A cursory search of the literature only produced the following:
In Modern Inorganic Chemistry (Mellor, J.W.; Longmans, Green and Co., NY
1925), on p 808 "Carbonates contain "CO3" as a dyad radicle (sic). There
are two possible alkali carbonates - normal and acid: (picture deleted).
The
normal salt is formed during the first action of carbon dioxide on sodium
hydroxide: 2 NaOH + CO2 = Na2CO3 + H2O. Sodium bicarbonate ... is formed
when an aqueous solution of the normal carbonate is treated with an
excess of carbon dioxide: Na2CO3 + H2O +CO2 = 2 NaHCO3..."
Could this be the reason for the nomeclature? Specifically, the first
chemist
to discover sodium bicarbonate named it so, because it required two
equivalents of CO2 to make.
Please help me solve this dilemna. I apologize if such a question has
appeared here previously.
Michael Mosher !
Not to make but yielded 2 equivalents on acidification (see below)
>
>Please help me solve this dilemna. I apologize if such a question has
>appeared here previously.
>
>
>Michael Mosher !
Consider a carbonate of a +2 ion. You could conceivably have either M(CO3) or
M(HCO3)2. When you dissolve it in water (or react with acid to dissolve &
liberate CO2) you could not see the extra H2O, so you would get either one or
two carbonates. The same nomenclature is used for most dianions where the
second H+ is weakly acidic.
--
* Dave Blackburn dbla...@alleg.edu flames to se...@home.dev.null *
* Chemistry, Macs, Hypercard, cats, <>< religion, & the Dead *
* (Anyone else who held these opinions would be as crazy as I am.) *
* "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own" *
* Save a virtual tree - Don't waste bandwidth - RECYCLE it! *