No quantity or zero comes first

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

then first quantity that has been divided
by all finites already... that is divided by
infinity already...

[Herp Derpington]

Shut up idiot.

[Sergio]

wrong!

1 comes first

2 comes second

3 comes third


and that is what my 3 year old granddaughter told me, she Knows for sure

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

On Saturday, January 16, 2021 at 4:52:25 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
> On 1/16/2021 2:27 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > then first quantity that has been divided
> > by all finites already... that is divided by
> > infinity already...
> >
> wrong!
>
> 1 comes first
>
> 2 comes second
>
> 3 comes third
>

The fundamental no quantity named zero
is the beginning winning of math.

[Sergio]

once a zero, always a zero.

but if a 1, that is something, the First One

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

Zero math is the subtraction limit.
There is no more quantity to subtract...

[Carmello Fumero-Diaz]

"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > The fundamental no quantity named zero is the beginning winning of
>> > math.
>> >
>> once a zero, always a zero. but if a 1, that is something, the First
>> One
>
> Zero math is the subtraction limit. There is no more quantity to
> subtract...

See the lame capitalist fascist *sustainable development* irony inhere?

Fire at Homeless Camp Puts US Capitol on Brief Lockdown, Interrupting
Inauguration Rehearsal
https://sptnkne.ws/FawD

Your only hope
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 10:14:41 AM UTC-8, Carmello Fumero-Diaz wrote:
> "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > The fundamental no quantity named zero is the beginning winning of
> >> > math.
> >> >
> >> once a zero, always a zero. but if a 1, that is something, the First
> >> One
> >
> > Zero math is the subtraction limit. There is no more quantity to
> > subtract...

Zero is the limit on subtraction... no quantity left to take...

Mitchell Raemsch

[Michael Moroney]

Except for things like electric charge, where I can have +2 coulombs,
take away 3 coulombs and have -1 coulombs as the result.

Or an overdraft checking account, where I have $40.00, I write a check for
$61.00 and have a balance of $-21.00.

Sorry, Smitch, once again you're wrong.

[Herp Derpington]

Shut up idiot.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 12:48:11 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 1/18/2021 1:46 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 10:14:41 AM UTC-8, Carmello Fumero-Diaz wrote:
> >> "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> The fundamental no quantity named zero is the beginning winning of
> >>>>> math.
> >>>>>
> >>>> once a zero, always a zero. but if a 1, that is something, the First
> >>>> One
> >>>
> >>> Zero math is the subtraction limit. There is no more quantity to
> >>> subtract...
> >
> > Zero is the limit on subtraction... no quantity left to take...
> Except for things like electric charge, where I can have +2 coulombs,
> take away 3 coulombs and have -1 coulombs as the result.

Ions are a relative...
Not ionic is an absolute

>
> Or an overdraft checking account, where I have $40.00, I write a check for
> $61.00 and have a balance of $-21.00.

You are going to the wrong bank you moron....

>
> Sorry, Smitch, once again you're wrong.

Zero is no quantity left to subtract from...

Mitchell Raemsch

[Michael Moroney]

On 1/18/2021 7:07 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 12:48:11 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 1/18/2021 1:46 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 10:14:41 AM UTC-8, Carmello Fumero-Diaz wrote:
>>>> "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> The fundamental no quantity named zero is the beginning winning of
>>>>>>> math.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> once a zero, always a zero. but if a 1, that is something, the First
>>>>>> One
>>>>>
>>>>> Zero math is the subtraction limit. There is no more quantity to
>>>>> subtract...
>>>
>>> Zero is the limit on subtraction... no quantity left to take...
>> Except for things like electric charge, where I can have +2 coulombs,
>> take away 3 coulombs and have -1 coulombs as the result.
>
> Ions are a relative...
> Not ionic is an absolute

What the hell does that mean? Do you make it up as you go along?

I didn't mention ions. The charges could be from electrons, pions,
kaons, omega particles or whatever.

The math of electric charges follows the math of negative numbers
perfectly. If I have 5 coulombs of charge and I subtract 7 coulombs of
charge I have -2 coulombs of charge.

> Or an overdraft checking account, where I have $40.00, I write a
check for
> $61.00 and have a balance of $-21.00.

> You are going to the wrong bank you moron....

ALL banks which offer overdraft checking do this.

You can do something similar with credit cards, too. If my statement
balance is $40.00, meaning I owe them $40, but I write a check for
$100.00 instead, my next statement will have a balance of $-60.00. I
"owe" them -60 dollars, meaning they owe ME $60. I can then use the
credit card until the amount I charge cancels the $-60.00. Math of
negative numbers!

>
>> Sorry, Smitch, once again you're wrong.

Which you prove every single day.

[zelos...@gmail.com]

we can still have negative numbers you imbecile