Corey, this is my view from NYC [coded message?]
Bill Ward
<hwt...@ilipwy.ac.kr> wrote:
>a very skillful attack
>
>who profits?
>
>-Israeli incursions in two P.A. towns
>-the largest British fleet organized in eighteen years
>"coincidentally" has been on route for days nearing the
>Middle East for "maneuvers"
>-America asking for coalition of global powers for
>new "counter-insurgent" war... a planetary Vietnam.
>
>Rather then seriously ask why people would kill
>themselves and so many others, "we" put an answer in
>their mouths and say, -Prez-"they attack us because we
>are the bastion of freedom in the world." period....
>Some introspection? No. Respect for the enemy? No.
>Understanding the enemy? No. That is why the forces of
>reaction do not know what the terms are or what to do.
>These are the fruits of the politics of denial. We deny
>the complaints of our victims, even deny they are our
>victims, and blind ourselves to a planet of enmity.
>Understanding this, as I have long fruitlessly preached
>as a "lunatic", one must take one of three possible
>courses: X) Understand ones position of domination, take
>every defensive measure, and terrorize the dominated. Y)
>Deny ones imperial position and be over run by a million
>cuts Z) Discard past paradigms worn thin since times
>before pharaoh, make a detente for all humankind and all
>the rest of nature, including a transformation in our
>relationships to the Earth and human to human.
>
>The standing "American authorities" want solution Y with
>a big war on the dispossessed, Islam, and the rest. It
>would be the fourth world war since the sheep in America
>seem to have missed the third one. Our "leaders"
>are inept, impotent, and culpable in one of two ways.
>First: For a second "hijacked" commercial jet to strike
>the most critical concentration in the global capitalist
>economy, twenty minutes after the first, and with no
>military response, is profound negligence. Particularly
>in the wake of the 1993 WTC attack, the success of this
>attack is pure negligence...or... complicity. If it is
>simple puerile negligence, then the governor of NY, and
>the mayor of NYC, who are so busy congratulating and
>patting each other on the back for what a great job they
>have done, should resign in shame and utter humiliation
>for their total failure. Also former governor Cuomo
>should beg the forgiveness of his constituents and the
>greater public. The joint chiefs of staff, as well as
>all regional military and air commanders should resign
>or be court-martialed for negligence. The current
>administration as well as members of senate and house
>intelligence and military committees should be removed
>from office and placed under house arrest for extensive
>questioning. The former administration should be
>likewise detained. All planning staffs for civil
>defense and air security should be detained and
>questioned, if not court marshaled. That is if an enemy
>attacked us. If there was, however, foreknowledge by any
>elements of our government, there should be a grand
>jury, and also a global response. There have been many
>comparisons today and since the annihilation of the WTC
>with Pearl Harbor, the attack on Hawaii in 1941. Years
>of speculation over the absence of our vital air-craft
>carriers at that attack, as well as myriad evidence,
>points to a foreknowledge by F.D.R. which is confirmed
>by a decade of public study of the code breaking facts
>of Ultra Mega. Many times after Pearl Harbor the
>British and Americans allowed their own troop ships to
>go to the bottom rather than reveal to the enemy that
>all their codes were useless. This was rationalized
>then and now as expedient both to motivate the American
>public to eagerness for war and to help finally win it.
>Today what would be the motive? In a world that should
>head for peace we have a threatened way of life, the
>global capitalist military industrial "complex". In
>need of perceived enemies and great battles, and willing
>to accept at least a police state "counter-insurgency"
>planetary domination system, would they sacrifice the
>WTC? Symbolically it will inspire hundreds of thousands
>of those disenfranchised with western freedom to fight
>and seek training and organizations that can help them
>achieve something so grand. There is our enemy, since
>realistically China has not invaded its neighbors
>significantly for a thousand year and is not likely to
>threaten the U.S.(only Tibet, and maybe one of
>Siberia.... wait and see-either way the U.S. never even
>did anything about Tibet) So now around the world we
>will have tight security which will not stop anything
>and the police state planet NWO will attempt to take
>control and will, basically if they are not stopped
>here. Guilty or innocent the current authorities have
>to go, for America and the Earth
>
>Feel free to distribute my views...
>
>What was it an attack against?
>
>a view from NYC: 14sep2001
>
>--
>
>
>
>
>
>Ismat's weaver converses without our boat after we recollect between it.
>
Does anybody know what this means?
Bill Ward
saict
<snip brilliant analysis from NYC>
> Does anybody know what this means?
It's a little sad. It means somebody forgot where his country came
from, and is ungrateful to those trying to retain it for him.