Bob
> What if I show you the matlab function IMROTATE implemented totally by
> me?
> Atleast then should you belive that I have th potential to do the same
> thing in C but I am requesting it only because I dont have time.
no
> Shall I mail you the MATLAB code of IMROTATE function written by me
> solely?
no
> Will atleast then you give me an equivalent C code?
no
> Or are u willing to conver it into C for me?
no
--
Kenneth Sloan sl...@uab.edu
Computer and Information Sciences (205) 934-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX (205) 934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/
Everyone has potential. The ones that write their own code for the
experience are the winners.
How do we know this isn't a class in c? Or an image processing class
that requires that you write code in c? In either case, if we provide
code to you, you have just cheated the school, your fellow students,
and most importantly, yourself.
I have seen you post several times, each time asking for a complete
solution. You won't do your own research and haven't even bothered to
use a web search engine. You have finally admitted to looking for
answers to homework, but you don't seem to get it that getting answers
from others is cheating.
I looked at your profile, and based on previous threads, I'm not sure
anyone here should provide you with anything.
duane
So you already have a full implementation of rotation by an arbitrary
angle, including high-quality resampling (at least bicubic)? Do you
understand how the code works?
If so, you understand all the hard bits, and converting this to C should
be pretty trivial for you. If you already have the algorithm in Matlab,
is the main point of the assignment to teach you how to do things in C
so they are smaller and faster.
>Atleast then should you belive that I have th potential to do the same
>thing in C but I am requesting it only because I dont have time.
Why don't you have time? School programs generally include enough time
to do the exercises. And the main point of assignments is to get *you*
to do the work so you understand it when it's done. Having someone else
give you the code might help you pass the course, but it wouldn't give
you the knowledge you're supposed to get from taking the course. That's
not doing you a favour in the long run, and it's definitely not fair to
your classmates or your future employers.
>Shall I mail you the MATLAB code of IMROTATE function written by me
>solely?
>Will atleast then you give me an equivalent C code?
>Or are u willing to conver it into C for me?
No.
By the way, I *have* written a C program to apply an arbitrary 2D
affine transformation to an image. Rotations are a subset of affine
transforms. It's not really much different internally except for the
user interface (you need to specify 6 numbers instead of 1). I learned
a lot in the process of building that program, particularly about
resampling methods better than bicubic.
Dave
That's what a well-designed homework assignment should do - you had to
learn something new to complete it. Aren't you glad now you did it
yourself, rather than getting already-written code from someone else?
Although this may seem a strange way of looking at it now, once you've
finished the course and your whole program, nobody will care what grade
you got in this course. They will only care what you actually *know*.
I've worked at a number of jobs over about 20 years, and no interviewer
ever asked me what marks I got in any of my courses. Nobody cared that
all of my knowledge of certain fields was acquired outside of the
classroom, either. They just cared about what I knew, what I had done
already, and what I could do for them if they hired me.
So the only lasting value of the assignment is what you figured out
while doing it, not what mark you got. It doesn't make sense to skip
the valuable part (the learning) in order to get a good mark fast.
Dave
Hear, hear. However, that presumes some usable knowledge from Human
Resources (or whatever title they adopted) departments. Sadly, some HR
departments seem to be lacking in (attracting) knowledge themselves
...
Nevertheless, you are right, knowledge/intellect is not the same as
grades.
Bart
>"Dave Martindale" <da...@cs.ubc.ca> wrote in message
>news:e8u6bh$19n$1...@swain.cs.ubc.ca...
>SNIP
>> Although this may seem a strange way of looking at it now, once
>> you've finished the course and your whole program, nobody will
>> care what grade you got in this course. They will only care what
>> you actually *know*.
>Hear, hear. However, that presumes some usable knowledge from Human
>Resources (or whatever title they adopted) departments. Sadly, some HR
>departments seem to be lacking in (attracting) knowledge themselves
>...
It also depends on who does the interviewing. When I was interviewed
for my current position, I talked to one or two people from HR about
company polices, etc - stuff like vacation, medical plans, intellectual
property - for perhaps half an hour. I spent perhaps another two hours
talking to technical people, about 10 of them - people I'd be directly
working with or under if I was hired. It was the technical people who
decided whether to hire me - not HR. That was true of my previous job
as well.
Now, when I applied to enter a graduate degree program at a university,
*they* wanted to know what my previous courses and marks had been.
That seems legitimate - if you want to be a student, they want evidence
that you've been good at being a student in the past. But none of the
Real World job interviews asked about marks.
Dave
Cheers
Theo
It's not really hard to tell which posters are the worst offenders.
There are some really good recent examples.
I personally have supplied complete code to people I thought had a
legitimate need. I have also spent a lot of time off line with others
who were actually learning. Those who are so obviously lazy students
get suggestions to do a little research.
duane
Why don't you try Myspace.com?
Bob