On 9/24/2022 12:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 08:29:47 -0500
> olcott <
polc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/24/2022 7:45 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> (N.B. I will continue to boast about this important original
>>> solution to the halting problem until all of you stop engaging with
>>> Olcott and his non-solution to the halting problem.)
>> If my rebuttal to the halting problem proofs was incorrect then at
>> least one person could correctly point out an error. So far no one
>> has done that. Many people did point out their own false assumptions
>> though.
>>
>>> I have an idea for a signaling simulating halt decider that forks
>>> the simulation into two branches if the input calls the halt
>>> decider as per [Strachey 1965]'s "Impossible Program":
>>>
>>> void P(void (*x)())
>>> {
>>> if (H(x, x))
>>> infinite_loop: goto infinite_loop;
>>> return;
>>> }
*Here is a copy of my function dating back before any of your versions*
On 4/15/2022 1:33 PM, olcott wrote:
> void P(u32 x)
> {
> if (H(x, x)) //
> HERE: goto HERE;
> }
(a) Three of the names are identical.
(b) The structure is identical.
(c) You added the same "return" instruction that I added.
(d) You converted the u32 x parameter to void function pointer as I have.
You copied my work verbatim, then applied the exact same adaptations to
my work that I applied, and only changed the name of the loop.
*A court of law would construe this as copyright violation*
*Cease and desist violating my copyright*