Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Let's summary the different company whose rework SMT

10 views
Skip to first unread message

marck.d...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 20, 2007, 2:52:37 PM2/20/07
to
I've seen a lot of talking about different company who make SMT Rework
Station but I' m still essitate which company choose between Hakko
Corporation, Xkar, Metcal, Ersa, Pace, JBC, Weller. I guess that there
also company.

What I want is good tools, accurate, efficient, in the Middle range So
AIRVAC from Zecatech and NICOLETTE is not in my range of wish (to much
expansive).

I'm seeking for a full system less expensive than 10000 dollars.

I would like you to tell me about different your experience

I wish people will give me the best informations.

george...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 20, 2007, 4:33:48 PM2/20/07
to
I had used several Rework Systems for my company and my
employes have used BOKAR units since 8 years and they can tell
you, they had over the years only few small remarks about these tools,
which
were usually quickly modified by the manufacturer.

www.bokar.com or commercial site in USA www.bomir.com

I'd like anyone in this forum to compare and to tell me what X-KAR
Products do not have in
comparison with its competitors such as Hakko, Pace or Weller and
Metcal that everybody is talking about?

If I remember they have such fully system for less than 10000
Dollars.


I'm waiting with a little interest, I'd like also know what other
people use and why.


George Leman

JeffM

unread,
Feb 20, 2007, 5:54:30 PM2/20/07
to
marck.delzenne@ gmail.com wrote:
>>I would like you to tell me about different your experience
>>
IP address 71.57.244.90

george.leman@ gmail.com wrote:
>[SPAM in the same broken English]
>
IP address 71.57.244.90

http://www.google.com/search?q=define:astroturfing

JeffM

unread,
Feb 20, 2007, 6:01:34 PM2/20/07
to
was: Let's summary the different company whose rework SMT

george.leman@ gmail.com (aka marck.delzenne@ gmail.com) wrote:
>[ SPAM SPAM] Rework Systems [SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM]

george...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 20, 2007, 8:47:44 PM2/20/07
to
I am not a spam writer and I will not allow you to treat me like that.

So you guy have just to wrote

That man got these address ...@gmail.com

IP adress is for example 68.29.172.86

and this other man get these adress ...@gmail.com

IP address is that 68.29.172.86

So trust me this is a spam, and game over

It's a little bit easy to accuse some one to be a spamer.

And is you look to the names you will see that both of them are french
so that's obvious than they don't have a perfect english right.


For your information I am live in France my adress is

37 quai Seine
75019 PARIS

so If you don't believe me just wrote to my box.

I'm not a sailer at all so I think that your setence are just crazy.


JeffM

unread,
Feb 20, 2007, 10:29:46 PM2/20/07
to
george.leman@ gmail.com wrote:
>It's a little bit easy to accuse some one to be a spamer.
>
It's VERY easy--and easily verified.
The OP
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.design/msg/48695380b5849764?dmode=source
and the SPAM response
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.design/msg/534f2db505b9a82c?dmode=source
were made from the same computer.

Anthony Fremont

unread,
Feb 21, 2007, 6:16:32 AM2/21/07
to

Looks pretty convincing to me. It certainly appears that george was caught
red-handed talking to himself. ;-)


0 new messages