On Sunday, January 30, 2022 at 10:30:42 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 11:09:15 PM UTC-8,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 29, 2022 at 5:38:40 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 3:33:00 AM UTC-8,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 5:41:11 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, January 24, 2022 at 6:51:03 PM UTC-8,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> > > > > > Anthony William Sloman <
bill....@ieee.org> wrote in
news:7c66b8a1-f58f-4b6a...@googlegroups.com:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 9:53:32 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > >> On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 11:00:11 PM UTC-8,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > > >> > On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 4:54:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 9:40:24 PM UTC-8,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 3:52:14 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 5:52:01 PM UTC-8,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 12:36:48 PM UTC+11,
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 9:22:44 AM UTC-8,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Anthony William Sloman <
bill....@ieee.org> wrote in
news:16f345d3-df2f-4813...@googlegroups.com:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Friday, December 31, 2021 at 9:24:48 PM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 20:51:29 -0800 (PST), Flyguy <soar2. ..@
yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 4:56:35 PM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail. com wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 3:29:45 PM UTC-5, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
> > > > "senior editor-at-large of media organization Breitbart News" .
> >
> > Peter Schweizer has made a business of writing revelations about senior Democrat's imagined crimes. The details have a habit of not standing up, but the people who buy that kind of nonsense don't care about accuracy.
> >
> Sloman has NO REBUTAL, typical of a libtard.
> >
> > > Sloman has NO REBUTAL, typical of a libtard.
> >
> > Flygiuy hasn't noticed that he's been rebutted - typical of an idiot.
>
> > > > > The libtard media actively suppressed the sordid details of Hunter Biden during the last election because they knew how damning it was.
> > > >
> > > > Or because they knew that the sordid details had all been invented by the Trump propaganda machine, and they would get sued into bankruptcy if they gave them any credence.
> > >
> > > Again, a TOTAL lack of evidence by Sloman.
> >
> > The Wikipedia biography made it pretty clear what was going on, but Flyguy can't understand stuff that isn't saying what he wants to hear.
>
> SNIPPERMAN thinks that an UNSIGNED bio is to be trusted.
It listed books that Peter Schweizer has published. If Peter Schweizer disagreed with the facts presented, he could have asked Wikipedia to correct them.
The message is perfectly clear to anybody brighter than Flyguy.
> It purports that the FBI could not find evidence of Hunter Biden's money laundering.
Unlike Trump's family, Hunter Biden hasn't been accused of money laundering.
> Newsflash: the FBI DOESN'T discuss particulars of on-going investigations for obvious reasons (except to Sloman).
None of the "crimes" revealed by Peter Schweizer have even been prosecuted. He is more an inventor that an investigative journalist.
Flyguy wants to add an imaginary FBI investigation into the imaginary crimes.
> The Biden administration cited the art business as particularly suited for corruption and money laundering:
>
https://nypost.com/2021/12/06/wh-flags-art-market-as-money-laundering-haven-amid-hunter-biden-shows/
> Guess what Hunter Biden's latest endeavor is? ART!
People might want to buy his artwork as a way of influencing his father. It would be pretty silly, but there people as dim as Flyguy around. It might be attempted corruption, but Joe Biden isn't going to be silly enough to favour anybody who bought his son's artworks.
As a mechanism for money laundering, it simply doesn't work, as is obvious to anybody brighter than Flyguy.
> > > > > No such courtesy would have been extended towards Don Jr.
> > > >
> > > > Because he really is a crook?
> > >
> > > Again, a TOTAL lack of evidence by SNIPPERMAN - this is getting repetitious!
> >
> > Flyguy hasn't noticed that this was a hypothesis, and as such didn't need supporting evidence.
>
> Sloman has NO REBUTAL, typical of a libtard.
And didn't need one, not that Flyguy has enough sense to realise this.
> > >As usual, I have to go and RESTORE Sloman's edits of MY comments - the clear sign of a DECEITFUL BASTARD!!!!
> >
> > Flyguy has his own ideas about how I should spell my name. Like most of his ideas they are obviously wrong, and I do correct them as a courtesy to anybody silly enough to read this "correspondence".
>
> Altering someone else's writings is UNETHICAL, at the very least - but that is par for the course for Sloman.
Allowing you to look even more like the idiot you are would be unkind. You haven't got a clue about the ethics involved.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney