's powerset as order type as
> successor construction, and a dialetheic ur-element
> Russell's negated correlates <-> Finlayson's note on statement of
> structurally true languages
> irrationals uncountable <-> Finlayson's "A function surjects the
> rationals onto the irrationals"

Ross A. Finlayson

unread,
Dec 27, 2018, 3:09:20 AM12/27/18
to
Take all that?
I keep all that.

j4n bur53

unread,
Dec 27, 2018, 5:33:04 AM12/27/18
to
> 1+1=2 <-> Finlayson's herpes 1+1=3

Jew Lover

unread,
Dec 27, 2018, 10:32:01 AM12/27/18
to
You are the Anglo-Saxon version of mega-stupid Italian Julio De Egidio.

Ross A. Finlayson

unread,
Dec 28, 2018, 1:14:54 PM12/28/18
to
"A function surjects the rationals onto the irrationals."

Ross A. Finlayson

unread,
Dec 30, 2018, 2:12:39 PM12/30/18
to
"Then, putting R[0,1] x N
is a similar way, there's only one
function not establishing structure
outside the space that
it has the values. "

Infinitesimals:
Cantor, cholera (bacteria)
Burse, amoebae (parasite)
Finlayson, herpes (virus)

Cantor can't have cholera,
for Burse it's a parasite,
I think I have all the viruses.

Or, "virii".

The action or motion of
drawing the points of the
line, whether this is always
under a constant function of
time, or what, establishing the
continuous domain, it is a simple
result that line-drawing sweeps
the line while no Cartesian Cantorian
functions admit any such function,
of course with the complete ordered
field as the equivalence classes of
sequences (or, series) that are Cauchy.

Whether as a constant function of time
in t[0,1] or not, it also so basically establishes
such a thing for example with Peano's
"constant infinitesimals" (cholera).

Line-drawing: now in remedial.

1.0: usually "measure theory".

I can write measure theory in that.

Ross A. Finlayson

unread,
Dec 30, 2018, 2:35:09 PM12/30/18
to
About "writing measure theory in that",
here for example I do so, briefly:

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/osVMgEVoxFg/vgjZ30CKAwAJ

f(n), n e N = dom(f)
n/d, n -> d, d -> oo

n > m => f(n) > f(m), monotone strictly increasing
f(n+1) - f(n) = f(m+1) - f(m), constant monotone

extent:
0 = 0/d e ran(f)
1 = d/d e ran(f)

density:
for each x in [0,1], there's a ran(f) in all neighborhoods of x
...

completeness:
the least-upper-bound for finite subsets of ran(f) is in ran(f)
the least-upper-bound for infinite subsets of ran(f) = 1 and is in ran(f)

measure:
measurable subsets {0, ..., f(n)} for n-set {0, ..., n}, or,
measurable subsets {f(m), ..., f(n)} for n > m form a sigma-algebra

Ross A. Finlayson

unread,
Aug 4, 2019, 9:00:28 PM8/4/19
to
About writing measure theory in that....

0 new messages