On Monday, February 19, 2018 at 12:48:31 PM UTC+13, Daud Deden wrote:
> This is a rapid response post, I later wrote a better one which was lost, so here, rant included and missing a few points. DD
>
> , February 10, 2018 at 11:34:25 AM UTC+13, Daud Deden wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 5:20:18 PM UTC-5, Daud Deden wrote:
> > > Ashakish@Pawnee, Ricaree: dog
> > -
> >
> > Ember-mobile-animate(embryonic spark of life)
>
> Perro@Span: dog ~ ember-bear(verb) ~
> Pariah/ari@India: dog (ferry/arigolu)
>
> > atimw@Cree: animal that pulls, dog
> just "dog" (I ..
>
> I'll stick with the That Monigyah Linguist's impression, he wrote a good blogpost on it, he didn't just 'click the dict.'.
So you feel "writing a good blogpost" produces superior results to
merely looking in a dictionary? What is the source of his knowledge
of Cree?
Recall he linked lion as misatim. In Sumerian, a bitch or lioness = nig.
>
> > anima(te/l)
> PIE *anə- 'breathe'
> > immal@Sumerian: wild cow (general ungulate?)
> > nyama@Mbuti: animal
> Proto-Bantu *ǹɲàmà 'meat; animal'
>
> Nyama@Mbuti: anima(l/te)
> Njama@PBantu: meat, animal
> Njama@Mbuti: thicket
> Jambo@Swahili: meet
> Meet/meat/meal/eat/gate/grate/grill/mill/mesh-mat.rix-menstru/in-heat/greet/mate/make(baby-domi.cile)/pemm.ican/jam/jamb
> All from ndjambua (part of ndjuambuangualua, an earlier rainforest form of OOA2 xyambuatlachya)
>
> > (b)inatang@Malay: animal
> > (b)intang@Malay: star
> > intan@Malay: spark.le (life-ember?)
> 'diamond'
>
> True in modern sense, but older sense included any sparkling/reflecting material.
And you know this how?
api fire, ambhi/bi.ntang/intan
> [I'm thinking that 'ambi.dextrous' originally referred to the back & forth spinning of a fire-drill, only later meaning specifically 'either-both hand' and extra.pol.ated, as in amphi.bian: both land & water.]
> > (b)inti@Malay: daughter
> from Arabic
> A not uncommon name for men in eastern ('pagan'/Christian)Indonesia.
Men are called "daughter"? How unusual.
Or perhaps you mean just that there is a not uncommon name for men in
eastern Indonesia which is "binti" or "inti" or something sounding
a bit like one or the other?
> > (b)ini@Malay: wife
> PAN *binahi 'woman, wife'
> Not girl/daughter, thus implies fer.tilized/s.peck.led/spar.kled/e{ncu}mbered/embarazado@Span.: pregnant
> >
> > (b)ntya(ng/mua) anima?
> Back to word-squashing, is it? So what language would this
> be a word of?
>
> Names & numbers are a Neo-etymogist's obsession, both have less importance in Paleo-etymology.
Yes, it's clear everything is a lot more ... fluid ... in paleo-etymology.
But surely you have some idea of when and where this language was spoken?
You've cited so many of these polysyllabic squishes, I've often wondered
whether you have a list of them somewhere. Just up there, where I see
"OOA2 xyambuatlachya", it almost looks as if you've got them numbered or
catalogued or something.
Linnaeus started a real taxonomic conundrum by claiming permanent labels for temporary-phases of flora & fauna, which are constantly gradually undergoing transformation due to mutation & natural selection, just like language. Why don't you label it "squash", if that comforts you?
It doesn't comfort me any more than using any other word. I use "squash"
because they seem to have been constructed by fusing the various sounds
of a group of words you feel must have a common source. If there is
some other process which led you to these polysyllables, you have not
so far managed (or wanted) to explain it.
I don't share your discomfort with unlabeled/noncategorised words, since I consider them less as discrete 'things' than as concepts coded in (climate-affected thus somewhat arbitrary) sound arrangements, always changing (but basal words changing slower). Languages are nationalistic things today, but long long ago they were c.amp(hi) things. If you are a permanent cubicle-dweller and haven't done any Primitive camping around a campfire, this will appear to be an alien concept, I can't fix that, ignorance is bliss/belief. If you are in a box/cage studying people/fauna who do/did not live in a box/cage, YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG, but nobody will tell you, because ALL YOUR PEERS are also in boxes/cages. THAT is why I'm doing this, and that is why my work is important, despite my many flaws in rendering Paleo-etymology coherently to modern hyper-domesticated AMHsapiens, like the typical non-field-tested Neo-etymogist's & their wannabes.
I realize the condescension is essential to your portrayal of yourself
as a pioneer in a completely alternative system. But most of the things you
project onto me are untrue, though you have no way of knowing it.
> [Note: I do not want to write this again, refer back to it when necessary. DD]
Why would I want to?
> same one as *xyuam(bua)tla and variations
> thereof? And why no asterisk?
>
> Asterisk/star/stella denotes conjecture. ALL is conjecture in Paleo-etymology, which is why 1. experience of non-domesticated nature, 2. study of primate-anthropoid-hominoid-hominin biology, 3. application of principles of Parsimony & Continuity, and 4. comprehension of the significance of portable broadleaf-shingled domiciles & sharpened sticks allowed and selected for vocal communication; are all significant in determining what produced this communication method we call language. Of course, you don't have to believe that, you can righteously claim it was an emperor or god that gave us language, as some have done.
No, I don't plan to do that, either.