The voltage supply is 12V, through a resisotr of 4.5-9K, to the sensor with
a 10K rheostat on it, and then to ground/negative terminal.
My question is about the calibration. The expected output of the sensor
would be 2.93V give or take the uncalibrated error. What if I need to add
voltage to the sensor. I am looking at it - that the rheostat would only
be dropping voltage. But - should I be looking at it this way, the output
of the sensor would be considered a voltage divider? So essentially, I
have two voltage dividers in play, the obvious one is the rheostat, which
in turn effects the output of the sensor whose voltage is also effected by
an implicit voltage divider? (between the the drop across the resistor and
the sensor)
And how does one calculate the current through the rheostat in this
situation, to determine what is left for the sensor?
Thanks.
-Dan Akers
-Dan Akers
My question about adding voltage is about the calibration. As I understand
it, the trim pots will cause voltage drops. But in the process of
calibration, I find that I need to ad an extra 30mV to the output. And it
seem that the trim pot would not help.
But I am a real amateur - so I think I am missing somethign because it
should be that difficult that if the factory produced LM135 might need an
op amp for correct calibration.
It seems to me, that the voltage from the supply is not being dropped
completely across the resistor because it still have to drop
proportionately arcoss the resistance contained in the LM135/rheostat, and
enough that gross changes could be made with a rheostat.
dig...@webtv.net (Dan Akers) wrote in news:24484-3E14964E-106@storefull-
2173.public.lawson.webtv.net:
--
Shop at http://www.handsonoptics.com
>I have not read your first post carefully yet, I have printed it out.
>THANK YOU.
>
>My question about adding voltage is about the calibration. As I understand
>it, the trim pots will cause voltage drops. But in the process of
>calibration, I find that I need to ad an extra 30mV to the output. And it
>seem that the trim pot would not help.
>
The adjustment pot on the LM335 messes with the internal workings of
the LM335, so can probably increase _or_ decrease the voltage across
the part.
--
Peter Bennett VE7CEI
GPS and NMEA info and programs: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter/index.html
Newsgroup new user info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq
You don't need the OP amp for correct calibration. I was merely
suggesting that if you want greater voltage output, proportional to
temperature, then you'll need some sort of linear amplifier. Take a
look at the LM3911. This an 8 pin DIP; essentially a LM135 and OP amp
in one package.
______________________________________
WG wrote;
"It seems to me, that the voltage from the supply is not being dropped
completely across the resistor because it still have to drop
proportionately arcoss the resistance contained in the LM135/rheostat,
and enough that gross changes could be made with a rheostat."
______________________________________
Re;
The supply voltage is dropped proportionately across the LM135 with
respect to the device temperature; never completely across the series
resistor. It is a shunt regulator of sorts, in that respect.
Regardless of the series resistor that you use, within limits of shunt
regulator design concepts of course, the voltage drop across the device
is ultimately determined by the device temperature along with the
characteristic sloping factor that can be slightly altered at the adj.
terminal of the device.
What are your exact requirements for a temp/voltage characteristic?
Current? Temp. range? What exactly are you trying to do???
-Dan Akers
dig...@webtv.net (Dan Akers) wrote in news:12797-3E15D85B-679@storefull-
2171.public.lawson.webtv.net:
--
Shop at http://www.handsonoptics.com
-Dan Akers
So before I build it - I want to understand how the components will impact
the circuit. For instance - the LM135 - if I needed to increave the output
for calibration, its not obvious that a trim pot would do that. My
background is chemical engineering, so I do have an interest, and the
ability to learn how basic circuits are working - although I am global
learner.
This was the last thing that puzzle me about the circuit. The only other
item was someone's suggection of putting a capacitor in series with the
feedback resistor on the comparator (I have a schmitt trigger/hysteresis)
around it.
dig...@webtv.net (Dan Akers) wrote in news:23461-3E1730D2-889@storefull-
2172.public.lawson.webtv.net:
--
Shop at http://www.handsonoptics.com
-Dan Akers
-Dan Akers
The circuit I have in mind is for a telescope already outside and in
equilibrium where the telescope is usually radiating heat and having a
temperature below that of ambient. And keeping the objective lens above
ambient would prevent the dew/frost from forming.
dig...@webtv.net (Dan Akers) wrote in news:23937-3E19DB9A-1162@storefull-
2174.public.lawson.webtv.net:
--
Shop at http://www.handsonoptics.com
dig...@webtv.net (Dan Akers) wrote in news:23938-3E19DF0B-550@storefull-
2174.public.lawson.webtv.net:
--
Shop at http://www.handsonoptics.com
If the two temperatures are accurately sensed, you don't have to worry
about how long the heat is on, because the control circuit will pulse
it on and off as required to maintain the temperature differential.
> So before I build it - I want to understand how the components will impact
> the circuit. For instance - the LM135 - if I needed to increave the output
> for calibration, its not obvious that a trim pot would do that. My
> background is chemical engineering, so I do have an interest, and the
> ability to learn how basic circuits are working - although I am global
> learner.
The pot steals a bit of current from the supply resistor based on
ohm's law (I=E/R) where E is the output voltage of the LM335 at what
ever temperature in is immersed in, and R is the pot total
resistance. For example, if you use the recommended 10k pot and the
output voltage is about 2.4 volts, then the pot will steal
2.4/10,000=.24 milliamp from the supply resistor, so you have to lower
that resistor enough to supply both the 1 milliamp or so needed to
make the 335 operate, and also .24 milliamp for the pot. The tap on
the pot (sliding contact) produces a voltage that is some fraction of
the output voltage. Varying this fraction trims the millivolts per
degree over a narrow range. I think you will have no trouble
producing a 2 or 3 degree miscalibration, so that the two temperatures
have to differ by 2 or 3 degrees to make the the output voltages match
and put the control circuit in the middle of its on off range.
> This was the last thing that puzzle me about the circuit. The only other
> item was someone's suggection of putting a capacitor in series with the
> feedback resistor on the comparator (I have a schmitt trigger/hysteresis)
> around it.
The capacitor in series with the feedback limits how long a power
pulse can be if the temperatures differ by exactly the desired
amount. Without that cap, the actual temperature will swing more and
less than the desired offset (because the on-off state of the heater
alters the switching temperature offset), with much longer power
pulses and much longer off time between them.
The series capacitor value allows you to choose the maximum on and off
time so that a rapid stream of narrow pulses holds the offset
essentially constant if the maximum on and off times are much shorter
than the thermal time constant of the heater and scope. A few seconds
max. on and off time should be fast enough to produce no measurable
temperature ripple.
--
John Popelish
-Dan Akers