Adios Radio Shack !! RIP
--
Tweetldee
Tweetldee at att dot net (Just subsitute the appropriate characters in the
address)
Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
My local shak still has everything, because I'm in there almost every day,
so they decided to hang onto there parts.
"Tweetldee" <dgma...@att99.net> wrote in message
news:tKIMa.33221$3o3.2...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
my 2 cents.
"Tweetldee" <dgma...@att99.net> wrote in message
news:tKIMa.33221$3o3.2...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
If you have been reading articles about RS, they are going out of the
parts business in most of their stores. There are 3 RS stores near to
me. They now have very little in the way of parts. They only have the
major accessories, and end user devices, as you mentioned.
They may be more expensive, but they have a great warranty, and return
policy if the customer is not satisfied. With many of the other places,
if you buy something and do not like it, you own it anyways.
--
Jerry Greenberg GLG Technologies GLG
==============================================
WebPage <http://www.zoom-one.com>
Electronics <http://www.zoom-one.com/electron.htm>
Instruments <http://www.zoom-one.com/glgtech.htm>
==============================================
A lot of it is probably because their is not the interest there use to be in
electronic construction. Can hardly build anything cheaper than you can buy
it for nowadays, or for the hobbyist to match it's complexity. There are
still plenty of unique items that can be built that cannot be bought, but
probably not enough to sustain an inventory of parts for Radio Shack.
"Tweetldee" <dgma...@att99.net> wrote in message
news:tKIMa.33221$3o3.2...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Tweetldee" <dgma...@att99.net> wrote in message
news:tKIMa.33221$3o3.2...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Perhaps it was a very discreet product :-)
> I gave up on our local Radio Shack when I sent my wife there for a 910K ohm
> resistor. They sold her a 1M ohm resistor and told her that will work.
At least it was within 10 percent. I've heard worse. :)
--- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Home Page: http://www.repairfaq.org/
Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/
+Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/lasersam.htm
| Mirror Site Info: http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/F_mirror.html
Important: The email address in this message header may no longer work. To
contact me, please use the Feedback Form at repairfaq.org. Thanks.
I've used worse. :)
Coincidentally, I was in two Radio Shacks the same day as you. I needed a
couple of caps (a 1500uf 10v 105c and a 1000uf 10v 105c) to repair a PC
mainboard. The RS parts department, which used to occupy a sizable portion
of the rear or the store is now just a few small drawers at the rear of the
store. They had neither part that I needed .
No matter, there was a tv repair shop just around the corner and although he
didn't have the capacitors in stock he willing to add what I wanted to his
weekly parts order.
--
Tony Sivori
"You've got questions. We've got answers."
Too bad those answers are usually wrong!
That gets tiring after a while. Been there, done that, they are simply too
incompetent to have much fun with it.
They have good sales on batteries, and one can find decent alarm clocks
there, but that is about it.
In this area the TV repair shops went first.
Jeff
> Well, I guess the death knell has sounded for the Shack as a source for
> experimenter and hobbyist parts. I went into a relatively new store (open
> less than a year) today to get a few resistors that I need in a hurry.
> What
> did I find? Not a resistor, capacitor, transistor, IC, switch, fuse, or
> anything that would be considered an electronic component was to be found.
> They had all kinds of TV coax, TV connectors, cell phones, home phones,
> phone accessories, satellite TV equipment, expensive toys, and a few
> stereo
> "systems", but but not an electronic component in sight. They had wire,
> solder, soldering irons, and such, but nothing to solder the wires to.
> They don't even carry the small project boxes any more.
> They're looking more like the electronics section in WalMart every day.
> Ooops, I take that back... the Shack's prices are 40-100% above what
> you'll pay for the same item at WalMart.
>
> Adios Radio Shack !! RIP
Im from the UK, and we use to have Tandy/Rat Shack in nearly every high
street and shopping mall. And about 5 years ago the UK operation was taken
over by Carphone Whorehouse (no more components, no more soldering irons,
no more 100-in-1 construction kits, just mobile phones and accesories).
But nine months ago a local satellite TV shop and dealer here in Bristol,
managed to get a Rat Shack franchise and he was selling quite a good range
of Rat Shack electronic components, metal detectors, radios, etc. the shop
ceased trading three months later, no one bought anything.
--
Paul S
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 22:09:29 GMT, "Tweetldee" <dgma...@att99.net>
wrote:
It'll probably keep going, but the days of them supplying anything useful in
the way of components are pretty much over. They're pretty much a cellphone
and toy store now.
>"James Sweet" <james...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3IsOa.3541$Ph3.749@sccrnsc04...
"Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
news:vglmlpf...@corp.supernews.com...
"Chris" <chr...@NSitproducts.com> wrote in message
"Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
news:vglr00d...@corp.supernews.com...
You're correct in what you say about the change in direction for RS. But,
in all political correctness, they need to change their advertising.
"You've got questions; we've got answers" doesn't convey the image that I
have (and have had for many years) that when I have a question at RS, I get
blank stares, or even worse, wrong answers. Their strategy of hiring sales
counter people with no idea of what they're selling is not a good idea. I
can understand their need to keep expenses to a minimum, but IMHO, that's
doing the business a disservice.
And the problem mentioned in an earlier post about having to wait 10-15-20
minutes for service while the lone counter clerk is on the phone selling a
cell phone is not a good image to have either. But in retrospect, I guess
that's cost reduction coming into play also... if your store doesn't have
that much traffic, why pay for the extra employees.
This thread is only the latest in a long stream of Radio Shack bashing
posts we've seen over the years.
Like I said a previous time, you are taking their slogan too literally.
Their "answers" are the products they offer. They take into consideration
who the average customer is, and offer "answers" to the most common
questions. The slogan does not mean they have products for everything, or
that they are a source of answers to general questions.
The nitpicking over the slogan has always struck me as nitpicking, people
who want to pick at Radio Shack, rather than a real point of contention.
If I go into virtually any store, i don't expect the sales people to know
much. I go in armed with what I need to know, and the clerks are only there
to ring up the sales and take the money. For a group of technically literate,
it just seems to be sour grapes to expect people working at Radio Shack
to know much, since it shouldn't even be a consideration in the first
place.
Michael
"Michael Black" <et...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:bef3tj$2rk$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
"Michael Black" <et...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:bef3tj$2rk$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
"Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
news:vgm9hie...@corp.supernews.com...
"Chris" <chr...@NSitproducts.com> wrote in message
news:c3GOa.90193$Io.78...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
"Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
news:vgmdvcl...@corp.supernews.com...
"Chris" <chr...@NSitproducts.com> wrote in message
news:qDHOa.90403$Io.78...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
"Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
news:vgmjgug...@corp.supernews.com...
"Chris" <chr...@NSitproducts.com> wrote in message
news:k0JOa.90550$Io.78...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
"Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
news:vgn1vep...@corp.supernews.com...
"Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
news:vglmlpf...@corp.supernews.com...
I was helping a guy repair a light controller board that consisted pretty
much of a couple optos and triacs, one of the triacs was fried and I
mentioned he could get one at radio shack, well the guy there sent him off
with an NPN transistor because it *looked* like the bad triac, it's amazing
he didn't get fireworks when he installed it.
"James Sweet" <james...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5fuPa.29690$sY2....@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net...
"James Sweet" <james...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WcuPa.29675$sY2....@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net...
"Dave" <gal...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591d176.0307...@posting.google.com...
And I really get the feeling people pick apart that slogan when they
wouldn't pick apart other company's slogans. And it is just an advertising
slogan, not a promise or some terms of agreement.
Which fast food chain had "Have it your way at...."? I haven't eaten
meat since 1979 and I sincerely doubt most fast food chains have much
of interest to me. But I don't nitpick on the slogan, accepting it
as an advertising slogan.
A local music store (and I suspect it's used elsewhere) use to say
"If we don't have it, you don't need it". Surely there were items
that you couldn't buy there that some did need, yet nobody attacked
the slogan.
This nitpicking is there in that earlier bit about the triac. People
are expecting the store to have a higher standard of knowledge then the
nitpickers themselves.
And that's what I find fascinating about these threads about Radio Shack.
There seems to be some reason that puts a target on the chain, and then
all the nitpicking comes out. But it doesn't seem to be the initial points
that drive the nitpicking, it's as if there is some reason to pick on the
chain, and then people find reasons to find fault with the chain.
Their parts are overpriced. I've known that since I was 14 years old and
first walked into a Radio Shack. Yes, they have limited stock. But
while both are things to gripe about, I really can't see where they
instill the hostility towards the chain that we see in these threads.
I simply didn't buy parts at Radio Shack, unless I was really stuck (or,
when they were clearing out things at which point I stocked up on some
nice parts at a low price). If Radio Shack decides not to sell parts (which
seems to be the case here in Canada for a number of years), it doesn't
make me angry at the chain, it simply makes me a little sad about what
caused that decision.
Michael
>This nitpicking is there in that earlier bit about the triac. People
>are expecting the store to have a higher standard of knowledge then the
>nitpickers themselves.
Well, yes... at least to understand that they don't know what the funny
black things with wires sticking out are. It isn't nitpicking to observe
that Rat Shack droids have even less clues than most. And Ghod knows, I
don't expect anything of them at all. But if I specifically asked for
Shinola, and the clerk sold me an unpolishable soft brown lump telling me
it was the "same thing," I humbly suggest they shouldn't have been hired in
the first place.
You gotta at least know the territory.
--
Gary Woods O- K2AHC Public keys at www.albany.net/~gwoods, or get 0x1D64A93D via keyserver
gwo...@albany.net gwo...@wrgb.com
fingerprint = E2 6F 50 93 7B C7 F3 CA 1F 8B 3C C0 B0 28 68 0B
But why advertise a weakness? They should be aware of their own
inability to answer technology questions intelligently (unless it is
about a cellphone contract). They advertise the one thing they don't
have, which is a bit silly, but they hope it will bring in customers
and make sales, and maybe it does.
"Michael Black" <et...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:bemrfm$6lv$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
Occasionally, but very rarely, I have found one who does know what is
what, but even then you just look at them funny because you can guess
they have probably already turned in their two-week notice and you
won't ever see them again.
"Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
news:vgtik6m...@corp.supernews.com...
> James Sweet:
> I regularly get supposedly "knowledgeable do-it-yourself repair people" in
> my store looking over the wall of transistors and diodes and randomly pick
> one that "looks" the same..... I used to spend a lot of time trying to
> help them and educate them about JEDEC numbers, voltage ratings, etc......
> and in the end they would insist on buying the incorrect part.....
sometimes
> totally incorrect like you described with the triac and transistor.....
> finally I just gave up......
I hope you have some sort of disclaimer on your receipts. Otherwise, if
somebody burns their house down, they might decide it's a good idea to sue
ya because they weren't "adequately advised or warned". It happens..
> Just imagine working in a drug store and as a clerk telling folks which
> over-the counter medications to buy....... not me, what if they had a
bad
> reaction to the medicine.... here are the products on the shelf , read
> the labels, make your own choice and pay your money.
The difference here is that medications do have labels. I haven't met many
electrical components, even on-card ones, that include warning or even
proper-usage labeling. Some of the Rat Shack parts did/do, but mostly they
just list the device's specs on the back.
It's just askin for trouble if you don't put disclaimers on your receipts
and, depending on your state's laws, disclaimers displayed prominently on
large signs hanging on your shop walls.
As in the infamous 'McDonalds hot coffee' suit. Or those salted peanut
packets 'Warning this product may contain nuts'.
How about KFC? 'Warning this product *may* contain chicken'. ;-)
--
Paul S
"paul s" <nos...@nospam.forme> wrote in message
news:r4TPa.9414$nD6.71...@news-text.cableinet.net...
> Ray L. Volts wrote:
> > >
> >
> > I hope you have some sort of disclaimer on your receipts. Otherwise, if
> > somebody burns their house down, they might decide it's a good idea to
sue
> > ya because they weren't "adequately advised or warned". It happens..
>
> As in the infamous 'McDonalds hot coffee' suit. Or those salted peanut
> packets 'Warning this product may contain nuts'.
>
> How about KFC? 'Warning this product *may* contain chicken'. ;-)
Sadly, our litigious society has gotten just that bad! Even sadder, though,
is that juries actually issue awards to these twits. You really have to
cover your ass in every imaginable fashion nowadays.
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 00:06:40 GMT, "Chris" <chr...@NSitproducts.com>
wrote:
I was working at Radio Shack at the time they brought in Len Roberts to run the
company. Over the next several years, most of the veteran managers and
corporate execs were basically forced out because they wouldn't adapt to the
new focus of the company. The company now seems to have a strategy of hiring
20 year old managers to 'run' their stores. These managers only qualifications
seems to be that have proven that they can sell; not that they know about what
they are selling or even the first thing about customer service. Here is a web
site that has been around a while: radioshacksucks.com
Take a look at the site and you'll see how much the employee's hate their own
company.
Jim
Yeah, that sucks .
I confidently predict that by 2023 the United States will collapse
into anarchy , due to >xx % of the population being lawyers of one
type or another .
-A
When was that? Even in the mid 70's, radio shack was pretty much
worthless for repairs or hobby work. I don't think RS has ever had
a selection of more than 20 integrated circuits.
People still seem to be thinking in terms of Radio Shack before Tandy
bought it. It was a small regional chain in the Boston area.
But that was over thirty years ago, maybe more like forty years.
Michael
Chris wrote:
> Yeah but it doesn't take much to familarize yourself to what you sell. You
> don't need to be a tech or even knowledgable in electronics. Just know the
> product line. If I need a power supply then just tell me where abouts I can
> find them. Don't tell me they aren't sold there. Now if I asked for a 120VAC
> to 12VDC AC adapter rated at 600mA and 11W well then I can understand. This
> really isn't rocket science.
>
> "Sofie" <so...@olypen.com> wrote in message
> news:vgm9hie...@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>Michael Black:
>>I agree.
>>Would any of the electronic knowledgeable people in this thread go to work
>>for Radio Shack or any other retail store as a counter clerk???? If you
>>are out of work then great, but then you should be looking for a job with
>>the appropriate pay the fits your skill level. Just go to any retail
>
> store
>
>>that has minimum wage clerks.... this is usually the case but not always.
>>Go to your local KMart or WalMart..... the minimum wage clerks are just
>>about useless.... if you can find a department manager you can get better
>>assistance ..... if you can find them at all.
>>Now certainly Radio Shack could pay a lot more for better qualified clerks
>>but most certainly the prices in the store would go up and the sales would
>>go down..... not a good combination. Again, the market place is price
>>driven, the customer wants to pay as little as possible, and that is what
>>they get.
"RedWing196" <redwi...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030715084558...@mb-m27.aol.com...
On 15 Jul 2003 21:32:29 GMT, TCS
On 16 Jul 2003 01:12:32 GMT, et...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michael Black)
wrote:
Back then there was also lafayette electronics. They went under by the
early 80's.
As I said, Radio Shack was a small regional chain selling parts (and some
equipment) in the Boston area.
At some point in the sixties, they were bought by Tandy. By 1968, they
were owned by Tandy, and were running 15 page "catalogs" in Elementary
Electronics. The mailing address was Fort Worth, TX.
Well, the November 1967 issue of Popular Electronics has an RS ad,
and the mailing address is Fort Worth, though no specific mention of
Tandy. However, it sure looks like they've had time to move up
from the regional chain.
I can't find ads for Radio Shack in the magazines I do have from earlier
in the sixties, so I don't know exactly when the takeover occurred.
Someone once suggested 1963, but I have no way of verifying that.
And to negate a common myth, Allied never owned Radio Shack. For
a brief while in the early seventies, the two were merged and were
called "Allied Radio Shack". But it did not last long, I gather
because the US government forced Tandy to sell off Allied. But ads
from 1971 did have the "Allied Radio Shack" label.
Michael
I'm old enough to remember Allied, and they were out of 100 N. Western Ave.,
Chicago, Illinois USA.
--
The function of an asshole is to emit quantities of crap. Spammers do
a very good job of that. However, I do object to my inbox being a
spammer's toilet bowl. -- Walter Dnes
google is your friend. 15 seconds of searching yielded:
http://www.digidome.nl/tandyand.htm
Well, maybe.
Over the years, I've seen plenty of incorrect information written
about Radio Shack (people saying Allied owned them for a while, people
not knowing of it's origins, even the point I responded to) that just
because someone has written it down on a webpage does not mean anything.
1963 would seem to be about right, based on how it must have had time
to develop under Tandy to get to the point of those 1968 ads.
But, being able to quote an ad directly seems to be a more absolute
source of information than some webpage that seems to be about computers
rather than a full history of the chain. I'm not dismissing the webpage's
date, only saying that given different bits of information, how do
you determine/decide which is accurate? I can state outright that
by 1968 Tandy owned Radio Shack, and point to a specific ad. Someone
saying "Tandy bought Radio Shack in 1963" has as much validity as someone
saying "Tandy bought Radio Shack in the early seventies", or for
that matter "Allied was based in England". For those who don't know,
any bit of information is just as valid as another.
So, sometimes, Google is not my friend.
Michael
"gothika" <got...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1lechvknij0g01n3v...@4ax.com...
>
> 60's and early 70's. They carried parts from Allied electronics.
> If you're old enough to remember Allied, then you know that they were
> out of Britain and had quite a catalog, I actually purchased parts to
> fix pioneer stereo's from allied, many came right out of a Radio Shack
> store.
<blink> Chicago, Illinois is out of BRITAIN? Damn, must of totally
spaced my geography classes - I always thought that was part of the USA.
BTW - Allied was formed in the USA in the 30's. Don't doubt they
had a UK branch ...
Radio Shack OWNED Allied for a while, too.
RwP
"gothika" <got...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:hqechvcmeclclsln1...@4ax.com...
> Tandy bought them out in the early 70's.
You seem to have misspelled 1964 there.
RwP
> What really bugs me is that it almost seems like they go out of their
> way to hire people who lack knowledge or even interest in anything
> remotely electronic. A few years back I had just finished Year 1 of
> college for a BSEE and needed some cash. There were no less than 3 Radio
> Shacks within a short drive of my house with huge can't-miss-it NOW
> HIRING signs in the windows. I of course noted in my resume my
> familiarity with electronics and all the related hoohah..."I could even
> help customers with design equations"...none of them even bothered to
> call back. A year down the road, it comes as little surprise that I come
Ah, so I'm not alone. Thanks! :)
well.... when you get old, the second thing to go is your memory
Businesses are just as much to blame
for our litigious society as the citizens
that bring these lawsuits. Most of these
cases are settled out of court by the
business for financial reasons. Mainly
they are not at fault but proving that
would cost more than the settlement.
Companies that fight these types of
lawsuits no matter the cost are less
likely to be sued.
Hence I have a garage full of surplus electronics and components. Is
there a trade school or maybe even a high school electronics instructor
in the greater Los Angeles area who would like a truck load of parts and
all manner of whole and partially whole electronics for the students to
practice with.
--
Dan Fraser
From Costa Mesa in sunny California
949-631-7535 Cell 714-420-7535
Check out my electronic schematics site at:
http://www.schematicsforfree.com
If you are into cars check out www.roadsters.com