Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
knews4...@yahoo.com
> On Nov 27, 2:44 pm, * US * wrote:
>
> > Notice how I am a bushworshipper who can't deal with reality.
>
> Yes, we have noticed that you perform the useful idiot function for
> your masters Boosh and Cheeeeney as a counter-disinfo shill to
> discredit legitimate opposition with your insane lunatic "theory."
>
> > I am running away from many facts, including these:
>
> No explosives went off; inside job and controlled demolition are
> proven to be physically impossible.
There's your lies again.
You have no way of knowing if any of the "noises" heard were
"detonations."
Even though Jone's has the smoking gun.
It is "impossible" for you to know as much as YOU say it is
"impossible" for anyone alive to "prove" they were.
Except you lie again saying it is "impossible" for the buildings to be
rigged for demolition.
It easily could have been.
It could have also been designed with their ultimate destruction in
mind.
Anyone with any forsight would know that sooner or later every
building get's torn down.
And your other lie is that it has all been "proven" to be "physically
impossible," when you provide not one cite.
I'll leave it to the others to to give another twenty sites that show
how full of SpookSpeak you are.
Iarnrod
> On Nov 27, 7:13 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 27, 2:44 pm, * US * wrote:
>
> > > Notice how I am a bushworshipper who can't deal with reality.
>
> > Yes, we have noticed that you perform the useful idiot function for
> > your masters Boosh and Cheeeeney as a counter-disinfo shill to
> > discredit legitimate opposition with your insane lunatic "theory."
>
> > > I am running away from many facts, including these:
>
> > No explosives went off; inside job and controlled demolition are
> > proven to be physically impossible.
>
> There's your lies again.
Where? You've yet to point to one. It's indisputable FACT that there
were no controlled demolition explosions going off. This simply is an
observed FACT.
> You have no way of knowing if any of the "noises" heard were
> "detonations."
Yes, I do. We all do. None are going off.
> Even though Jone's has the smoking gun.
He has no such thing, not even in dispute. He found evidence of
drywall dust in the debris.
> It is "impossible" for you to know as much as YOU say it is
> "impossible" for anyone alive to "prove" they were.
Wrong. It is a proven FACT that there are no explosives going off at
collapse initiation of any of the three collapsed buildings. This is
simply fact that you need to deal with, loser. Looking at any of the
thousands of videos and photos of the events proves me right and you
wrong.
> Except you lie again saying it is "impossible" for the buildings to be
> rigged for demolition.
I didn't say it is impossible for buildings to be rigged, although it
is proven fact that these buildings were not.
What I tell you is impossible is for there to be silent and invisible
explosives and gravity defying thermitethat you believe in.
> It easily could have been.
No, it could not have been at all. It is not possible for those
particular buildings to have been rigged with explosives because no
one saw any of it. It did not happen, period. You are imagining it,
that's all. But in the real world, it did not happen.
> It could have also been designed with their ultimate destruction in
> mind.
BWAAAHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!! Kooker Komedy Gold!!!
> Anyone with any forsight would know that sooner or later every
> building get's torn down.
Holy SHIT.
> And your other lie is that it has all been "proven" to be "physically
> impossible," when you provide not one cite.
I HAVE provided the cite: EVERY BOT OF EVIDENCE. NONE shows ANY CD
explosives going off. There are NONE. FACT. Are you a congenital
idiot?
> I'll leave it to the others to to give another twenty sites that show
> how full of SpookSpeak you are.
I have been proven correct and you ahev been proven wrong,
knowsknothing. Deal with it.