Sincerely,Alain.
Alain, expressions like f^{f(x)}(x) have a clear meaning when
considered in the context of the Ackermann function.
Addition
f(x) = a+x
f^{n}(x) = a*n + x
f^{f(x)}(x) = a*(a + x) + x
Multiplication
f(x) = a*x
f^{n}(x) = a^n * x
f^{f(x)}(x) = a^{a*x} * x
See http://www.tetration.org/scimath/1 for an exported Mathematica
notebook. While both addition and multiplication result in solutions
for f(x), the plots of the solutions show they are not monotonic.
More generally, f^{f(x)}(x) is meaningful when using continuously
iterated functions, but then you loose the chance of arriving at a
closed form solution. I would be very surprised if anyone could find
a monotonic closed form solution.
Daniel
Thank for your reply.
I've got a different view and prefer standing heavily upon Abel
counting functions.
When phi(x) and f(x) are such as :phi(f(x))=phi(x)+1
phi(f^[r](x) = phi(x) + r ,r real ;with phi invertible
f^[r](x) = phi^[-1](phi(x) +r) ;and with r=f(x)
f^[f(x)](x) = phi^[-1](phi(x) +f(x)) .
With this tool you can ALSO solve for instance:
f((2x +1)^[f(x)])= 3*f(x) ...
I am sure there is still much work for us!.
COURAGE,
Alain.