If you refer to the assumed switch configuration you'll see that
the IPM has no connection to the only negative supply rail - its
output is actually prevented from going negative by D14.
If you refer to the output waveform, you'll see the IPM doing its
think in the waveform's preliminary hash, where it switches
quickly between Vs and gound. There are no other switches that
can do this, except for those in the IPM.
There were no blown fuses on this board, and the IPM shows
highZ/bodyVf diode readings on the pins for SUS_OUT, VS and GND,
when lifted. I had no trouble desoldering the IPM using a normal
iron, one pin at a time, for removal. It has a solid black epoxy
body - part number SPI-42X39090-2. The Y_SUS PCB is 3-layer.
One of the 3 paralleled external fets had avalanched and gone
resistive between gate and drain to overload -VY. With this was
fixed, the buffer board seemed to pump -VY more negative than
its regulated -200V, increasing to -250V or more to put the
parallel fets into danger of avalanche). A new buffer board
prevented this.
The external heatsunk mosfets DO get hot. The two parts ID'd as
900V operate in their linear mode to develop the ramps, using a
miller-cap/diode network between gate and drain. These two slopes
are visible on the sick puppy's panel drive waveforms.
I suppose that if the SUS_UP slope was slower and continuous,
then a ~ book waveform could be created, using the end of
drive period as the SUS-DN, per older 'return to -VY' methods.
The book timing (40us/div) suggests that SUS-UP and SUS_DN are
expected to complete in ~ (+)100us (-)80us time periods.
Sick puppy's SUS_UP (50us/div) is too quick. The components in
the 900V part's set-up miller network seem to be OK individually.
Maybe if it was slower, the waveform might magically turn into
a single pulse, rather than a double one. . . . . ?
RL
Still don't know why the buffer test point doesnt follow SUS_OUT.
I'm working with a dark screen - a few pin-pricks of colour
visible in a dark room.
RL