Global warming

[taku]

Is ist possible to reverse the damage that is being done to the earth,
taking into account the current technological limits?

[Coby Beck]

"taku" <thmus...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1115288742.2...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

> Is ist possible to reverse the damage that is being done to the earth,
> taking into account the current technological limits?

You need to at least define a time scale for this question because
ultimately whatever crap we dump into the environment (including radioactive
materials with million year halg lives) will slip under the neighbouring
tectonic plate.

But making some basic assumptions about your question, I would say it is
*possible* to greatly limit the extent of the damage and have a recovery
begin in a few decades.

--
Coby Beck
(remove #\Space "coby 101 @ bigpond . com")

[Ian St. John]

taku wrote:
> Is ist possible to reverse the damage that is being done to the earth,
> taking into account the current technological limits?

That depends on some undefined terms. What do you consider damage?
Obviously, kill off everyone and 'Nature' will provide a state that some
would consider 'improved' at some point, but is that the objective?

[James]

"Ian St. John" <ist...@noemail.usa> wrote in message
news:Grqee.6181$VL3.6...@news20.bellglobal.com...

Suppose you tell us.

[Ian St. John]

I'm too smart for you James. I never engage in futile debates. Only real
ones.