Lubos Motl's forced resignation from Harvard University Physics Department
Jack Sarfatti
I complained to Amazon about Lubos Motl smearing Woit's & Smolin's
anti-string theory books as "crank" and "crackpot." At least he reviewed
those. In my case he never bought any of my books about UFOs,
paranormal, quantum physics, relativity, my autobiography, etc from
Amazon, he does not own them, he never read them, and yet he tagged them
with insults and slurs. It now looks like Amazon will not allow
non-customers who did not buy the books from them to tag them with
slander and libelous language in acts of personal vengeance as was so in
the case of Lubos Motl. Motl insults Sir Roger Penrose as "disconnected"
from Reality, but at least he reviewed Roger's book. It's one thing for
people to flame each other in e-mail, it's quite another to do it
irresponsibly like Lubos Motl making financially damaging comments under
false circumstances commenting negatively on books never read without
specific details in a review to substantiate the allegations.
People like Lubos who live in glass houses should not throw stones
http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~motl/
Lubos was, in reality, fired last week or so from Harvard Physics
Department (outwardly he "resigned" - but no one willingly resigns from
Harvard in mid-year obviously) for precisely this kind of unprofessional
public activity. Too much blogging and calling people bad names and too
little research. Not wise for a young man without tenure. BTW for the
record I had nothing to do with Harvard's decision and did not at all
try to get Lubos fired. I only found out about his tags of my books
after he tendered his resignation. Lubos, of course, uses me as his
scapegoat in this tawdry affair. Wikipedia should learn from Amazon. It
was Lubos Motl working for Shermer et-al at CSICOPS who got me into the
War with Wiki and whose associate Calton Bolick keeps false information
on me in my bio, e.g. me and Uri Geller. They keep "reverting"
corrections to distorted information about what allegedly happened in
1975 as if it is true today in 2007 - that is Calton's doing. Jaron
Lanier's description of Wikipedia as "Digital Maoist" Cult attempting to
take over the Internet like The Borg is apt.
Somewhere on Wiki Lubos writes I did not write to his bosses but he
seems to have forgotten that. In any case it was Lubos who fired the
first shot across my bow, not the other way round and, again I repeat, I
played no active role in ending his short career in the Physics Big
Leagues at Harvard. He did it all by his little self without any help
from me. Let him blame Karmic Destiny. ;-)
PS, It also appears that Lubos has made blacklists for webmaster of
Harvard Physics with names like "scum", "criminals", "cranks" and
"crackpots" - sounds like Lubos since he invented some of those tags on
Amazon now removed.
References
Exhibit A:
X-Apparently-To: sarf...@pacbell.net via 68.142.199.144; Fri, 19 Jan
2007 07:01:31 -0800
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 128.103.101.20
X-Originating-IP: [128.103.101.20]
Authentication-Results: mta106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com
from=physics.harvard.edu; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 207.115.36.52 (EHLO nlpi023.sbcis.sbc.com) (207.115.36.52)
by mta106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:01:31
-0800
X-Originating-IP: [128.103.101.20]
Received: from physics.harvard.edu (physics.harvard.edu [128.103.101.20])
by nlpi023.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.8 inb/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0JF1PwW010826
for <sarf...@pacbell.net>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:01:25 -0600
Received: from login.physics.harvard.edu ([192.168.100.11])
by physics.harvard.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1H7vAv-0006w5-QK
for sarf...@pacbell.net; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:57:05 -0500
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:57:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Lubos Motl <mo...@physics.harvard.edu>
To: Jack Sarfatti <sarf...@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Has China shot down a US NRO Satellite starting real Space War?
In-Reply-To: <ED162CB0-40DD-4781...@pacbell.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.07...@login.physics.harvard.edu>
References: <007701c73b65$efcc0750$6800a8c0@a7n8xedx>
<F9F5437A-8DEE-48E7...@pacbell.net>
<ED162CB0-40DD-4781...@pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Incidentally, you were the first external person who has created a very
unpleasant situation for me at Harvard, and this has repeated itself lots
of times and this fucked up job has always been used as a tool to
blackmail me. I don't want to be blackmailed and manipulated like that all
the time. Best, Lubos
______________________________________________________________________________
E-mail: lu...@matfyz.cz fax: +1-617/496-0110 Web:
http://lumo.matfyz.cz/
eFax: +1-801/454-1858 work: +1-617/384-9488 home: +1-617/868-4487
(call)
Webs: http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/ http://motls.blogspot.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Exhibit B.
From: mo...@physics.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: Penrose on the Maldacena conjecture & Ed Witten
Date: January 19, 2007 6:55:32 AM PST
To: sarf...@pacbell.net
X-Apparently-To: sarf...@pacbell.net via 68.142.199.34; Fri, 19 Jan
2007 06:55:36 -0800
X-Yahoofilteredbulk: 128.103.101.20
X-Originating-Ip: [128.103.101.20]
X-Originating-Ip: [128.103.101.20]
Authentication-Results: mta140.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com
from=physics.harvard.edu; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 207.115.20.158 (EHLO flpi118.sbcis.sbc.com)
(207.115.20.158) by mta140.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 19 Jan
2007 06:55:35 -0800
Received: from physics.harvard.edu (physics.harvard.edu
[128.103.101.20]) by flpi118.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.8 inb/8.13.8) with
ESMTP id l0JEtEND002722 for <sarf...@pacbell.net>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007
06:55:15 -0800
Received: from login.physics.harvard.edu ([192.168.100.11]) by
physics.harvard.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
(Exim 4.50) id 1H7v9R-0006tc-VO for sarf...@pacbell.net; Fri, 19 Jan
2007 09:55:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <99950EE4-ED7E-4B8A...@pacbell.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.07...@login.physics.harvard.edu>
References: <BAY105-F1824C67CE...@phx.gbl>
<4F6D9385-0B9E-4A8E...@pacbell.net>
<0DBD8244-53D9-4262...@pacbell.net>
<Pine.LNX.4.62.06...@feynman.harvard.edu>
<D6BA01E2-7AE8-4448...@pacbell.net>
<Pine.LNX.4.62.06...@feynman.harvard.edu>
<99950EE4-ED7E-4B8A...@pacbell.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
I don't depend on any grant but I just resigned. It's probably not your
business to ask, is it? Best, Lubos
______________________________________________________________________________
E-mail: lu...@matfyz.cz fax: +1-617/496-0110 Web:
http://lumo.matfyz.cz/
eFax: +1-801/454-1858 work: +1-617/384-9488 home: +1-617/868-4487
(call)
Webs: http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/ http://motls.blogspot.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Exhibit C.
From: mo...@feynman.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: The Wit & Wisdom of Lubos Motl on George Chapline & Lisa
Randall ;-)
Date: April 6, 2006 12:07:47 PM PDT
To: sarf...@pacbell.net
X-Apparently-To: sarf...@pacbell.net via 68.142.199.147; Thu, 06 Apr
2006 12:07:50 -0700
X-Originating-Ip: [128.103.101.233]
X-Originating-Ip: [128.103.101.233]
Authentication-Results: mta106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com
from=feynman.harvard.edu; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 207.115.20.32 (EHLO flpvm02.prodigy.net)
(207.115.20.32) by mta106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 06 Apr
2006 12:07:49 -0700
Received: from schwinger.harvard.edu (schwinger.harvard.edu
[128.103.101.233]) by flpvm02.prodigy.net (8.12.10 083104/8.12.10) with
ESMTP id k36J72OQ013759 for <sarf...@pacbell.net>; Thu, 6 Apr 2006
12:07:03 -0700
Received: from [140.247.123.226] (helo=feynman) by
schwinger.harvard.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FRZpb-00021w-Jm for
sarf...@pacbell.net; Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:07:47 -0400
Received: from motl (helo=localhost) by feynman with local-esmtp (Exim
4.50) id 1FRZpb-00051k-6c for sarf...@pacbell.net; Thu, 06 Apr 2006
15:07:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <443564AF...@earthlink.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.62.06...@feynman.harvard.edu>
References: <2f9.255c92...@aol.com>
<44344D5C...@earthlink.net>
<53B4108F-0522-409F...@pacbell.net>
<44349B6B...@earthlink.net>
<64102ED1-2C3F-469A...@pacbell.net>
<443564AF...@earthlink.net>
Organization: Harvard University
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: Lubos Motl <mo...@schwinger.harvard.edu>
Dear Jack,
I've read most of this text of yours and it's entertaining. Thanks,
Lubos
______________________________________________________________________________
E-mail: lu...@matfyz.cz fax: +1-617/496-0110 Web:
http://lumo.matfyz.cz/
eFax: +1-801/454-1858 work: +1-617/384-9488 home: +1-617/868-4487
(call)
Webs: http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/ http://motls.blogspot.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jack Sarfatti
sarf...@pacbell.net
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
would it?"
- Albert Einstein
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=23999
http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.jack.sarfatti
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Dec122006.ppt
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1310681739984181006&q=Sarfatti+Causation&hl=en
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lub/sets/72157594439814784
galathaea
lubos has been hunting for cranks for some time
he is very full of himself
and overconfident as many intelligent young men become
perhaps this will humble his certainty
maybe grow him some perspective on what is important
and how damaged and damaging he has become...
> X-Apparently-To: sarfa...@pacbell.net via 68.142.199.144; Fri, 19 Jan
> 2007 07:01:31 -0800
> X-YahooFilteredBulk: 128.103.101.20
> X-Originating-IP: [128.103.101.20]
> Authentication-Results: mta106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com
> from=physics.harvard.edu; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
> Received: from 207.115.36.52 (EHLO nlpi023.sbcis.sbc.com) (207.115.36.52)
> by mta106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:01:31
> -0800
> X-Originating-IP: [128.103.101.20]
> Received: from physics.harvard.edu (physics.harvard.edu [128.103.101.20])
> by nlpi023.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.8 inb/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0JF1PwW010826
> for <sarfa...@pacbell.net>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:01:25 -0600
> Received: from login.physics.harvard.edu ([192.168.100.11])
> by physics.harvard.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
> (Exim 4.50)
> id 1H7vAv-0006w5-QK
> for sarfa...@pacbell.net; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:57:05 -0500
> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:57:05 -0500 (EST)
> From: Lubos Motl <m...@physics.harvard.edu>
> To: Jack Sarfatti <sarfa...@pacbell.net>
> Subject: Re: Has China shot down a US NRO Satellite starting real Space War?
> In-Reply-To: <ED162CB0-40DD-4781-8480-7FC42AC99...@pacbell.net>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0701190956000.3...@login.physics.harvard.edu>
> References: <007701c73b65$efcc0750$6800a8c0@a7n8xedx>
> <F9F5437A-8DEE-48E7-B1C5-276947C8C...@pacbell.net>
> <ED162CB0-40DD-4781-8480-7FC42AC99...@pacbell.net>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Incidentally, you were the first external person who has created a very
> unpleasant situation for me at Harvard, and this has repeated itself lots
> of times and this fucked up job has always been used as a tool to
> blackmail me. I don't want to be blackmailed and manipulated like that all
> the time. Best, Lubos
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> E-mail: l...@matfyz.cz fax: +1-617/496-0110 Web:http://lumo.matfyz.cz/
> eFax: +1-801/454-1858 work: +1-617/384-9488 home: +1-617/868-4487
> (call)
> Webs:http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/ http://motls.blogspot.com/
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Exhibit B.
> From: m...@physics.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: Penrose on the Maldacena conjecture & Ed Witten
> Date: January 19, 2007 6:55:32 AM PST
> To: sarfa...@pacbell.net
> X-Apparently-To: sarfa...@pacbell.net via 68.142.199.34; Fri, 19 Jan
> 2007 06:55:36 -0800
> X-Yahoofilteredbulk: 128.103.101.20
> X-Originating-Ip: [128.103.101.20]
> X-Originating-Ip: [128.103.101.20]
> Authentication-Results: mta140.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com
> from=physics.harvard.edu; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
> Received: from 207.115.20.158 (EHLO flpi118.sbcis.sbc.com)
> (207.115.20.158) by mta140.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 19 Jan
> 2007 06:55:35 -0800
> Received: from physics.harvard.edu (physics.harvard.edu
> [128.103.101.20]) by flpi118.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.8 inb/8.13.8) with
> ESMTP id l0JEtEND002722 for <sarfa...@pacbell.net>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007
> 06:55:15 -0800
> Received: from login.physics.harvard.edu ([192.168.100.11]) by
> physics.harvard.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
> (Exim 4.50) id 1H7v9R-0006tc-VO for sarfa...@pacbell.net; Fri, 19 Jan
> 2007 09:55:33 -0500
> In-Reply-To: <99950EE4-ED7E-4B8A-8C85-5CB802941...@pacbell.net>
> Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0701190955140.3...@login.physics.harvard.edu>
> References: <BAY105-F1824C67CEFD073EF7FFCD7C0...@phx.gbl>
> <4F6D9385-0B9E-4A8E-B08B-52ACC91A6...@pacbell.net>
> <0DBD8244-53D9-4262-8BD9-55263EFE7...@pacbell.net>
> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605051547240.10...@feynman.harvard.edu>
> <D6BA01E2-7AE8-4448-BBE1-537FDF125...@pacbell.net>
> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605051618150.10...@feynman.harvard.edu>
> <99950EE4-ED7E-4B8A-8C85-5CB802941...@pacbell.net>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> I don't depend on any grant but I just resigned. It's probably not your
> business to ask, is it? Best, Lubos
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> E-mail: l...@matfyz.cz fax: +1-617/496-0110 Web:http://lumo.matfyz.cz/
> eFax: +1-801/454-1858 work: +1-617/384-9488 home: +1-617/868-4487
> (call)
> Webs:http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/ http://motls.blogspot.com/
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Exhibit C.
> From: m...@feynman.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: The Wit & Wisdom of Lubos Motl on George Chapline & Lisa
> Randall ;-)
> Date: April 6, 2006 12:07:47 PM PDT
> To: sarfa...@pacbell.net
> X-Apparently-To: sarfa...@pacbell.net via 68.142.199.147; Thu, 06 Apr
> 2006 12:07:50 -0700
> X-Originating-Ip: [128.103.101.233]
> X-Originating-Ip: [128.103.101.233]
> Authentication-Results: mta106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com
> from=feynman.harvard.edu; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
> Received: from 207.115.20.32 (EHLO flpvm02.prodigy.net)
> (207.115.20.32) by mta106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 06 Apr
> 2006 12:07:49 -0700
> Received: from schwinger.harvard.edu (schwinger.harvard.edu
> [128.103.101.233]) by flpvm02.prodigy.net (8.12.10 083104/8.12.10) with
> ESMTP id k36J72OQ013759 for <sarfa...@pacbell.net>; Thu, 6 Apr 2006
> 12:07:03 -0700
> Received: from [140.247.123.226] (helo=feynman) by
> schwinger.harvard.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FRZpb-00021w-Jm for
> sarfa...@pacbell.net; Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:07:47 -0400
> Received: from motl (helo=localhost) by feynman with local-esmtp (Exim
> 4.50) id 1FRZpb-00051k-6c for sarfa...@pacbell.net; Thu, 06 Apr 2006
> 15:07:47 -0400
> In-Reply-To: <443564AF.1070...@earthlink.net>
> Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0604061506520.19...@feynman.harvard.edu>
> References: <2f9.255c92a.3165a...@aol.com>
> <44344D5C.7040...@earthlink.net>
> <53B4108F-0522-409F-B872-F737E3E46...@pacbell.net>
> <44349B6B.2060...@earthlink.net>
> <64102ED1-2C3F-469A-8485-B2EFE537C...@pacbell.net>
> <443564AF.1070...@earthlink.net>
> Organization: Harvard University
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> Sender: Lubos Motl <m...@schwinger.harvard.edu>
>
> Dear Jack,
> I've read most of this text of yours and it's entertaining. Thanks,
> Lubos
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> E-mail: l...@matfyz.cz fax: +1-617/496-0110 Web:http://lumo.matfyz.cz/
> eFax: +1-801/454-1858 work: +1-617/384-9488 home: +1-617/868-4487
> (call)
> Webs:http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/ http://motls.blogspot.com/
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Jack Sarfatti
> "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
> would it?"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
fishfry
Jack Sarfatti <sarf...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> Lubos was, in reality, fired last week or so from Harvard Physics
> Department
Nothing about this on Woit's blog. Is this confirmed?
galathaea
> In article <gFvth.65858$qO4.18...@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
> Jack Sarfatti <sarfa...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Lubos was, in reality, fired last week or so from Harvard Physics
it is already on his wikibio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubo%C5%A1_Motl
in words eerily similar to jack's...
on harvard's physics staff web site
motl's 287a course teachings
redirect to courses taught by others
fishfry
"galathaea" <gala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 23, 5:35 pm, fishfry <BLOCKSPAMfish...@your-mailbox.com> wrote:
> > In article <gFvth.65858$qO4.18...@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
> > Jack Sarfatti <sarfa...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Lubos was, in reality, fired last week or so from Harvard Physics
> > > DepartmentNothing about this on Woit's blog. Is this confirmed?
>
> it is already on his wikibio
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubo%C5%A1_Motl
>
> in words eerily similar to jack's...
>
As of 9pm Tuesday (pdt) Motl's Wiki page has been purged of the
paragraph in question. I only know about all this stuff from what I read
on the Web ... but would Harvard fire a physicist for antics on Amazon?
galathaea
On Jan 23, 9:09 pm, fishfry <BLOCKSPAMfish...@your-mailbox.com> wrote:
> In article <1169606251.589784.268...@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
i am sure you already are aware
that people with the mathematical skill
and physical understanding
of lubos' level
often have strong visual obssessions
they tend to write or draw many diagrams and figures
and attach complex meanings to their forms
these types of obssessions can be very tiring
as visual processing is particularly energy intensive
so the strongly mathematical can be more sleepy
irritable
particularly this time of year
with short days keeping melatonin levels high
and seasonal affect disorder setting in
anyway
my point is that explosive conflicts are common this time of year
and particularly for those who spend much energy
to think deeply about things
i suspect lubos began to overfocus on something
some dynamic went bad for him
and he may have legitimately resigned
feeling unforced in the maneuver
if the story pans out
jack's wikiediting aside
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablis, magician, liar
Ivar Rosquist
>> As of 9pm Tuesday (pdt) Motl's Wiki page has been purged of the
>> paragraph in question. I only know about all this stuff from what I read
>> on the Web ... but would Harvard fire a physicist for antics on Amazon?
>
> i am sure you already are aware
> that people with the mathematical skill
> and physical understanding
> of lubos' level
> often have strong visual obssessions
Whatever his mathematical skills, in his replies to the criticisms of
string theory brought up by Woit and Smolin, Motl came across as an
opinionated individual, apparently able to conduct ad hominem attacks and
little else - that way providing support for the most lurid claims by both
authors on the character of the string theory community.
Luminoso
wrote:
>Memorandum for the Record
>
>I complained to Amazon about Lubos Motl smearing Woit's & Smolin's
>anti-string theory books as "crank" and "crackpot." At least he reviewed
>those. In my case he never bought any of my books about UFOs,
>paranormal, quantum physics, relativity, my autobiography, etc from
>Amazon, he does not own them, he never read them, and yet he tagged them
>with insults and slurs. It now looks like Amazon will not allow
>non-customers who did not buy the books from them to tag them with
>slander and libelous language in acts of personal vengeance as was so in
>the case of Lubos Motl. Motl insults Sir Roger Penrose as "disconnected"
>from Reality, but at least he reviewed Roger's book. It's one thing for
>people to flame each other in e-mail, it's quite another to do it
>irresponsibly like Lubos Motl making financially damaging comments under
>false circumstances commenting negatively on books never read without
>specific details in a review to substantiate the allegations.
>
>People like Lubos who live in glass houses should not throw stones
>
>http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~motl/
>
>Lubos was, in reality, fired last week or so from Harvard Physics
>Department (outwardly he "resigned" - but no one willingly resigns from
>Harvard in mid-year obviously) for precisely this kind of unprofessional
>public activity. Too much blogging and calling people bad names and too
>little research. Not wise for a young man without tenure.
Are you kidding ? Obnoxious and judgemental, slanderous,
negative, halfway-informed, insulting ... just watch,
he'll land a job as a science consultant for CNN, FOX
or one of the others. Hey, Mark Furman was a racist,
abusive, evidence-falsifying all-'round bad cop and
now he's the 'expert' CNN uses anytime there's an
issue involving police. He should be in jail, but
instead he's on prime time.
Luminoso
wrote:
String "theory" doesn't seem to be verifiable or
falsifiable, it's not really 'science' at all.
It might represent the first try at an entirely
new way of thinking about the universe that
eventually LEADS to something that can be verified
or perhaps innovations in instrumentation will make
it possible to observe higher-dimensional processes
that confirm the theory but, as is, well ....
Do those who condemn string theory deserve to be
bad-mouthed ? Do those who advocate string theory
deserve to be bad-mouthed ? The answer to both
is "it depends".
Amadeus Polonium-210
of evidence" with OJ's bloodsample.
> >http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~motl/
> abusive, evidence-falsifying all-'round bad cop and
> now he's the 'expert' CNN uses anytime there's an
> issue involving police. He should be in jail, but
thus:
Hollinger began as an arms manufacturer,
sort-of like EMI. so, look forward to the day when
Obnoxico Music Corp. gets into laser pistols.
this just in:
yesterday's (Tues,. Nov.15) *UCLA Daily Bruin* finally noted that
darfur is entirely Muslim, though downplaying it AMAP.
thus:
Dick Cheeny, Don Rumsfeld, Osama bin Latin and HARRY POTTER
-- which is a real, fictional character? -- form a mission
to Darfur, to prevent a war instead of to start one:
if Darfur is "100% Muslim," then
what's really going on, there?
is it just aother British Quag for USA soldiers to get bogged
into, with Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan et al ad vomitorium,
under auspices of the UN and NATO?
why won't the Bruin publish the fact of Islam on the ground,
therein?
thus:
Why doesn't the [UCLA Daily] Bruin report that
Darfur's populace is "100%" Muslim,
according to the DAC's sponsor,
Terry Saunders?...
"99%" was the figure given
by Brian Steidle, when I finally found
him at the Hammer, after everyone else
had left (he, his friend & I were the
very last to leave!)...
What could it possibly mean?
--The Other Side (if it exists ... nah !-)
Jack Sarfatti
Jack Sarfatti
ankola007
this is ankola and i wanna to post a new link to that and i'll give you the details of that link..with this i'll clarify your quries regarding bisiness
[url=http://www.bizoppjunction.com/business-forums]Business Forums[/url]
Jan Sladky
That is enough to understand why Lubos reacted such way - all rational people would do the same.
"Lubos was, in reality, fired last week or so from Harvard Physics Department (outwardly he "resigned" - but no one willingly resigns from Harvard in mid-year obviously) for precisely this kind of unprofessional
public activity. Too much blogging and calling people bad names and too little research."
His resignation from Harvard had nothing to do with above mentioned. BTW - how the guy knows that ? Paranormal abilities ? ;-)
"I had nothing to do with Harvard's decision and did not at all try to get Lubos fired"
Everybody knows you are the good guy ;-)
rasterspace
I have completely forgotten the matter. but,
Jack's stuff was hilarious.
rasterspace
it was certainly addressed to that debate, and
some physicist just wrote, long & recondite,
in some physics blog linked from another one,
from a link in one of the groups.
that's why I generally try not to rely
on links.