# Bassam Karzeddin hidden answer on Qoura about the refutation of (Galois, Ruffini & Able) theorems for global idiots mathematicians

176 views
Skip to first unread message

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Jan 20, 2020, 2:22:07 AM1/20/20
to

Learn freely the hidden trick (in a few minutes) of the insolvability of Quantic equation and higher by radicals

Q: Why do mathematicians illegally make real root solution for this non-solvable Diophantine equation (n5−m5=nm4) , where (n, m) are positive coprime integers?

full hidden topic (with unseen image of a one line formula) on this link below:

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-mathematicians-illegally-make-real-root-solution-for-this-non-solvable-Diophantine-equation-n-5-m-5-nm-4-where-n-m-are-positive-coprime-integers/answer/Bassam-Karzeddin-1

Is it possible up to this date that my question isn't well-received by public academic mainstream mathematicians despite teaching repeatedly the way to the answer? Wonder!, let us rewrite this insolvable Diophantine Equation here again
$(n^5 - m^5 = nm^4)$ Eqn. 1

Never mind, we know in advance that there can't be any existing integers $n, m$ that can ever satisfy this Diophantine Equation, (Right?)
Do you know why? Wonder!

The reason is too simple especially for the beginners in number theory for sure
Just because $n$ or $m$ divides exactly the RHS of Eqn. 1, But so, unfortunately, doesn't divide exactly the LHS of the same Eqn. 1, hence contradiction, and no solution ever exists and no matter however large your $(n, m)$ are chosen, where also such ratio ($x = \frac{n}{m}$) doesn't exist, for sure

**Note that the word “divides exactly” means the quotient or the result is a full integer, whereas the term “doesn’t divide exactly” means the quotient or the result isn’t a full integer but a fraction or rational number that isn’t a full integer**

But, let me play this magic trick and keep the so innocent people wondering about solutions for the rest of their entire lives and many centuries to come until someone would eventually come and rescue them by revealing the magician’s true secret to keeping the innocent people away from his magic deeds and intentions against humanity as a whole, where then (she/he) would enjoy the outcome alone without being noticed

And what was that magician's trick? Wonder!
It is unbelievably too simple, just divide the whole Eqn.1 by the term $m^5$, and set( $x = \frac{n}{m})$, then rearrange the terms where one wonderfully gets this incredible and irreducible famous polynomial of odd fifth degrees

$(x^5 - x - 1 = 0)$

that must have at least one real algebraic root (not necessarily by radicals) and 4 other dependent complex roots (derived strictly from the same real root) in accordance with the well-designed fundamental theorem of algebra a few centuries back

Where the innocent people would keep wondering aimlessly why such quintic polynomials and higher are impossible to solve by real radicals, and they would keep trying to understand this mind puzzle in order to solve it by real radicals at least for one real root, (where the untold, hidden fact that there isn’t any real root to be represented by anything or by radicals or be simply classified as real algebraic number solution)
But we secretly know (together) "now" that no such real root ever exists as per our above simple proof, adding the absolute fact of the impossibility of geometric exact construction of such an imaginable real root (in human minds only)

And please don't complicate the issue anymore by asking like smart questions about the other 4 roots that are strictly associated and derived from that non-existing real number root

Or asking when drawing on the graph where it must cross the (X-Axis), since we did explain them repeatedly and very well earlier in many relevant answers if you do remember for sure

please look carefully into my collapsed answers also in this very important issue to the whole mathematical sciences, since I didn’t delete them where no valid reasons were legally stated behind their suppressing, but because they were simply contradicting the common global educational mathematics among the mainstream academics generally

Where continuity of real numbers was simply proven false beside those imaginary numbers (in other published answers) and in half-page for continuum hypothesis and one page for imaginary numbers

But if we truly insist to have something like an approximated real root for any other non-mathematical purpose, then Wolfram Alpha is good enough, or many other well-known approximation methods like (Cauchy sequences, Dedekind cuts, Newton's approximations, Limits, Convergence, intermediate theorem, …., etc.)
But in any case, I found this formula as the best applicable for such approximations, with a little manipulation by making $x = \frac{1}{y}$, where the applied polynomial by this old formula would be directly for $(y^5 + y^4 = 1)$, then get your needed approximations (but never as you like but as you are capable to make it up to some integer index $N$ in accordance with this following self-proved formula:

Noting importantly that none of the above-mentioned methods of approximations would be considered valid in defining even a single true real irrational (constructible) number like $\sqrt{2}$ for example, simply because they are incapable to get many uncountable constructible numbers that are strictly less than $\sqrt{2}$ where such situations are independent of any imaginable technology of computations and absolutely perpetual, just because you can’t simply equate exactly any decimal rational number (with its endless field) with truly existing (hence constructible) irrational number like $\sqrt{2}$, where it is existence is independent on rationales as a diagonal distance of a square with unity side, that may also exist in many uncountable triangles (with exactly known sides)

The whole theme of this repeated with many similar answers I did publish for free is to well-understand the impossibilities of solving polynomials by radicals in a few minutes and not to waste your precious life aimlessly into many other much longer reasons that are in total doubt even among the expert mathematicians until this date

I truly want to help others in simple natural forms and without throwing them with made-up riddles by human magicians and with no need at all to understand (Galois, Ruffini, and Able) the so complicated theorems, and you may like to save it, since many others may not like it where they would secretly report it to waste all my efforts to help others again and again for no spoken or any valid reason so far,

And other related published answers of mine are also helpful to get this simple trick completely behind insolvability of polynomials by radicals
I hope this is helpful

Regards

Copyrights (c), 2020
Bassam Karzeddin

Reference: The Formula -Solution of equations by power series (1995), (earlier posts)
Public published answers (Bassam Karzeddin)
Wikipedia (General)

This is purely for future natural historical purposes

### Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Jan 20, 2020, 2:29:33 AM1/20/20
to
Hi, BKK, say, how are you doing with that Math Stalk Exchange. Any friendlier?

I myself had a huge huge run in with that dastardly outfit. Some 10 years ago some of these sci.math tramps and hooligans and criminals forged my name to MSE with stupid questions, trying to make me look bad.

Math Stalk Exchange is a good name for that outfit.

And as soon as I reported the forgery, many here in sci.math unsubscribed to sci.math and to MSE. Feeling that there are too many criminals to make this forum worthwhile.

AP

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Jan 20, 2020, 11:16:03 AM1/20/20
to
Actually, they are the worst moderated site or place I had ever experienced in my life, they are even much worse the Donkeypedia it self, and the worst moderated site ever existing in the whole world

SE is solely made for ordinary traditional mathematics, where a repeated knowledge that maybe true or going with their common beliefs would be so much appreciated

The main problem with that site (despite being good for beginners to learn some basic things in mathematics, is that they have usually thousands of police moderators in every section where their main duty is exactly like house dogs gourds (to protect the huge common ignorance in mathematics)

They immediately get so mad once one write a claim starting by saying I discovered ..., I proved …,...

And immediately they ask where are the proofs, and once one shows them the irrefutable elementary proofs (based on natural numbers that no one can deny),

where they get so silent and can't say a word, then they ask the claimers,

where did you publish your proof?

and if you tell them that is just published before your own eyes since it is contradicting your global common education and of course is impossible to be acceptable by your disrespected alleged top most Journals and Universities (who are more dogmatic than you about those too sensitive issues that would certainly hurt their so sensitive feelings)

beside being myself not a professional to write the way you like or understand, but giving you the greatest chances to raise it (as it happened naturally) and get benefited as well from it, but not to steal it completely as your own and deny their original discoverers (as always as usual)

Then suddenly and very cowardly they start raining you "anonymously" with many down votes until they delete it completely and without mentioning any valid or convening single reason,

and later, stealing them completely even from your own file and visibility only, so that they didn't hear or see anything about them before

And when you politely ask them why such incomprehensible behaviors towards a true proven a matures discoveries?

they simply tell you indirectly that we are in fact not so different from Donkeypedia but we are so little dwarfs who aren't allowed to support any truth even with thousands proofs especially from an outsiders,

Go simply to our hiding masters behind the scene who are aware of every thing but never touch our or their so sensitive feeling about our beliefs

And if they don't approve anything then you have nothing, and whatever they decide we simply have to obey, and we can't change our inherited traits

And we hate so much anyone tries to teach us any lessons since we are the teachers with degrees and proven records of (...guess what?)

So, don't ever try for any big matters since that isn't for you or simply for anyone arbitrary, even if you could make them so clear of (our seven sisters mostly moronica problems)

We are not at all different from Donkypedia, and our place isn't for any discovery and our sources are in full suspect and never realizable

So, this is actually the reality we do live and experience from the most negligible word of myth magicians

The main things they mostly do enjoy a lot and more than any other human being categories are

1) Infinite stupidity from their greatest achievements like infinity
2) Infinite denials to the proven facts in their false mathematics
3) Infinite hate towards superior armatures true proven talents
4) Infinite dishonesty with reasoning and ability of fabrications of any historical facts

5) Infinite inability before the most basic mathematics even about the symbol decimal notation (that is a wonderful piece of evidence against their fake alleged intelligence that one can't even imagine)

6)Infinite ignorance and no nobility at all with most of them, that was ever proven except of course in the many stories that are in plenty of so many foraged historical and modern books

I don't like to add more of such a well-described categories of human beings that are globally explored nowadays for general public attention to understand them very well and before they spoiled the whole word and true science with their very stupid math that was based on "idiots axiomatic endless choices" that ruin completely the mathematics itself and most of the similar sciences like those modern (philosophers, logicians, pure physicians) with their life waste talks and too long tongs

But I think this era is nearly over, where I did notice many uncountable allowed questions from school kids on Qoura that are raining them like hell where their best experts have completely and suddenly stopped to answer them the way they used to do before

But, despite all their very bad traits, they really in urgent need for people who would eventually save them even by biological brain surgery operations, in order to get them requalified for some suitable useful works in their societies they do belong to, since they are counting as human beings after all, FOR SURE

Regards

Bassam Karzeddin

### Zelos Malum

unread,
Jan 21, 2020, 1:50:52 AM1/21/20
to
Ilelgaly? What law is being broken?

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Feb 23, 2020, 9:12:40 PM2/23/20
to
Zelo is still acting shamefully as clueless (as always as usual), and I can't repeat every great scandel in mathematics history for each acadimTROll for thousands of times

BKK

### Zelos Malum

unread,
Feb 24, 2020, 1:23:04 AM2/24/20
to
Den måndag 24 februari 2020 kl. 03:12:40 UTC+1 skrev bassam karzeddin:
> Zelo is still acting shamefully as clueless (as always as usual), and I can't repeat every great scandel in mathematics history for each acadimTROll for thousands of times
>
> BKK

You have never once said anything with any value. You fail basic mathematics everytime. You don't even know how to make a proof.

### philipe...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 24, 2020, 12:50:23 PM2/24/20
to
Well, Bassam, if you claim to have a proof for something the very minimum you can expect is that people ask for that proof you claim to have.

Did you expect otherwise?

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Feb 24, 2020, 1:34:52 PM2/24/20
to
On Monday, February 24, 2020 at 8:50:23 PM UTC+3, philipe...@gmail.com wrote:
> Well, Bassam, if you claim to have a proof for something the very minimum you can expect is that people ask for that proof you claim to have.
>
> Did you expect otherwise?

Why should I RE PROVE my points of view for thousands of times and for each person as well? Wonders!

The issue that you are incapable to understand is the unsolvability of some
*********VERY SIMPLE******** Diapphontine Equations that your top historical and living masters name it polynomials, that must have roots from those non-existing integers, (as simple as that), adding the fart imaginary roots to complete the game with qotiniouty of real number exposed stories

All the huge false math magic can be well-understood even from a single insolvable Diaopkhontine Equation and by a clever mid-school student for sure

But how to convey this absolute fact to all TROLLS of alleged genius mathematicians? wonders

It is an impossible task I swear unless your alleged top-figures say it and without giving you any little chance to hear your own silly opinions, and you would be so thrilled and very happy then, for sure

You truly have nothing more than a very empty skull box carried on your very broken shoulders academic mathematicians and alike
BKK

### philipe...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 24, 2020, 2:14:57 PM2/24/20
to
You seem to not understand what the adjective "diophantine" means when attached to the noun "equation".

And for God's sake, learn to spell your own pet peeves!!!

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Aug 24, 2020, 11:58:25 AM8/24/20
to
This topic should be regarded as a truer natural historical record for an easy issue subject that reveals almost all the wrong mathematical foundation FOR SURE
BKK

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Sep 28, 2020, 8:25:33 AM9/28/20
to
On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 10:22:07 AM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Oct 11, 2020, 9:20:05 AM10/11/20
to
On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 10:22:07 AM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Jul 28, 2023, 7:55:25 AMJul 28
to
Are you still incapable to simply understand the very simple insolvabl Diaphontine Equations & how do they make huge fart buissness mathematics from them by investing the irreducible polynomials & much more fun fart mathematics that last for many centuries (with fabricated novolistic historical stories about so many genious kids like Galois, Cardano, ..., etc)
What a false rubbish history of mathematics is indeed?
Good luck to have a grien of brain 🧠
BKK

### markus...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 28, 2023, 4:13:20 PMJul 28
to
måndag 20 januari 2020 kl. 08:22:07 UTC+1 skrev bassam karzeddin:
You don't believe in square roots either?

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Jul 29, 2023, 8:32:41 AMJul 29
to
You are certainly a liar, where there are hundreds of my posts (either hidden or still published) that tells exactly the opposite of your claim about the square root

And the ball in your yard where you can bring a single post of mine that document your illegal claims

Unless you believe that well-known resident Troll 🧌 on sci.math (as Dan CT)since he used to claim the same for hundreds of times without a single evidence

What is not an existing number about Sqrt2 for example is its endless decimal RATIONAL comparison or appromations in your common understanding
But Sqrt2 exists as it is being EXACTLY the Diagonal distance of a square with unity side distance
Sqrt2 exists only in its surd form as it is, where the rest is only endless comparison between true existing irrational numbers & rational deci
mal numbers (that are impossible to be EXACTLY equal

People have to understand something being explained & well-tought freely for themselves almost hundreds of times
Also interested people with facts (if ever existing) must distinguish between an annymous liars & honest researchers
GOOD LUCK
BKK

### markus...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 29, 2023, 9:03:54 AMJul 29
to
In base sqrt(2), the decimal expansion is finite. Why does it matter what the decimal expansion is in base 10?

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Jul 29, 2023, 12:24:36 PMJul 29
to
> In base sqrt(2), the endless decimal expansion is finite. Why does it matter what the decimal expansion is in base 10?
We are taking about the decimal rational approximation in base 10 number system that usually is practiced, where where the base Sqrt2 is indeed finite but so irrelevant to our discussion

In general, the ancient Greeks proved rigorously this Diaphontine Eqn. (n^2 = 2m^2) has no existing natural number solutions in just quarter a page or few minutes, where as the alleged top-most genius modern living mathematicians found (magically & miraculously) so many integer solutions as they like!
Of course, by fooling the so innocent minds of world 🌎 school students inorder to create huge fart buissness mathematics for themselves with huge unnecessary volumes of fart math that are available freely in tons at Donkypedia & the allegedly top-most repuitabe Journals &Universities
And so funnily they believe themselves blindly!

Do you want me to reexplain such a silly numerical trick for you to deny it again & forever...?

Or you may be able to understand it by your self secretly!

Mathematics is too difficult for mathematicians indeed
BKK

### Chris M. Thomasson

unread,
Jul 29, 2023, 2:23:34 PMJul 29
to
[...]

Is this you John? as bassam karzeddin ?

Just wondering...

### markus...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 29, 2023, 2:52:34 PMJul 29
to
Why does it matter what the decimal expansion of a number in base 10 is?

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Aug 3, 2023, 11:40:51 PMAug 3
to
The base doesn't matter
BKK

### markus...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 4, 2023, 6:16:21 AMAug 4
to
Then, in base b: every number is 1.

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Aug 6, 2023, 1:11:44 PMAug 6
to
What does this matter is the fact about many things that need only few minutes to fully well-understand, where as the human orientation of those well trusted & supposedly vell-knowledgable academics in the field tend to human desires of achievements by making so huge & so unnecessary volumes of fake knowledge that goes for centuries as the case with quintic equation stories that are still officially unsetteled despite being completely uncovered strictly in public free sites for general math education

There are of course many more similar stories to uncover from the foreged & so shamful history of mathematics & ginious historical mathematicians where people generally don't know at all or even dare to have a doubt in them for sure

Bassam Karzeddin

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Aug 30, 2023, 5:30:46 PMAug 30
to
On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 9:22:07 AM UTC+2, bassam karzeddin wrote:

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Sep 4, 2023, 1:17:23 PMSep 4
to
On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 9:22:07 AM UTC+2, bassam karzeddin wrote:

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Sep 5, 2023, 5:17:07 PMSep 5
to
On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 9:22:07 AM UTC+2, bassam karzeddin wrote:

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Sep 13, 2023, 3:13:29 AMSep 13
to
On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 9:22:07 AM UTC+2, bassam karzeddin wrote:
Assuming that there are still a small existing group of (decent, honnest, wise, intelligent, brave, noble, ..., etc) mathematicians on earth, then ignorance about this particular issue among worl students & researchers should have been completely finished by this time!

But the truth seems exactly opposite since the global ignorance seems only exapanding endlessly about this fatal issue for sure

So, keep it for the near future historical records as a strong evidence to my standing claims, where only ignorance in mathematics is still expanding endlessly in all false directions for sure

And more of shame added upon the allegedly top-most figures not only on mathematicians but also upon all (Logicians, philosophers & physicians as well )

BKK

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Sep 16, 2023, 6:22:47 AMSep 16
to
Here is an irrefutable example about the fake great history of mathematics FOR SURE

BKK

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Sep 21, 2023, 10:29:52 AMSep 21
to
I'm orienting the new uprising researchers to verify seriously such unbelievable stories as Galois, where I think most likely it was a full fabricated story with no true characters as they reveal it in their so-shamful history of mathematicking, not very Sure!

BKK

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Sep 26, 2023, 3:39:08 AMSep 26
to

### bassam karzeddin

unread,
Oct 16, 2023, 1:44:13 PMOct 16
to
In short, if real solution to (x^5 - x -1 = 0) is no existing number then why trying hopelessly to search in real existing radicals?
Unbelievable stupidity or Unbelievable devilish human thoughts to insult perpetually the human minds, FOR sure

BKK
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages