Re: Any politician who desires to climb the ladder of power turns to Jewish billionaires for instruction; still inciting religious vilification in lieu of race discrimination, BringNoBrainAlong?

[Kangaroo Court Australia]

Minority Report: Collusion to Pervert the Administration of Justice S
CI 2013 00092 Pham v Nguyen | S CI 2013 00093 Pham v VCAT & Ors

Dear Associates to Emerton J,
Berto, Mr Michael Ahrens and Transparency Australia,
Attorneys General and VIC Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission,
MPs, Friends, Students of Law and Human Rights Defenders,


1. We have issues with Emerton J, amending her orders and or
judgements, according to (inter alia)
Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 26
Right not to be tried or punished more than once

26. Right not to be tried or punished more than once

A person must not be tried or punished more than once for an offence
in
respect of which he or she has already been finally convicted or
acquitted in
accordance with law.

2. We promise NOT to accuse her of incompetence according to

Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 24
Fair hearing

24. Fair hearing

(1) A person charged with a criminal offence or a party to a civil
proceeding
has the right to have the charge or proceeding decided by a competent,
independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public
hearing.


3. We will look at her independence and impartiality instead.

4. We do not give Emerton J and the Supreme Court Victoria, consent to
amend her judgements and orders, and or to rerun our cases.

5. Emerton J failed to indicate any Act or rules that allow her to
make amendments to Final Orders.

5. Any changes will result in Citizens' Arrests for a conspiracy to
pervert justice according to the Crimes Act 1914.

6. Emerton J decisions will be appealed to the Court of Appeal
anyways.

7. We would like to thank Mr Bruce Chen and VGSO for officially
highlighting breaches of the Charter for the High Court.


Searching for answers,

Le Tuan PHAM
PO BOX 1255
St Albans 3121
nwn.we...@gmail.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <chambers.ju...@supremecourt.vic.gov.au>
Date: Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:22 PM
Subject: S CI 2013 00092 Pham v Nguyen | S CI 2013 00093 Pham v VCAT &
Ors
To: nwn.we...@gmail.com, Bruce...@vgso.vic.gov.au



Dear Parties,

S CI 2013 00092 Pham v Nguyen
S CI 2013 00093 Pham v VCAT & Ors

We refer to the correspondence of Mr Chen dated 12 June 2013.

In light of the clerical error in the Orders made on 7 June 2013 in
the above proceedings, her Honour proposes to amend the Orders under
the slip rule in the following way.

In S CI 2013 00092:

The Applicant’s application for leave to appeal against the Orders of
the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal made on 13 and 14
December 2012 in proceedings R2012/4144 and R2012/9296, is refused.

and in S CI 2013 00093:

The Applicant’s application for review of the Orders of the Victorian
Civil and Administrative Tribunal made on 13 and 14 December 2012 in
proceedings R2012/4144 and R2012/9296, is dismissed.

If the parties have any issues with these amendments, please let us
know by close of business on Monday, 17 June 2013. Otherwise, the
Orders will be made.

Kind regards,

Joel Tito and Saie Neal | Associates to the Honourable Justice
Emerton

Supreme Court of Victoria
210 William Street, Melbourne, 3000 | DX 210608
( (03) 9603 7202 7 (03) 9670 8408 *
Chambers.Ju...@supremecourt.vic.gov.au