Peter Luschny schrieb:
The total numbers of indefinite integrals in Table 1 on page 7 do not
agree with the sources; in my files, Hearn's suite comprises 285
integration problems and Timofeev's suite 705 problems. From these
numbers, one computes a modest success rate of 67% for Hearn, and a
disappointingly low 19% for Timofeev. The principle used in selecting
the integration problems must be clearly documented in the paper -
readers will suspect Texas sharpshooting otherwise.
Also, two instances of "Apostle" on page 7 should be corrected to
"Apostol".
Martin.
PS: Are the authors reinventing ancient technology? Their integrator
should perhaps be run against Moses' SIN program.