Sounds more like you're after, "Find a function whose gradient is xj +
yi"
If that's the case, you "simply" take the antiderivative of each term,
with the usual caveat that there are infinitely many functions F(x,y)
whose gradient is f(x,y).
Is that what you're after here?
"Heath" <heath...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f7e7d3d4.03042...@posting.google.com...
But this discounts the dz term. Is it possible to treat dz and xdy+ydx
separately in dz=xdy+ydx? Is the dz term the same as "A" in the above?
I'm not sure what you mean by "Find a function whose gradient is xj +
yi".
Thanks again,
Heath
cha...@pentek.com (Charles Krug) wrote in message news:<slrnbaafm7....@skinner.pentek.org>...
"GVK" <kovalev...@qwest.net> wrote in message news:<Qmbpa.3$652....@news.uswest.net>...
This is coincidence. How about xdy-ydx=0 or x^2dy+y^2dx=0?
For x^2dy+y^2dx=0, look at 1/x + 1/y.
No coincidence at all.
Martin Cohen