Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Gladiator diet
10 views
Skip to first unread message
Taka
May 15, 2013, 9:20:41 PM5/15/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
"Despite having low animal protein intake, and eating a diet based on
'toxic' neolithic barley supplying much-feared gluten, phytates, and
other "anti-nutrients" supposed to interfere with calcium absorption,
these gladiators had 'exhorbitant' calcium levels in their bones?
Strong bones in agriculturalists? How could that happen? "
MORE: http://donmatesz.blogspot.jp/2011/07/real-gladiator-diet.html
-----------------
Paleo x Vegetarian fight, who is right?
get these 2 guys into the arena:
http://donmatesz.blogspot.jp/ x http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.jp/
Evidently seed oil based vegetarian diet is bad - see e.g. the India
example.
Anybody got some data on maximum lifespans reached by vegetarians
versus paleo freaks?
Taka
'toxic' neolithic barley supplying much-feared gluten, phytates, and
other "anti-nutrients" supposed to interfere with calcium absorption,
these gladiators had 'exhorbitant' calcium levels in their bones?
Strong bones in agriculturalists? How could that happen? "
MORE: http://donmatesz.blogspot.jp/2011/07/real-gladiator-diet.html
-----------------
Paleo x Vegetarian fight, who is right?
get these 2 guys into the arena:
http://donmatesz.blogspot.jp/ x http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.jp/
Evidently seed oil based vegetarian diet is bad - see e.g. the India
example.
Anybody got some data on maximum lifespans reached by vegetarians
versus paleo freaks?
Taka
John H. Gohde
May 16, 2013, 6:12:25 AM5/16/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On May 15, 9:20 pm, Taka <taka0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Despite having low animal protein intake, and eating a diet based on
> 'toxic' neolithic barley supplying much-feared gluten, phytates, and
> other "anti-nutrients" supposed to interfere with calcium absorption,
> these gladiators had 'exhorbitant' calcium levels in their bones?
> Strong bones in agriculturalists? How could that happen? "
>
> MORE:http://donmatesz.blogspot.jp/2011/07/real-gladiator-diet.html
>
> -----------------
>
> Paleo x Vegetarian fight, who is right?
>
> get these 2 guys into the arena:http://donmatesz.blogspot.jp/xhttp://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.jp/
> "Despite having low animal protein intake, and eating a diet based on
> 'toxic' neolithic barley supplying much-feared gluten, phytates, and
> other "anti-nutrients" supposed to interfere with calcium absorption,
> these gladiators had 'exhorbitant' calcium levels in their bones?
> Strong bones in agriculturalists? How could that happen? "
>
> MORE:http://donmatesz.blogspot.jp/2011/07/real-gladiator-diet.html
>
> -----------------
>
> Paleo x Vegetarian fight, who is right?
>
>
> Evidently seed oil based vegetarian diet is bad - see e.g. the India
> example.
>
> Anybody got some data on maximum lifespans reached by vegetarians
> versus paleo freaks?
>
> Taka
I got some data on Taka, but it ain't pretty.
> Evidently seed oil based vegetarian diet is bad - see e.g. the India
> example.
>
> Anybody got some data on maximum lifespans reached by vegetarians
> versus paleo freaks?
>
> Taka
0 new messages