Thanks,
-Martin
Roger Breton
m schrieb:
What is a CIE chart ?
Best regards --Gernot Hoffmann
--
Douglas Cummins
Calcoast - ITL
--
Ken
Timo Autiokari
I do not see Gernot pointing out that calling "it" a CIE chart is
incorrect. I only see him asking, "What is a CIE chart?" Hence my
remark. Shame on Gernot as a long-time contributor to this group for
not expanding on his extremely short question/comment.
A chromaticity diagram is only the "Horseshoe" plot of the color space,
often with the colors in the background. If you're interested in
plotting colors within the color space, then you've gone beyond the
chromaticity diagram.
Please remember that color science is not limited to just trying to
match color output from various devices (e.g. monitor & printer), which
is what most of the participants in this group debate about. It also
includes testing the color of real world objects to make sure they fall
within an established tolerance, possibly under different illumination
conditions. Using charts is a fast and simple means of doing this.
If people still can not envision what it means to plot color on a CIE
chart, I'll be glad to show some examples.
--
CIE 1931 xy Chromaticity Diagram
...did I really need to say that or are you just having fun at my
expense?
Did anyone not understand what I am asking? My apologies if it was
confusing.
-Martin
We encounter 'CIE charts' as illustrations
http://www.fho-emden.de/~hoffmann/ciegraph17052004.pdf
or as diagrams for measured or calculated values:
http://www.fho-emden.de/~hoffmann/colcalc03022006.pdf
Both systems are based on PostScript instead of Excel.
Best regards --Gernot Hoffmann
Yes on all of the above. I am looking for tools --of any kind-- to
plot these sorts of diagrams.
One project is to plot LED xy measurements in the context of various
gamut triangles.
A different project is to compare gamut triangles.
Both for illustrative (to publish a document or include in a
powerpoint) and analytical purposes.
Thanks,
-Martin
> A chromaticity diagram is only the "Horseshoe" plot of the color space,
> often with the colors in the background. If you're interested in
> plotting colors within the color space, then you've gone beyond the
> chromaticity diagram.
I don't think that's correct. It's called a chromaticity diagram
because you are plotting the chromaticities--usually the x-y
coordinates--of the color. The lightness information is lost on this
diagram since it's a projection. The "Horseshoe" is a plot of the
chromaticities of the spectrum locus. "Plotting colors within the
space" is simply the showing the chromaticities of other colors. Why
is that going beyond the chromaticity diagram? That's actually what
it's intended to be used for.
Oh, and although you see it all the time, it's often recommended to
"not" show colors in the background of a chromaticity diagram because
1) no inks or display can reproduce the full gamut 2) the lightness
dimension is not represented and 3) there is no means to include
colors like black, gray, and brown.
Ken Fleisher
Please take a look at my free AIM-XLA Exel add-in:
http://www.aim-dtp.net/aim/technology/aim_xla/index.htm
With it you can easily do all the above and a horseload more. There are
about 200 functions and command all together, some patience is required
in the familiarization phase. And you do need to dig in to the help
file, not just browse it.
Timo Autiokari
Thanks, I will.
-Martin
PTKen wrote:
> On Feb 28, 8:25 pm, "Douglas G. Cummins"
> <Douglas.Cumm...@MAPSONcalcoast-itl.com> wrote:
>
>> A chromaticity diagram is only the "Horseshoe" plot of the color space,
>> often with the colors in the background. If you're interested in
>> plotting colors within the color space, then you've gone beyond the
>> chromaticity diagram.
>
> I don't think that's correct. It's called a chromaticity diagram
> because you are plotting the chromaticities--usually the x-y
> coordinates--of the color. The lightness information is lost on this
> diagram since it's a projection. The "Horseshoe" is a plot of the
> chromaticities of the spectrum locus. "Plotting colors within the
> space" is simply the showing the chromaticities of other colors. Why
> is that going beyond the chromaticity diagram? That's actually what
> it's intended to be used for.
>
It ain't a diagram if you're plotting on it. It's then a chart or a plot.
'nuff said.
"A diagram is a 2D symbolic representation of information according to
some visualization technique. Sometimes, the technique uses a 3D
visualization which is then projected onto the 2D surface.
...
There are at least the following types of diagrams:
* Graph-based diagrams: ...
* Chart-like diagram techniques, which display a relationship
between two variables that take either discrete or a continuous ranges
of values; examples:
...
o scatter plot
..."
That sounds a lot like a chromaticity diagram to me--including plots
of 'any' color, not just the spectral colors.
If you have a different definition of a diagram, please share it.
Thanks.
Ken Fleisher
On Mar 3, 2:17 pm, "Douglas G. Cummins"
You stated that calling a chromaticity diagram a CIE chart was incorrect
and a bad habit. That's nonsensical. A chart is a plot of data points
and if you're plotting a set of cartesian coordinates in a CIE color
space, then you've got a CIE chart. It's also a CIE chromaticity
*chart* or *plot* (since chromaticity and color mean just about the same
thing), but the *diagram* is a specific data set - not just any data plot.
see http://www.efg2.com/Lab/Graphics/Colors/Chromaticity.htm
I say that the CIE Chromaticity Diagram is the "horseshoe" of locus
points plotted on a x-y chart (dependent on CIE 1931, 1976, or whatever
standard observers you're using to plot) - often times the colors within
the loci are printed in the background. Once you start adding data
points to the diagram then it's a chart or plot and no longer just the
CIE Chromaticity Diagram.