Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: The Grand Solution

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Forthminder

unread,
Aug 4, 2009, 6:09:09 PM8/4/09
to
On Aug 4, 11:05 am, Alex Levitt <astrala...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> [...]
> Does thought generate language or does language generate thought?

http://code.google.com/p/mindforth -- the AI Mind in Forth --
is based on the principle that thought generates language.
As associative spikes travel from concept to concept on the
http://code.google.com/p/mindforth/wiki/MindGrid
a linguistic superstructure tracks the spreading activation
and generates a sentence about the thought-in-progress.

The linguistic superstructure not only _tracks_ the
http://code.google.com/p/mindforth/wiki/SpreadingActivation
but also it _influences_ the spreading activation.

For example, to finish the thought "Tiger plays...",
the linguistic superstructure associates from the
noun "Tiger" to the verb "plays" and follows the
accumulation of activation to the object "golf."

Hope this helps.

Arthur
--
http://code.google.com/p/mindforth/wiki/AiHasBeenSolved

Geek

unread,
Aug 5, 2009, 4:51:25 AM8/5/09
to
"Forthminder" <ment...@myuw.net> wrote in message
news:5e7c0cb4-60cd-4b5b...@b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

For example, to finish the thought "Tiger plays...",
the linguistic superstructure associates from the
noun "Tiger" to the verb "plays" and follows the
accumulation of activation to the object "golf."

In which case the logic is incorrect because it should be, "with her cubs"


0 new messages