Ruud Harmsen <
r...@rudhar.com> wrote:
> Sat, 22 Jun 2019 22:51:06 -0000 (UTC): António Marques
> <
anton...@sapo.pt> scribeva:
>
>> Ruud Harmsen <
r...@rudhar.com> wrote:
>>> Sat, 22 Jun 2019 03:06:40 -0700 (PDT): M?cis?aw Wojna-Bojewski
>>> <
craoi...@gmail.com> scribeva:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 10:28:29 AM UTC+3, Franz Gnaedinger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Google translate, which I consider the best of the available translating
>>>>> tools
>>>>
>>>> I can only heartily laugh at this.
>>>
>>> Why? Is DeepL way better, you think? It's more limited where the
>>> choice of languages are is concerned.
>>
>> Icredible as it may seem, in my experience Bing is better.
>>
>> GT does behave as if any transaction uses English as an intermediate step.
>
> DeepL too, as I demonstrated:
>
https://rudhar.com/lingtics/machtrns/nl03.htm
> (In Dutch, about German, English and Dutch.)
>
> What is the URL of Bing Translator? I didn't even know Microsoft had
> one.
>
Google is not (was never) the state of the art, you know. They're actually