Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DAVID BLACKMON: Another Green Vehicle Pipe Dream Explodes Like The Hindenburg

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Leroy N. Soetoro

unread,
Feb 18, 2024, 8:04:54 PMFeb 18
to
https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/15/opinion-another-green-vehicle-pipe-
dream-explodes-like-the-hindenburg-david-blackmon/

It would be impossible to estimate the number of stories we’ve seen over
the last 30 years loudly proclaiming that hydrogen cars are the real
future in the transportation space. And hey, you must admit there is some
logic to it, as long as you don’t look too deeply into the problem.

After all, hydrogen is by far the most abundant element in the universe.
It is also highly combustible, as the passengers on the Hindenburg found
out the hard way in 1937.

Oh, the humanity!

So, it’s everywhere, it’s combustible, what could possibly be the holdup?

Thirty years later, we have discovered that the array of holdups is almost
endless, starting with how to source the trillions of dollars in capital
that would be needed to build out all the infrastructure that would have
to be constructed to facilitate a mass conversion away from gas powered
ICE cars. Then, you would need trillions more dollars to convert old
factories or build new ones to manufacture billions of cars. Then, you’d
probably need trillions more to re-jigger all the global supply chains to
move hydrogen all over the world on ships. (RELATED: DAVID BLACKMON:
America’s Next Door Neighbor Is Taking Anti-Fossil Fuel Craziness To A
Whole New Level)

It’s a lot of steel, a lot of concrete, a lot of new ships, a lot of new,
safer rail cars, a lot of new pipeline infrastructure, none of which
currently exists, and at the end of the day, a ruinous amount of money to
pay for it all.

Contrary to popular myth, you can’t just start moving hydrogen in existing
natural gas pipelines, because the hydrogen molecules are far tinier than
methane molecules, and those existing pipelines would leak like thousand-
mile-long sieves and blow a whole lot of stuff up if you tried doing that.
On top of everything else, most hydrogen exists in nature as part of a
compound like methane (CH4), and it takes more energy to separate out the
hydrogen molecules than they will ultimately provide.

Bottom line: This is all very hard and complex and requires more money
than most companies are willing to even try to source and invest.

And then there’s Shell. Shell is one company that, in response to outside
pressures including those from the ESG investor community and even Dutch
court decisions, has invested in various hydrogen-related projects in the
US and Europe. One location in the US is California, the green virtue-
signaling capital of the universe outside of Germany.

Of the 55 hydrogen refueling stations extant in California, Shell had
until recently been the operator of seven of them. But it’s a hard
business to be in, and recently, Shell’s management finally decided to
give up this particular ghost.

As reported by Hydrogen Insight, Shell announced on Feb. 7 that it was
permanently closing all seven of its hydrogen stations, citing “supply
complications and other external market factors” as the reason.

Supply complications? External market factors? Man, nobody could’ve seen
those coming!

“This decision could also reflect a lack of demand,” the story’s author
notes. Yet another factor nobody could have foreseen!

The story goes on to note that, in 2022, Shell “closed down all three of
its hydrogen filling stations in the UK, with the company and its partner
Motive citing a similar focus on serving heavy-duty trucks, which the
sites would not be able to accommodate.”

Think about it: How large do you think the markets for hydrogen-fueled 18
wheelers and buses are likely to become, even in the UK or California?
Doesn’t it seem likely we will be reading this exact same story a few
years from now, only it will be about Shell permanently shutting down its
heavy-duty truck stations wherever they exist?

There are practical applications for which hydrogen is a suitable fuel
source. The hydrogen hub ExxonMobil is creating to generate power for its
Baytown Refinery and other industrial plants outside Houston appears to be
a good example.

There are other examples, but none of them would make a pinprick of
difference in terms of global greenhouse gas emissions. If EVs are non-
viable on a societal scale, hydrogen’s viability in the transportation
sector is a tiny fraction of that.

Can we stop this sort of madness and focus on real solutions that really
will matter? Please?

David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent
40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public
policy and communications.


--
We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.
0 new messages