Has anyone had experience with this and are there any caveats?
--
you can contact me via http://aardvark.co.nz/contact/
Need a cruise missile?
http://www.interestingprojects.com/needamissile.shtml
For some good information on purging :-
http://gowelding.com/met/austenitic.html
Regards
John Dyson www.gowelding.com
"Bruce Simpson" <see.si...@ct.info> wrote in message
news:8mo6g0ha67smauupt...@4ax.com...
AWS D10.4 Recommended Practices for Welding Austenitic
Chromium-Nickel Stainless Steel Piping and Tubing
From section 7.4 Inert Gas Purging
"The gases used for weld root purging are generally argon and helium.
It has been established that nitrogen may be used satisfactorily for
purging purposes when welding stainless steel pipe. Where weld
discoloration due to slight surface oxidation is not objectionable,
use of commercial or standard dry nitrogen is acceptable. It should
be recognized that nitrogen absorption can reduce the ferrite content
of the root pass."
The discoloration mentioned both by this reference and by John Dyson
is probably due to the purity of the nitrogen rather than an effect
attributable to the nitrogen itself. Higher purity nitrogen will cost
more than commercial grade nitrogen. The cost is normally why
nitrogen was being considered in place of argon in the first place.
AWS also has a publication (D18.2) that shows the effect of back purge
oxygen levels (ppm range) on the internal oxide tint (weld
discoloration) for stainless steel TIG welding.
Having said all this, the company standards for my previous company
(an oil company) prohibited the use of nitrogen as a backing purge gas
for TIG welding of stainless steel. This was because of the many
critical corrosion-resistant applications and questions about purity
for the nitrogen.
Tom Doody
Brian
"Tom Doody" <tdoo...@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:eea2eb71.04072...@posting.google.com...