Stackoverflow and similar systems (stackexchange)
hijack your information
(or misinformation), and monetize it by putting advertisements
on the pages. The managers of these systems, while
probably well-intentioned, may interject their own values
(and ignorance) indirectly through choices of indexing,
filtering, etc.
Then there are the proprietary systems like
community.wolfram.com
and
mapleprimes.com where the bias is mostly explicit: how to use
system X to do Y.
And the specialized newsgroups like comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
which are censored to remove not only spam but any messages that
mention rivals to Mathematica.
So where does that leave you? Clearly naifs will post questions anywhere.
Where do knowledgeable people look at questions and answer them?
Maybe diffusion of this sort means that people who know the answers
will not bother.
The content of sci.math.symbolic has, at various times, been so diluted
that contributors have stopped reading it. Is this what will happen
with these "new" forums?
I think the answer to the question of how to assign to columns and rows
was answered promptly when posted to the maxima mailing list -- a
technology probably even old that this uucp-style newsgroup.
So...
Telling people to use stackoverflow ... is that a good idea?
RJF
PS. Maxima could be altered to allow more alternatives to the
lhs of an assignment, or another assignment-style operation
could be defined. In either case the technology needed to
recognize the "location" meanings of col and row
could be modeled on the Common Lisp setf macro.
Or you might consider why you need to do something more efficiently
than a loop. Are you in a hurry? Are you using large matrices
in Maxima? Seriously?