Yours sincerely.
Sources:
*http://brownfieldagnews.com/2010/09/21/ethanol-production-efficiency-
improves/
The government should mandate that all car companies make ALL vehicles
Flex-fuel. It's doesn't cost much but I think the oil companies are
bribing the car companies not to do it. If all cars were flex fuel,
alternative suppliers would begin to pop up everywhere weaning us of
terrorist's oil supplies.
--
LSMFT
Simple job, assist the assistant of the physicist.
No, it's not expensive, and GM used to make a lot of flex-fuel autos. (Don't
know if they still do.)
Problem is, ethyl alcohol is still not really cost-competitive with
gasoline. Making lots of cars that use it would increase the demand, but I
don't think that would do much to reduce production cost, something that
alcohol producers have been trying to do /regardless/ of whether there are
cars to use alcohol.
"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message
news:ibkjnk$rmj$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
It is more than just the surface data. More land clearing, more pesticides,
more fertilizers, increasing food costs for folks who can ill afford that,
more environmental damage, and the beat goes on.
Ethyl alcohol is for making us stupid (when we drink it and also when we
imagine it to be a solution to the Middle East crisis).
Flex fuel cars? Sure, why not (as William said, it is really not a big
deal). However, the corn thing here in the US would collapse immediately if
ALL the government subsidies were cancelled (and they should be).
It is time to bite the bullet and increase the cost of energy (by removing
government manipulation and subsidies) and thus encourage conservation and
investment into better ideas.
But, NO, the US just printed another six hundred billion dollars of fake
money to prop up an unsustainable economic system for another month or two.
And when it all falls down, we will be worried about far more than flex fuel
cars.
Humpty Dumpty is soon going to have a great fall.
OBama says you're welcome.
You seem to miss the point. Yes there are alternative fuels available,
however, there isn't the infrastructure in place for them.
There's two type of fuel you KNOW you'll be able to find on a long
distance trip. Gasoline and diesel. No kerosene, alcohol, charging
stations etc..
The infrastructure of gasoline and diesel have been put in place
over the past 100 years. That isn't going to change over night.
Kind of like the phone company. There is billions of miles of wire
installed.
Jeff
A new infrastructure will never get off the ground if no car can burn
it. If all cars were flex fuel I could start selling something to my
neighbors, then the town, make a little money, expand to another town,
then the next state. Gas stations started with one. then expanded.
I guess some people don't get it.
Just 'what' are you going to sell your neighbors? There are all
kinds of permits required to sell any fuel. Are you going to jury rig
some pile of crap and ignore those laws? You mention Hydrogen. Do you
have any idea of the problems of storing Hydrogen? Steel is porous to
hydrogen and will develop embrittlemnt problems. Biodiesel requires the
same storage facilites as diesel. Alcohol requires federal license to
manufacture in quantity. Do you want the ATF to go Waco on your ass?
--
Politicians should only get paid if the budget is balanced, and there is
enough left over to pay them.
how does LNG or propane work with electronic fuel injection?
do you have to redo the -entire- engine control system,along with the fuel
system and intake? Emissions controls too?
cars don't have carburetors anymore,it's all multi-point fuel injection.
ISTR that "flex-fuel" cars use LIQUID fuels,not gases or liquified gases.
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com
"LSMFT" wrote in message news:WteEo.27896$3f.2...@newsfe12.iad...
Yes, but flex fuel is rather specific:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/flextech.shtml
Topic drift is one thing but .................