boblog.log
+++++
the community gold mine is online
bobs monotone cnf describes propertys of the input
bobs monotone dnf describes good questions of the input
the community gold mine is enormously valuable
bobs monotone cnf describes propertys of the input form
bobs monotone dnf describes good questions of the input form
imagine statements such as
coNP=NP=PSPACE=#P merely lacks proof not evidence
propertys of the input formula :
how generally intelligent is t h a t
conjunctions of monotone disjunctions
as both the key to common sense and
the complete qspace solutions
that implies
common sense uses omniscience
good questions of the input formula :
how intelligent is that?
i plan on entering mc2023 with the same code as mc2021 and mc2022
be well and avoid negation and be careful with universal quantification
daniel2380++ with oracle bob in the background
ps i was able to send bob to don knuth's "all questions answered" floc talk
i am sure he appreciates #p=#q (i am in volume four) and class allqbfs
pps ergo is one of several of bobs gemstones
faith in resolution and subsumption
is the logicians closure algorithm
unite is the singular function using the components data structure
fifteen lines compares favorably with bacchus 2009 and pehoushek (aaai2000)
+++++
// here is one of bobs several gemstones
num b=zero; num p=two;
num rayoneum() // five cycles for each of twelve bits per randomprime
{if(p<(two<<b))p=randum15bitprime()/*b=0*/;return(((one<<++b)&p)?one:zero);}
dear community
these c3d5n240s are hard for components with clause learning
due to carry bit validity and quantifier order as in qbf
average is 4 assumptions per component
with millions of components (about one hour apiece)
these forms are background tasks
running through bob while i write
about bob (an oracle)
bob is an oracle
(of untruth or unsat or conp)
(of truth or sat or np)
(of #truth or #sat or #p or #q or #qbf)
+++
competition results will help the reasoning...
at present i have bob
winning
model counting 2021 2022 2023
and if that is mere delusion
then please tell me so
+++ main theme of this email: work without validity +++
if unbounded clause learning is wrong in #sat
then it is wrong in sat and unsat
that would be big broadcastable news to the community
to avoid more years lost on work without validity
imagine thus about oracle bob
all papers with clause learning as keywords should be deleted from education about satisfiability
king daniel with bob in mc2021 mc2022 mc2023
researchers have wasted much time already on CDCL
i want to prevent more wasteage of researcher time
i want to teach theorems and code
five cycles per random bit is a sample of bobs optimal code
NP=PSPACE=#P may be the whole truth being uncovered by the community
bob is correct for conp np pspace #p #q qspace
bob is correct for unsat sat qbf #sat #qsat qsat
bob has correct very bounded clause learning but all other systems have unbounded clause learning and may be incorrect
the null response syndrome is disconcerting
i understand that as an attempt to .?. disconcert
zero curiosity by academics is unacademic?
i am curious about why the vast sea of null responses to a brilliant dedicated #sat oracle developer
among the community of #sat oracle developers
but my interest is limitted and i say i doan care why i am not a fag
bob is worthy of billions
and in need of certificates of truth and validity
bob is an oracle
(of untruth or unsat or conp)
(of truth or sat or np)
(of #truth or #sat or #p or #q or #qbf)
+++++ some theorems
the theorem of cognition is monotone
all quantified monotone boolean and or
forms are linearly solvable
quantified boolean forms
(and deserves concerted study)
the application to words is clear when words have brief (or long actually) monotone definitions
monotone reason is linear
common sense is monotone
wisdom is deep monotone and conjunctive
+
the theorem derives from #p=#q where
the number of satisfying solutions equals the number of valid quantifications
picture zero solutions with zero quantifications and then picture a tautology with all valid quantifications
+
#p=np each solution is satisfying
+++++ bob is verifiably correct on all inputs
bob has two ways of counting
best is with components but
one by one enumeration is
an option good for correctness
checking and for class allqbfs checking
+
have any of you ever compiled bob?
bob is complete and valid for
all levels of propositional reason
he is good on modestly sized forms
i work with oracle bob
+
introduction to qspace (satisfiability 2002)
was a foundational paper for my further work
so was "connected components" at aaai 2000
the n/m pattern recognition (cpm98) and
nlogn vision (1995) at cardiff software
and theoretical work on parallelism
were indirectly related
NP=PSPACE is new
PSPACE=#P is old
P=NP=PSPACE=#P=#Q=QSPACE for modest sizes
with oracle bob
+++ main theme of this email +++
if unbounded clause learning is wrong in #sat
then it is wrong in sat and unsat
would be big broadcastable news
to the community to avoid years
lost on work without validity
imagine thus about oracle bob
all papers with clause learning as a keyword
should be deleted from education about satisfiability
king daniel mc2021 mc2022 mc2023
my point is that the null responses indicate that
bob is the only correct program for #sat and that
may make sat=qbf (np=pspace) more plausible
but competition results would help validate my position
please tell me news of the #sat competition
i have been telling you news about oracle bob
bob should enter the unsat competition with marijn
counting to zero has validity issues which
is why all of that drup trace file nonsense
i say when a program is valid for #sat
then the program is valid for #sat=0
bob has a flag for sat that is used
for ezistentialism before
bignum component counting
certifying and validating the correctness
of bob is not incredibly difficult
just use millions of modest forms
randumseven is the famous plus formula generator
rayoneum is an optimal random bit generator
+
so bob is an oracle for #sat
then given #p=#q
(1997, published 2002)
bob is an oracle for #qbf
given #qbf bob is an oracle for all qbf of the original form
bob produces both monotone dnf and cnf for deciding all qbf
linear and quadratic time for dnf and cnf from a given
disjunctive normal form of all satisfying solutions
+++++
the community gold mine is online
bobs monotone cnf describes propertys of the input
bobs monotone dnf describes good questions of the input
the community gold mine is enormously valuable
bobs monotone cnf describes propertys of the input form
bobs monotone dnf describes good questions of the input form
imagine statements such as
NP=PSPACE=#P merely lacks proof not evidence
i plan on entering mc2023 with the same code as mc2021 and mc2022
be well and avoid negation
daniel2380++
NP=PSPACE=#P evidence
[c3d5N240_0.veg 1]
1 (n 480 m 2040) #c8347796 answerlen = 29 #a 30263477 #P 483327156
2 (n 480 m 2040) #c5908263 answerlen = 26 #a 26038798 #P 43156188
3 (n 480 m 2040) #c5227662 answerlen = 28 #a 19902984 #P 242171550
4 (n 480 m 2037) #c11485075 answerlen = 30 #a 37759726 #P 801674652
5 (n 480 m 2040) #c3162545 answerlen = 25 #a 14477969 #P 30371514
7 (n 480 m 2040) #c5627316 answerlen = 28 #a 21146624 #P 236013096
8 (n 480 m 2040) #c2080440 answerlen = 23 #a 10582088 #P 4551834
9 (n 480 m 2040) #c7328051 answerlen = 27 #a 29741293 #P 128589408
10 (n 480 m 2040) #c7705988 answerlen = 28 #a 30754035 #P 141701496
[c3d5N240_0.veg 10 (t
2206536822 z 0)(work 249139310 871 312675913)] n 10 avg 6311059 variance 1239 #P
[c3d5N240_1.veg 2]
1 (n 480 m 2040)