I have maintained for some time now that the universal database of
integers represented by the traditional number line that may have
arbitrary direction and has a scale of 1 is totally unsuited to
cryptography i.e the analytical scale of the traditional number line
is the periodicity of just one, meaning the integers are inductively
recognizable as being separated by a constant value of 1, i.e. 6
follows 5, 7 follows 6 and so on. This beautifully transparent
structure is totally unsuited to the application of cryptography
however and in a recent posting from me being called “Scalable Key
Cryptography “ the periodicity or scale of encryption number lines is
made wildly diffused as a variable positive integer that is never
repeated and a line is discarded for a fresh one for each encryption
of a single plaintext item. That is intended to give it the required
intractability that is needed to withstand attack by cryptanalysis.
Summarising.
There are now two forms of cryptography available that are world
firsts in the crypto scene.
1) Vector Cryptography uses uniquely customized number lines that are
characterized by their direction.
2) Scalar Cryptography uses number lines that are characterized by
their ever-changing scale and may have any direction.
Both crypto schemes use a line just once only and then discard it for
a fresh line after each enciphering of a single plaintext. They are
equally secure crypto schemes and differ only in the management
options.
The Emperor is stark naked !
The industry is long over due for putting to bed – it is after all
simply a piece of applied mathematics ? - the vast field of satellite
industry jargon is ready for kicking into touch also. – it has got
completely out of hand in my view – bandying heavy jargon around is
not cryptography - adacrypt