Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: NOAA: the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average 233— NOT
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Last Post
Feb 16, 2012, 4:56:50 AM2/16/12
to
On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> above the 20th century average.
>
> So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> forever.
>
> http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
— —
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.
1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the
logic of what you say. You have to tell them
what is right in very simple terms. If they do
not agree, you will never be able to change
their mind.
2- The religious fanatic: If what you say goes
against their religious belief, they will cling
to that belief even if it means their death.
3- There is no way to reform evil- not in a
million years. There is no way to convince
anthropogenic_global_warming_alarmists,
terrorists, serial killers, paedophiles, and
predators to change their evil ways, They
knew what they were doing was wrong, but
knowledge didn't stop them. It only made
them more careful in how they went about
performing their evil deeds.˙
> January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> above the 20th century average.
>
> So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> forever.
>
> http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
— —
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.
1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the
logic of what you say. You have to tell them
what is right in very simple terms. If they do
not agree, you will never be able to change
their mind.
2- The religious fanatic: If what you say goes
against their religious belief, they will cling
to that belief even if it means their death.
3- There is no way to reform evil- not in a
million years. There is no way to convince
anthropogenic_global_warming_alarmists,
terrorists, serial killers, paedophiles, and
predators to change their evil ways, They
knew what they were doing was wrong, but
knowledge didn't stop them. It only made
them more careful in how they went about
performing their evil deeds.˙
Falcon
Feb 16, 2012, 5:16:28 AM2/16/12
to
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:56:50 -0800 (PST)i, Last Post wrote ...
26th warmest January on record."
Hilarious.
--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)
>
> On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> > above the 20th century average.
> >
> > So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> > forever.
> >
> > http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
>
> ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
"...the global land surface temperature was 0.61C ... making this the
> On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> > above the 20th century average.
> >
> > So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> > forever.
> >
> > http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
>
> ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
26th warmest January on record."
Hilarious.
--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)
Dawlish
Feb 16, 2012, 6:46:23 AM2/16/12
to
•The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for
January 2012 was the 19th warmest on record at 54.30°F (12.39°C),
which is 0.70°F (0.39°C) above the 20th century average of 53.6°F
(12.0°C). The margin of error associated with this temperature is +/-
0.14°F (0.08°C).
Spinner tries to spin, but fails miserably, as usual. Why is the world
so much warmer than the GISS average, given that there are so many
negative forcings? Such a difficult question, isn't it?
You know the likely answer, but it doesn't suit you to say it, does
it? This you have to try and spin something, like you always, always
do (and always, always fail).
Falcon
Feb 16, 2012, 6:56:07 AM2/16/12
to
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:46:23 -0800 (PST)i, Dawlish wrote ...
Grasping at straws is one thing, but the "26th warmest January on
record"? That really takes some beating.
>
> On Feb 16, 10:16 am, Falcon <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:56:50 -0800 (PST)i, Last Post wrote ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> > > > above the 20th century average.
> >
> > > > So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> > > > forever.
> >
> > > >http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
> >
> > > ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
> >
> > "...the global land surface temperature was 0.61C ... making this the
> > 26th warmest January on record."
> >
> > Hilarious.
> >
>
> And your point is?
> On Feb 16, 10:16 am, Falcon <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:56:50 -0800 (PST)i, Last Post wrote ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> > > > above the 20th century average.
> >
> > > > So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> > > > forever.
> >
> > > >http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
> >
> > > ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
> >
> > "...the global land surface temperature was 0.61C ... making this the
> > 26th warmest January on record."
> >
> > Hilarious.
> >
>
Grasping at straws is one thing, but the "26th warmest January on
record"? That really takes some beating.
I-Practically-Invented-The-Internet
Feb 16, 2012, 6:57:55 AM2/16/12
to
AAA+
"Falcon" wrote in message news:MPG.29a6ff2e8...@news.plus.net...
"Falcon" wrote in message news:MPG.29a6ff2e8...@news.plus.net...
Dawlish
Feb 16, 2012, 7:30:34 AM2/16/12
to
temperature in the NOAA/GISS series.
Doesn't that suggest something has been happening, that appears to
have passed you by? I'll ask again, as you've ducked the question -
here, it's starred for you so you can't miss it:
**Why is the world so much warmer than the GISS average, given that
there are so many
negative forcings?**
Falcon
Feb 16, 2012, 8:13:34 AM2/16/12
to
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:30:34 -0800 (PST)i, Dawlish wrote ...
bad has happened since you started off the global scare, so please
explain why you think colder is better.
> Doesn't that suggest something has been happening, that appears to
> have passed you by? I'll ask again, as you've ducked the question -
> here, it's starred for you so you can't miss it:
It suggests that, if you think global averages mean anything, things got
a little warmer. I welcome the change, however small it has been. Or at
least I would if it had been really noticeable. Why do you think change
is a bad thing?
> **Why is the world so much warmer than the GISS average, given that
> there are so many negative forcings?**
I don't care. GISS keeps changing its record and you have no idea why,
do you? You're just one of many on the green gravy train. It won't last
forever. Enjoy the interglacial.
>
> On Feb 16, 11:56 am, Falcon <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:46:23 -0800 (PST)i, Dawlish wrote ...
> >
> > > On Feb 16, 10:16 am, Falcon <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:56:50 -0800 (PST)i, Last Post wrote ...
> >
> > > > > On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> > > > > > above the 20th century average.
> >
> > > > > > So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> > > > > > forever.
> >
> > > > > >http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
> >
> > > > > ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
> >
> > > > "...the global land surface temperature was 0.61C ... making this the
> > > > 26th warmest January on record."
> >
> > > > Hilarious.
> >
> > > And your point is?
> >
> > Grasping at straws is one thing, but the "26th warmest January on
> > record"? That really takes some beating.
> >
>
> On Feb 16, 11:56 am, Falcon <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:46:23 -0800 (PST)i, Dawlish wrote ...
> >
> > > On Feb 16, 10:16 am, Falcon <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:56:50 -0800 (PST)i, Last Post wrote ...
> >
> > > > > On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> > > > > > above the 20th century average.
> >
> > > > > > So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> > > > > > forever.
> >
> > > > > >http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
> >
> > > > > ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
> >
> > > > "...the global land surface temperature was 0.61C ... making this the
> > > > 26th warmest January on record."
> >
> > > > Hilarious.
> >
> > > And your point is?
> >
> > Grasping at straws is one thing, but the "26th warmest January on
> > record"? That really takes some beating.
> >
>
> It's almost 30 years since we had a month with a below average global
> temperature in the NOAA/GISS series.
You say that as if it's a bad thing. There's no evidence that anything
> temperature in the NOAA/GISS series.
bad has happened since you started off the global scare, so please
explain why you think colder is better.
> Doesn't that suggest something has been happening, that appears to
> have passed you by? I'll ask again, as you've ducked the question -
> here, it's starred for you so you can't miss it:
a little warmer. I welcome the change, however small it has been. Or at
least I would if it had been really noticeable. Why do you think change
is a bad thing?
> **Why is the world so much warmer than the GISS average, given that
> there are so many negative forcings?**
do you? You're just one of many on the green gravy train. It won't last
forever. Enjoy the interglacial.
Dawlish
Feb 16, 2012, 5:36:54 PM2/16/12
to
Transition Zone
Feb 18, 2012, 1:54:08 PM2/18/12
to
On Feb 16, 4:56 am, Last Post <last_p...@primus.ca> wrote:
> On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> > above the 20th century average.
>
> > So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> > forever.
>
> >http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
>
> ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
No. You lie.
> On Feb 15, 7:44 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > January was the 323rd consecutive month with a global temperature
> > above the 20th century average.
>
> > So where's the significant cooling, deniers? The La Nina won't last
> > forever.
>
> >http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
>
> ø NOAA & Trenberth lie
ala
Feb 18, 2012, 8:42:17 PM2/18/12
to
"Falcon" <fal...@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.29a6ff2e8...@news.plus.net...
> Grasping at straws is one thing, but the "26th warmest January on
> record"? That really takes some beating.
>
>
Last Post
Feb 18, 2012, 10:48:06 PM2/18/12
to
TZ is too gullible to live.
I have caught Trenberth and his agency
with false data several times.
NOAA operates the CO2 monitor on
Mauna Loa and it's charts are not credible.
Of course they have zero usefulness.
ø Tyndall was the first to correctly measure the
infrared absorptive powers of the gases nitrogen,
oxygen, water vapour, carbon dioxide, ozone,
methane, etc. He concluded that water vapour is
the strongest absorber of radiant heat in the
atmosphere and is the principal gas controlling air
temperature. Absorption by the bulk of the other
gases is negligible.
ø TZ fits #1 perfectly in my sig below.
0 new messages