Kenwood L-1000T , 1990
N_Cook
dismantled as quite a workup to get to the stage of getting to the C11
supercap with only 1/4V on it. Anyone aware of anything else that needs
changing as a lot of normal electros on the Vdd line through different
parts of the kit. I will change the fractional farad (if I can find such a
squat one) but how to test these to confirm it is failed? charge to 5V and
time discharge through an R but what sort of value , high enough not to
phase it , and low enough for reasonable time to 2.5V? ESR I imagine is
irrelevant. Schematic is on e-service
William Sommerwerck
charging voltage low, or is the cap leaky/shorted?
For testing, I'd try charging the cap through 100 ohms or so. That should
give a time constant in a range suitable for following along on your DVM.
Unless you have zero vertical clearance, a replacement cap can be mounted
just about anywhere. The lead length doesn't matter.
David
>"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message
>news:i8sqgc$e49$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
You should know that these types of capacitors have an extremely
high internal series resistance so the internal resistance would
swamp out 100 ohms and make the measurement useless. Low ESR is
not needed since they only need to supply micro-amps when called
to duty.
David
William Sommerwerck
>> or so. That should give a time constant in a range
>> suitable for following along on your DVM.
> You should know that these types of capacitors have an
> extremely high internal series resistance so the internal
> resistance would swamp out 100 ohms and make the
> measurement useless.
I once replaced a nicad battery in a tuner with a supercap, fed through
about 5K. The capacitor charges up quickly, which does not suggest an
extremely high series internal resistance. (I can check this, if you like.
The tuner is in my bedroom.)
The Wikipedia article says that EDLCs have a very high /power/ density --
that is, they can deliver their stored energy very quickly. This is
inconsistent with an extremely high series internal resistance. In fact, the
article lists the following advantage...
"Extremely low internal resistance (ESR) and consequent high cycle
efficiency (95% or more) and extremely low heating levels."
N_Cook
news:i8sqgc$e49$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Wiring across from the cavernous central space makes sense. The very squat
form factor of the original may well have precipitated its failure. I was
forgetting about all the diodes along the power rail route so only one
nearby standard electro (assuming the diodes are ok)
Art Todesco
resistance' and 'leakage resistance'. Internal resistance would be in
series with the capacitor. Leakage resistance would be across the
capacitor, causing it to discharge.
David
"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message
news:i8ssep$mk2$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> For testing, I'd try charging the cap through 100 ohms
>> or so. That should give a time constant in a range
>> suitable for following along on your DVM.
> You should know that these types of capacitors have an
> extremely high internal series resistance so the internal
> resistance would swamp out 100 ohms and make the
> measurement useless.
The Wikipedia article says that EDLCs have a very high /power/
density --
that is, they can deliver their stored energy very quickly. This
is
inconsistent with an extremely high series internal resistance.
In fact, the
article lists the following advantage...
"Extremely low internal resistance (ESR) and consequent high
cycle
efficiency (95% or more) and extremely low heating levels."
Note that we are not talking about super-caps here but memory
backup capacitors that are very small considering their
capacitance and CV^2 value. Super capacitors are a very
different chemistry and for a different purpose entirely.
David
N_Cook
news:i8ssep$mk2$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
I was not aware of the promising automotive use of supercaps, safe
ultra-fast charge etc
William Sommerwerck
> backup capacitors that are very small considering their
> capacitance and CV^2 value. Super capacitors are a very
> different chemistry and for a different purpose entirely.
Are you certain? A "conventional" cap would not be able to retain the memory
very long. You need something 0.1F or larger -- and conventional caps rarely
come in that size.
I installed a supercap in my Lux tuner, and it holds the memory two or three
days.
Baron
I would concur with William. I have a 0.22F @ 5v on my desk at the
moment, it holds its charge for many days.
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
David
news:i8t5pt$sg5$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
William Sommerwerck Inscribed thus:
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
Lets get things correct here. Memory backup capacitors can have
very high capacitance values and extremely low leakage. That is
not in dispute. The term supercap does not refer to the typical
memory capacitor installed on consumer electronics equipment.
That is a different type that has high series resistance. If you
have a ESR meter, measure one for yourself but discharge it first
for a long time.
David
Baron
> "Baron" wrote in message
> news:i8t5pt$sg5$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> William Sommerwerck Inscribed thus:
>
>>> We are not talking about super-caps here but memory
>>> backup capacitors that are very small considering their
>>> capacitance and CV^2 value. Super capacitors are a very
>>> different chemistry and for a different purpose entirely.
>>
>> Are you certain? A "conventional" cap would not be able to
>> retain the
>> memory very long. You need something 0.1F or larger -- and
>> conventional caps rarely come in that size.
>>
>> I installed a supercap in my Lux tuner, and it holds the memory
>> two or
>> three days.
>
> I would concur with William. I have a 0.22F @ 5v on my desk at
> the
> moment, it holds its charge for many days.
>
> Best Regards:
> Baron.
>
> Lets get things correct here. Memory backup capacitors can have
> very high capacitance values and extremely low leakage. That is
> not in dispute. The term supercap does not refer to the typical
> memory capacitor installed on consumer electronics equipment.
> That is a different type that has high series resistance. If you
> have a ESR meter, measure one for yourself but discharge it first
> for a long time.
>
> David
Thanks for your note.
Yes the cap I have is intended for memory retention service. I do have
an ESR meter but it hadn't occurred to me to actually measure it,
though I do take your point about discharging it first. I did
discharge it some time ago and was surprised by how much the voltage
had recovered the following day.
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
William Sommerwerck
> very high capacitance values and extremely low leakage. That is
> not in dispute. The term supercap does not refer to the typical
> memory capacitor installed on consumer electronics equipment.
> That is a different type that has high series resistance. If you
> have a ESR meter, measure one for yourself but discharge it first
> for a long time.
I'm not sure what the "typical" memory capacitor is. With respect to my Lux
5T50, the cap was one I selected and installed.
Baron
Hi William,
I found references to "Super Cap" on EPCOS website.
http://www.epcos.com/inf/20/25/ds/b32330_b32332_450.pdf
Not quite what I expected.
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
William Sommerwerck
> http://www.epcos.com/inf/20/25/ds/b32330_b32332_450.pdf
> Not quite what I expected.
This is an AC starter cap -- dubbed a Super Motor Cap. Not the same thing.
N_Cook
Replacement .2F one , connected to 5V ps via 220R took 35 sec to rise from
3V to 4V
Baron
> David Inscribed thus:
>>
>>> I would concur with William. I have a 0.22F @ 5v on my desk at
>>> the moment, it holds its charge for many days.
>>>
>>> Best Regards:
>>> Baron.
>>
>> Lets get things correct here. Memory backup capacitors can have
>> very high capacitance values and extremely low leakage. That is
>> not in dispute. The term supercap does not refer to the typical
>> memory capacitor installed on consumer electronics equipment.
>> That is a different type that has high series resistance. If you
>> have a ESR meter, measure one for yourself but discharge it first
>> for a long time.
>>
>> David
>
> Thanks for your note.
> Yes the cap I have is intended for memory retention service. I do
> have an ESR meter but it hadn't occurred to me to actually measure it,
> though I do take your point about discharging it first. I did
> discharge it some time ago and was surprised by how much the voltage
> had recovered the following day.
>
Just and update: I got the marked value wrong, its 2.2F @ 5v. There is
no indication of the manufacturer. I've currently got a 4.5v 60ma
torch bulb connected across it to discharge it. It took a few seconds
for the bulb to stop glowing. Anyway I'm going to leave it overnight
and check its ESR tomorrow. It should be well and truly discharged by
then.
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
Cydrome Leader
for something like that from 1990, it would most likely be a cap made by
Elna (quite likely dark blue) NEC (possibly green) or Panasonic (all sorts
of colors). Standard Oil was even making them at the time.
Also, they didn't have 'low' ESR supercaps like they do now, so ignore any
crap off wikipedia or comparisons to modern datasheets for products that
look the same.
William Sommerwerck
>> to my Lux 5T50, the cap was one I selected and installed.
> For something like that from 1990, it would most likely be a cap
> made by Elna (quite likely dark blue) NEC (possibly green) or
> Panasonic (all sorts of colors). Standard Oil was even making
> them at the time.
Try 1980. I don't remember the brand, but I don't think it was any of these.
Regardless of what you do or don't think, IT WORKS. The storage time -- when
the tuner is turned off and left off -- is about 40% of the original tiny
nicad battery the supercap replaced (3 days versus a week). This seems
reasonable, and is consistent with the information given in the Wikipedia
article.
> Also, they didn't have "low" ESR supercaps like they do now,
> so ignore any crap off Wikipedia or comparisons to modern
> datasheets for products that look the same.
I don't think anyone here knows what they're talking about. I'm certainly
aware of my own ignorance.
N_Cook
news:i90gcu$2ra$1...@reader1.panix.com...
I discharged overnight an NEC U6 265 green, 0.2F, 5.5V and got an ESR of
5.6R
baron
Following up: The ESR measures 10-11 ohms (last digit can't make up its
mind). Peak charge current from a 5v 0.5ohm source hits 480ma (AVO 8
on 1A range) before rapidly dropping to zero. Four hours later the
terminal voltage is still 5V (Advance 10Mopv meter).
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
baron
That's about half of the value I measured.
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
David
news:i91jrh$810$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Baron Inscribed thus:
>mnd). Peak charge current from a 5v 0.5ohm source hits 480ma
>(AVO 8
>on 1A range) before rapidly dropping to zero. Four hours later
>the
>terminal voltage is still 5V (Advance 10Mopv meter).
>
>--
>Best Regards:
> Baron.
You have a good one with 10 ohms. The 10 - 15 year old ones had
much higher ESR even when new but still low leakage.
David
baron
Wow ! Thanks. :-)
Apart from playing with it yesterday, its sat on my bench for weeks
looking for something to do...
--
Best Regards:
Baron.