Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Recent Letter Reveal Issac Newtons BIG GRAVITY CONSPIRACY And Prove That The Big Lefty Science Fraud Dates Back Hundreds Of Years!!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

bo^n-o

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 12:26:29 AM11/25/09
to
The Global Warming Conspiracy's Most Damning Emails

November 25 2009

QUOTE: there was now a "clique" of 43 climate scientists stifling true
debate, with Mann, Jones and Briffa all named.

QUOTE: that clique morphed into a conspiracy that has helped to panic the
world - including KRudd - into spending billions on a scare that may not in
fact exist.

QUOTE: "peer review" is too often "mates' review".

QUOTE: It means the "consensus" of scientists we hear of may not actually
exist and the IPCC reports cannot be trusted to be balanced.

THREE weeks ago Prime Minister KRudd named me as part of an international
conspiracy to spread lies about global warming.

How I laughed.

But I'm not laughing now.

Emails leaked at the weekend show there is indeed a conspiracy to deceive
the world - and KRudd has fallen for it.

This conspiracy comprises a group of warming scientists who have been
central in spreading the false claim that the world has never been hotter
and man's gases are to blame.

It's come to light after nearly 4000 emails and documents were stolen from
the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia and dumped on
the internet by what is almost certainly a whistleblower.

What they reveal is perhaps the greatest scientific scandal of our time - a
conspiracy by warmist scientists to fudge statistics, sack sceptical
scientists, block the release of data to prevent checking, illegally destroy
data, deceive reporters, censor sceptical papers, and hide errors in their
work.

Most extraordinary are the emails in which these scientists admit to each
other what they've never confessed to the world - that the world is not
warming as their theories predicted.

In fact, it's been cooling since 2001.

Cried one, IPCC co-author Kevin Trenberth, in an email to other members of
this conspiracy: "The fact is that we cannot account for the lack of warming
at the moment and it's a travesty that we can't."

These are not some obscure scientists. Rather, they include co-authors of
the reports of the UN's IPCC - which KRudd cites as his proof that warming
is "happening and it's caused by human activity".

They include Phil Jones, head of the CRU unit from which the emails were
taken - a unit that Britain's former chief scientific adviser, Sir David
King, said "set the agenda for the major research effort" in climate
science.

They include Pennsylvania State University's Michael Mann and CRU deputy
director Keith Briffa, both IPCC co-authors, who also produced the two
studies that most convinced journalists of the false claim that it's now
hotter than the Medi�val Warm Period just 800 years ago.

They also include scientists responsible for the HadCRU data - one of the
four main measurements of the world's temperature today.

All this may sound too James Bond-like to be true.

Yet only three years ago we were warned that many of these same people had
indeed created a network that was distorting science.

In 2006 the US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee
commissioned eminent statisticians to check Mann's famous "hockey stick" - a
graph used by the IPCC to claim today's temperatures were the highest for
thousands of years.

Their report not only found that Mann's work was too flawed to be relied
upon, just as a retired petroleum engineer, Steve McIntyre, had first said,
but that there was now a "clique" of 43 climate scientists stifling true
debate, with Mann, Jones and Briffa all named.

Few heeded the warning.

And so that clique morphed into a conspiracy that has helped to panic the
world - including KRudd - into spending billions on a scare that may not in
fact exist.

That's the background.

Now here are just some of the emails.

**** FIDDLING DATA: "Hide the decline"

Phil Jones tells Michael Mann and others how he made his data show warming:

***"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to
each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for
Keith's to hide the decline. "

Mick Kelly, Professor of Climate Change at Jones' university, on hiding
recent cooling:

***"Anyway, I'll maybe cut the last few points off the filtered curve before
I give the talk again as that's trending down as a result of the end effects
and the recent cold-ish years. "

A CRU programming code for dealing with tree-ring data:

***"Uses corrected MXD but shouldn't usually plot past 1960 because these
will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures. "

From green entrepreneur Adam Markham to the CRU, ordering better propaganda:

***"WWW Australia are worried that this may present a slightly more
conservative approach to the risks than they are hearing from CSIRO. In
particular, they would like to see the section on variability and extreme
events beefed up if possible. "

****FAITH, NOT SCIENCE: "This is all gut feeling"

Phil Jones shows his faith:

I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be
proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn't being political, it
is being selfish.

Phil Jones to his CRU staff:

***"I hope you're not right about the lack of warming lasting till about
2020. I'd rather hoped to see the earlier Met Office press release with Doug's
paper that said something like - half the years to 2014 would exceed the
warmest year currently on record, 1998! "

From Phil Jones to Adelaide-born Tom Wigley, now of the US University
Corporation for Atmospheric Research, saying he cannot believe the Medi1�val
Warm Period really was warmer:

***"Bottom line - there is no way the MWP (whenever it was) was as warm
globally as the last 20 years ... this is all gut feeling, no science, but
years of experience of dealing with global scales and variability. "

From Phil Jones to Michael Mann, on the death of Australian sceptic John
Daly:

***"In an odd way this is cheering news!"

****COVERING UP: "Destroy the emails"

Phil Jones warns Michael Mann that Steve McIntyre and Prof Ross McKittrick,
two sceptics who first debunked Mann's "hockey stick", are now wanting to
check CRU data:

***"If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I
think I'll delete the file rather than send to anyone ... We also have a
data protection act, which I will hide behind. "

From Phil Jones to Michael Mann and others:

***"PS I'm getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station
temperature data. Don't any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a
Freedom of Information Act! "

Phil Jones to American climatologist and IPCC lead author Benjamin Santer:

***"I did get an email from the FOI person here early yesterday to tell me I
shouldn't be deleting emails - unless this was normal deleting to keep
emails manageable! "

Phil Jones to Michael Mann, just three weeks after an FOI request from
sceptic David Holland:

***"Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? "

***"Keith will do likewise ... Can you also email Gene and get him to do the
same? "

****SILENCING SCEPTICS: "Beat the crap out of him"

Ben Santer on a sceptical climatologist :

***"Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I'll be tempted to
beat the crap out of him. "

Phil Jones on cheating on deadlines to sneak warmist material into the IPCC:

***"Ammann/Wahl - try and change the Received date! Don't give those sceptic
something to amuse themselves with. "

Tom Wigley on ousting the editor of Geophysical Research Letters (achieved):

***"If you think that Saiers is in the greenhouse sceptics camp, then, if we
can find documentary evidence of this, we could go through official AGU
channels to get him ousted. "

Phil Jones to Michael Mann on keeping two sceptics' papers from the IPCC:

***"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. K and
I will keep them out somehow - even if we have to redefine what the
peer-review literature is! "

Michael Mann on removing the editor of Climate Science (achieved):

***"How to deal with this is unclear, since there are a number of
individuals with bona fide scientific credentials who could be used by an
unscrupulous editor to ensure that anti-greenhouse science can get through
the peer review process (Legates, Balling, Lindzen, Baliunas, Soon, and so
on). "

Michael Mann to the CRU's Tim Osborn and Keith Briffa, on blocking sceptics'
comments on his RealClimate website:

***"We can hold comments up in the queue and contact you about whether or
not you think they should be screened through or not ... "

****OUR THEORY ISN'T WORKING! "Where the heck is global warming?"

IPCC lead author Kevin Trenberth privately tells Mann, Santer, Wigley, Jones
and leading alarmists such as Stephen H. Schneider and James Hansen that the
data doesn't show what their climate models predicted:

***". where the heck is global warming? We are asking that here in Boulder
where we have broken records the past two days for the coldest days on
record. ... The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the
moment and it is a travesty that we can't. "

****WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN?

It doesn't mean all global warming science is bogus. But it does mean the
process used to produce it is corrupted.

It means "peer review" is too often "mates' review". It means sceptical
scientists have not had the hearing they deserve, and leading warmist
scientists have not been honest or frank.

It means the "consensus" of scientists we hear of may not actually exist and
the IPCC reports cannot be trusted to be balanced.

It means that claims we've never been hotter are false or unproven, and much
research now needs to be rechecked.

And at heart it means global warming theory is too weak to accept, being
contradicted by a decade of climate.

Even Flannery, the alarmist who claimed global warming could cause Sydney,
Brisbane and Adelaide to run out of water by last summer, now admits - after
reading some of these emails - that "the computer modelling and the real
world data disagree", since "for the last 10 years we've gone through a
slight cooling trend".

He confessed at last: " We don't understand all of the factors that create
earth's climate."

When even Flannery says that, tell me why KRudd says the science is still
good enough to hit us with a colossal tax on gases to "stop" a warming that's
actually stopped already?

Heed this fraud.

End this farce.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/column_the_warming_conspiracys_most_damning_emails/

Warmest Regards

B0n oz

"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."

Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville


Surfer

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:36:45 AM11/25/09
to
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:26:29 +1100, "bo^n-o" <p...@o.com> wrote:

>
>http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/column_the_warming_conspiracys_most_damning_emails/
>
".....Emails leaked at the weekend show there is indeed a conspiracy
to deceive the world...."

Here is a sober appraisal of the emails:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/cif-green/2009/nov/23/leaked-email-climate-change

"....Generally, though, the emails are extremely focused, technical,
and, dare I say it, really dull. As noted on realclimate.org, the
emails contain "no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of
George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to
'get rid of the MWP', no admission that global warming is a hoax, no
evidence of the falsifying of data, and no 'marching orders' from our
socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords...."


And here is independent evidence of warming:

Arctic sea ice extent is still decreasing. See graph at right.
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/index.html

Larger image here
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/n_plot_hires.png


Australia Mining Pioneer & Founder of the True Geology

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:30:26 PM11/25/09
to
VOLCANIC ACTIVITY UNDER ANTARCTICA ICE SHEET SEEN BY THE TRUE GEOLOGY
AS UNELUCTABLE CONSEQUENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING & hence of Earth
accelerate'd drift on Ecliptics, leading ultimately to planet axis
instability due to shifting Ice/ Water masses !

This is below copy of a letter sent recently to an Australian paper,
and alluding at the fact that the present situation of searing
temperatures, to explode by the way right up to the 120°F or 50°C mark
this very Summer 2009/2010, are ominous portent for a True Geologist,
whose knowledge is deeply rooted in the UPL or Universal Pressure Law,
corner stone of the True Geology indeed; OF MORE WONDROUS events due
to the Sloshing effects on the Ocean Masses due to a destabilised
Earth Axis. Although conservatively I am speaking of likely 100 m
Tsunamis hitting the Australian Coast lines, the reality is probably
of over 2000 m high waves sweeping the whole continent due to a stern
but uncompromising application of the Le Chatelier Principles in
Physico/Chemistry process ! In clear a new equilibrium once the point
of no return has been reached. In coming month extremely brutal
volcanoes of the Pinatubo or Toba class will erupt under the South
Pole Inlansis, seen by the True Geology indeed, as safety valves
preserving the planet from blasting away in space, as this was the
case of the present Belt of Aerolithes between Mars & Jupiter.
We will live the Universities fools as well as the Politicians finding
their inspirations with those ANU, Curtin, Monash etc Cretins keep on
drooling their soothing discourses about Cyclic phenomena & other
optimistic return to better days ... In a True Geology approach
indeed all planets emerge in turn from their Mother Star
( demonstrating the utter lunacies of so-called divine religious JIC
sects & their imbeciles prophets, as well as the so-called sci000nce
of those Oxford Morons & of their Intellectual Slaves all over the
world i.e. in Australia, France, China, Japan etc ) and drift through
a life range where we are at the present, and exit towards_ in our
case_ Mars, Jupiter. The rate of saturation of our Mother Star is
given as a rule of thumb by the Titius-Bode laws, through which the
initial calving of a planet takes place through what could be called
a surface tension critical point being reached. In this light the
mere existence of our planet can be proven to be in the million years
scale , as the coming book on the True Geology will establish* !

* Probably too late indeed to offset Mankind irresistible head long
pursuit to Global suicide through Ignorance, Greed, Parasitism,
Criminal behaviour & abominable exploitation of all Earth resources.
Blood-sucking carrion-feeding beasts of prey is a fair description of
all that Inhumanity bleating to Spooks, to Idols, to Walls while
committing at the same time the worse atrocities towards the 3
Kingdoms of the Earth : The Mineral ( blasting it without even a
thanks for the richness harvested) The Vegetal ( cutting & burning to
size as well as poisoning it with chemical fertilizers & criminals
molecules destroying the humus ) The Animal ( Using our friends in a
most atrocious way indeed, based again on those Medical Cunts while a
regime with very little proteins is a warranty to long life &
permanent health )

The Writing is on the wall, and you can continue to accept being
intoxicated by the Medias, and the clowns appearing on the scene of
the world, the facts that your basis of reasoning is completely
fraudulent, as the True Geology demonstrates, and hence your
optimistic conclusions are equally wrong.
La Rochelle 25 Nov 2009 jpturcaud

HEATWAVES AN OMINOUS SIGN
Green left on line

Renfrey Clarke, Adelaide
25 November 2009

Quote
Adelaide's Central Bus Station is an austere but pleasing building
built recently near the middle of town. No longer merely for coach
travellers, the structure is now to be Adelaide's version of the New
Orleans Superdome — a place of public refuge from what threatens, in
time, to be another full-scale natural catastrophe.
The air-conditioned bus station is now kept open 24 hours a day, with
cold water supplied, to give relief to city residents at risk from the
latest of Adelaide's now alarmingly frequent heatwaves.
Endquote
full story at http://www.greenleft.org.au/2009/819/42103

To the Editor
Green Left on line

Sir

I have just read you article relative to Adelaide searing temperatures
presently. Your conclusions are hooked on a fraudulent science of
notorious cretins & this is why you are unable to read the writing on
the wall indeed.
One of the dogmas of the present fraudulent science of Geology, whose
theories are all completely false from the word go, is the stability
of Earth on Ecliptics present orbit, this since alleged creation,
alternatively big bang, & till the end of time...

It is not so, and the continuous drift accelerated by Global Warming
is most likely to produce some event which in your wildest drift, none
of you Antipodean people have anticipated, and this is the awakening
of major volcanoes under the Antarctica Ice Sheet.... of the Pinatubo
or Toba class. The consecutive inland sea of say 10 000 Km² with a
height of 3 000 m would make its way to the open ocean very rapidly,
and the 1000 m high tsunami pushed by the 30 000 Km3 volume of water
behind would certainly reach your country in very little time indeed.
I will leave you work out the height of the incoming wave, or at
least a rule of the thumb estimate, when it will hit your shores. My
consideration is that nothing will be really left of your city of
Adelaide when the water has receded, all the more since a additional
MSL of + 5 m will have to be considered permanently.

I am certain that none within your so-called scientific Antipodean
world (ANU or equally clueless imbeciles), has been able to consider
that most likely scenario, which is not only a possibility but a
certainty in the light of the True Geology, and this within at the
most 2 years ! The History of the Earth is not as the JIC* sects
underlying the Geological theories want it to be, in fact each planet
reaches in turn the life range, and it clearly appears that we are
exiting now at high pace** indeed, with all the immediate consequences
of necessary expansion of the planets within an anisobaric &
anisotropic Cosmic environment. Something again completely foreign to
the conditioned minds masquerading as geologists the world over.

... at least you are warned and this is the aim of my message

*JIC judeo-islamo-christian
** Increased strenght of met vortex

Yours faithfully


Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer Mine (Australia largest Copper &
Gold Mine)
Nifty (Cu) & Kintyre (U, Th) Mines, all in the Great Sandy Desert
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Founder of the True Geology

~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One Never Forgiven ~


for background info.
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/nac.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm
"True Geology" Foundation Document
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/69327
"Turcaud Bath" as a free gift to Suffering Humanity
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/107947

Bob Casanova

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 6:05:12 PM11/25/09
to
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:30:26 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by "Australia Mining Pioneer
& Founder of the True Geology" <jptu...@neuf.fr>:

>VOLCANIC ACTIVITY UNDER ANTARCTICA ICE SHEET SEEN BY THE TRUE GEOLOGY
>AS UNELUCTABLE CONSEQUENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING

Sorry, but tectonic activity, including (or, if you prefer,
volcanism), doesn't result from global warming, but from
events below the crust.

And "uneluctable"? Sorry, the OED doesn't seem to recognize
that word. Nor does Webster's.

Webster's *did* suggest "unemployable" as possibly the word
you intended to use, which seems to fit you better...
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

0 new messages