Please help- I'm going to hike in the Allagash Wilderness, (in Maine)
and the heart of Adirondacks (in Ny State) this summer and I am ready
to purchase a unit soon and don't want to make an error in this
purchase.
Which one would you recommend, and or "not recommend"
Thank you,
Robert B
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Good luck!
I'll be buying the unit within 3 weeks-so please advise why I should
buy a particular unit.
Who said it was a cheaper antenna?
> Im a
> little concerned about the "locking feature" for satellite. Does by,
> having a "cheaper attenna", make it more difficult for satellites to
> lock.
As far as I can tell it locks just as good and just as quick as the
III Plus.
--
Darrel Goheen
G...@tvnav.com
http://www.tvnav.com/navhome.html
I will be buying the unit, next week (probably the GPS 12map). I like
the idea that the GPS 12 map is $20.00 cheaper-base price-plus the fact
Garmin will give a $50.00 rebate-if purchased before April 30,2000. But
I did read from one of the "comparitive" articles (I know its not my
imagination), that the GPS 12map was made a little cheaper, and the
antenna was cheaper. If you say that its the "exact antenna"- I'll take
your word for it. Have you had experience with oversea models-my friend
@ "upstate NY", says that there are 12 overseas units "japanese" and I
think "german", that have features better than the american units, work
quicker, lock faster, and might be more "accurate" (I don't see how
possible, if they all rely on the "error routine" 100 meters circle
thrown in by the "Department of Defense")-especially when the whole GPS
unit system is dependent upon U.S. Dept of Defense Satellites (24
satllites now!,-and I think 12 are going to be sent up for more
redundancy and overlap.)
Any information would be helpful.
I'm going be using this (the unit) primarily for hiking (a little
car/direction driving)
Later,
Regards,
Joe Mehaffey wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> A couple of items.
> 1) The patch style antenna on the Garmin G-12Map is essentially the same
> sensitivity as the quad helix antenna on the G-III PLUS. And.. The
> performance of the two units is essentially the same with just a few
> features different. You can check our website for a comparison of the
> differences and a product review of each.
> 2) Many people think the G-12Map case and style is more robust and
> suitable for severe use such as hiking as compared with the G-III PLUS
> with its swing around antenna. I do not necessarily believe it is more
> robust myself, but I wonder if you will share with us why you think the
> G12Map is not robust.
> 3) I am not aware of any consumer model GPS receivers from Japan or
> Germany being sold here in the USA. Can you give us brands and model
> numbers that your friend was talking about?
> 4) All common consumer GPS receivers have about the same accuracy.
> This is especially true when you consider the effects of SA. See our
> website for the article: GPS RECEIVER ACCURACY: HOW ACCURATE SHOULD I
> EXPECT THEM TO BE?
>
> Joe Mehaffey
> --
> Got a Question about GPS technology? Looking for a GPS FAQ site?
> See: http://joe.mehaffey.com
robertb...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> I will be buying the unit, next week (probably the GPS 12map). I like
> the idea that the GPS 12 map is $20.00 cheaper-base price-plus the fact
> Garmin will give a $50.00 rebate-if purchased before April 30,2000. But
> I did read from one of the "comparitive" articles (I know its not my
> imagination), that the GPS 12map was made a little cheaper, and the
> antenna was cheaper. If you say that its the "exact antenna"- I'll take
> your word for it. Have you had experience with oversea models-my friend
The III+ and the 12Map do not use the same antenna but the performance
is
substantially the same. The 12Map is a patch antenna which is prefered
by hikers since it can't easily be broken. It has an external antenna
capability but will not use the same external antenna as a III+.
> @ "upstate NY", says that there are 12 overseas units "japanese" and I
> think "german", that have features better than the american units, work
> quicker, lock faster, and might be more "accurate" (I don't see how
> possible, if they all rely on the "error routine" 100 meters circle
> thrown in by the "Department of Defense")-especially when the whole GPS
> unit system is dependent upon U.S. Dept of Defense Satellites (24
> satllites now!,-and I think 12 are going to be sent up for more
> redundancy and overlap.)
I don't believe any of this. The maps are different and the Japanese
one
just might display all the text in japanese. Do you read Japanese?
Dale
> Any information would be helpful.
>
> I'm going be using this (the unit) primarily for hiking (a little
> car/direction driving)
>
> Later,
>
> Robert B
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
--
For GPS data see: Joe -- http://joe.mehaffey.com
Peter -- http://www.vancouver-webpages.com/peter/
Karen -- http://www.gpsy.com/gpsinfo/
Reach me at: Dal...@cwnet.com
But anyhow, Do you have the spec's on the new Garmin 162 and 168 units
coming out this spring. Should one wait for these unit releases. Whats
the prices?. Whats the specs?. When will they be purchased for first
available date. Are they good for hiking?. I know they have more memory
versus the 12map and Garmin GPS 3+., What other features do these new
units have, compared to the GPS 3+, and GPS 12map?
I will be purchasing the units soon(this week or next), probably (most
likely) from the "Kansas Dealer", whose on this forum. He has the best
prices and best technical support.
What would be the best GPS receiver with these constraints in mind??
*Must be portable and rugged
*Safety: would be best for helping me if I get lost in some out of the
way place!
*Features: best features for traveling in the woods and mountains
*Altitude display and accuracy
*Maps: best maps for cities and towns in Asia
*Computer upload: would be nice if I could store the routes I follow
in my travels, and then upload them to a computer at a later time...
I'd very much appreciate any/all advice!
Dave.
(I can be sent email directly at ods...@usa.net (with no 'o's)
I assume (always dangerous) the 12 has a 48-type antenna that BNCs on. If
the III+ use the same connection as the II+, the antenna is that slip on
BNC.
If I am correct, it IS a cheap shot. It is not a positive connection and
not as weatherproof. It would be on the level of the slip on F connector on
cable TV.
Basic Ham Radio stuff you already know, though.
"Joe Mehaffey" <j...@mehaffey.com> wrote in message
news:38977B5A...@mehaffey.com...
All of the 12 models have a built in patch antenna.
GB
<robertb...@my-deja.com> a écrit dans le message :
87ael0$898$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
A full BNC connector has a bayonet locking ring on the male plug, and
the antenna on the GPS 48 uses this.
The GPS II/II+/III/III+ use a different arrangement. The receiver
has a proper female BNC, but the antenna has a male BNC without the
locking ring. When mounted on the GPS, the antenna is locked to
the GPS by a plastic flange on the antenna mating with a groove in
the GPS case.
When you remove the antenna from the GPS, an extension cable will
lock to the female BNC on the GPS - the "ears" for the bayonet ring
are present. But the antenna merely slips into the female BNC on
the other end of the extension cable and is held by friction. There
is no locking ring to hold the antenna to the female BNC. And this
is why you might not want to expose this connection to the airstream
outside a car.
Dave