W. eWatson wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 10:29 PM, ehsjr wrote:
>
>> W. eWatson wrote:
>>
>>> I have a domed observatory. Presently, it has two a/c motors that
>>> operate the rotation of the dome, and the shutter. The latter opens to
>>> the sky as the shutter is raised. I must move either manually with a
>>> lever.
>>
>>
>> Assuming that the existing a/c motors move the dome & shutter with
>> whatever degree of accuracy/speed/precision you need, there is no need
>> to change them. Literature for the new controller says:
>> "It is possible to connect other types of motors, such as AC motors,
>> using external relays."
>
> Good find. I guess you found that in the pdf manual. Yes, I see it.
> Interestingly though, the president of the company suggested DC on their
> Yahoo Group, but gave no explanation why.
Well, I'll take a guess at that. It may be that the new controller
was designed to provide more precise rotation increments to a DC
motor than it can to an AC motor via a relay. The controller can
time *exactly* how long current is applied to a DC motor. With an AC
motor, the controller must operate a relay, and the controller cannot
control how long the relay takes to transfer. When the controller
tells the directly connected DC motor to move, current through the
motor starts immediately. When it tells a relay connected AC motor to
move, there is a delay while the relay contacts transfer. The
controller can't "see" that delay so it can't be as precise in
controlling how much rotation you get at the motor shaft.
We are not talking about a large amount of error. In fact, a relay's
transfer time is likely to be much faster than the time it takes
you to operate your existing lever switch. Therefore, it should be
more precise in controlling motor rotation than your manual lever
switch. The fact that the error the relay introduces is likely
much less than the error the manual lever switch causes is one reason
to go with your existing AC motor setup (assuming it meets your needs
at present) and relays when you install the new controller. The
other is cost: you'll be able to buy relays for way less than
it would cost to replace your motors.
>
>>
>>
>> Assuming that the lever you use now operates a switch, you will
>> replace that switch with relay contacts. In fact, you may be able
>> to retain the lever setup as is, and just wire the relay contacts
>> in parallel with the existing switch. Retaining the lever setup
>> will allow you to manually operate just as you do now, if you
>> need to.
>
> I understand the concept of a relay, but how does it work in the case of
> motors here?
Ok, here's a schematic representation of your present setup
showing your lever operated switch and the motor it controls:
-------- /
| AC |-----o o-----[Motor]---+
| Source | |
| |-----------------------+
--------
Here it is again, except this time it shows the addition of
the relay that your new circuit will control:
/
+--o o--+ <== added relay contact; new controller
| | controls the relay, opening or closing
| | the contacts as needed.
-------- | / |
| AC |--+--o o--+--[Motor]---+
| Source | |
| |-----------------------+
--------
By wiring the relay contacts in parallel with the lever switch
contacts, the motor can be controlled by either the relay or
the lever switch. You need to check that the relay contacts are
rated to carry *AND* switch the power to the motor - which means
you need to know the amperage and horsepower rating of the motor.
And some form of battery monitoring/charge control, unless that is
already built into the new controller.
Ed
< snip >