RichD <
r_dela...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I figure a crypto group is appropriate place to ask a
> hacking question -
>
> I read an article
Ok, stop right there. First firmly keep in mind the Gell-Mann Amnesia
effect:
https://www.epsilontheory.com/gell-mann-amnesia/
Once that is firmly in mind, then read the article.
> ...
>
> Anyhow, to cover his tracks, he routed his traffic through servers in
> Japan and Russia. How is that accomplished? I mean, TCP traffic is
> routed by each router, independently, according to its algorithms. I
> mean, one requests a Web page, and it flows through the network, node
> to node, as determined by each router, not by the destination's
> order.
Now, return to the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. Keep in mind that in
*any* story authored by a reporter, if the reporter has used a
technical word, they have, with *very* high certianty, used it
incorrectly. So, what you think of as "routing" is most certianly not
what really happened, but that word sounded best to the reporter, as
incorrect as it was.
> How does someone sitting in his home office direct the routing?
I can think of at least two ways:
1) several VPN's strung end to end
2) using several machines for which they have 'access' (whether hacked
or not) to string together a series of ssh sessions end to end.
But it is highly unlikely they were able to adjust the global internet
routing tables to "route" just their packets through Japan and Russia.
But to a reporter, with *no* technical knowledge, a multi-hop VPN would
seem like "/routing/ packets through Japan and Russia".
Then, while reading other stories for which you have actual knowledge,
keep the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect in mind. You'll notice how often the
stories *are* wrong (as in *very* wrong). Then, consider the fact that
if /every/ story you read for which you have actual knowledge, the
writer was /wrong/, then how likely are the other stories, written by
the same or other writers, on topics for which you don't have actual
knnowledge, going to somehow magically be /right/.