Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
PSpice Netlisting/Template Trick
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Jim Thompson
Apr 23, 2013, 4:01:58 PM4/23/13
to
Just discovered (or re-remembered :-), in PSpice...
To just have the color of an LED showing in the schematic (I hate
over-klutzy drawings), I just enter color and the template collects
the model name...
Template= X^@refdes %1 %2 My\@COLOR\@LED
COLOR=RED
LED=LED
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
To just have the color of an LED showing in the schematic (I hate
over-klutzy drawings), I just enter color and the template collects
the model name...
Template= X^@refdes %1 %2 My\@COLOR\@LED
COLOR=RED
LED=LED
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
John Larkin
Apr 23, 2013, 4:09:24 PM4/23/13
to
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:01:58 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-Th...@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>Just discovered (or re-remembered :-), in PSpice...
>
>To just have the color of an LED showing in the schematic (I hate
>over-klutzy drawings), I just enter color and the template collects
>the model name...
>
>Template= X^@refdes %1 %2 My\@COLOR\@LED
>COLOR=RED
>LED=LED
>
> ...Jim Thompson
Sounds like you're simulating my "LED differential pair" circuit.
<To-Email-Use-Th...@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>Just discovered (or re-remembered :-), in PSpice...
>
>To just have the color of an LED showing in the schematic (I hate
>over-klutzy drawings), I just enter color and the template collects
>the model name...
>
>Template= X^@refdes %1 %2 My\@COLOR\@LED
>COLOR=RED
>LED=LED
>
> ...Jim Thompson
It works, doesn't it.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
amdx
Apr 27, 2013, 6:55:36 PM4/27/13
to
On 4/23/2013 3:09 PM, John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:01:58 -0700, Jim Thompson
> <To-Email-Use-Th...@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>
>> Just discovered (or re-remembered :-), in PSpice...
>>
>> To just have the color of an LED showing in the schematic (I hate
>> over-klutzy drawings), I just enter color and the template collects
>> the model name...
>>
>> Template= X^@refdes %1 %2 My\@COLOR\@LED
>> COLOR=RED
>> LED=LED
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>
> Sounds like you're simulating my "LED differential pair" circuit.
>
> It works, doesn't it.
>
>
That simulation takes a loooong time to run.
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:01:58 -0700, Jim Thompson
> <To-Email-Use-Th...@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>
>> Just discovered (or re-remembered :-), in PSpice...
>>
>> To just have the color of an LED showing in the schematic (I hate
>> over-klutzy drawings), I just enter color and the template collects
>> the model name...
>>
>> Template= X^@refdes %1 %2 My\@COLOR\@LED
>> COLOR=RED
>> LED=LED
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>
> Sounds like you're simulating my "LED differential pair" circuit.
>
> It works, doesn't it.
>
>
Mikek :-)
Jim Thompson
Apr 27, 2013, 7:35:07 PM4/27/13
to
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:55:36 -0500, amdx <am...@knologynotthis.net>
wrote:
"Sounds like"??? The netlist I provided is that of the PSpice
schematic I published earlier...
Message-ID: <o3jgn8haue5tqqhk8...@4ax.com>
Where I PATCHED Larkin's not-so-well-thought-out circuit, then ran it
both on PSpice and LTspice.
The reason is takes a "loooong time to run" in LTspice has nothing to
do with run time, but is all about the poor library handling in
LTspice. Watch the message tray in LTspice to see what is happening.
I posted a separate message addressing this library (mis)behavior.
wrote:
schematic I published earlier...
Message-ID: <o3jgn8haue5tqqhk8...@4ax.com>
Where I PATCHED Larkin's not-so-well-thought-out circuit, then ran it
both on PSpice and LTspice.
The reason is takes a "loooong time to run" in LTspice has nothing to
do with run time, but is all about the poor library handling in
LTspice. Watch the message tray in LTspice to see what is happening.
I posted a separate message addressing this library (mis)behavior.
amdx
Apr 28, 2013, 9:10:16 AM4/28/13
to
I don't have a clue if it really takes a long time to run.
I was just picking on you, Larkin tried to drag you into an argument
and it had been 4 days with no response.
Guess you were just being the bigger man. Good job!
Mikek
Jim Thompson
Apr 28, 2013, 11:07:02 AM4/28/13
to
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:10:16 -0500, amdx <am...@knologynotthis.net>
Actually it seems to... but all the excess time is taken up by
loading my library, which is extensive. PSpice scans an index, loads
only the location of the components used, then runs. LTspice checked
_every_ component in my library, then barfed because a component not
even being used by the schematic, had a syntax LTspice didn't
understand... like my digital behavioral stuff. So I had to pare down
MyLib.lib to MyLibLTC.lib, containing only LTC-syntax-compatible
components. It's still "slow" because of LTspice checking _every_
component.
Maybe I can figure out a trick to get around that... like create a
schematic-specific library on the fly
>I was just picking on you, Larkin tried to drag you into an argument
>and it had been 4 days with no response.
> Guess you were just being the bigger man. Good job!
> Mikek
Thanks!
loading my library, which is extensive. PSpice scans an index, loads
only the location of the components used, then runs. LTspice checked
_every_ component in my library, then barfed because a component not
even being used by the schematic, had a syntax LTspice didn't
understand... like my digital behavioral stuff. So I had to pare down
MyLib.lib to MyLibLTC.lib, containing only LTC-syntax-compatible
components. It's still "slow" because of LTspice checking _every_
component.
Maybe I can figure out a trick to get around that... like create a
schematic-specific library on the fly
>I was just picking on you, Larkin tried to drag you into an argument
>and it had been 4 days with no response.
> Guess you were just being the bigger man. Good job!
> Mikek
Jim Thompson
Apr 28, 2013, 12:37:48 PM4/28/13
to
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:07:02 -0700, Jim Thompson
[snip]
Aha! Solution right under my nose... PSpice has a compression utility
that "packages" _only_ the needed components and models. (Conceived
originally to allow passing a schematic to another PSpice user, who
has his own symbols and models.)
So, a little klutzy, but it'll work... compress, uncompress, and the
.CIR file will now library only the required components.
Thus I can address quickly circuit questions that come up here, by
doing my solutions in PSpice, but conveying the content easily to the
LTspice user.
Aha! Solution right under my nose... PSpice has a compression utility
that "packages" _only_ the needed components and models. (Conceived
originally to allow passing a schematic to another PSpice user, who
has his own symbols and models.)
So, a little klutzy, but it'll work... compress, uncompress, and the
.CIR file will now library only the required components.
Thus I can address quickly circuit questions that come up here, by
doing my solutions in PSpice, but conveying the content easily to the
LTspice user.
Baron
Apr 28, 2013, 2:41:44 PM4/28/13
to
Jim Thompson Inscribed thus:
Neat !
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
--
Best Regards:
Baron.
0 new messages