As I went to lifeservices.com, Sandy and Durk's long-time partner, I found out
now it is redirected to ketofoods.com, dedicated to keto food. There are no
traces of S&D left any more.
My wild guess is their cooperation ended as LS tended to move to the more
lucrative keto market. But does anyone know what was really going on and where I
can find the past articles and newsletters of S&D ? Any news about them ?
Thanks for your attention.
ywliu
There's also this:
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0094963/fullcredits
!!!!
Russ.
Hoffmann Yen-Wei Liu <yenw...@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<bngn71$s...@netnews.hinet.net>...
I see: for reasons which we can only guess at, you want us to think that
Pearson is between 50 and 55. In which case you will kindly explain to us
how he came to graduate *38 years ago*:
"Durk took a triple minor at MIT in physics, biology and psychology,
with a triple minor in electrical engineering, computer science, and
chemistry, graduating in 1965."
(http://www.nuvobody.com/pages/professionals/durk_sandy.aspx)
Was he really *12 years old* when this happened? Or maybe he'd reached
*17*?? Or is the truth simply that you are just another Usenet asshole
shooting your mouth off?
Russ.
More bullshit. Fact is, no-one can know *squat* about *what kind of shape
he'd be in otherwise*.
Russ.
We cannot know that they would in fact be in even WORSE shape had they not
been doing what they do.
When people estimate my age, I do not look "significantly" younger (However
I do somewhat, im 44 they usually guess early to mid thirties) than my
actual years, but in comparison to what my family members were at this age,
I do look significantly younger.
"Russell.Beale" <R...@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:4EDnb.3315$sP5....@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net...
"R.Coyote" wrote:
RUSS..you are SET in your theme so DIE in it! B-0b1
(sigh) So does anyone simply know his (and her) birthdate?
Understand, I own two of their books, myself....
--
You know what to remove, to reply....
Durk mentions being 37 in the book. I'm looking specifically at a comment on
page 220 in chapter 7: "Durk now has more hair than he did ten years ago
when he was 27." The book came out in 1982. So by adding 21 years to that,
we have a pretty good idea of his age being around 59 or so, depending upon
the lag time between the writing and the actual publication. From recent
photos I have seen, I'd say he currently does look his age--not older, not
younger. He appears to have saved his hair, however, though it is fully
gray. I have no idea if he's maintained favorable blood test results.
Mike Leake
>Durk mentions being 37 in the book. I'm looking specifically at a comment on
>page 220 in chapter 7: "Durk now has more hair than he did ten years ago
>when he was 27." The book came out in 1982. So by adding 21 years to that,
>we have a pretty good idea of his age being around 59 or so, depending upon
>the lag time between the writing and the actual publication. From recent
>photos I have seen, I'd say he currently does look his age--not older, not
>younger. He appears to have saved his hair, however, though it is fully
>gray. I have no idea if he's maintained favorable blood test results.
Durk graduated MIT in 1965, which would indicate he was at least
twenty at that time, even allowing for his brilliance.
According to an interview published in 1996, they were both fifty-two
at that time, which would make them fifty nine today.
The interview is here: http://www.levity.com/mavericks/p&s-int.htm
--
Richard Steven Hack
"Whatever does not kill me makes me stronger" -
and YOU have not killed me!