At first I'd say "I don't care." Or "I'll be dead, it won't
matter to me." Or else I'd start a rant about death-phobic
Americans, and funerals being for the living and not the dead,
and the Mexicans know how it's done; going down to the sepulchre
on Dias de los Muertos. Party with the deceased while being
forced to contemplate your own mortality!
But that didn't stop the question.
Hmmmmmm. Burial or cremation. Only two choices, eh?
Heh.
At first I made a habit of requesting an "Open Casket Cremation."
But then I stumbled across a Japanese article where such things
are already done! (The furnace chamber has a wall of high-temp
glass, so the family can retire to the viewing room to satisfy
their curiousity.)
Then I started coming up with more "creative" suggestions. How
about freezing me in liquid nitrogen, sharpening my head to a point,
then dropping me out of a plane over farmlands? A fertilizer
spike!
Let's see, what else...
(((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) )))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
bi...@eskimo.com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA 206-789-0775 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci
I've willed my body to female CANNIBALS,
preferably AMAZONS, (one last time in a
chick :-).
My 18 year old wife will get to keep
the best parts, to keep her from being
lonely well into her old age.
My meat will be well aged ~ 100 years,
aka well hung.
You could always be plastinized, and gain a little bit or immortality
by appearing on late-night channel 4 dissection programs.
> Every so often a daughter, spouse, or relative would ask, "When
> you die, do you want to be cremated or buried?"
>
> At first I'd say "I don't care." Or "I'll be dead, it won't
> matter to me." Or else I'd start a rant about death-phobic
> Americans, and funerals being for the living and not the dead,
> and the Mexicans know how it's done; going down to the sepulchre
> on Dias de los Muertos. Party with the deceased while being
> forced to contemplate your own mortality!
>
> But that didn't stop the question.
>
> Hmmmmmm. Burial or cremation. Only two choices, eh?
>
> Heh.
>
> At first I made a habit of requesting an "Open Casket Cremation."
> But then I stumbled across a Japanese article where such things
> are already done! (The furnace chamber has a wall of high-temp
> glass, so the family can retire to the viewing room to satisfy
> their curiousity.)
>
> Then I started coming up with more "creative" suggestions. How
> about freezing me in liquid nitrogen, sharpening my head to a point,
> then dropping me out of a plane over farmlands? A fertilizer
> spike!
>
> Let's see, what else...
>
Get stuffed like Jeremy Bentham
http://www.frankieroberto.com/weblog/189.xhtml
--
Dirk
The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
You could omit the sharpening and dropping part.
Look, if you had a hard drive crash full of irreplacable data, and the
recovery company said there was no way they knew how to recover any of
it in 2005, though some or even most of it might still be there in some
form, what would you do? Cremate it? Bury it?
Well, your brain is much the same kind of thing. Put it on the shelf
and see what the future brings.
SBH
> I stumbled across a Japanese article where such things
> are already done! (The furnace chamber has a wall of high-temp
> glass, so the family can retire to the viewing room to satisfy
> their curiousity.)
Perhaps its a matter for satisfaction or relief of fear, that the
hated/feared family member might return for retribution.
Why not do a web search on burial and cremation, and report back? I'll
swag that Christians, expecting resurrection, the vain, desiring
post-mortem worship, and those that cannot accept death will desire burial.
Those with contempt for society would desire cremation, for the opposite
reason; it puts them beyond any final acts of dishonor.
If you really want to do something novel, donate your body to science
and let some interns play pranks with your body parts.
Scott
--
**********************************
DIY Piezo-Gyro, PCB Drill Bot & More Soon!
http://home.comcast.net/~scottxs/
POLITICS, n.
A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
The conduct of public affairs for private advantage. - Ambrose Bierce
There is no giant behind the devastation of the world—only a shriveled
creature with the wizened
face of a child who is out to blow up the kitchen because he cannot
steal his cookies and eat them, too. - Ayn Rand
**********************************
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
me...@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
> Get stuffed like Jeremy Bentham
> http://www.frankieroberto.com/weblog/189.xhtml
That's getting popular! I've searched for the last several minutes for
an article, posted on another news group last year, about people that
have their family members stuffed. It costs a few thousand dollars. One
woman had her child stuffed. A family had there grandma stuffed, but the
foot started mildewing and the dog chewed it off and buried it or something.
Don't die. Get a big family or your clan to pickle your brain in
alcohol (Harris probably had this idea too) at approximately the moment
of death and have them keep running with it like Raiders of the Lost
Ark. It's true that from all that we can tell with instruments,
there's an awful lot of destruction of brain cells and no sign of
consciousness, but heck, there's even information coming out of black
holes and according to some big theorists some of it encoded into
spacetime geometry near black holes. Someday another Civilization
smarter than ours (probably another species too, unless you have a
hangup on apes) may decide to revive whatever's left or clone our
brains from what's left. Of course, with all that alcohol, we might
start resembling some of the Elitists on sci.physics.
Osher Doctorow
Jim
RST Engineering (jw) said:
Could you run that by me again? I was born 66 years ago approximately,
before they handed out computers. I guess that just makes me a visitor
on the internet. :>)
Osher
I think I would like the ultimate no frills burial. Use a 20 foot long auger
on a post hole digger, and just tamp me in all the way to the bottom of the
hole. This would put me well into the clay layer, and the ground could be
then used for almost any other purpose as soon as the soil was compacted
back into the hole. 15 minute job start to finish.
Relatives that were not liked could be inserted head first :<))
> If you really want to do something novel, donate your body to science
> and let some interns play pranks with your body parts.
But Scott, what if Science doesn't want it..... ;-)
--
James McInerney
My G gauge garden homage to the now long gone railways of Tasmania's
west coast, the "Rurr Valley Railway"
http://www.cia.com.au/bullack/rvrtitle.html
also http://www.cia.com.au/bullack/ , where the steam era NSWGR
secondary lines live on in HO at bucolic "Lambing Flat"
and http://members.optusnet.com.au/lambingflat/ for the family stuff!
> Hmmmmmm. Burial or cremation. Only two choices, eh?
>
> At first I made a habit of requesting an "Open Casket Cremation."
> But then I stumbled across a Japanese article where such things
> are already done! (The furnace chamber has a wall of high-temp
> glass, so the family can retire to the viewing room to satisfy
> their curiousity.)
Perhaps prompted by the case last year in which a crematorium operator
was found to be simply stacking the corpses up round the back? At least
this way you can see that you are getting your moneysworth.
Paul Burke
>Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
>
>> Get stuffed like Jeremy Bentham
>> http://www.frankieroberto.com/weblog/189.xhtml
>
>That's getting popular! I've searched for the last several minutes for
>an article, posted on another news group last year, about people that
>have their family members stuffed. It costs a few thousand dollars. One
>woman had her child stuffed. A family had there grandma stuffed, but the
>foot started mildewing and the dog chewed it off and buried it or something.
>
>Scott
The stuffed great leaders seem to require regular maintenance- Lenin,
Mao, Bulgaria's Georgi Dimitrov (taken off display and cremated in
1990), and Ho Chi Minh are the ones that come to mind. Hmm.. maybe a
combination of animatronics, tanning and taxidermy could preserve some
of your more annoying^H^H^H characteristic mannerisms and witticisms
for posterity.
There are companies that claim to take your remains and make precious
stones or pottery from them (after cremation).
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
sp...@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
> combination of animatronics, tanning and taxidermy could preserve some
> of your more annoying^H^H^H characteristic mannerisms and witticisms
> for posterity.
I suggest reading Tom Sharpe's book "The Throwback", which actually
describes (in exquisite detail) the process of combining animatronics &
taxidermy on the human body.
It's a very very funny book.
--
Cheers,
Ade.
More seriously, I'd seen too many gravesites looking lonely and uncared
for: my answer is an unmarked site, or none at all. Cremation is the
ultimate sharing: assuming a well mixed atmosphere, everyone will
breathe part of you with every breath.
Cryonics - Alcor.
Wikipedia: "Readers tend to find Sharpe's work either extremely
offensive or outrageously funny." ;-)
Okay, I'll pick it up.
> Let's see, what else...
Check out "towers of silence" of Iran.
--
"gusfande ghorbuni ham tuye azA koshte misheh ham tu
arusi."
> Well, your brain is much the same kind of thing. Put it on the shelf
> and see what the future brings.
It'll beat the purpose. Dying is part of it all.
--
"khodAyA:
roshde elmi va aghliye marA az fazilate _ta'assob_
va _ehsAs_ va _eshrAgh_ mahrum nasAz."
- Ali Shari'ati
Cremation eliminates the option of rising from the grave and terrorizing
the villagers, although you could still fly up people's noses.
>Then I started coming up with more "creative" suggestions. How
>about freezing me in liquid nitrogen, sharpening my head to a point,
>then dropping me out of a plane over farmlands? A fertilizer
>spike!
>
>Let's see, what else...
Look into donating your body to science. You don't get to say exactly
what's done with it, but you might be buried in a forensics garden,
provide data on the physical durability of humans for auto manufacturers,
be dissected by medical students, or any number of possibilities. See the
book "Stiff", by Mary Roach.
--
"Not that there's anything wrong with just lying around on your back. In
its way, rotting is interesing too... It's just that there are other ways
to spend your time as a cadaver." -- Mary Roach, "Stiff", 2003.
>On 13 Apr 2005 18:35:32 -0700, bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
>
>> Let's see, what else...
>
>Check out "towers of silence" of Iran.
Or the Tibetan "sky burials".
Google
plastination 18,200 hits
Cremate is primarily calcium phosphate from calcined skeleton. You
are some 3-5 lbs of finest bone china. Have yourself secondarily
fired into upscale adult toys. Prince Charles would like that now
that his second wife no longer needs tampons.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:33:47 -0500, the renowned Maleki
> <male...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On 13 Apr 2005 18:35:32 -0700, bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Let's see, what else...
>>
>>Check out "towers of silence" of Iran.
>
> Or the Tibetan "sky burials".
>
>
Yes, that's also nice. But a little bit morbid, requiring
someone actually cut up the dead. In Iran's Tower of Silence
the dead is left by themselves inside such enclosures up in
the mountains, and the family climbs down back to their
houses. A couple of weeks later they go up again to gather
the remaining bones and throw them in the central ditch the
place has. the ditch is open at the top, so the bones join
the ones of earlier generations and together they watch the
Sun and stars every day and night, and the snow and rain,
for ever. I'd like to go that way.
Here's one of them:
http://www.photosource.co.uk/christineosborne/graphics/cop246.jpg
--
"_gorize_ be hoseyn va AshurAye hoseyn sonnati sakht
amigh va besyAr porma'ni va shAyesteye ta'ammol
ast. har lahzeh rA bAyad be dAstAne 'u peyvand
dAd. har ruz rA bAyad be AshurA peyvast, hameye
mAh-hA rA be moharram, hameye noghtehAye zamin rA
be An gusheye sorkh. az harche matrah ast, towhid,
maz-hab, ghor'An, mohammad, ali, hajj, ebAdat,
falsafeh, erfAn, eshgh, imAn, shAdi, gham, ..., az
har aghide'i har sonnati, har mas'ale'i har rasmi,
az har bo'di az ab'Ade zendegi, ejtemA', tArikh,
akhlAgh, ruh, va az harke va harche, bAyad be
hoseyn va AshurAye hoseyn _goriz_ zad.
bAyad be dAstAne 'u peyvand khord. vagarnah
mojarrad va motlaghim. vagarnah mobham va
bisamarim. mehvare harche ke hast amale 'ust."
- Ali Shari'ati
His first wife doesn't either.
Leonard
"Maleki" <male...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1m3cmaktlldvt.1...@40tude.net...
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:14:25 +0100, the renowned Ade Vickers
> <javi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>Spehro Pefhany said:
>>
>>
>>>combination of animatronics, tanning and taxidermy could preserve some
>>>of your more annoying^H^H^H characteristic mannerisms and witticisms
>>>for posterity.
>>
>>I suggest reading Tom Sharpe's book "The Throwback", which actually
>>describes (in exquisite detail) the process of combining animatronics &
>>taxidermy on the human body.
>>
>>It's a very very funny book.
>
>
> Wikipedia: "Readers tend to find Sharpe's work either extremely
> offensive or outrageously funny." ;-)
>
> Okay, I'll pick it up.
I think 'Throwback' is the best.
http://nietzsche.thefreelibrary.com/Thus-Spake-Zarathustra/59-1
"> My sighing sat on all human graves, and could no longer arise: my
> sighing and questioning croaked and choked, and gnawed and nagged day
> and night:
>
> --"Ah, man returneth eternally! The small man returneth eternally!"
>
> Naked had I once seen both of them, the greatest man and the smallest
> man: all too like one another--all too human, even the greatest man!
>
> All too small, even the greatest man!--that was my disgust at man!
> And the eternal return also of the smallest man!--that was my disgust
> at all existence!
>
> Ah, Disgust! Disgust! Disgust!--Thus spake Zarathustra, and sighed
> and shuddered; for he remembered his sickness. Then did his animals
> prevent him from speaking further.
" - Nietzsche
> I'd prefer to be blown up...and include the copy of XP that I have tha I
> don't use.
I'm thinking of the scene in "Doctor Stranglove" where the cowboy sits
on a hung H-bomb to release it, and ends up riding it down to ground-0 =)
>
> Check out "towers of silence" of Iran.
>
Don't know about Iranian Zoroastrians, but the Indian Parsees (same
religion) are having trouble because the vultures that pick the bones
clean are dying out, poisoned by agricultural advances.
Paul Burke
Certainly there are enough dead in those areas to sustain
voltures on a constant basis, making it unnecessary for them
to eat anything else (this is so in Iran's). So if the birds
are dying out it must be something in the flesh of the dead.
Too much spices? :)
--
"dir zAyideh zud mikhAd bozorg koneh."
Or, dip the dead body in Pd(II) to prime it, then electrolessly plate,
then electroplate a nice thick layer of metal. One might do well to
remove labile organics thereafter re decomposition gas production. I
suppose one could dip in Aquadag and then plate. Lacks aesthetics.
Who gives a shit what you like, Jim? I see that your social skills
haven't improved, either.
--
Former professional electron wrangler.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This publication is the sole property of monkey #108765
and his typewriter. It does not represent the opinions of any other
primate, either alive or dead, or any descendants thereof.
The 'news' spot on Saturday Night Live did an obituary on Mary Leakey
(anthropologist and wife of Louis Leakey) when she passed away. It ended
with something like, "...where she was laid to rest and will remain
until some other anthropologist digs her up".
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature
replaces it with. -- Tennessee Williams
As I remember the picture of you in the Seattle Times, you've got
enough fur on you so that you could be freeze dried like people do to
their favorite pets. Then they can just prop you up on the corner.
Well, considering the local climate, a glass display case full of
dry nitrogen would probably prevent you from developing a bad case
of mold or mice.
Mark Zenier mze...@eskimo.com Washington State resident
Yep. What a way to go.
Today you can be cremated, then have the carbon from the ashes converted
into a diamond. Nice remainder for your wife (or oldest daughter).
Not cheap though.
<http://www.lifegem.com/secondary/lifeline/LifeLine_web_newsletter_e1.pdf>
Arie
Perhaps not cheap, but not particularly expensive if you compare it to a
casket, vault, plot, headstone, and all the other ripoffs. My MIL's
funeral last year was close to $10K and the plot/vault/headstone were
already there. It's not cheap to die!
--
Keith
The wife would just start trying to fatten me up in order to get a few
more carats out of the deal.
;-)
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code.
I think the 10K should mostly pay for a party for the survivors,
hopefully to celebrate your life, have a few drinks and tell stories.
The rest of it (unless your religion specifies something) is pretty
much optional. I think it costs about $100 to get someone cremated.
The gem thing is a bit gross- properly cremated remains have no carbon
in the ash! ... so...they have to deliberately not thoroughly cremate
the remains to leave some carbon.. ugh.
From a previous post:
..according to the patent application 20040154528 August
12, 2004:
The approximate composition of human ash:
[0036] CaO 39.0%
[0037] P205 50.2%
[0038] K20 4.8%
[0039] Na203 3.8%
[0040] MgO 0.9%
[0041] SiO2 1.1%
[0042] Fe203 0.2%
[0043] ZnO 0.1%
(No carbon/sp)
[0049] The manufacture of diamonds using human remains is to be
completed using any number of known methods. The human/animal remains
prior to desiccation/heating/cremation shall be referred to as the
"remains". These methods include but are not limited to the following:
collection of carbon from a gaseous phase during the heating/cremation
process, or heating the subject at a temperature at or lower than that
necessary for cremation in order to facilitate the
collection/formation of carbon. The carbon may be collected at a later
stage of cremation or after cremation. In addition, this may be done
in a low oxygen or controlled oxygen environment. In order to collect
carbon suitable for diamond creation the remains may be heated in a
contained/controlled environment--for example a reusable or one time
use stainless steel containment vessel or other vessel or crematorium
that may have filtered collection vents or events which draw the
carbon/volatile material/gas through a filter or collection chamber
prior to final dispersion. The carbon may also be purified and/or
converted into graphite. During the diamond making process a "seed"
diamond may be used as a seed for the end diamond product. The
diamonds generated from the human carbon may be re-mixed with other
diamonds or mixtures and re-subjected to the diamond making devices or
other processes for one or more trials in order to increase the size
of the final product or enhance the final product.
>>It'll beat the purpose. Dying is part of it all.
Who says? And how do they know? If you think death is such a great
deal, you're welcome to demonstrate by shuffling off sooner.
A bunch of folks originally from your country now let themselves get
eaten by buzzards in Bombay. I'm unable to discover if they're still
allowed to do it in Iran, where some Zoroastrians still live. Is
providing energy for the wings of a vulture part of it all, too?.
Edward Abbey once thought so. But when it came to his own remains, he
wimped out.
SBH
Like everyone doesn't breathe "part of you" in every breath already.
The human body has a huge turnover in atoms. At 4% a day, the average
person at age 40 has already put 30 metric tons or so of atoms that
have been part of this body into the environment. Given these figures,
the nonsense that attends discussions of cremation vs burial (in terms
of talking about 50 kg MORE matter or so, at the end) is just silly.
But it's a great example of how our common sense tends to go South when
talking about death.
SBH
> Get stuffed like Jeremy Bentham
> http://www.frankieroberto.com/weblog/189.xhtml
I recall him well. I went to UCL. After a bit you get used to walking by
the glass box with him inside. In the Main Hall IIRC.
Graham
I read somewhere, somewhen that this is done to prevent spreading
disease. I never verified this snippet.
/BAH
Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
So, other than the carbon and water, we're made of Maalox, sand,
rust, and fungus cream.
Cool!
--
Cheers!
Rich
------
Revenge is sleeping with your enemy's wife. Sweet revenge is the
realization that she's a lousy lay.
> Arie de Muynck wrote:
>>
>> <bi...@eskimo.com> ...
>> > Hmmmmmm. Burial or cremation. Only two choices, eh?
>>
>> Today you can be cremated, then have the carbon from the ashes converted
>> into a diamond. Nice remainder for your wife (or oldest daughter).
>> Not cheap though.
>>
>> <http://www.lifegem.com/secondary/lifeline/LifeLine_web_newsletter_e1.pdf>
>>
>
> The wife would just start trying to fatten me up in order to get a few
> more carats out of the deal.
>
> ;-)
And nobody ever talks about the gold that's rendered out of the corpse's
teeth.
--
Cheers!
Rich
------
Two golfers were being held up as the twosome of women in front of them
whiffed shots, hunted for lost balls and stood over putts for what seemed
like hours. "I'll ask if we can play through," Bill said as he strode
toward the women. Twenty yards from the green, however, he turned on his
heel and went back to where his companion was waiting. "Can't do it," he
explained, sheepishly. "One of them's my wife and the other's my
mistress!" "I'll ask," said Jim. He started off, only to turn and come
back before reaching the green. "What's wrong?" Bill asked. "Small world,
isn't it?"
>> Well, your brain is much the same kind of thing. Put it on the shelf
>> and see what the future brings.
>
>
>>>It'll beat the purpose. Dying is part of it all.
>
>
> Who says? And how do they know? If you think death is such a great
> deal, you're welcome to demonstrate by shuffling off sooner.
>
Do you think that if a person like me could keep living,
eventually _one_ jingo would be left on earth to live? Even
a jingo should get his chance. Who knows what else is in
there that he carries.
> A bunch of folks originally from your country now let themselves get
> eaten by buzzards in Bombay. I'm unable to discover if they're still
> allowed to do it in Iran,
They do it illegally.
> where some Zoroastrians still live. Is
> providing energy for the wings of a vulture part of it all, too?.
It's a lesser matter of giving it to worms or to vultures,
and a much greater matter of giving back what's owed, in
return for having eaten other life forms for a few decades.
It is stupidity and selfishness to cremate the body. Very
ugly; and you cannot, morally, keep living, while other life
forms you consume keep dying. Plus we got here on the shear
fact that we kept dying so the next one could have what we
had.
> Edward Abbey once thought so. But when it came to his own remains, he
> wimped out.
>
> SBH
--
"Here is the question: Do the unknown circumstances we
face cause us to re-evaluate the call? Of course
not."
- Arthur Blessitt
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:38:44 -0400, the renowned keith
> <k...@att.bizzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:11:04 +0200, Arie de Muynck wrote:
>>
>>> <bi...@eskimo.com> ...
>>>> Hmmmmmm. Burial or cremation. Only two choices, eh?
>>>
>>> Today you can be cremated, then have the carbon from the ashes converted
>>> into a diamond. Nice remainder for your wife (or oldest daughter).
>>> Not cheap though.
>>>
>>> <http://www.lifegem.com/secondary/lifeline/LifeLine_web_newsletter_e1.pdf>
>>
>>Perhaps not cheap, but not particularly expensive if you compare it to a
>>casket, vault, plot, headstone, and all the other ripoffs. My MIL's
>>funeral last year was close to $10K and the plot/vault/headstone were
>>already there. It's not cheap to die!
>
> I think the 10K should mostly pay for a party for the survivors,
Wrong. There are laws that must be obeyed. There are those who control
the process.
> hopefully to celebrate your life, have a few drinks and tell stories.
Stories, perhaps. The only thing to drink was a mix of hydrogen-hydroxide
in two physical states.
> The rest of it (unless your religion specifies something) is pretty much
> optional.
You don't know what you're talking about. Laws dictate what must be done
with the dead. Those who have a vested interest...
I think it costs about $100 to get someone cremated.
Not here, and not there. I don't know where you live, but it cost me more
than that to have my dog cremated (another requirement).
> The gem thing is a bit gross- properly cremated remains have no carbon
> in the ash! ... so...they have to deliberately not thoroughly cremate
> the remains to leave some carbon.. ugh.
Whatever. I think it's a better alternative than taking up space in the
ground. And not much more expensive than what we paid for a box.
<snip>
> [0049] The manufacture of diamonds using human remains is to be
> completed using any number of known methods. The human/animal remains
> prior to desiccation/heating/cremation shall be referred to as the
> "remains". These methods include but are not limited to the following:
> collection of carbon from a gaseous phase during the heating/cremation
> process, or heating the subject at a temperature at or lower than that
> necessary for cremation in order to facilitate the collection/formation
> of carbon. The carbon may be collected at a later stage of cremation or
> after cremation. In addition, this may be done in a low oxygen or
> controlled oxygen environment. In order to collect carbon suitable for
> diamond creation the remains may be heated in a contained/controlled
> environment--for example a reusable or one time use stainless steel
> containment vessel or other vessel or crematorium that may have filtered
> collection vents or events which draw the carbon/volatile material/gas
> through a filter or collection chamber prior to final dispersion. The
> carbon may also be purified and/or converted into graphite. During the
> diamond making process a "seed" diamond may be used as a seed for the
> end diamond product. The diamonds generated from the human carbon may be
> re-mixed with other diamonds or mixtures and re-subjected to the diamond
> making devices or other processes for one or more trials in order to
> increase the size of the final product or enhance the final product.
Interesting. I wonder if the Boston group of diamond-makers is going
there. IIRC the "yellows" are from the Miami (Moscow) group.
--
Keith
>>
>> I think the 10K should mostly pay for a party for the survivors,
>
>Wrong. There are laws that must be obeyed. There are those who control
>the process.
How much does compliance actually cost? A thousand dollars? Two? I
doubt it's in conflict with my statement. They (funeral homes) can't
force you to use their insanely overpriced coffins anymore in the US..
you can buy one from Costco for $999 if you want. But most of us still
do.
>> hopefully to celebrate your life, have a few drinks and tell stories.
>
>Stories, perhaps. The only thing to drink was a mix of hydrogen-hydroxide
>in two physical states.
We've tended to have a catered reception elsewhere afterward. Not
exactly a wake, but not so sad either.
>> The rest of it (unless your religion specifies something) is pretty much
>> optional.
>
>You don't know what you're talking about. Laws dictate what must be done
>with the dead. Those who have a vested interest...
The laws took some of the control away from the funeral homes,
although some still take try to take advantage. It's a vulnerable time
and difficult for those making the decisions. I do think the ritual is
very important, for intangible but very, very real reasons. But the
last couple of holy dudes I paid at such gatherings only got a couple
hundred bucks donation, a negligible percentage of the total.
>I think it costs about $100 to get someone cremated.
>
>Not here, and not there. I don't know where you live, but it cost me more
>than that to have my dog cremated (another requirement).
"Many memorial societies offer members cremation services provided by
licensed mortuaries at costs considerably less than the national
average. Families who care for their own dead can use crematories
directly at charges from $75 to $200."
That's the *real* cost from the establishment that does the work. I've
designed controls used in crematoriums, BTW. Animal and human. Of
course the funeral home might jack that up.. like their markup on a
$400 casket to $4000.
>> The gem thing is a bit gross- properly cremated remains have no carbon
>> in the ash! ... so...they have to deliberately not thoroughly cremate
>> the remains to leave some carbon.. ugh.
>
>Whatever. I think it's a better alternative than taking up space in the
>ground. And not much more expensive than what we paid for a box.
As a reasonable alternative, I understand you can make a decent
pottery glaze from normal ashes. Makes more sense to be a key bowl
than sit around in an urn (or a molded black plastic box, which is how
they come from the subcontractor).
I sleep with my mouth open. She pried that out years ago.
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Excuse me for butting in, but I'm interrupt-driven.
The EU RoHS legislation is having an unexpected effect on
cremations in the UK.
It turns out that the mercury amalgam commonly used in dental
fillings will require very expensive filtering to be added to crematoriums
chimneys to prevent the release of mercury into the atmosphere.
Regards
Ian
Ssssh! You'll wake K**th W*lsh!
--
Richard Herring
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:08:54 -0400, the renowned keith
> <k...@att.bizzzz> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I think the 10K should mostly pay for a party for the survivors,
>>
>>Wrong. There are laws that must be obeyed. There are those who control
>>the process.
>
> How much does compliance actually cost? A thousand dollars? Two? I
> doubt it's in conflict with my statement. They (funeral homes) can't
> force you to use their insanely overpriced coffins anymore in the US..
> you can buy one from Costco for $999 if you want. But most of us still
> do.
We cremated both my Mom and my Dad, and IIRC it was about $800.00 each,
but they took care of everything - and that included a side-by-side
urn, which was the first time I'd ever heard of such a thing. The urn
is buried at Ft. Snelling, which was "free", since Dad was a vet.
My Dad used to say, "Do NOT give me a funeral. If a bunch of people
want to gather around and tell each other how wonderful I am, let them
do it while I'm still alive and can be there to appreciate it."
Thanks,
Rich
There _was_ a crematorium here that had the audacity to charge $1500
(IIRC), but it was shut down by the state funeral directors because it
didn't "meet standards". The average funeral here goes for $5K. The
$10K for the MIL was in IL and was considered low there. The cemetery
even tried to double-charge for the vault (a requirement). Even so,
they charged $750 for a hole in ground that had been paid for 25 years
years earlier.
> My Dad used to say, "Do NOT give me a funeral. If a bunch of people
> want to gather around and tell each other how wonderful I am, let them
> do it while I'm still alive and can be there to appreciate it."
He's right, by then it's too late. However, the funeral isn't for him.
--
Keith
>Spehro Pefhany wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:14:25 +0100, the renowned Ade Vickers
>> <javi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Spehro Pefhany said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>combination of animatronics, tanning and taxidermy could preserve some
>>>>of your more annoying^H^H^H characteristic mannerisms and witticisms
>>>>for posterity.
>>>
>>>I suggest reading Tom Sharpe's book "The Throwback", which actually
>>>describes (in exquisite detail) the process of combining animatronics &
>>>taxidermy on the human body.
>>>
>>>It's a very very funny book.
>>
>>
>> Wikipedia: "Readers tend to find Sharpe's work either extremely
>> offensive or outrageously funny." ;-)
>>
>> Okay, I'll pick it up.
>
>I think 'Throwback' is the best.
Read it today. A very funny book, especially impressive considering
that it's 25+ years old.
I'm refreshing myself with it too... Not quite as fast as in the olde
days (I read a bit slower now). Up to Lockhart's early exploits in
Sandicott Crescent so far...
Glad you enjoyed it... I can also recommend Porterhouse Blue & Wilt from
the same author.
--
Cheers,
Ade.