Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
ajay
subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
It is done to save Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of E =mc2
Dr Drake is REQUESTED to justify himself as he is associated with
world's most famous American Physical Society.
Email of Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000,
Email of Ajay Sharma ajay.s...@rediffmail.com, 0091 94184 50899
Website www.AjayOnLine.us
Part I
Ajay Sharma has sent paper to Editor Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F.
Drake 17 March 2008 manuscript no. DQ10345A.
The title of the paper
Experimental and theoretical feasibilities of conversion factor
other than c2 in mass energy inter-conversion equation
by Ajay Sharma
Wrong subtraction of 8th class mathematics in letter dated 19
June 2008 by
Dr Gordon W.F. Drake
In letter dated 19 June 2008, wrote equations and then doing wrong
subtraction of 8th standard level. In my paper I have justified that
Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of E =mc2, also gives
E 'proportional to' mc2
or E =Ac2m
i.e. E =mc2 is generalized as E =Ac2m
Dr Gordon W.F. Drakes perception of cyclic process in Email dated 19
June 2008
1. A hydrogen atom of mass M in its ground state absorbs a
photon of frequency f and makes a transition
to the first excited state.
2. The hydrogen atom of mass M* in its excited state is then
converted entirely into the energy of a high-frequency
photon of frequency f*.
Then
hf* = M*c^2 = Mc^2 + hf/A.
hf* = Mc2 + hf/A. (1)
3. The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f.
hf* =Mc2 + hf (2)
Subtraction by Editor Gordon W.F.Drake of eq.(1) and eq.(2)
hf* = Mc2 + hf/A
hf* =Mc2 + hf
---------------------------
Difference = hf/A – hf = hf (1/A-1) (3)
and interpreted it.
WRONG, 8th class subtraction by Editor Dr W.F. Drake.
Dr Drake has forgotten the basic definition of equation that it has
LHS and RHS. Further basic rule which is taught to 8th class student
is while subtraction is that LHS of one equation is subtracted from
LHS from second equation. RHS of one equation is subtracted from the
second equation.
Mistake of Dr Drake: Dr Drake did not subtract LHS of eq.(1) from
LHS of eq.(2), which is absolutely wrong.
Correct version is
hf* = Mc2 + hf/A
hf* = Mc2 + hf
---------------------------
0 = hf/A – hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1 (4)
LHS is subtracted from LHS, (hf* - hf* = 0) and RHS is subtracted from
RHS (hf/A – hf).
As the Left Hand Sides of both the equations are equal, hence the
difference is zero.
Thus Dr Drake applied 8th class mathematics incorrectly.
Part II
What was Drakes' motive behind remarks?
Ajay Sharma in paper manuscript DQ10345A
Experimental and theoretical feasibilities of conversion factor
other than c2 in mass energy inter-conversion equation
has generalized E = mc2 to E =Ac2m on the basis concrete theoretical
and experimental evidences.
Now Editor Dr Gordon W.F. Drake, wanted to prove this
generalization is wrong and he invented own mechanism for this.
But in the process he proved, that he did 8th class mathematics WRONG.
Thus Dr Drake is wrong, and generalization of E=mc2 to E =Ac2m is
correct.
The theme of Einstein's paper of Sep. 1905 of E = mc2
(i) Einstein's Sep.1905, derivation of E = mc2 also predicts that
E 'proportional to' mc2.
The reason for above deduction is that Einstein derived E=mc2 under
SPECIAL CONDITIONS, and under GENERAL CONDITIONS the result,
E 'proportional to' mc2 or E =Ac2m (5)
It is justified by Ajay Sharma in manuscript DQ10345A.
What is meant by Special Conditions in Einstein's Sep. 1905
derivation?
In Einstein's derivation of E=mc2 of Sep. 1905 there are four
variables and Einstein took suitable values of variables. This
derivation involves emission of light energy by luminous body.
(a) Luminous body under consideration emits only TWO waves.
(b) Luminous body emits two waves of EQAUL magnitudes.
(c) Two waves are emitted by body in exactly opposite directions ( =
0 and =180).
(d) Einstein has taken velocity in classical region (v<<c and applied
binomial theorem).
Under the Special or handpicked conditions, Einstein derived
L = mc2 (6)
where L is light energy emitted by body. Then Einstein replaced L by E
to get
E = mc2 (7)
What is meant by General Conditions in Einstein's derivation?
The conditions other than taken by Einstein are called General
conditions. For example,
(A) The body emits LARGE NUMBER of light waves.
(B) The waves emitted are of DIFFERENT MAGNITUDES.
(C) Body emits waves at DIFFERENT ANGLES.
(D) Light emitting body may be at rest.
Under the General or handpicked conditions, Einstein derived (typical
calculations)
L = mc2/1141 = 0.000876mc2 (8)
L 'proportional to' mc2
As above,
E 'proportional to' mc2 or E =Ac2m. (5)
Then, E =Ac2m. is applied in various cases.
For further information visit
www.AjayOnLine.us
Email ajay.s...@rediffmail.com, 0091 94184 50899
AJAY SHARMA 02 October 2009
tomy tomy
> On Oct 16, 11:08 am, "Dono." <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 15, 10:11 pm, ajay <ajayonline...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 16, 7:20 am, "Dono." <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 15, 6:42 pm, ajay <ajayonline...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Oct 15, 10:38 pm, "Dono." <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Oct 15, 11:22 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > No, he has realized that you are a crank and are not capable
> > > > > > > of being educated so there was no more need to waste time trying
> > > > > > > to help you.
>
> > > > > > Exactly
>
> > > > > ------
> > > > > To
> > > > > Dono
>
> > > > > Dr Drake knows he is wrong.
>
> > > > No, he know YOU are wrong.
>
> > > -----
> > > To
> > > DONO
> > > How I am wrong? Dr Drake is silent over. Why does he not defend
> > > himself ?
>
> > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> > He just got bored with your stupidity. Me too, bye.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> ------
> To
> DONO
>
> Why did Drake not address the issue in letter dated 6th Oct. 2009 ?
> The reason is that it is difficult for him defend.
> Soon I am going to point out his limitations about
> LAW OF CONSERVATION OF energy.
>
> Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
interesting
tomy tomy
ajay
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
-------
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
-----
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > interesting- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> -----
>
> - Show quoted text -
--------
To
Inertial
Can you write mathematical eqaution for phrase
''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into
a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f.''
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
zimdoo zimdoo
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > interesting- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > -----
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --------
> To
>
> Inertial
>
> Can you write mathematical eqaution for phrase
>
> ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> that converts it back into
> a hydrogen atom in its ground
> state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> frequency f.''
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
----------
Can Dr Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000 commit
8th class mistake while subtracting eqautions ?
Zimdoo
zimdoo zimdoo
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --------
> > To
>
> > Inertial
>
> > Can you write mathematical eqaution for phrase
>
> > ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> > that converts it back into
> > a hydrogen atom in its ground
> > state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> > frequency f.''
>
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Can Dr Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000 commit
> 8th class mistake while subtracting eqautions ?
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
z
ajay
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --------
> > > To
>
> > > Inertial
>
> > > Can you write mathematical eqaution for phrase
>
> > > ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> > > that converts it back into
> > > a hydrogen atom in its ground
> > > state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> > > frequency f.''
>
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Can Dr Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000 commit
> > 8th class mistake while subtracting eqautions ?
>
> > Zimdoo- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
--------------
Yes
Dr Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000 has
commited
8th class mistake while subtracting eqautions ?
HE IS SILENT OVER THE ISSUE , it will not prove him right.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Robert Higgins
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > To
>
> > > > Inertial
>
> > > > Can you write mathematical eqaution for phrase
>
> > > > ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> > > > that converts it back into
> > > > a hydrogen atom in its ground
> > > > state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> > > > frequency f.''
>
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Can Dr Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000 commit
> > > 8th class mistake while subtracting eqautions ?
>
> > > Zimdoo- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > z- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --------------
> Yes
>
> Dr Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000 has
> commited
> 8th class mistake while subtracting eqautions ?
No.
>
> HE IS SILENT OVER THE ISSUE , it will not prove him right.
YOU should be silent - you're a nitwit.
>
> Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
wrote:
> > > > Can Dr Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000 commit
> > > > 8th class mistake while subtracting eqautions ?
>
> > > > Zimdoo- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > z- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --------------
> > Yes
>
> > Dr Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: p...@aps.org, 001-631-591-4000 has
> > commited
> > 8th class mistake while subtracting eqautions ?
>
> No.
>
>
>
> > HE IS SILENT OVER THE ISSUE , it will not prove him right.
>
> YOU should be silent - you're a nitwit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
----
To
Robert Higgins
The person who commits mistake becomes silent so that he is not
exposed.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:37d53276-c5a8-43c5...@t2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
You don't have the sense to be silent .. you still think you're right even
though every one has pointed out your mistake. You're just a cretin
ajay
> "ajay" <ajayonline...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > ----
>
> > To
> > Robert Higgins
>
> > The person who commits mistake becomes silent so that he is not
> > exposed.
>
> You don't have the sense to be silent .. you still think you're right even
>
> - Show quoted text -
--------
To
Inertial
(i) Write mathematical equation for phrase
'' The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f ''.
YOU DID NOT WRITE THE EQAUTION. The eqaution is
hf* = Mc^2 + hf
Dr Drake used it in further analysis.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
But that is not the full statement Drake made, so that is not the full
equation that expresses what he said. You are being deceptive and
dishonest.
> Dr Drake used it in further analysis.
His reply to you was correct.
Your theory is wrong
You are deceptive and dishonest
Get over it and get a life.
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
---------
To
Inertial
My everything is transparent.
Why does Dr Drake not explain everything?
ajay sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
How embarrassing for you :):)
> Why does Dr Drake not explain everything?
My guess is because he already *has* explained it, and you couldn't
understand it and instead have kept badgering him with excessively long
correspondence trying to tell him what an idiot he is and that he cannot do
his job. Basically .. you're not worth him wasting any more of his time.
Drake is correct.
Your theory is refuted.
Your paper is rightly rejected.
Your book should be withdrawn.
Physics is clearly not for you.
You should find another hobby.
Perhaps become a sci-fi author (if you can improve your grammar) ?
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
------
To
Inertial
(i) Write mathematical equation for phrase ( written by Dr Drake )
'' The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f ''.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
Read my reply.
You quote above only PART of what he said. So you end up with an incomplete
equation.
When you include all he said you end up with
hf* = Mc^2 + hf + excess energy
It is YOUR mistake, not his, nor mine.
Get over it
Learn from it
ajay
--------
TO
Inertial
How you can say that
mathematical equation for
'' The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f ''.
is
hf* = Mc^2 + hf + excess energy
From where excess energy came?
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
----
To
Inertial
You are wrong while formulating equation for phrase
''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f ''
The equation is
hf* = Mc^2 + hf + excess energy
not
hf* = Mc^2 + hf
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
------
To
Inertial
You are wrong while formulating equation for phrase
''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f ''
The equation is
hf* = Mc^2 + hf
not
hf* = Mc^2 + hf + excess energy
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
Easy
> mathematical equation for
>
> '' The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
> state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> frequency f ''.
> is
> hf* = Mc^2 + hf + excess energy
It is the equation from the full section 3 comment .. not the small part of
it you chose to look at and ignored the rest
> From where excess energy came?
From when A is not 1 (ie from your faulty theory). That is why A MUST be 1.
You theory is refuted. Recall the books you've sold (have you sold any?)
and refund the money .. its the only honest thing to do.
Inertial
You are wrong for ignoring the sentence that follows on from that. I am not
wrong.
> ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
> state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> frequency f ''
>
> The equation is
> hf* = Mc^2 + hf + excess energy
Yes it is. That's what I said the equation for the FULL comment by Drake is
.. not the part you dishonestly picked.
> not
> hf* = Mc^2 + hf
Yes it is not that.
Inertial
Shut up . you idiot
ajay
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > ------
> > To
> > Inertial
>
> > You are wrong while formulating equation for phrase
>
> > ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> > that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
> > state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> > frequency f ''
>
> > The equation is
> > hf* = Mc^2 + hf
> > not
> > hf* = Mc^2 + hf + excess energy
>
> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> Shut up . you idiot
------------
To
Inertial
I expect scientific reasoning.
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
I gave it already. Drake gave it already. You have demonstrated that you
don' understand it. Shut up and go away, you idiot.
ajay
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > ------
> >> > To
> >> > Inertial
>
> >> > You are wrong while formulating equation for phrase
>
> >> > ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> >> > that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
> >> > state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> >> > frequency f ''
>
> >> > The equation is
> >> > hf* = Mc^2 + hf
> >> > not
> >> > hf* = Mc^2 + hf + excess energy
>
> >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> >> Shut up . you idiot
>
> > ------------
> > To
>
> > Inertial
>
> > I expect scientific reasoning.
>
> I gave it already. Drake gave it already. You have demonstrated that you
> don' understand it. Shut up and go away, you idiot.
--------
To
Inerial
To
>> > Inertial
>> > You are wrong while formulating equation for phrase
''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f ''
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
I did play your little game and did not formulate an equation for just that
phrase .. as that would be dishonest and would encourage your current
dishonesty. I gave you the formula for the paragraph .. not just a single
sentence out of context.
It is YOUR MISTAKE that you only looked at one sentence out of the reply.
You would be an extremely poor reviewer, maybe even as bad as you are at
physics and basic maths.
> ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
> state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> frequency f ''
Shut the fuck up you little whining bastard. You got it wrong.. your theory
is refuted crap. Drake was completely correct in his dismissal of your
paper.
ajay
-----------
To
INERTIAL
Are you using this language to yourself ?
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
Gees you're an idiot. I'm talking to you, you moron !!!!
Shut the fuck up and stop your unfounded whinging. You're a waste of
everyone's time. You got it wrong.. your theory is refuted crap. Drake was
ajay
>
> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
------
To
Inertial
I never knew you can describe yorself in such a decent way.
What my work is available at
www.AjayOnLine.us
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
You're sounding like an even bigger fool now
> What my work is available at
> www.AjayOnLine.us
If its anything like what you've shown us so far ... its crap. Get a new
hobby, you're not cut out for physics.
ajay
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse
''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but you say 4.
there is no left over energy as you have claimed.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
doug
ajay wrote:
--------
> To
>
> Inertial
>
> How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse
>
> ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
> state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> frequency f ''
>
> There are three energies here , but you say 4.
> there is no left over energy as you have claimed.
>
>
> Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant
whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand
it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.
Inertial
You certainly can't be believed.
I have explained this multiple times
> ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine
> that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground
> state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
> frequency f ''
>
> There are three energies here , but you say 4.
> there is no left over energy as you have claimed.
Yes .. there is .. in the sentences immediately following that one that are
part of the same paragraph and the same explanation. You need to read the
paragraph in full, you moron, and not just pick one bit out.
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6fd95ecf-dd3f-4291...@k26g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
No .. he has shown very simply and clearly how your theory violates it. But
you're too much of an idiot to understand that
ajay
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fd21ca58-7b0c-4e6e...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
The left over must be zero or you don't get conservation.. For it to be
zero, A = 1. Your theory that A is not always 1 is refuted
doug
ajay wrote:
No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy.
You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here
which is at zero.
>
> Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A
is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.
ajay
> "ajay" <ajayonline...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > -------------
> > To
> > Doug
>
> > Under what conditions energy is conseved?
>
> You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A
> is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be.
>
> - Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
tomy tomy
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > -------------
> > > To
> > > Doug
>
> > > Under what conditions energy is conseved?
>
> > You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A
> > is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be.
> > Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --------------
>
> To
> Doug
>
> Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
>
> Under what conditions energy is conseved?
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
interesting
ajay
>
> > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > -------------
> > > > To
> > > > Doug
>
> > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved?
>
> > > You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A
> > > is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be.
> > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --------------
>
> > To
> > Doug
>
> > Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
>
> > Under what conditions energy is conseved?
>
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
-------
To
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c...@l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has already explained it to you.
We here have explained how he is correct and how you have misread what he
wrote. All have shown that your theory is wrong.
doug
ajay wrote:
Read Drakes writeup. He explains it quite well. If you do
not understand that, there is no hope for you.
>
> Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
>
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
To
Doug
Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy and which conditions it
holds?
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
To
Inertial
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
Yes .. but that would serve no purpose. Drake has explained nicely why your
theory results in lack of conservation of energy (indeed, it generates
energy from nothing when A is not 1). If you don't understand conservation
of energy, you should not be publishing physics. If you do, you don't need
to ask me to explain it to you. Stop wasting everyone's time.
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fdd462a3-2a74-4a46...@e34g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
If you don't know what it is, you shouldn't be publishing physics. If you
do know, then there is no point in asking me to tell you what it is. You
are wasting everyone's time with your nonsense.
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Like 8th class math, Dr Drake has misinterpretted Law of Conservation
of Energy.
He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED SYETEM.
The value of 'A' has been calculated
simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION OF ENERGY HOLDS
good to ISOLATED SYSTEM .
Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with E=Ac^2m.
If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results are OK.
Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply. I am also sending the
letter to other officials of American Physical Society,
so the they may also understand his high handedness and misuse of
office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
--------
Inertial
Like 8th class math, Dr Drake has misinterpretted Law of Conservation
of Energy.
He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED SYETEM.
The value of 'A' has been calculated
simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION OF ENERGY HOLDS
good to ISOLATED SYSTEM .
Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with E=Ac^2m.
If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results are OK.
Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply. I am also sending the
letter to other officials of American Physical Society,
so the they may also understand his high handedness and misuse of
office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
-
doug
He will have a good laugh except for being pestered by a crank.
The APS people will also have a good laugh.
>
> AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
-----
To
INERTIAL
Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy ?
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> -----
>
> To
> INERTIAL
>
> Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy ?
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
doug
ajay wrote:
Have you made any progress trying to understand Drakes
explanation of your mistake?
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457...@p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
No
> He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED SYETEM.
No
> The value of 'A' has been calculated
> simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION OF ENERGY HOLDS
> good to ISOLATED SYSTEM .
Then A must be 1. Your theory is refuted.
> Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with E=Ac^2m.
> If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results are OK.
When A = 1
> Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply.
Poor bastard .. you are just being a pathetic pain in the arse
> I am also sending the
> letter to other officials of American Physical Society,
> so the they may also understand his high handedness and misuse of
> office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York
They will all see what an idiot you are. Good.
Inertial
Yes.. I've told you that already.
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
-------
To
INERTIAL
Let us come to point number 1.
I have written that
DRAKE has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
I re-assert it.
You said NO
Can you justify your wrong claim defining ISOLATED SYATEM , NON-
ISOLTED SYSTEM and Law of Conservation of Energy?
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c...@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
Then you are wrong twice
> You said NO
And I'll say it again
> Can you justify your wrong claim defining ISOLATED SYATEM , NON-
> ISOLTED SYSTEM and Law of Conservation of Energy?
It is your claim that is wrong. I am not the one making claims.
Yours is wrong, as Drake clearly demonstrated. If energy is to be
conserved, A = 1, if A is not 1 then energy is not conserved.
You clearly do not understand the physics involved. Perhaps you are blinded
by your prejudices and over-inflated ego, as are most crackpots such as
yourself.
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Drake has applied Law of Conservation of Energy to NON-ISOLATED
SYSTEM.
The mathematical equations ALLOWS us to calculate the conditions
when system is isolated.
The system is ISOLATED when A=1,thus energy is conserved.
When (A>1, A<1) then system is NON-ISOLTED and Law of Conservation of
Energy is not applicable.
Hence in this case (A>1, A <1 , system is NON-ISOLATED ), the Law of
Conservation of
Energy is not applicable. Thus there is no possibility any conclusion
in this regard. It is simple.
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741...@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
Nope
> The mathematical equations ALLOWS us to calculate the conditions
> when system is isolated.
> The system is ISOLATED when A=1,thus energy is conserved.
>
> When (A>1, A<1) then system is NON-ISOLTED and Law of Conservation of
> Energy is not applicable.
So the law only applies when you want it to apply.
> Hence in this case (A>1, A <1 , system is NON-ISOLATED ),
Wrong
> the Law of
> Conservation of
> Energy is not applicable. Thus there is no possibility any conclusion
> in this regard. It is simple.
Yes .. you're an annoying little idiot.
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
-----
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
If it applied to NON-ISOLATED SYSTEM,then we can calculate the
conditions
under which it becomes ISOLATED.
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71...@n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
Are you still here whining and complaining? Get a life
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -
---------
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
Fuck off you idiot. Get a life
ajay
-------
To
Inertial
The understanding of defintion of Law of Conservation of Energy
is absolutely necessary in this regard.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
That is why you fail
ajay
Inertial
Look it up yourself. If you can understand it.
No more replies from me .. I have made mine (and your) position very clear.
You failed to understand and interpret Dr Drake's reply, even with my help,
which refutes your theory. You are now on a childish and unfounded vendetta
against him and wasting the time of way too many people who have far better
things to do that deal with a crackpot like you.
Goodbye .. you are not worth any more of my time.
ajay
------
To
INERTIAL
You did not even define LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY .
So how onw can trust you.
If you know it then define and we will proceed further.
If Dr Drake replies I will put here.
It is my duty to put limitations of individual at international forum.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Inertial
"ajay" <ajayon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f...@w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
I don't have to. I'm not the one who has a problem with it
> So how onw can trust you.
Because I'm not an idiot stalker like you
> If you know it then define and we will proceed further.
You have nowhere to go to
> If Dr Drake replies I will put here.
Why would he .. he has already refuted your theory
> It is my duty to put limitations of individual at international forum.
What a load of crap .. you're deluded as well as an idiot.
Sorry for replying again .. no more.
Fuck off you little prick
ajay
zimdoo zimdoo
>
> - Show quoted text -...
>
> read more »
--------
Inertial
You are making tall claims then why dont you define Law of
Conservation of Momentum.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
++++++++++++++++++
To
INETRIAL
If you know LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY DISCUSS IT HERE.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -...
>
> read more »
.
zimdoo zimdoo
>
> - Show quoted text -...
>
> read more »
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>....
To
INERIAL
Why dont you define law of conservation of energy, if you know it.
zimdoo
ajay
----------
To
Zimdoo
That is the main problem, one c
ajay
>
> - Show quoted text -...
>
> read more »
The Law of Conservation of energy is that FOR ISOLATED SYSTEM THE
ENERGY IS CONSERVED.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
zimdoo zimdoo
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
what about conditions ?
ajay
tomy tomy
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
But how Dr DRAKES comes in discussion here.
ajay
tomy tomy
))))))))))))))))))))
How ?
ajay
.
tomy tomy
---------------
Dr Darke has interpretted the Law of Conservation of Energy for NON
ISOLATED SYSTEM.
ajay
--------
Then he calculated value of 'A' and interpretted that it contradicts
E=Ac2M.
But in fact is that this value of 'A' determines whether system is
ISOLATED or not.
This is basic mistake.
Will De Drake, Editor Physical Review A explain ?
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
------------------
Then he calculated value of 'A' and interpretted that it contradicts
E=Ac2M.
But in fact is that this value of 'A' determines whether system is
ISOLATED or not.
This is basic mistake.
Will De Drake, Editor Physical Review A explain ?
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
zimdoo zimdoo
+++++++++++
Why does Dr Drake does not calrify that
HE HAS DONE DONE 8TH CLASS MATHEMATICS CORRECTLY
HE HAS APPLIED 11TH CLASS law od conservation of energy correctly?
ZIMDOO
ajay
zimdoo zimdoo
+++++++++++++++++++++
Definitely I will Email Dr Drake to explain why he did 8th class math
wrong and applied Law of conservation of energy incorrectly
ZIMDOO
ajay
ajay
zimdoo zimdoo
-------------------
No response from Dr Drake yet.
zimdoo
tomy tomy
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
++++++++++++++++
Dr Drake , Editor Physical Review A
get up from sleep
POST here that
(i) you know 8th class math well.
(ii) You have correctly applied LAW OF CONSERVATION OF MATTER.
Tell the world through GOOGLE GROUP.
tomytomy
zimdoo zimdoo
============
Dr Drake did not respond to my email
zimdoo
ajay
------------------------
There are clear mistakes of 8th class Math and 11th class physics
done by Drake to misuse
the office of American Phyiscal Society. He hoped that he has status
of God and will never be exposed.
Ajay SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
ajay
K
tomy tomy
=======
There is no big and small in science except LOGIC.
TOMYTOMY