On Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:14:55 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <
je...@cruzio.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 03 Jun 2017 12:45:30 -0400,
olds...@tubes.com wrote:
>
>>I did NOT buy it for printing. I dont really need a printer. I probably
>>print something about 3 times a year, and I just let the local library
>>print it for me at 15 cents a page, and it's on a high quality laser
>>printer. If I wanted a printer, I'd only buy a laser type.
>
>I was going to try to convince you that a laser printer is much better
>than an ink sprayer for printing, but decided that I had said enough.
>
>You might have a problem using it as a scanner if you don't have ink
>cartridges installed. Some HP printers of that era would notice that
>your printer was out of ink, and produce a screen full of error
>messages announcing that if you don't buy some new carts, the world as
>we know it would suddenly end. The problem was that the error
>messages would not go away and would appear in the middle of literally
>everything that you might be doing with the printer including
>scanning. If you get a "feed me more ink" message while trying to use
>the scanner, you have the problem. I know a few tricks to somewhat
>circumvent this problem, but finding some cheap printer carts on eBay
>will satisfy the printers insatiable appetite for ink, and make the
>demanding error messages disappear.
No convincing needed. I know a laser printer is much better. I was told
that the ink drys up in these inkjets too, and only last a half year or
maybe a full year. So if I print my usual amount of pages, which is less
than 20, I'd waste most of the ink anyhow.
If I still had one, I'd connect up an old dot matrix printer, just for
plain text stuff. The ribbons in them lasted years. They were cheap to
use and did a halfway decent job on text, but not pictures.
Either way, I'll just give the library $5 or less each year for
printing, and spend much less that way and wont have to cope with dried
up ink. Better yet, the library can print paper about 16 by 20 inches
large. Great for schematics. And it's still 15 cents a page.
I connected that thing earlier and scanned a piece of colored junk mail,
just to test it. I did not have it connected to the computer (obviously,
without a cable). It has a little LCD screen on it, and I saw the scan
on that screen, and no error messages. My camera is packed away in my
camping stuff, so I did not have a SD card handy. So, after I did the
scan, the printer seemed confused with no place to copy the image. I hit
"Print" and heard it chatter. Only then did an error pop up (No paper).
So, I think it will work as a scanner.