thanks in advance
Denny B
I think you're right. I see a lot more tantilums in older computer and
other compact electronics. If you've ever looked at data sheets for any
high performance device, they almost always recommend using tantilum, or
ceramic caps for filtering. Sure, they do short sometimes, but I've
only seen a couple of shorted tantilums for the hundreds of leaky or dry
Al electrolytics I've replaced.
--
Andy Cuffe
balt...@psu.edu
Pretty right, I am using SMD alus wherever I can now, Tantalums are
reserved for:
- low drop regulator output caps
- low quiescent current applications
- low ESR applications except SMPS
- decoupling of rather sensitive chips
especially if equal or greater 10uF.
SMD Tantalums are now (9/2000) about 4 to 6 times more
expensive than they were in 1998, at least here in Germany.
The alus are much cheaper and remained at their low cost, if not even
became cheaper. I have no problems with them until now, and in a
recent application I even decided to put a 22uF/25V standard
electrolytic (non-SMD) in because of *space*. A SMD, either alu or
tantalum, has a bigger footprint than two pads of 6/100" diameter and
1/10" lead spacing, that's a fact.
thanks
Denny B
"Stefan Huebner" <c...@tecs.de> wrote in message
news:39ba00e6...@news.tecs.de...