dead output transistors
<grin>
I now see it is DDT (TM) for speaker protection , there was no DC on the
output of either channel so presumably false protect cct and the crowbar
triac is ok. Still can't find what DDT stands for though
http://www.peavey.com/media/pdf/manuals/80300112.pdf
Why should I have had to do this for you?
Reseat the socketed devices. Temperature isn't a factor, humidity more
likely the cause of slight corrosion of the pinned devices.
--
Live Fast Die Young, Leave A Pretty Corpse
>What does DOT (TM) accronym? stand
>for ?
Don't Open This.
--
Jeff Liebermann je...@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Looks as though a TO92 has decided to take in condensation, go ohmic and
move the bias a bit negative.
TO92 failures the same, with a load of Crest audio slave amps left over
winter ,almost outdoors , by someone else.
TO92 60V, 0.6A , 9V on one end of the 47K base resistor and 8mV on the
other. Checks out DVM diode test and no obvious DVM resistance between pins.
Now removed can see ,under x30, slight build up of corrossion crud where the
legs enter the plastic, marginally more than the layer of corrossion over
the rest of the legs.
I will let the owner see the result under pocket magnifier , that and bill
might change his storage arrangements.
Some people just don't realize that electronics of this type really need
to be stored in a climate controlled storage unit.
The other owner , with the Crest audio amps thought covering with a plastic
sheet , include a bag of silical gel, and leave in a Dutch barn was
sufficient. He never even recharged the silica gel - having no knowledge of
that process.
I wonder why TO92 and not TO220 or TO3 fail in these circumstances. I
suppose the leads corrode and swell and then like concrete spalling due to
rusting of rebar, the plastic splits enough for capilliary water condensate
to migrate up into the die. Something to do with small diameter leads for
TO92?
I will try to remember to split open this TO92 and see if it cleaves along
the corrossion plane.
Different maker to the Crest TO92 so not a batch problem.
I think the corrosion infiltrated the die. Like ice crystals in concrete
as you said. Repeated heat thaw cycles exacerbate the issue. Furthermore,
not having a fresh/sufficient desiccant furthers the process. Why the
TO92 suffers more would only be guessing. May be a batch issue. I know
there are plenty that don't suffer from extreme conditions. But they may
be saved from frequent use.
Different manuafacturer and series of TO92 transistors rather than different
amp maker , so less likely a batch problem. In TO92, TO126 and TO220 the
encapsulation all goes down to the die IIRC. Perhaps corrossion on small
diameter leads has a better forcing/splitting effect into the plastic, then
capilliary. Continue the bad environment long enough and the other classes
of encapsulation would start failing also is my guess.
Further back in thread 80mV not 8mV on the base