On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:45:25 -0500, "bw" <
bwe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Raveninghorde" <raveninghorde@invalid> wrote in message
>news:n1ge775cjl7a19r9i...@4ax.com...
>>
>> I use the LM358 by the bucket load because they are cheap. I also use
>> the LM358A for the better offset voltage spec.
>>
>> I'm always on the look out for an alternative with lower offset that
>> is still cheap. I've just come across the LM2904A/LM2904AV from TI.
>> The V version runs at 32V same as the LM358. The offset voltage is
>> better, 1mV typical compared to 3mV and worst case 2mV as opposed to
>> 7mV for the LM358. Basically the same spec as the LM158A.
>>
>> They are cheap as well. We pay about $0.07 for the LM358 and these are
>> $0.09.
>
>For the price, the LM358 is likely the best.
>LM358 and LM2904 are identical except for max voltage allowed. There is a
>Fairchild datasheet that covers both. The LM258 has a slightly lower offset.
OPA2277 is over 10x the cost of the LM2904AV. It's too expensive for a
lot of applications.
You're forgeting the definition of engineering. An engineer does for a