On 17/04/2016 1:58 AM,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 8:47:40 PM UTC+10,
> DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 09:27:06 -0000 (UTC), Julian Barnes
>> <
jb9...@notformail.com> Gave us:
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:45:29 -0500, Tim Wescott wrote:
>>>
>>> Flipping the polarity of the pulses as whit3rd suggested seems a
>>> somewhat more dependable method.
>>>
>> Two synched PWMs on the same line with one creating the negative
>> pulses and one creating the positive pulses 180 degrees out of
>> phase with each other. But there is a lot of wasted energy, and no
>> need to do it when there are DC motors out there that are far more
>> efficient.
>
> I don't see where the energy is being wasted. The difference between
> DC motors and synchronous/stepper-motors is how you switch the
> current through the drive coils - the same currents do the same job.
> You can set up inefficient drive schemes for both sorts of motors,
> but neither is intrinsically more efficient than the other.
desired AC sinewave, plus lots of harmonics. The higher harmonics would
Indeed, I tried to run a fan off a modified-sinewave inverter. The fan