Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Newborns cry in their native tongue!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

ranjit_...@yahoo.com

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 5:53:41 PM11/10/09
to
http://russiatoday.com/Sci_Tech/2009-11-06/newborns-cry-native-tongue.html
<<The researcher compared recordings of the cries of 30 French and 30
German babies between 2 and 5 days old. French babies tended to
produce cries with a rising melody contour, while Germans more often
cried falling cries. These patterns are typical for French and German
language respectively.>>

Christian Weisgerber

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 7:41:34 PM11/10/09
to
ranjit_...@yahoo.com <ranjit_...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Mark Liberman comments in the blog entry "Native Wails" on Language
Log:
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1869

Science story badly mangled by news media. Who'd've thought?

--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 11:22:48 PM11/10/09
to
On Nov 10, 7:41 pm, na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> ranjit_math...@yahoo.com <ranjit_math...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >http://russiatoday.com/Sci_Tech/2009-11-06/newborns-cry-native-tongue...

> > <<The researcher compared recordings of the cries of 30 French and 30
> > German babies between 2 and 5 days old. French babies tended to
> > produce cries with a rising melody contour, while Germans more often
> > cried falling cries. These patterns are typical for French and German
> > language respectively.>>
>
> Mark Liberman comments in the blog entry "Native Wails" on Language
> Log:http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1869
>
> Science story badly mangled by news media.  Who'd've thought?

NPR handled it well (with relevant audio) -- but I don't see what's
new about the finding.

Ruud Harmsen

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 5:52:14 AM11/11/09
to
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:53:41 -0800 (PST): "ranjit_...@yahoo.com"
<ranjit_...@yahoo.com>: in sci.lang:

They picked it up by listening in the womb, obviously. After nine
months of exposure it catches on.
--
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.eu

Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 8:17:43 AM11/11/09
to
On Nov 11, 5:52 am, Ruud Harmsen <r...@rudhar.eu> wrote:
> Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:53:41 -0800 (PST): "ranjit_math...@yahoo.com"
> <ranjit_math...@yahoo.com>: in sci.lang:
>
> >http://russiatoday.com/Sci_Tech/2009-11-06/newborns-cry-native-tongue...

> ><<The researcher compared recordings of the cries of 30 French and 30
> >German babies between 2 and 5 days old. French babies tended to
> >produce cries with a rising melody contour, while Germans more often
> >cried falling cries. These patterns are typical for French and German
> >language respectively.>>
>
> They picked it up by listening in the womb, obviously. After nine
> months of exposure it catches on.

That is indeed what the German researcher suggested, but that, too, is
not a new idea.

Message has been deleted
0 new messages